Here a summary of 10 reasons to abolish the death penalty in English related to what we have done previously with Amnesty Italy by answering in English Part 2

Answer to point 1-10
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/388

Conclusion
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/386
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/387

Previous 1:1 with Amnesty

🇺🇸
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/16
to
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/23

🇫🇷🇺🇸
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/79
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/89

🇮🇹🇺🇸
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/293
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/299
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/304

https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/374
to
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/387

https://t.me/AmnestyShit/39
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/40

Other 1:1
🇪🇸 🇺🇸
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
to
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/261

https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
to
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/285

🇩🇪🇺🇸
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/97
to
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/101

https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/122
to
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/148

🇮🇹🇺🇸
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/306
to
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/363

Fanpage a partire da
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/313

🇫🇷🇺🇸
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/15
to
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/75

https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/171
to
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/182

🇪🇺🇺🇸
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/152
to
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/164

etc.

All channels with science and facts!
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda
https://t.me/AmnestyShit
https://t.me/AmnestyFacts

About homicides / recidivism
https://t.me/AmnestyFake
https://t.me/RecidivismFacts
https://t.me/ParoleFacts
https://t.me/BreivikParole
https://t.me/SoSorryTelegram
https://t.me/BreivikSyndrome
etc.

Our statement about Amnesty
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/116
https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda
https://t.me/DeathSentenceBullshit/1546
etc.

Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 2

Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95

Los estudios científicos realizados no han podido nunca encontrar pruebas convincentes que demuestren que la pena capital tiene mayor poder disuasorio frente a la delincuencia que otros castigos.

Scientific studies have never been able to find convincing evidence that capital punishment has a greater deterrent power against crime than other punishments

Yes, BUT EVEN THE OPPOSITE!!!!! because this cannot be showed with science!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102

and don't forget that such things DEPENDS FROM A LOT OF FACTORS!!!
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/363
to
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/404

It's like saying "if we give condoms for free, there are no pregnant women anymore" which would be just BULLSHIT!

Plus is NOT just about deterrent!
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/43
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/364
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/375

"The evidence reviewed in this chapter should lead any dispassionate analyst to conclude that it is not prudent to accept the hypothesis that capital punishment, as practised in the United States, deters murder to a marginally greater extent than does the threat and application of the supposedly lesser punishment of life imprisonment"

Who wrote that?
Carolyn Hoyle! a researcher BEING PART OF THIS MAFIA WRITING BULLSHIT! like we showed previously!
https://t.me/CarolynHoyle
but still 1000x better than Amnesty!

Let we check what she is writing "the non-experimental research to which the study of the deterrent effects of capital punishment is necessarily limited will almost certainly be unable to meet those standards of proof"

"The only scientifically and ethically acceptable conclusion from the complete body of existing social science literature on deterrence and the death penalty is that it is impossible to tell whether deterrent effects are strong or weak or whether they exist at all . . . "

See next post

Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 3

Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95

"Nor is there any reason to change the judgment made in 1985 that the data ‘are not sufficiently strong to lead researchers with different prior beliefs to reach a consensus regarding the deterrent effects of capital punishment"

"Most of those who favour abolition (assuming that they are not opposed to execution under any circumstances) would demand proof that executions have a substantial marginal deterrent effect"
NOPE! WE GIVE A SHIT TO DETERRENT! Is NOT HUGE important for serious criminals! RECIDIVISM IS MUCH MORE IMPORTANT!
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/43

and we know that with death penalty WE KILL RECIDIVISM 100%!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/270
https://t.me/RecidivismFacts
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance
https://t.me/BreivikParole
https://t.me/ParoleFacts

Do we keep in prison people that maybe will not do the same crime again? Well THIS IS PART OF THE SAFETY! and we do that with a life sentence too!

Human Rights and Safety of the population = high recidivism risk = high prison escape or whatever > Human Rights of Serious Criminals!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/387

doesn't matter if Breivik will or will not redo a terror attack! BREIVIK IS A SERIOUS RISK and many other criminals are even a serious risk!
https://t.me/AndersBehringBreivikTelegram/768
even if there is the possibility he will never do that again! DOESN'T MATTER!

POPULATION > SERIOUS CRIMINALS!
FOREVER!

Plus the real question is deterrent of which type of crime, with which reason????! Why always just talking about deterrent!! Like we do with climate change, talking about average and saying that a baby is polluting exactly like a rich person 🤦‍♂️!
https://t.me/ClimateChangeTelegram/67

This is NOT science and facts! This is just 💩!

No matter what, Carolyn Hoyle in this part of the book IS NOT writing bad things! It's exactly like what we are saying! See next post

Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 4

Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95

So Carolyn Hoyle in this part of the book IS NOT writing bad things! It's exactly like what we are saying! THERE IS NO EVIDENCE FOR BEING PRO OR CONTRA RELATED TO THE TOPIC DETERRENT! but don't come here with the bullshit "no death penalty = less homicides!" BECAUSE THIS IS BULLSHIT!
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/133
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/116
🖇🤡 https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx

and we said previously, Carolyn is not considering all point of views and sometimes is writing bullshit, but she is doing still a better job than Amnesty!
https://t.me/CarolynHoyle

For, as Dezhbakhsh and Shepherd recognize, executions also have costs: ‘these include the harm from the death penalty’s possibly discriminatory application and the risk of executing innocent people. Policy makers must weigh the benefits and costs to determine the optimal use of the death penalty’

Read such posts
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/377
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/355

What she is writing:

First, there is the problem of sufficient data.
First, the percentage of people sentenced to death in the United States who actually are executed is minute so the data will always seem insufficient!!

Second...the executions that do occur are disproportionately centered in a few states—indeed, close to a majority in a single state—so the various effects of skewing hamper sound empirical inference-drawing.

The inference drawn is that the fear of capital punishment rather than long imprisonment will not restrain those who are apt to commit murder, because murder usually arises from an explosion of temper or loss of control, from mental illness or defective personality, or from panic when faced with imminent capture.

Why exactly JUST TALKING ABOUT MURDERS!!! IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT MURDERS!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328

We find that the existing evidence for deterrence is surprisingly fragile ...

See next post

Amnesty 🇪🇸 1 to 1 about pena de muerte / death penalty facts Part 5

Part 1 https://t.me/AmnestyOneToOne/95

The estimated effects of capital punishment on homicide rates change dramatically even with small changes in econometric specifications!!!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/328

LIKE WE SAID! is not just about "death penalty yes or no"! It's MORE COMPLEX!

Fourth, have all the relevant variables been taken into account when attempt- ing to control for those other factors that might affect both the homicide rate and the execution rate? EXACTLY!!!

Factors that may affect the homicide rate, outside gun ownership, are difficult to measure because they are facets of the more general social climate and culture, such as migration, the effectiveness of informal social controls, the extent of alcohol abuse, the availability and price of illegal drugs, the degree of communal integration, and the extent to which there is a ‘sub-culture of violence’ or alternative modes of relieving frustrations other than violence ... etc.
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/392

At least Carolyn Hoyle has brain and cite such things! instead OF IGNORING LIKE AMNESTY!

Reason why Carolyn Hoyle is 1000x better than Amnesty! BUT still not perfect! sharing all points or facts ...
https://t.me/CarolynHoyle

Yet, ‘None of the new deterrence studies consider the epidemics of drug use and related violence" 🤦‍♂️ ....

What about cannabis???
https://t.me/RapeTelegram/2284

Let we remember positive correlation between cannabis and homicides, if we exclude poor US states ... Does this mean cannabis increase homicides? NOPE! It's just correlation! NOT A FACT! Like death penalty cannot be correlated in the same way!
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/373

In summary: "... no es prudente aceptar la hipótesis de que la pena capital tenga un mayor poder disuasorio sobre los asesinatos que la amenaza y aplicación de la cadena perpetua, pena supuestamente inferior" IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT THIS; THERE IS MUCH MORE BEHIND! and who wrote this book is saying such things too!