Se deveria volver a legalisar la pena de muerte en chile? - One to one with Chile - Death Penalty FAQ Part 5
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
Medical costs associated with homicide are estimated at $7600 per victim, or a total of $4.5 million per annum, with lost earnings accounting for the greatest proportion of the total cost.
DO WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT MEDICAL COST AND OTHER THINGS WITH A RAPE??!! which will take years or never to be fixed!!!
https://t.me/TraumaTelegram
Second, homicide comprises a variety of offenders and victims in different social settings. Homicide is committed by different people under different sets of pressures or circumstances!!!!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
Homicide typologies were developed according to the primary relationship between the victim and offender, and then the circumstances sur- rounding the crime. For example, the circumstances in which a teenager kills her abusive parent are vastly different from those where a neighbor kills a neighbor in the course of a spontaneous dispute.
Many people who commit murder have never offended previously and are not likely to again.
Exactly, if you killed your "hated bad dad, you did your job" ... no reason why you need to kill your mother ... but again, it's complex ...
This is not the case for mass hate crimes!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
Amnesty (1991) "The death penalty is mandatory for murder in Hong Kong but the Governor has invariably commuted death sentences. The last execution was carried out in 1965"
University of Oxford "A study comparing murder rates in Singapore, which uses the death penalty for murder, with Hong Kong, which has abolished the death penalty, shows no difference in murder rates since executions ended in Hong Kong 30 years ago"
Perfect, between 1965 and ban there was HUGE 📉 and 📈 🤦♂️ which doesn't show ANYTHING!
Plus how can you compare two states, if there are so many difference between them, not related to death penalty at all ...
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
Medical costs associated with homicide are estimated at $7600 per victim, or a total of $4.5 million per annum, with lost earnings accounting for the greatest proportion of the total cost.
DO WE WANT TO TALK ABOUT MEDICAL COST AND OTHER THINGS WITH A RAPE??!! which will take years or never to be fixed!!!
https://t.me/TraumaTelegram
Second, homicide comprises a variety of offenders and victims in different social settings. Homicide is committed by different people under different sets of pressures or circumstances!!!!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
Homicide typologies were developed according to the primary relationship between the victim and offender, and then the circumstances sur- rounding the crime. For example, the circumstances in which a teenager kills her abusive parent are vastly different from those where a neighbor kills a neighbor in the course of a spontaneous dispute.
Many people who commit murder have never offended previously and are not likely to again.
Exactly, if you killed your "hated bad dad, you did your job" ... no reason why you need to kill your mother ... but again, it's complex ...
This is not the case for mass hate crimes!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
Amnesty (1991) "The death penalty is mandatory for murder in Hong Kong but the Governor has invariably commuted death sentences. The last execution was carried out in 1965"
University of Oxford "A study comparing murder rates in Singapore, which uses the death penalty for murder, with Hong Kong, which has abolished the death penalty, shows no difference in murder rates since executions ended in Hong Kong 30 years ago"
Perfect, between 1965 and ban there was HUGE 📉 and 📈 🤦♂️ which doesn't show ANYTHING!
Plus how can you compare two states, if there are so many difference between them, not related to death penalty at all ...
Se deveria volver a legalisar la pena de muerte en chile? - One to one with Chile - Death Penalty FAQ Part 6
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
As an indication of the present thinking of the Government even after the 2012 amendments, Law Minister Shanmugam was quoted as favouring the death penalty for those who rape ✅ or sexually assault women, resulting in the victim’s death ✅✅, and for those who hurt a child and the child dies, unless the accused can prove why there should not be such a penalty in these cases (Hoe 2014).
So University of Oxford, even this story about asiatic countries is bullshit!
Singapore executions where high in 1995, crimes decreased ... For Hong Kong
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/239
for Australia / Canada
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/229
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/221
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/226
So again, it's complex! multiple factor influence such things!
Let we continue
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/221
Si, pena de muerte para los reincidentes. A veces uno ve en las noticias que hay delincuentes con más de 100 condenas y que pasan por la puerta giratoria. Ellos no creo que puedan ( ni quieran) rehabilitarse. En esos casos debiera haber, por último a la 50ª condena, automáticamente pena de muerte.
Yes, death penalty for repeat offenders. Sometimes you see on the news that there are criminals with more than 100 convictions and they go through the revolving door. I don't think they can (or want to) rehabilitate themselves. In these cases there should be, finally, at the 50th conviction, the death penalty automatically.
✅🙅♂️ is not about repeat offenders, but about deep of the crime, suicides related to the crime, recidivism, etc.
You cannot compare hate terrorism with stealing 5 iPhone 🤦♂️ ...
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/37
https://t.me/HanauTerror/113
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/179
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/180
https://t.me/SuicideRape/4
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/44
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
As an indication of the present thinking of the Government even after the 2012 amendments, Law Minister Shanmugam was quoted as favouring the death penalty for those who rape ✅ or sexually assault women, resulting in the victim’s death ✅✅, and for those who hurt a child and the child dies, unless the accused can prove why there should not be such a penalty in these cases (Hoe 2014).
So University of Oxford, even this story about asiatic countries is bullshit!
Singapore executions where high in 1995, crimes decreased ... For Hong Kong
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/239
for Australia / Canada
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/229
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/221
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/226
So again, it's complex! multiple factor influence such things!
Let we continue
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/221
Si, pena de muerte para los reincidentes. A veces uno ve en las noticias que hay delincuentes con más de 100 condenas y que pasan por la puerta giratoria. Ellos no creo que puedan ( ni quieran) rehabilitarse. En esos casos debiera haber, por último a la 50ª condena, automáticamente pena de muerte.
Yes, death penalty for repeat offenders. Sometimes you see on the news that there are criminals with more than 100 convictions and they go through the revolving door. I don't think they can (or want to) rehabilitate themselves. In these cases there should be, finally, at the 50th conviction, the death penalty automatically.
✅🙅♂️ is not about repeat offenders, but about deep of the crime, suicides related to the crime, recidivism, etc.
You cannot compare hate terrorism with stealing 5 iPhone 🤦♂️ ...
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/37
https://t.me/HanauTerror/113
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/179
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/180
https://t.me/SuicideRape/4
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/44
Se deveria volver a legalisar la pena de muerte en chile? - One to one with Chile - Death Penalty FAQ Part 7
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
AGAIN, REMEMBER THAT DOING A SERIOUS CRIME IS NOT SYNONYM OF KILLING SOMEONE!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/118
Si, porque hay delincuentes que ya no son rehabilitables y terminan siendo un cacho para el país.
= Yes, because there are criminals who can no longer be rehabilitated and end up being a waste for the country.
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/180
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/122
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/259
about cost
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/176
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/177
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/134
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/65
https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/487
Si pero solo con pruebas irrefutables
= Yes but only with irrefutable evidence
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/58
solo para delitos de homicidio, secuestros, violaciones, corrupcion, o felonia, quizas se me escapa alguno mas.
Narcotráfico, terrorismo, traición
only for crimes of homicide 🙃, kidnappings 🙃, rapes 🙃, corruption 🙃, or felonies 🙃, perhaps I have missed one more.
Drug trafficking, terrorism 🙃, betrayal 🙅♂️
So most of our answer are it depends!
homicide
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
kidnappings
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/43
rapes
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/58
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/163
to
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/165
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/180
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/148
corruption: mostly 🙅♂️, but corrupted people deserve prison! dimission and NO WAY TO DO THE SAME JOB AGAIN!
https://t.me/InPrisonNOW/7
except if corruption is connected with tons of deaths etc. (example related to climate change / animals / genocide)
terrorism
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/79
betrayal 🙅♂️
it would be like adultery
https://t.me/IsraelWarWomenRights/384
felonies
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences/175
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
AGAIN, REMEMBER THAT DOING A SERIOUS CRIME IS NOT SYNONYM OF KILLING SOMEONE!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/118
Si, porque hay delincuentes que ya no son rehabilitables y terminan siendo un cacho para el país.
= Yes, because there are criminals who can no longer be rehabilitated and end up being a waste for the country.
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/180
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/122
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/259
about cost
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/176
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/177
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/134
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/65
https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/487
Si pero solo con pruebas irrefutables
= Yes but only with irrefutable evidence
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/58
solo para delitos de homicidio, secuestros, violaciones, corrupcion, o felonia, quizas se me escapa alguno mas.
Narcotráfico, terrorismo, traición
only for crimes of homicide 🙃, kidnappings 🙃, rapes 🙃, corruption 🙃, or felonies 🙃, perhaps I have missed one more.
Drug trafficking, terrorism 🙃, betrayal 🙅♂️
So most of our answer are it depends!
homicide
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
kidnappings
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/43
rapes
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/58
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/163
to
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/165
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/180
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/148
corruption: mostly 🙅♂️, but corrupted people deserve prison! dimission and NO WAY TO DO THE SAME JOB AGAIN!
https://t.me/InPrisonNOW/7
except if corruption is connected with tons of deaths etc. (example related to climate change / animals / genocide)
terrorism
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/79
betrayal 🙅♂️
it would be like adultery
https://t.me/IsraelWarWomenRights/384
felonies
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences/175
If the death penalty were to be
reintroduced in Turkey, it may be applied to
a category of crimes that includes
-related offences.
This could risk having a large number of people being falsely accused and sentenced to death, including journalists, lawyers, and human rights defenders.
🤦♂️ are for you journalists, lawyers, and human rights defenders TERRORIST???! WTF!!!
A terrorist is someone who did a terror attack! such people, especially if not related to ☪️, should get death penalty
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence
https://t.me/addlist/cCAHzkmLGz80ODcx
exactly like mass killers!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/62
If reimplemented, they need to be applied using brain!
https://t.me/IsraelWarWomenRights/1446
Con la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos y la constitución de las Naciones Unidas, los países miembros de esta organización determinaron que la pena de muerte vulnera dos derechos fundamentales: el derecho a la vida y el derecho a no sufrir tortura. Sí, es cierto que una persona que asesina o tortura a otra también los vulnera, pero quien debe proteger los derechos humanos en todo momento son las instituciones. Es decir, el Estado no puede vulnerar un derecho humano solo porque una persona lo haya hecho.
With the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the constitution of the United Nations, the member countries of this organization determined that the death penalty violates two fundamental rights: the right to life and the right not to suffer torture. Yes, it is true that a person who murders or tortures another also violates them, but those who must protect human rights at all times are the institutions. That is, the State cannot violate a human right just because a person has done so.
Human right definition IS SHIT! and need to be changed once at all!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/49
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/218
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/170
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/191
Torture
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel
reintroduced in Turkey, it may be applied to
a category of crimes that includes
-related offences.
This could risk having a large number of people being falsely accused and sentenced to death, including journalists, lawyers, and human rights defenders.
🤦♂️ are for you journalists, lawyers, and human rights defenders TERRORIST???! WTF!!!
A terrorist is someone who did a terror attack! such people, especially if not related to ☪️, should get death penalty
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence
https://t.me/addlist/cCAHzkmLGz80ODcx
exactly like mass killers!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/62
If reimplemented, they need to be applied using brain!
https://t.me/IsraelWarWomenRights/1446
Con la Declaración Universal de los Derechos Humanos y la constitución de las Naciones Unidas, los países miembros de esta organización determinaron que la pena de muerte vulnera dos derechos fundamentales: el derecho a la vida y el derecho a no sufrir tortura. Sí, es cierto que una persona que asesina o tortura a otra también los vulnera, pero quien debe proteger los derechos humanos en todo momento son las instituciones. Es decir, el Estado no puede vulnerar un derecho humano solo porque una persona lo haya hecho.
With the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the constitution of the United Nations, the member countries of this organization determined that the death penalty violates two fundamental rights: the right to life and the right not to suffer torture. Yes, it is true that a person who murders or tortures another also violates them, but those who must protect human rights at all times are the institutions. That is, the State cannot violate a human right just because a person has done so.
Human right definition IS SHIT! and need to be changed once at all!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/49
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/218
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/170
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/191
Torture
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel
Reinstatment of the death penalty in Turkey - worldwide / Restablecimiento de la pena de muerte en Chile Part 2
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
Torture
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/212
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/213
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/214
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/183
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/179
La discusión en torno a la pena de muerte siempre está permeado por conceptos morales, religiosos y valóricos, pero también sociológicos, políticos y legislativos https://perma.cc/X4VN-RJPG
The discussion around the death penalty is always permeated by moral, religious and value concepts, but also sociological, political and legislative.
Yes, let we remember the propaganda by Amnesty, Carolyn Hoyle , John Bessler / universities
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/143
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyMafia
https://t.me/JohnBessler
https://t.me/AmnestyFacts
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
and obviously even religion!! Reason why legal suicide and abortion is still not available! like other things ...
https://t.me/ReligionTelegram
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/146
Lo que en los cuarteles de Etilmercurio nos preguntamos es ¿sirve la pena de muerte para reducir el número de crímenes violentos? ¿Cambiaría en algo las cosas si se reestableciera, o sería solo una forma de revancha? ¿Podemos reemplazarla por otro tipo de condenas?
= What we ask at the Etilmercurio barracks is, does the death penalty serve to reduce the number of violent crimes? Would things change at all if it were reestablished, or would it just be a form of revenge? Can we replace it with other types of sentences?
a) reducing new crimes IS NOT THE ONLY GOAL!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
https://t.me/RecidivismFacts
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts
b) no one know that, because crimes are not just related to death penalty yes or no! some states showed a decrease, other an increase! Ask criminals if you want a real answer!
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1747
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
Torture
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/212
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/213
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/214
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/183
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/179
La discusión en torno a la pena de muerte siempre está permeado por conceptos morales, religiosos y valóricos, pero también sociológicos, políticos y legislativos https://perma.cc/X4VN-RJPG
The discussion around the death penalty is always permeated by moral, religious and value concepts, but also sociological, political and legislative.
Yes, let we remember the propaganda by Amnesty, Carolyn Hoyle , John Bessler / universities
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/143
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyMafia
https://t.me/JohnBessler
https://t.me/AmnestyFacts
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
and obviously even religion!! Reason why legal suicide and abortion is still not available! like other things ...
https://t.me/ReligionTelegram
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/146
Lo que en los cuarteles de Etilmercurio nos preguntamos es ¿sirve la pena de muerte para reducir el número de crímenes violentos? ¿Cambiaría en algo las cosas si se reestableciera, o sería solo una forma de revancha? ¿Podemos reemplazarla por otro tipo de condenas?
= What we ask at the Etilmercurio barracks is, does the death penalty serve to reduce the number of violent crimes? Would things change at all if it were reestablished, or would it just be a form of revenge? Can we replace it with other types of sentences?
a) reducing new crimes IS NOT THE ONLY GOAL!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
https://t.me/RecidivismFacts
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts
b) no one know that, because crimes are not just related to death penalty yes or no! some states showed a decrease, other an increase! Ask criminals if you want a real answer!
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1747
Reinstatment of the death penalty in Turkey - worldwide / Restablecimiento de la pena de muerte en Chile Part 3
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
b) Ask criminals if you want a real answer!
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1747
https://t.me/JohnBessler/13
https://t.me/JohnBessler/24
to
https://t.me/JohnBessler/74
c) is still not the only goal!, because of a)!!! and remember death penalty IS NOT THE ONLY THING WE NEED TO WORK ON!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/134
Quizás debamos empezar recordando que en Chile las cárceles no son hoteles cinco estrellas (5) y pasar un tiempo en ellas significa a veces una condena a muerte.
= Perhaps we should start by remembering that in Chile prisons are not five-star hotels (5) and spending time in them sometimes means a death sentence.
Maybe Breivik should go in America Latina, before talking bullshit about human rights!
https://t.me/BreivikParole/108
https://t.me/ParoleFacts
https://t.me/PrisonerParole
b) exactly like we wrote previously!!! People always talking about cruel ... do we want to talk how cruel is living in some prisons, not Breivik prison??!!
https://t.me/BreivikHotel
If someone need to live 80 years in such prisons, is not a wow when they do suicide!!
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/93
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/34
So what exactly is more cruel ... assisted forced suicide (= death penalty) or self made suicide (by prisoners)??
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/60
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts/33
Emblemáticos son el incendio de la cárcel de Iquique, en 2001 (donde fallecieron 26 jóvenes de entre 18 y 27 años, primerizos, procesados sin condena y hasta inocentes) o el incendio de la cárcel de San Miguel, donde fallecieron 81 personas (uno de ellos era un joven de 22 años condenado por vender películas pirata).
See next post
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
b) Ask criminals if you want a real answer!
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1747
https://t.me/JohnBessler/13
https://t.me/JohnBessler/24
to
https://t.me/JohnBessler/74
c) is still not the only goal!, because of a)!!! and remember death penalty IS NOT THE ONLY THING WE NEED TO WORK ON!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/134
Quizás debamos empezar recordando que en Chile las cárceles no son hoteles cinco estrellas (5) y pasar un tiempo en ellas significa a veces una condena a muerte.
= Perhaps we should start by remembering that in Chile prisons are not five-star hotels (5) and spending time in them sometimes means a death sentence.
Maybe Breivik should go in America Latina, before talking bullshit about human rights!
https://t.me/BreivikParole/108
https://t.me/ParoleFacts
https://t.me/PrisonerParole
b) exactly like we wrote previously!!! People always talking about cruel ... do we want to talk how cruel is living in some prisons, not Breivik prison??!!
https://t.me/BreivikHotel
If someone need to live 80 years in such prisons, is not a wow when they do suicide!!
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/93
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/34
So what exactly is more cruel ... assisted forced suicide (= death penalty) or self made suicide (by prisoners)??
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/60
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts/33
Emblemáticos son el incendio de la cárcel de Iquique, en 2001 (donde fallecieron 26 jóvenes de entre 18 y 27 años, primerizos, procesados sin condena y hasta inocentes) o el incendio de la cárcel de San Miguel, donde fallecieron 81 personas (uno de ellos era un joven de 22 años condenado por vender películas pirata).
See next post
Reinstatment of the death penalty in Turkey - worldwide / Restablecimiento de la pena de muerte en Chile Part 4
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
Emblematic are the fire at the Iquique prison in 2001 (where 26 young people between the ages of 18 and 27 died, first-timers, prosecuted without conviction and even innocent) or the fire at the San Miguel prison, where 81 people died (one of (they were a 22-year-old man convicted of selling pirated films) (we haven't verified that!)
No matter what, we cannot ignore similar things!!! We always forget such things!!!!
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/93
https://t.me/IgnorancePeople/7
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel
https://t.me/WolfRights
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/182
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/132
Pero volvamos a nuestro tema. En el marco del 13º Congreso sobre Justicia Penal y Prevención del Delito del año 2015, Iván Simonovic, subsecretario general de Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos fue enfático en decir que «no hay evidencia científica de que la pena de muerte desaliente la comisión de crímenes de manera más efectiva que las condenas largas o perpetuas sin derecho a libertad condicional».
But back to our subject. Within the framework of the 13th Congress on Criminal Justice and Crime Prevention in 2015, Iván Simonovic, Undersecretary General of the United Nations for Human Rights, was emphatic in saying that "there is no scientific evidence that the death penalty discourages the commission of crimes." more effectively than long or life sentences without the right to parole.
Yes, exactly, NO WAY TO SHOW THIS CAN INCREASE OR DECREASE CRIMES! this doesn't mean we don't get less crimes!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/226
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/74
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/22
Remember such words
Whether or not there is a general deterrent effect, there is certainly a diminishing effect on crime “since execution eliminates categorically the possibility of recidivism”
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
Emblematic are the fire at the Iquique prison in 2001 (where 26 young people between the ages of 18 and 27 died, first-timers, prosecuted without conviction and even innocent) or the fire at the San Miguel prison, where 81 people died (one of (they were a 22-year-old man convicted of selling pirated films) (we haven't verified that!)
No matter what, we cannot ignore similar things!!! We always forget such things!!!!
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/93
https://t.me/IgnorancePeople/7
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel
https://t.me/WolfRights
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/182
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/132
Pero volvamos a nuestro tema. En el marco del 13º Congreso sobre Justicia Penal y Prevención del Delito del año 2015, Iván Simonovic, subsecretario general de Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos fue enfático en decir que «no hay evidencia científica de que la pena de muerte desaliente la comisión de crímenes de manera más efectiva que las condenas largas o perpetuas sin derecho a libertad condicional».
But back to our subject. Within the framework of the 13th Congress on Criminal Justice and Crime Prevention in 2015, Iván Simonovic, Undersecretary General of the United Nations for Human Rights, was emphatic in saying that "there is no scientific evidence that the death penalty discourages the commission of crimes." more effectively than long or life sentences without the right to parole.
Yes, exactly, NO WAY TO SHOW THIS CAN INCREASE OR DECREASE CRIMES! this doesn't mean we don't get less crimes!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/226
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/74
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/22
Remember such words
Whether or not there is a general deterrent effect, there is certainly a diminishing effect on crime “since execution eliminates categorically the possibility of recidivism”
Reinstatment of the death penalty in Turkey - worldwide / Restablecimiento de la pena de muerte en Chile Part 5
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
Remember such words
Whether or not there is a general deterrent effect, there is certainly a diminishing effect on crime “since execution eliminates categorically the possibility of recidivism” (Ehrlich, 1975a).
https://t.me/StuproFatti/388
Guau. Un poquito extremo, ¿no? Pero si yo tengo miedo de que me maten, ¿no debería reducir eso mis ganas de matar y violar? (porque claro, todos nos conocemos perfectamente el Código Penal y sabemos qué condena corresponde a cada crimen).
Wow. A little extreme, right? But if I'm afraid of being killed, shouldn't that reduce my desire to kill and rape? (because of course, we all know the Penal Code perfectly and we know what sentence corresponds to each crime).
Check answer here
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/229
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/221 (pictures)
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/139
Sin embargo, las cifras muestran que la tasa de asesinatos en Estados sin pena de muerte es menor que en los Estados donde sí existe este castigo https://perma.cc/X4VN-RJPG
= However, figures show that the murder rate in States without the death penalty is lower than in States where this punishment does exist.
Is not really correct! In some states, there are more homicides, in other not!!!
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/133
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/342
to
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/404
PLUS AGAIN; IS NOT JUST ABOUT HOMICIDES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/63
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/118
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
¡No tan rápido, cerebrito! ¿Entonces las personas matan menos a otras personas cuando no hay pena de muerte?
Not so fast, brainiac! So people kill other people less when there is no death penalty? 💡
EXACTLY!!! It depends from many factors, like said previously!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/265
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/143
See next post
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
Remember such words
Whether or not there is a general deterrent effect, there is certainly a diminishing effect on crime “since execution eliminates categorically the possibility of recidivism” (Ehrlich, 1975a).
https://t.me/StuproFatti/388
Guau. Un poquito extremo, ¿no? Pero si yo tengo miedo de que me maten, ¿no debería reducir eso mis ganas de matar y violar? (porque claro, todos nos conocemos perfectamente el Código Penal y sabemos qué condena corresponde a cada crimen).
Wow. A little extreme, right? But if I'm afraid of being killed, shouldn't that reduce my desire to kill and rape? (because of course, we all know the Penal Code perfectly and we know what sentence corresponds to each crime).
Check answer here
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/229
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/221 (pictures)
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/139
Sin embargo, las cifras muestran que la tasa de asesinatos en Estados sin pena de muerte es menor que en los Estados donde sí existe este castigo https://perma.cc/X4VN-RJPG
= However, figures show that the murder rate in States without the death penalty is lower than in States where this punishment does exist.
Is not really correct! In some states, there are more homicides, in other not!!!
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/133
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/342
to
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/404
PLUS AGAIN; IS NOT JUST ABOUT HOMICIDES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/63
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/118
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
¡No tan rápido, cerebrito! ¿Entonces las personas matan menos a otras personas cuando no hay pena de muerte?
Not so fast, brainiac! So people kill other people less when there is no death penalty? 💡
EXACTLY!!! It depends from many factors, like said previously!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/265
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/143
See next post
Reinstatment of the death penalty in Turkey - worldwide / Restablecimiento de la pena de muerte en Chile Part 6
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
... descubrió que todos estos estudios tienen fallas fundamentales.
= found that all of these studies are fundamentally flawed.
We already answered that
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/226
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
Same can be said by "Furthermore, the public support for the death penalty may depend on the current crime rates: more homicides may frustrate the public and lead to more executions or, when the execution rates remains constant, undermine the support of the death penalty"
When in reality you don't need to support that just based on that! because you exactly know a Breivik 2.0
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence
https://t.me/addlist/cCAHzkmLGz80ODcx
Dahmer 2.0
https://t.me/DahmerDeathSentence
https://t.me/DahmerFacts
or other
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/146
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/17
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/37
https://t.me/ParoleFacts
https://t.me/AmnestyExamples
or even mass animal torture
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
can ALWAYS happen!
YOU DON'T CHANGE MIND EVERY 1000 SECONDS!!! like you don't change your wife every day!
Related
https://t.me/PalestineIgnorance/7
https://t.me/PalestineIgnorance/8
https://t.me/KeepEyesClosed/6
https://t.me/IsraelWarWomenRights/270
https://t.me/SciencePoliticalParty/100
https://t.me/SciencePoliticalParty/101
So, when the Gallup organization asked a national sample of American citizens whether they believed that Timothy McVeigh should be executed for the mur- ders he committed in the Oklahoma bombing, 79% said ‘yes’ including 22% who, although generally opposed to capital punishment, thought that McVeigh nevertheless deserved to be executed
Remember that this show exactly the importance of having things before we need that! exactly like for legal suicide and abortion! as we said previously!!!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/201
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
... descubrió que todos estos estudios tienen fallas fundamentales.
= found that all of these studies are fundamentally flawed.
We already answered that
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/226
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
Same can be said by "Furthermore, the public support for the death penalty may depend on the current crime rates: more homicides may frustrate the public and lead to more executions or, when the execution rates remains constant, undermine the support of the death penalty"
When in reality you don't need to support that just based on that! because you exactly know a Breivik 2.0
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence
https://t.me/addlist/cCAHzkmLGz80ODcx
Dahmer 2.0
https://t.me/DahmerDeathSentence
https://t.me/DahmerFacts
or other
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/146
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/17
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/37
https://t.me/ParoleFacts
https://t.me/AmnestyExamples
or even mass animal torture
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
can ALWAYS happen!
YOU DON'T CHANGE MIND EVERY 1000 SECONDS!!! like you don't change your wife every day!
Related
https://t.me/PalestineIgnorance/7
https://t.me/PalestineIgnorance/8
https://t.me/KeepEyesClosed/6
https://t.me/IsraelWarWomenRights/270
https://t.me/SciencePoliticalParty/100
https://t.me/SciencePoliticalParty/101
So, when the Gallup organization asked a national sample of American citizens whether they believed that Timothy McVeigh should be executed for the mur- ders he committed in the Oklahoma bombing, 79% said ‘yes’ including 22% who, although generally opposed to capital punishment, thought that McVeigh nevertheless deserved to be executed
Remember that this show exactly the importance of having things before we need that! exactly like for legal suicide and abortion! as we said previously!!!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/201
Reinstatment of the death penalty in Turkey - worldwide / Restablecimiento de la pena de muerte en Chile Part 7
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
Remember that this show exactly the importance of having things before we need that! exactly like for legal suicide and abortion! as we said previously!!!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/201
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/217
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/218
So again, having a death penalty doesn't mean YOU NEED TO APPLY THAT TO ALL PRISONERS!!!! like you don't use all your wage, otherwise when you are elderly, you have no money at all ... (in case you have a good wage ... for poor people the situation is a bit different ...)
Better to have that, than not to have that!!! Don't forget such point! especially because reenabling death penalty is huge complex!
https://t.me/EuropeFacts/69
So Carolyn Hoyle
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1747
near all your bullshit in Amnesty style ... NOPE, we are not using just "celebrities" ...
First, we discovered them all thanks our Breivik investigation and other researchers, NOT NETFLIX OR WHATEVER!
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1223
https://t.me/IsraelWarWomenRights/869
and we got interest for Breivik story thanks Hamas (and Norway)
Second, THE MAIN PROBLEM IS THAT PEOPLE FORGET THINGS PRETTY FAST! Like Hamas will be "past" in few months ... This happens with EVERYTHING! People already forgot all pro of getting COVID! (A LOT OF PROS!!!, near killed people and financial problems ...)
https://t.me/IsraelWarBullshit/355
https://t.me/GenRevolutionOfficial/28
https://t.me/GenRevolutionOfficial/217
https://t.me/GenRevolutionOfficial/426
https://t.me/BreivikFacts/5
https://t.me/BreivikBullshit/89
https://t.me/BreivikBullshit/90
NEVER FORGET!!!!
https://t.me/MahsaAminiTelegram/135
https://t.me/NeverForgetTelegram
https://t.me/AntoniaBarra
https://t.me/AliceSchembri
https://t.me/SuicideRape
https://t.me/BreivikTrauma
WE FOR SURE WILL NEVER FORGET! so it's not about that Carolyn Hoyle!!
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
Remember that this show exactly the importance of having things before we need that! exactly like for legal suicide and abortion! as we said previously!!!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/201
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/217
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/218
So again, having a death penalty doesn't mean YOU NEED TO APPLY THAT TO ALL PRISONERS!!!! like you don't use all your wage, otherwise when you are elderly, you have no money at all ... (in case you have a good wage ... for poor people the situation is a bit different ...)
Better to have that, than not to have that!!! Don't forget such point! especially because reenabling death penalty is huge complex!
https://t.me/EuropeFacts/69
So Carolyn Hoyle
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1747
near all your bullshit in Amnesty style ... NOPE, we are not using just "celebrities" ...
First, we discovered them all thanks our Breivik investigation and other researchers, NOT NETFLIX OR WHATEVER!
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1223
https://t.me/IsraelWarWomenRights/869
and we got interest for Breivik story thanks Hamas (and Norway)
Second, THE MAIN PROBLEM IS THAT PEOPLE FORGET THINGS PRETTY FAST! Like Hamas will be "past" in few months ... This happens with EVERYTHING! People already forgot all pro of getting COVID! (A LOT OF PROS!!!, near killed people and financial problems ...)
https://t.me/IsraelWarBullshit/355
https://t.me/GenRevolutionOfficial/28
https://t.me/GenRevolutionOfficial/217
https://t.me/GenRevolutionOfficial/426
https://t.me/BreivikFacts/5
https://t.me/BreivikBullshit/89
https://t.me/BreivikBullshit/90
NEVER FORGET!!!!
https://t.me/MahsaAminiTelegram/135
https://t.me/NeverForgetTelegram
https://t.me/AntoniaBarra
https://t.me/AliceSchembri
https://t.me/SuicideRape
https://t.me/BreivikTrauma
WE FOR SURE WILL NEVER FORGET! so it's not about that Carolyn Hoyle!!
Reinstatment of the death penalty in Turkey - worldwide / Restablecimiento de la pena de muerte en Chile Part 8
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
So Carolyn Hoyle
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyMafia
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
first, people vote without even knowing why they vote!!
https://t.me/IgnorancePeople/10
so they prefer to remain ignorant!
https://t.me/IgnorancePeople/40
https://t.me/IgnorancePeople/41
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/116
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/166
and this is a big problem!!! because you first need to learn, then you need to say something!
🤜🤜 https://t.me/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx
🤜🤜 (2) https://t.me/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx
"Such polls record immediate opin- ions and responses, which are inevitably affected by the nature and specificity of the questions posed"
Such things ARE NOT RESEARCH, is 💩!
Like when we compile online all infos that they request us with dddd dddd 🇦🇫 a@a.com 🤣
You can write the shit you want in such things! just think how we choose randomly an answer (without even reading) in the hope once done we get a 10-20$ coupon 🤣 and such idiot believe what we said ...
Plus remember that stats are shit in general!
https://t.me/PenaDeMuertes/132
"A number of factors and influences have been found to shape views on this subject, in particular: knowledge about the administration of capital punishment; racial animus, religion"
Like we said previously ...
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/263
Concerns about the administration of justice
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/221
"evidence that some defence attorneys have been incompetent (see Chapter 7), and concern about the lethal injection procedure"
a) https://t.me/ShittyDeathExecutions/20
https://t.me/ShittyDeathExecutions/36
b) death sentence = assisted suicide!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/212
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/262
So Carolyn Hoyle
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyMafia
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
first, people vote without even knowing why they vote!!
https://t.me/IgnorancePeople/10
so they prefer to remain ignorant!
https://t.me/IgnorancePeople/40
https://t.me/IgnorancePeople/41
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/116
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/166
and this is a big problem!!! because you first need to learn, then you need to say something!
🤜🤜 https://t.me/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx
🤜🤜 (2) https://t.me/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx
"Such polls record immediate opin- ions and responses, which are inevitably affected by the nature and specificity of the questions posed"
Such things ARE NOT RESEARCH, is 💩!
Like when we compile online all infos that they request us with dddd dddd 🇦🇫 a@a.com 🤣
You can write the shit you want in such things! just think how we choose randomly an answer (without even reading) in the hope once done we get a 10-20$ coupon 🤣 and such idiot believe what we said ...
Plus remember that stats are shit in general!
https://t.me/PenaDeMuertes/132
"A number of factors and influences have been found to shape views on this subject, in particular: knowledge about the administration of capital punishment; racial animus, religion"
Like we said previously ...
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/263
Concerns about the administration of justice
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/221
"evidence that some defence attorneys have been incompetent (see Chapter 7), and concern about the lethal injection procedure"
a) https://t.me/ShittyDeathExecutions/20
https://t.me/ShittyDeathExecutions/36
b) death sentence = assisted suicide!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/212