Behind the death penalty Part 5
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Europe is refusing the selling of lethal dosis, a crime that is the reason why shitty death executions get applied, if lethal dosis is not possible anymore!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/45
https://t.me/DeathExecutionMethod
https://t.me/ShittyDeathExecutions
A crime promoted by Amnesty and John Bessler bullshit propaganda!
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/143
https://t.me/JohnBessler
by ignoring all other things behind that ...
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/59
to
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/61
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel
https://t.me/AmnestyFacts
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
Back to Breivik ...
Da jeg var liten og vokste opp, fikk vi vite at Adolf Hitler var en grusom mann som fortjente å dø https://perma.cc/MJB6-VYC8
When I was little and growing up, we were taught that Adolf Hitler was a cruel man who deserved to die.
this is the best example!!! because again there is a dilemma:
Killing Hitler or not? like allowing Michael Scofield to do prison break or not?
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
One thing is sure, Michael Scofield with that caused MUCH MORE DEATHS! and we cannot ignore that!
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1742
Same for Hitler ... if we killed Hitler years ago, maybe many people would NEVER DIE!
So the question is, better 1 now, or 1000 later?
Obviously Lincoln Burrows was innocent!
https://t.me/TedBundyTelegram/10
but this doesn't need the fact that the story behind Lincoln Burrows caused more deaths! and Michael said that too!
No matter, we don't stand for discrimination based sentences!
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences
https://t.me/BlackHumanRights
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/169
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/146
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/148
or to make victims 😋
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/122
🙅♂️ to innocent people
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/176
Blecker mener ikke at alle drapspersoner fortjener dødsstraff
See next post
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Europe is refusing the selling of lethal dosis, a crime that is the reason why shitty death executions get applied, if lethal dosis is not possible anymore!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/45
https://t.me/DeathExecutionMethod
https://t.me/ShittyDeathExecutions
A crime promoted by Amnesty and John Bessler bullshit propaganda!
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/143
https://t.me/JohnBessler
by ignoring all other things behind that ...
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/59
to
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/61
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel
https://t.me/AmnestyFacts
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
Back to Breivik ...
Da jeg var liten og vokste opp, fikk vi vite at Adolf Hitler var en grusom mann som fortjente å dø https://perma.cc/MJB6-VYC8
When I was little and growing up, we were taught that Adolf Hitler was a cruel man who deserved to die.
this is the best example!!! because again there is a dilemma:
Killing Hitler or not? like allowing Michael Scofield to do prison break or not?
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
One thing is sure, Michael Scofield with that caused MUCH MORE DEATHS! and we cannot ignore that!
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1742
Same for Hitler ... if we killed Hitler years ago, maybe many people would NEVER DIE!
So the question is, better 1 now, or 1000 later?
Obviously Lincoln Burrows was innocent!
https://t.me/TedBundyTelegram/10
but this doesn't need the fact that the story behind Lincoln Burrows caused more deaths! and Michael said that too!
No matter, we don't stand for discrimination based sentences!
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences
https://t.me/BlackHumanRights
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/169
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/146
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/148
or to make victims 😋
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/122
🙅♂️ to innocent people
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/176
Blecker mener ikke at alle drapspersoner fortjener dødsstraff
See next post
Behind the death penalty Part 6
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Blecker does not believe that all murderers deserve the death penalty. But in these cases, he believes that we have a moral obligation to carry out the death penalty https://perma.cc/MJB6-VYC8
EXACTLY! Not all murders deserve a death penalty!!!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
and remember, is not just related to killing someone or not!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/118
you could be Breivik, by killing 0 people, you still deserve death for hate crimes!
Let we remember Norway shitty laws related to rape!!! (not only that ...)
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/49
Learn with Norway
https://t.me/LearnWithNorway
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/45
to
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/47
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/28
Nå blir vel dødsstraff aldri gjeninnført i Norge, (avskaffet i 1948) men maksimumstraffen på 20 år bør heves/endres til ”livslangt fengselsopphold eller institusjon” https://perma.cc/2LYX-9NF6
Now the death penalty will probably never be reintroduced in Norway (abolished in 1948), but the maximum sentence of 20 years should be raised/changed to "life imprisonment or institution".
Will probably never, if NO ONE IS CONTRASTING AMNESTY BULLSHIT. But nope never doesn't mean never, if we promote real facts!
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
No matter, better life, than NOTHING!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/177
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts/21
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/58
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/45
https://t.me/AndersBehringBreivikTelegram/75
Anders Behring Breivik sier han ikke vil ha respekt for en dom på 21 års fengsel, noe han beskriver som en «latterlig straff» https://perma.cc/Y7VZ-ASJK
Anders Behring Breivik says he will not respect a sentence of 21 years in prison, which he describes as a "ridiculous punishment".
For to år siden vedtok Stortinget at maksimalstraffen for terror skulle være 30 år. Justisdepartementet vet ennå ikke når den nye loven kan tre i kraft.
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Blecker does not believe that all murderers deserve the death penalty. But in these cases, he believes that we have a moral obligation to carry out the death penalty https://perma.cc/MJB6-VYC8
EXACTLY! Not all murders deserve a death penalty!!!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
and remember, is not just related to killing someone or not!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/118
you could be Breivik, by killing 0 people, you still deserve death for hate crimes!
Let we remember Norway shitty laws related to rape!!! (not only that ...)
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/49
Learn with Norway
https://t.me/LearnWithNorway
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/45
to
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/47
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/28
Nå blir vel dødsstraff aldri gjeninnført i Norge, (avskaffet i 1948) men maksimumstraffen på 20 år bør heves/endres til ”livslangt fengselsopphold eller institusjon” https://perma.cc/2LYX-9NF6
Now the death penalty will probably never be reintroduced in Norway (abolished in 1948), but the maximum sentence of 20 years should be raised/changed to "life imprisonment or institution".
Will probably never, if NO ONE IS CONTRASTING AMNESTY BULLSHIT. But nope never doesn't mean never, if we promote real facts!
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
No matter, better life, than NOTHING!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/177
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts/21
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/58
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/45
https://t.me/AndersBehringBreivikTelegram/75
Anders Behring Breivik sier han ikke vil ha respekt for en dom på 21 års fengsel, noe han beskriver som en «latterlig straff» https://perma.cc/Y7VZ-ASJK
Anders Behring Breivik says he will not respect a sentence of 21 years in prison, which he describes as a "ridiculous punishment".
For to år siden vedtok Stortinget at maksimalstraffen for terror skulle være 30 år. Justisdepartementet vet ennå ikke når den nye loven kan tre i kraft.
Behind the death penalty Part 7
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Two years ago (= 2009), the Storting decided that the maximum sentence for terrorism should be 30 years. The Ministry of Justice does not yet know when the new law may enter into force https://perma.cc/TT2X-9X2U
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/4
I proposisjonen Stortinget fikk sto det at dette ville ta tid og at implementeringen av den nye straffeloven var ventet å kunne skje 1. januar 2012. Det er som kjent ikke ennå, sier statssekretær Terje Moland Pedersen (Ap) i Justisdepartementet til Nettavisen.
In the proposal the Storting received, it was stated that this would take time and that the implementation of the new penal code was expected to take place on 1 January 2012. As is known, that is not yet, says State Secretary Terje Moland Pedersen (Ap) in the Ministry of Justice to Nettavisen.
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/12
Det var Adresseavisen som tirsdag skrev at datarot gjør at terrorsiktede Anders Behring Breivik - med 77 liv på samvittigheten - bare kan dømmes etter den gamle terrorparagrafen med maksimal fengselsstraff på 21 år, ikke den nye Stortinget vedtok i 2009. Den gangen vedtok lovgiverne å øke maksimalstraffen til 30 år.
It was Adresseavisen that wrote on Tuesday that a computer mess means that terrorist accused Anders Behring Breivik - with 77 lives on his conscience - can only be sentenced under the old terror clause with a maximum prison sentence of 21 years, not the new one adopted by the Storting in 2009. At that time, the legislators decided to increase the maximum sentence to 30 years.
https://t.me/NorwayErrors
Heving av tidsrammen til 30 år ble gjort fordi maksimalstraffen for terror i Norge og flere andre europeiske land er 30 år. På den måten gir man signaler om at Norge ikke er et «safe haven» for terrorister med lavere straffenivå enn andre land.
Raising the time frame to 30 years was done because the maximum sentence for terrorism in Norway and several other European countries is 30 years.
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Two years ago (= 2009), the Storting decided that the maximum sentence for terrorism should be 30 years. The Ministry of Justice does not yet know when the new law may enter into force https://perma.cc/TT2X-9X2U
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/4
I proposisjonen Stortinget fikk sto det at dette ville ta tid og at implementeringen av den nye straffeloven var ventet å kunne skje 1. januar 2012. Det er som kjent ikke ennå, sier statssekretær Terje Moland Pedersen (Ap) i Justisdepartementet til Nettavisen.
In the proposal the Storting received, it was stated that this would take time and that the implementation of the new penal code was expected to take place on 1 January 2012. As is known, that is not yet, says State Secretary Terje Moland Pedersen (Ap) in the Ministry of Justice to Nettavisen.
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/12
Det var Adresseavisen som tirsdag skrev at datarot gjør at terrorsiktede Anders Behring Breivik - med 77 liv på samvittigheten - bare kan dømmes etter den gamle terrorparagrafen med maksimal fengselsstraff på 21 år, ikke den nye Stortinget vedtok i 2009. Den gangen vedtok lovgiverne å øke maksimalstraffen til 30 år.
It was Adresseavisen that wrote on Tuesday that a computer mess means that terrorist accused Anders Behring Breivik - with 77 lives on his conscience - can only be sentenced under the old terror clause with a maximum prison sentence of 21 years, not the new one adopted by the Storting in 2009. At that time, the legislators decided to increase the maximum sentence to 30 years.
https://t.me/NorwayErrors
Heving av tidsrammen til 30 år ble gjort fordi maksimalstraffen for terror i Norge og flere andre europeiske land er 30 år. På den måten gir man signaler om at Norge ikke er et «safe haven» for terrorister med lavere straffenivå enn andre land.
Raising the time frame to 30 years was done because the maximum sentence for terrorism in Norway and several other European countries is 30 years.
Behind the death penalty Part 8
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Selv om loven er endret slik at man i dag kan dømmes for terror til forvaring med en tidsramme på 30 år og en minstetid på 20 år, kan ikke dommen til Breivik endres. Dette er fordi lover ikke gis tilbakevirkende kraft i Norge https://perma.cc/U5GA-NG7D
Although the law has been changed so that today one can be sentenced for terrorism to detention with a time frame of 30 years and a minimum term of 20 years, Breivik's sentence cannot be changed. This is because laws are not given retroactive effect in Norway.
💩 with 🇳🇴 quality!!! 🤦♂️ cannot be change UNTIL WE START TO CHANGE LAWS ONCE AT ALL!
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/41
and stop doing errors over errors!
https://t.me/NorwayErrors
https://t.me/LearnWithNorway
https://t.me/HanauBreivik
Forsinket oppgradering av datasystemer i politiet og domstolsapparatet gjør at terrorsiktede Anders Behring Breivik ikke kan dømmes etter den nye terrorparagrafen med maksimalstraff på 30 år, skriver Adresseavisen tirsdag.
Delayed upgrading of computer systems in the police and the court apparatus means that terrorist accused Anders Behring Breivik cannot be sentenced under the new terror clause with a maximum sentence of 30 years, writes Adresseavisen on Tuesday 🤦♂️ obviously, because this is 🇳🇴!!! errors over errors!!!
So now let we summarise all previous posts:
a) we started from the John Bessler bullshit
https://t.me/JohnBessler/142
and we agree it make no sense to apply a death sentence in one case, ignoring that for other ..
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/145
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/147
b) we talked about animal, suicide, abortion and how people forget such cruelty / tortures
https://t.me/JohnBessler/153
https://t.me/JohnBessler/154
https://t.me/JohnBessler/155
c) about Europe mafia!
https://t.me/EuropeFacts/70
d) homicide != homicide
https://t.me/JohnBessler/156
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
e) about other Norway errors ...
https://t.me/NorwayErrors
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Selv om loven er endret slik at man i dag kan dømmes for terror til forvaring med en tidsramme på 30 år og en minstetid på 20 år, kan ikke dommen til Breivik endres. Dette er fordi lover ikke gis tilbakevirkende kraft i Norge https://perma.cc/U5GA-NG7D
Although the law has been changed so that today one can be sentenced for terrorism to detention with a time frame of 30 years and a minimum term of 20 years, Breivik's sentence cannot be changed. This is because laws are not given retroactive effect in Norway.
💩 with 🇳🇴 quality!!! 🤦♂️ cannot be change UNTIL WE START TO CHANGE LAWS ONCE AT ALL!
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/41
and stop doing errors over errors!
https://t.me/NorwayErrors
https://t.me/LearnWithNorway
https://t.me/HanauBreivik
Forsinket oppgradering av datasystemer i politiet og domstolsapparatet gjør at terrorsiktede Anders Behring Breivik ikke kan dømmes etter den nye terrorparagrafen med maksimalstraff på 30 år, skriver Adresseavisen tirsdag.
Delayed upgrading of computer systems in the police and the court apparatus means that terrorist accused Anders Behring Breivik cannot be sentenced under the new terror clause with a maximum sentence of 30 years, writes Adresseavisen on Tuesday 🤦♂️ obviously, because this is 🇳🇴!!! errors over errors!!!
So now let we summarise all previous posts:
a) we started from the John Bessler bullshit
https://t.me/JohnBessler/142
and we agree it make no sense to apply a death sentence in one case, ignoring that for other ..
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/145
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/147
b) we talked about animal, suicide, abortion and how people forget such cruelty / tortures
https://t.me/JohnBessler/153
https://t.me/JohnBessler/154
https://t.me/JohnBessler/155
c) about Europe mafia!
https://t.me/EuropeFacts/70
d) homicide != homicide
https://t.me/JohnBessler/156
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
e) about other Norway errors ...
https://t.me/NorwayErrors
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
A summary of the last 8 posts https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/65
Now in few words:
🙅♂️ animal torture / cruelty 🙅♂️ death penalty to animals done by humans 🙅♂️ train suicide and similar things 🙅♂️ priority of humans over animals 🙅♂️ euthanasia abuse to animals due to ignorance* 🙅♂️ VIP suicide 🙅♂️ indifference for other people rights 🙅♂️@ShittyDeathSentences @ShittyDeathExecutions 🙅♂️ @KeepEyesClosed 🙅♂️ @AmnestyPropaganda https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx 🙅♂️ @IgnorancePeople 🙅♂️ @PrisonBreakFacts 🙅♂️ @ParoleFacts @BreivikParole 🙅♂️ @HumanRightAbuse 🙅♂️ @DiscriminationTelegram 🙅♂️ @JobDiscrimination 🙅♂️ @EuropeAbuse 🙅♂️ missing empathy = @AspergerSyndromeTelegram @EmpathyTelegram 🙅♂️ bullshits in general!!! without science! and multiple perspective
🤜🤜 https://t.me/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx
🤜🤜 (2) https://t.me/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx
🖇🛡 https://t.me/addlist/pL2yDj4ErKNjNjBh
🖇🤡 https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
✅ Not Today Not Tomorrow
https://t.me/NotTodayTelegram
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/123
✅ abortion ✅ @StopDieWelle ✅ @EthicalDilemmaHumanRights ✅ new human rights definition based on amount / deep of crimes ✅ @LearnWithNorway = no doing again the exact same errors like in the past!!!! @HanauBreivik ✅ @NoBreivikMania ✅ @BreivikDeathSentence @DeathSentenceFAQ @AnimalAbuseDeathSentence @DeathSentenceNOW ✅ @LawsTelegram @HumanRightsChecklist @MissionPlaneta @WeAreTheFutureTelegram ✅ more rights for animals ✅ life sentences, if death penalties will never be a reality! (WITHOUT PAROLE) ✅ better future based on science / facts and not bullshit ✅ legal suicide instead! = less trauma for families / victims and all people watching such things! ✅ die with dignity and this means
✅ letal dosis for ☑️ legal assisted suicide! and ☑️ death penalty! 🙅♂️ letal dosis crimes by 🇪🇺!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyInhumane/56
*
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/154
to
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/157
A summary of the last 8 posts https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/65
Now in few words:
🙅♂️ animal torture / cruelty 🙅♂️ death penalty to animals done by humans 🙅♂️ train suicide and similar things 🙅♂️ priority of humans over animals 🙅♂️ euthanasia abuse to animals due to ignorance* 🙅♂️ VIP suicide 🙅♂️ indifference for other people rights 🙅♂️@ShittyDeathSentences @ShittyDeathExecutions 🙅♂️ @KeepEyesClosed 🙅♂️ @AmnestyPropaganda https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx 🙅♂️ @IgnorancePeople 🙅♂️ @PrisonBreakFacts 🙅♂️ @ParoleFacts @BreivikParole 🙅♂️ @HumanRightAbuse 🙅♂️ @DiscriminationTelegram 🙅♂️ @JobDiscrimination 🙅♂️ @EuropeAbuse 🙅♂️ missing empathy = @AspergerSyndromeTelegram @EmpathyTelegram 🙅♂️ bullshits in general!!! without science! and multiple perspective
🤜🤜 https://t.me/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx
🤜🤜 (2) https://t.me/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx
🖇🛡 https://t.me/addlist/pL2yDj4ErKNjNjBh
🖇🤡 https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
✅ Not Today Not Tomorrow
https://t.me/NotTodayTelegram
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/123
✅ abortion ✅ @StopDieWelle ✅ @EthicalDilemmaHumanRights ✅ new human rights definition based on amount / deep of crimes ✅ @LearnWithNorway = no doing again the exact same errors like in the past!!!! @HanauBreivik ✅ @NoBreivikMania ✅ @BreivikDeathSentence @DeathSentenceFAQ @AnimalAbuseDeathSentence @DeathSentenceNOW ✅ @LawsTelegram @HumanRightsChecklist @MissionPlaneta @WeAreTheFutureTelegram ✅ more rights for animals ✅ life sentences, if death penalties will never be a reality! (WITHOUT PAROLE) ✅ better future based on science / facts and not bullshit ✅ legal suicide instead! = less trauma for families / victims and all people watching such things! ✅ die with dignity and this means
✅ letal dosis for ☑️ legal assisted suicide! and ☑️ death penalty! 🙅♂️ letal dosis crimes by 🇪🇺!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyInhumane/56
*
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/154
to
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/157
Se deveria volver a legalisar la pena de muerte en chile? - One to one with Chile - Death Penalty FAQ Part 1
confias en el poder judicial? Yo no.
= entrusted to the judicial power? Yo no.
Cuatro fueron los sospechosos y un imputado, que finalmente quedó libre por falta de pruebas, se trata del guardia de ese entonces que trabajaba en el colegio Bautista, Domingo Cofré, del cual la fiscalía no pudo probar su autoría.
There were four suspects and one accused, who was finally released due to lack of evidence, was the guard at the time who worked at the Bautista school, Domingo Cofré, whose prosecution could not prove his responsibility https://perma.cc/42YY-29XF
Un desconocido ingresó al departamento donde ella vivía y en dos minutos terminaron con su vida golpeándola brutalmente con elementos contundentes, posteriormente la dejaron boca abajo en una tina con agua caliente y para finalizar tan cruel acto incendiaron el departamento para borrar evidencias.
A stranger entered the apartment where she lived and in two minutes they ended her life by brutally beating her with blunt elements, later they left her face down in a tub with hot water and to finish such a cruel act they set the apartment on fire to erase evidence.
Cuatro fueron los sospechosos y un imputado, que finalmente quedó libre por falta de pruebas, se trata del guardia de ese entonces que trabajaba en el colegio Bautista, Domingo Cofré, del cual la fiscalía no pudo probar su autoría.
There were four suspects and one accused, who was finally released due to lack of evidence, was the guard at the time who worked at the Bautista school, Domingo Cofré, whose prosecution could not prove his responsibility.
Our answer: if there is proof yes death, otherwise life!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/135
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/143
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/146
Showing a rape is not so easy too, but if this can be showed WITH VALID METHODS! not 💩 methods, then yes!
About corruption see next post
confias en el poder judicial? Yo no.
= entrusted to the judicial power? Yo no.
Cuatro fueron los sospechosos y un imputado, que finalmente quedó libre por falta de pruebas, se trata del guardia de ese entonces que trabajaba en el colegio Bautista, Domingo Cofré, del cual la fiscalía no pudo probar su autoría.
There were four suspects and one accused, who was finally released due to lack of evidence, was the guard at the time who worked at the Bautista school, Domingo Cofré, whose prosecution could not prove his responsibility https://perma.cc/42YY-29XF
Un desconocido ingresó al departamento donde ella vivía y en dos minutos terminaron con su vida golpeándola brutalmente con elementos contundentes, posteriormente la dejaron boca abajo en una tina con agua caliente y para finalizar tan cruel acto incendiaron el departamento para borrar evidencias.
A stranger entered the apartment where she lived and in two minutes they ended her life by brutally beating her with blunt elements, later they left her face down in a tub with hot water and to finish such a cruel act they set the apartment on fire to erase evidence.
Cuatro fueron los sospechosos y un imputado, que finalmente quedó libre por falta de pruebas, se trata del guardia de ese entonces que trabajaba en el colegio Bautista, Domingo Cofré, del cual la fiscalía no pudo probar su autoría.
There were four suspects and one accused, who was finally released due to lack of evidence, was the guard at the time who worked at the Bautista school, Domingo Cofré, whose prosecution could not prove his responsibility.
Our answer: if there is proof yes death, otherwise life!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/135
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/143
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/146
Showing a rape is not so easy too, but if this can be showed WITH VALID METHODS! not 💩 methods, then yes!
About corruption see next post
Se deveria volver a legalisar la pena de muerte en chile? - One to one with Chile - Death Penalty FAQ Part 2
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
About corruption
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/172
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/179
especially
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/169
https://t.me/InPrisonNOW/7
No, la pena de muerte no sirve para prevenir. Existe solo para que la masa sienta catarsis por una venganza que no les corresponde a ellos. Lo que deben volver son los trabajos forzados y volver productivo el tiempo de los presos. Fabricas ESTATALES. La pena de muerte transforma a toda la sociedad que la permite en verdugos.
= No, the death penalty does not serve to prevent. It exists only so that the masses feel catharsis for a revenge that is not theirs. What must return is forced labor and make the prisoners' time productive. STATE factories. The death penalty transforms the entire society that allows it into executioners.
Prevent
Is not possible to answer that with science, preventing is not the only goal
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/139
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/93
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts/90
and remember that crimes are not crimes!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/180
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/217
Death penalty is NOT 😋
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/122
La pena de muerte transforma a toda la sociedad que la permite en verdugos —> we are already that!!! WITH ANIMALS!!!
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/132
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/153
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/39
or other things
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel
Tu problema es que crees que los criminales se asustan por las penas, la evidencia es clara, el miedo no sirve para evitar crimenes, por ejemplo, en el caso de los homicidios
The evidence is clear, fear does not help to avoid crimes, for example, in the case of homicides.
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE! See next post
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
About corruption
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/172
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/179
especially
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/169
https://t.me/InPrisonNOW/7
No, la pena de muerte no sirve para prevenir. Existe solo para que la masa sienta catarsis por una venganza que no les corresponde a ellos. Lo que deben volver son los trabajos forzados y volver productivo el tiempo de los presos. Fabricas ESTATALES. La pena de muerte transforma a toda la sociedad que la permite en verdugos.
= No, the death penalty does not serve to prevent. It exists only so that the masses feel catharsis for a revenge that is not theirs. What must return is forced labor and make the prisoners' time productive. STATE factories. The death penalty transforms the entire society that allows it into executioners.
Prevent
Is not possible to answer that with science, preventing is not the only goal
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/139
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/93
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts/90
and remember that crimes are not crimes!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/180
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/217
Death penalty is NOT 😋
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/122
La pena de muerte transforma a toda la sociedad que la permite en verdugos —> we are already that!!! WITH ANIMALS!!!
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/132
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/153
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/39
or other things
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel
Tu problema es que crees que los criminales se asustan por las penas, la evidencia es clara, el miedo no sirve para evitar crimenes, por ejemplo, en el caso de los homicidios
The evidence is clear, fear does not help to avoid crimes, for example, in the case of homicides.
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE! See next post
Whether or not there is a general deterrent effect, there is certainly a diminishing effect on crime “since execution eliminates categorically the possibility of recidivism” (Ehrlich, 1975a).
Exactly! It's not only about deterrent, since deterrent depends from SO MANY FACTORS NOT RELATED TO DEATH PENALTY OR NOT!
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/363
to
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/404
and is different from crime to crime and person to person
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
WE CANNOT CLASSIFY ALL IN THE SAME CATEGORY!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/97
Just think about
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/10
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/60
https://t.me/SoSorryTelegram/24
vs
https://t.me/SoSorryTelegram/19
https://t.me/SoSorryTelegram/25
Katz et al. (2003) doubt that a deterrent effect of the death penalty (when it exists) can be shown with the usual data because the variation in the crime rates is simply not large enough
Moreover, Donohue and Wolfers (2005) note that the debate about the death penalty “may be driven by ideology and advocacy motives”.
OTHER PEOPLE WITH BRAIN!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/143
It's just propaganda!
https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/82
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
Remember, no matter if to prevent or remove recidivism, we need to work on other things too!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/134
University of Oxford: Furthermore, homicide rates have been declining since the early 1990s across all American states, both retentionist and abolitionist 🤦♂️
Sorry what???! 😂
https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda/65
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/404
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/133
"Of course, murder rates are affected by many factors beyond the criminal justice process"
YES; AND THERE IS NOT JUST MURDER!!!!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/118
University of Oxford: "If the death penalty has a deterrent effect, we would not expect a fall in murder rates following abolition. And yet the murder rate decreased in multiple countries after abolition, including Australia, Canada ...🤦♂️
See next post
Exactly! It's not only about deterrent, since deterrent depends from SO MANY FACTORS NOT RELATED TO DEATH PENALTY OR NOT!
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/363
to
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/404
and is different from crime to crime and person to person
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
WE CANNOT CLASSIFY ALL IN THE SAME CATEGORY!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/97
Just think about
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/10
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/60
https://t.me/SoSorryTelegram/24
vs
https://t.me/SoSorryTelegram/19
https://t.me/SoSorryTelegram/25
Katz et al. (2003) doubt that a deterrent effect of the death penalty (when it exists) can be shown with the usual data because the variation in the crime rates is simply not large enough
Moreover, Donohue and Wolfers (2005) note that the debate about the death penalty “may be driven by ideology and advocacy motives”.
OTHER PEOPLE WITH BRAIN!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/143
It's just propaganda!
https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/82
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
Remember, no matter if to prevent or remove recidivism, we need to work on other things too!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/134
University of Oxford: Furthermore, homicide rates have been declining since the early 1990s across all American states, both retentionist and abolitionist 🤦♂️
Sorry what???! 😂
https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda/65
https://t.me/AmnestyFake/404
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/133
"Of course, murder rates are affected by many factors beyond the criminal justice process"
YES; AND THERE IS NOT JUST MURDER!!!!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/118
University of Oxford: "If the death penalty has a deterrent effect, we would not expect a fall in murder rates following abolition. And yet the murder rate decreased in multiple countries after abolition, including Australia, Canada ...🤦♂️
See next post
Se deveria volver a legalisar la pena de muerte en chile? - One to one with Chile - Death Penalty FAQ Part 4
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
University of Oxford: "And yet the murder rate decreased in multiple countries after abolition, including Australia, Canada and across eastern Europe" 🤦♂️
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/32
When in REALITY INCREASED IN CANADA! and decreased in California! 🤣🤦♂️
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/226
Antall drap i Norge har de siste ti årene vært relativt stabilt. Antallet i år, med 38 ofre, er imidlertid det høyeste siden 2013.
The number of murders in Norway has been relatively stable in the last ten years. However, the number this year, with 38 victims, is the highest since 2013 https://perma.cc/5RM8-RU9E
https://t.me/ChatGPTBullshit/97
Let we check this if what University of Oxford is writing is true or bullshit ...
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/226
All jurisdictions in Australia abolished the death penalty by 1985. In 2010, the Australian government passed legislation that prohibited the reintroduction of capital punishment.
Ronald Ryan was the last man hanged in Australia, 50 years ago on 3 February 1967.
Ryan and his accomplice Peter Walker ESCAPED!!!! from Pentridge Prison on 19 December 1965 https://perma.cc/3QNK-UULQ
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts
Last death execution was 1967 ... and homicides INCREASED AFTER THAT 🤣 with no death penalty ... = BULLSHIT!
Even if we consider 1985 ... 1988 was higher for example 🤦♂️ 🤣
University of Oxford is talking BULLSHIT!
Probably they cannot make difference between suicides and homicides ... 🤦♂️
So back to the comment ...
First, what do you mean with fear??! Fear of dying, fear of how you dying, fear of being caught, fear of need to do suicide because you have no death penalty, .... SO WHAT EXACTLY DOES FEAR MEAN!!!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/221
No matter what, interventions (now talked in general) can reduce crimes! ... about death penalty we already wrote previously
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/226
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
University of Oxford: "And yet the murder rate decreased in multiple countries after abolition, including Australia, Canada and across eastern Europe" 🤦♂️
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/32
When in REALITY INCREASED IN CANADA! and decreased in California! 🤣🤦♂️
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/226
Antall drap i Norge har de siste ti årene vært relativt stabilt. Antallet i år, med 38 ofre, er imidlertid det høyeste siden 2013.
The number of murders in Norway has been relatively stable in the last ten years. However, the number this year, with 38 victims, is the highest since 2013 https://perma.cc/5RM8-RU9E
https://t.me/ChatGPTBullshit/97
Let we check this if what University of Oxford is writing is true or bullshit ...
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/226
All jurisdictions in Australia abolished the death penalty by 1985. In 2010, the Australian government passed legislation that prohibited the reintroduction of capital punishment.
Ronald Ryan was the last man hanged in Australia, 50 years ago on 3 February 1967.
Ryan and his accomplice Peter Walker ESCAPED!!!! from Pentridge Prison on 19 December 1965 https://perma.cc/3QNK-UULQ
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts
Last death execution was 1967 ... and homicides INCREASED AFTER THAT 🤣 with no death penalty ... = BULLSHIT!
Even if we consider 1985 ... 1988 was higher for example 🤦♂️ 🤣
University of Oxford is talking BULLSHIT!
Probably they cannot make difference between suicides and homicides ... 🤦♂️
So back to the comment ...
First, what do you mean with fear??! Fear of dying, fear of how you dying, fear of being caught, fear of need to do suicide because you have no death penalty, .... SO WHAT EXACTLY DOES FEAR MEAN!!!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/221
No matter what, interventions (now talked in general) can reduce crimes! ... about death penalty we already wrote previously
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/226