Sorry, you are talking about nature ... and there is even not a nature in the index of your book 🤦♂️ ...
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/55
https://t.me/AnimalCrueltyFacts
https://t.me/BauernprotestRealitat
and with this example, you show even the fact, that death penalty should not be used everytime and everywhere.
You can have a death penalty WITHOUT using it, just when needed!
https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/321
THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE ALWAYS FORGET
Not that you come here "ops, it was better to have that" ... Do you need assisted suicide now, if you don't wish to die?? NOPE Do you need abortion now, if you are not pregnant?? NOPE Do you need ....? NOPE!
This doesn't mean that you don't need such things in future too! Remember
a) removing death penalty is synonym of HAVING AN HARD LIFE TO REIMPLEMENT THAT!
https://t.me/EuropeFacts/55
https://t.me/EuropeFacts/56
https://t.me/EuropeFacts/36
https://t.me/EuropeFacts/69
b) or no way to reimplement that
https://t.me/JohnBessler/132
c) don't forget Norway!
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/18
to
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/23
Synes du det hadde vært riktig om Norge innførte dødsstraff i forbindelse med denne saken, lurte aktor Inga Bejer Engh.
Det hadde vært det riktige på mange måter. Skal man vurdere en sak som dette, er det bare to utganger. Jeg ser på 21 års fengsel som en patetisk straff, svarte Breivik.
Do you think it would have been right if Norway introduced the death penalty in connection with this case, wondered prosecutor Inga Bejer Engh.
It would have been the right thing in many ways. If one considers a case like this, there are only two ways out. I see 21 years in prison as a pathetic punishment, Breivik replied.
https://t.me/BreivikBullshit/81
only 50 prisoners?
Well, we already said that they get applied at too lower rate ...
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1706
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/24
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/110
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/55
https://t.me/AnimalCrueltyFacts
https://t.me/BauernprotestRealitat
and with this example, you show even the fact, that death penalty should not be used everytime and everywhere.
You can have a death penalty WITHOUT using it, just when needed!
https://t.me/AmnestyBullshit/321
THIS IS WHAT PEOPLE ALWAYS FORGET
Not that you come here "ops, it was better to have that" ... Do you need assisted suicide now, if you don't wish to die?? NOPE Do you need abortion now, if you are not pregnant?? NOPE Do you need ....? NOPE!
This doesn't mean that you don't need such things in future too! Remember
a) removing death penalty is synonym of HAVING AN HARD LIFE TO REIMPLEMENT THAT!
https://t.me/EuropeFacts/55
https://t.me/EuropeFacts/56
https://t.me/EuropeFacts/36
https://t.me/EuropeFacts/69
b) or no way to reimplement that
https://t.me/JohnBessler/132
c) don't forget Norway!
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/18
to
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/23
Synes du det hadde vært riktig om Norge innførte dødsstraff i forbindelse med denne saken, lurte aktor Inga Bejer Engh.
Det hadde vært det riktige på mange måter. Skal man vurdere en sak som dette, er det bare to utganger. Jeg ser på 21 års fengsel som en patetisk straff, svarte Breivik.
Do you think it would have been right if Norway introduced the death penalty in connection with this case, wondered prosecutor Inga Bejer Engh.
It would have been the right thing in many ways. If one considers a case like this, there are only two ways out. I see 21 years in prison as a pathetic punishment, Breivik replied.
https://t.me/BreivikBullshit/81
only 50 prisoners?
Well, we already said that they get applied at too lower rate ...
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1706
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/24
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/110
Behind the death penalty Part 2
Sånn sett er det synd Indrebø ble sparket. Han virker å være en person med fornuftige holdninger, sier Breivik med henvisning til meddommeren som ble fjernet for å ha kommet med en kommentar 23. juli i fjor om at dødsstraff ville vært det eneste rettferdige https://perma.cc/6793-ATPZ
In that sense, it's a shame Indrebø was fired. He seems to be a person with reasonable attitudes, says Breivik, referring to the co-judge who was removed for having made a comment on 23 July last year that the death penalty would be the only fair thing.
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/18
to
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/23
Jeg tenkte at det var en selvmordsaksjon, jeg trodde ikke jeg skulle overleve 22. juli.
I thought it was a suicide attempt, I didn't think I would survive the 22nd of July.
Breivik sa han regnet med at det var «fem prosent sannsynlighet» for at han skulle overleve angrepet i Regjeringskvartalet.
Breivik said he reckoned there was a "five percent probability" that he would survive the attack in the Government Quarter.
Det er tross alt Norges best bevoktede bygninger. Men så overlevde jeg ikke bare det, jeg overlevde Utøya også.
After all, they are Norway's best-guarded buildings. But then I not only survived that, I also survived Utøya.
🤣 .... SURE!!
Scroll from
https://t.me/BreivikErrors/11
Like etter at han ble pågrepet på Utøya 22. juli, kom han med en rekke krav til politiet. Blant dem var at det skulle innføres dødsstraff og såkalt waterboarding, vanntortur, i Norge.
Shortly after he was arrested on Utøya on 22 July, he made a number of demands to the police. Among them was that the death penalty and so-called waterboarding, water torture, should be introduced in Norway.
Disse tankene har han om sin egen henrettelse:
Det betyr at Gud kaller meg hjem. Jeg har ikke noe liv her i fengsel, så en dødsstraff vil ikke forkludre noen planer som er lagt. Det er ikke noe her som jeg ønsker å holde fast i, sier han.
Sånn sett er det synd Indrebø ble sparket. Han virker å være en person med fornuftige holdninger, sier Breivik med henvisning til meddommeren som ble fjernet for å ha kommet med en kommentar 23. juli i fjor om at dødsstraff ville vært det eneste rettferdige https://perma.cc/6793-ATPZ
In that sense, it's a shame Indrebø was fired. He seems to be a person with reasonable attitudes, says Breivik, referring to the co-judge who was removed for having made a comment on 23 July last year that the death penalty would be the only fair thing.
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/18
to
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/23
Jeg tenkte at det var en selvmordsaksjon, jeg trodde ikke jeg skulle overleve 22. juli.
I thought it was a suicide attempt, I didn't think I would survive the 22nd of July.
Breivik sa han regnet med at det var «fem prosent sannsynlighet» for at han skulle overleve angrepet i Regjeringskvartalet.
Breivik said he reckoned there was a "five percent probability" that he would survive the attack in the Government Quarter.
Det er tross alt Norges best bevoktede bygninger. Men så overlevde jeg ikke bare det, jeg overlevde Utøya også.
After all, they are Norway's best-guarded buildings. But then I not only survived that, I also survived Utøya.
🤣 .... SURE!!
Scroll from
https://t.me/BreivikErrors/11
Like etter at han ble pågrepet på Utøya 22. juli, kom han med en rekke krav til politiet. Blant dem var at det skulle innføres dødsstraff og såkalt waterboarding, vanntortur, i Norge.
Shortly after he was arrested on Utøya on 22 July, he made a number of demands to the police. Among them was that the death penalty and so-called waterboarding, water torture, should be introduced in Norway.
Disse tankene har han om sin egen henrettelse:
Det betyr at Gud kaller meg hjem. Jeg har ikke noe liv her i fengsel, så en dødsstraff vil ikke forkludre noen planer som er lagt. Det er ikke noe her som jeg ønsker å holde fast i, sier han.
Behind the death penalty Part 3
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
He has these thoughts about his own execution:
It means that God is calling me home. I have no life here in prison, so a death sentence will not spoil any plans that have been laid. There is nothing here that I want to hold on to, he says https://perma.cc/MJB6-VYC8
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/60
https://t.me/SerialKillerDeathSentence/15
https://t.me/SerialKillerDeathSentence/19
Han har argumentert for at de som har fått dødsstraff fortjener en rask, og smertefull død, men ikke tortur. Helst ved skyting.
He has argued that those who have received the death penalty deserve a quick and painful death, but not torture. Preferably when shooting.
What exactly is torture? Is an assisted suicide torture??!
NOPE, if applied with brain and not incompetence!!
First NOT TODAY NOT TOMORROW! This should be clear! We wrote now showing a different perspective about such topic, that 99.999% of the people ALWAYS FORGET!
https://t.me/NotTodayTelegram
Are you thinking about suicide? Get help from your parents, phone centers, etc.
https://t.me/NotTodayTelegram/19
REMEMBER, TONS OF PEOPLE DIE WITH (ASSISTED) SUICIDE
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/29
but even tons of people die with selfmade suicide = example jumping in front of a train!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/59
Is jumping in front of a train or other things NOT A TORTURE??! because of missing laws in our planet, except in few part in 🇨🇦, 🇧🇪, 🇳🇱, 🇨🇭 (but remember, having assisted suicide doesn't mean everyone can get that! if specific conditions are not respected, we don't mean now depression!!!)
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/122
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/123
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/11
Is refused assisted suicide NOT a torture??!!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/11
Exactly like a refused abortion!
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/115
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/186
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/11
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/163
See next post
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
He has these thoughts about his own execution:
It means that God is calling me home. I have no life here in prison, so a death sentence will not spoil any plans that have been laid. There is nothing here that I want to hold on to, he says https://perma.cc/MJB6-VYC8
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/60
https://t.me/SerialKillerDeathSentence/15
https://t.me/SerialKillerDeathSentence/19
Han har argumentert for at de som har fått dødsstraff fortjener en rask, og smertefull død, men ikke tortur. Helst ved skyting.
He has argued that those who have received the death penalty deserve a quick and painful death, but not torture. Preferably when shooting.
What exactly is torture? Is an assisted suicide torture??!
NOPE, if applied with brain and not incompetence!!
First NOT TODAY NOT TOMORROW! This should be clear! We wrote now showing a different perspective about such topic, that 99.999% of the people ALWAYS FORGET!
https://t.me/NotTodayTelegram
Are you thinking about suicide? Get help from your parents, phone centers, etc.
https://t.me/NotTodayTelegram/19
REMEMBER, TONS OF PEOPLE DIE WITH (ASSISTED) SUICIDE
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/29
but even tons of people die with selfmade suicide = example jumping in front of a train!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/59
Is jumping in front of a train or other things NOT A TORTURE??! because of missing laws in our planet, except in few part in 🇨🇦, 🇧🇪, 🇳🇱, 🇨🇭 (but remember, having assisted suicide doesn't mean everyone can get that! if specific conditions are not respected, we don't mean now depression!!!)
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/122
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/123
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/11
Is refused assisted suicide NOT a torture??!!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/11
Exactly like a refused abortion!
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/115
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/186
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/11
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/163
See next post
Behind the death penalty Part 4
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Again, not today not tomorrow!
https://t.me/NotTodayTelegram
Exactly like a refused abortion!
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/115
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/163
to
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/165
etc.
Let we remember that Breivik is a consequence of refused abortion too!
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/201
Is falling the first suicide attempt not a torture?? (especially if a person just want to die, no matter what, even knowing he has a disease, that is just a pain and cannot be fixed with a phone call or whatever!)
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/12
Now we mean in general, NOT RELATED TO DEPRESSION!!! This should be clear! We DON'T PROMOTE SUICIDE! but fight instead for legal suicide when needed!
and remember 🙅♂️ VIP SUICIDE!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/60
Why you forget the trauma related to animals???
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/153
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/132
or other type of traumas
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/21
Yes, we apply death penalty to animals too!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/55
https://t.me/AnimalFactsTelegram/123
https://t.me/BauernprotestRealitat/41
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/58
but keeping eyes closed is easier!
https://t.me/AspergerSyndromeTelegram/42
https://t.me/IgnorancePeople
https://t.me/IgnoringCrimes
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/95
https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda/65
https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda/76
Start to watch all point of views and not just with a limited way! and stop to fight for one thing, ignoring the other!
https://t.me/IgnorancePeople/7
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
Obviously there is much more behind the death penalty and we cannot just use "suicide" to show that ...
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ
BUT we don't need to forget the crime done by Europe!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/57
A crime that is the reason why shitty death executions get applied, if lethal dosis is not possible anymore!
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Again, not today not tomorrow!
https://t.me/NotTodayTelegram
Exactly like a refused abortion!
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/115
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/163
to
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/165
etc.
Let we remember that Breivik is a consequence of refused abortion too!
https://t.me/HumanRightsChecklist/201
Is falling the first suicide attempt not a torture?? (especially if a person just want to die, no matter what, even knowing he has a disease, that is just a pain and cannot be fixed with a phone call or whatever!)
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/12
Now we mean in general, NOT RELATED TO DEPRESSION!!! This should be clear! We DON'T PROMOTE SUICIDE! but fight instead for legal suicide when needed!
and remember 🙅♂️ VIP SUICIDE!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/60
Why you forget the trauma related to animals???
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/153
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/132
or other type of traumas
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/21
Yes, we apply death penalty to animals too!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/55
https://t.me/AnimalFactsTelegram/123
https://t.me/BauernprotestRealitat/41
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/58
but keeping eyes closed is easier!
https://t.me/AspergerSyndromeTelegram/42
https://t.me/IgnorancePeople
https://t.me/IgnoringCrimes
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/95
https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda/65
https://t.me/AmnestyPropaganda/76
Start to watch all point of views and not just with a limited way! and stop to fight for one thing, ignoring the other!
https://t.me/IgnorancePeople/7
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
Obviously there is much more behind the death penalty and we cannot just use "suicide" to show that ...
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ
BUT we don't need to forget the crime done by Europe!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/57
A crime that is the reason why shitty death executions get applied, if lethal dosis is not possible anymore!
Behind the death penalty Part 5
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Europe is refusing the selling of lethal dosis, a crime that is the reason why shitty death executions get applied, if lethal dosis is not possible anymore!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/45
https://t.me/DeathExecutionMethod
https://t.me/ShittyDeathExecutions
A crime promoted by Amnesty and John Bessler bullshit propaganda!
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/143
https://t.me/JohnBessler
by ignoring all other things behind that ...
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/59
to
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/61
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel
https://t.me/AmnestyFacts
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
Back to Breivik ...
Da jeg var liten og vokste opp, fikk vi vite at Adolf Hitler var en grusom mann som fortjente å dø https://perma.cc/MJB6-VYC8
When I was little and growing up, we were taught that Adolf Hitler was a cruel man who deserved to die.
this is the best example!!! because again there is a dilemma:
Killing Hitler or not? like allowing Michael Scofield to do prison break or not?
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
One thing is sure, Michael Scofield with that caused MUCH MORE DEATHS! and we cannot ignore that!
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1742
Same for Hitler ... if we killed Hitler years ago, maybe many people would NEVER DIE!
So the question is, better 1 now, or 1000 later?
Obviously Lincoln Burrows was innocent!
https://t.me/TedBundyTelegram/10
but this doesn't need the fact that the story behind Lincoln Burrows caused more deaths! and Michael said that too!
No matter, we don't stand for discrimination based sentences!
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences
https://t.me/BlackHumanRights
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/169
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/146
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/148
or to make victims 😋
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/122
🙅♂️ to innocent people
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/176
Blecker mener ikke at alle drapspersoner fortjener dødsstraff
See next post
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Europe is refusing the selling of lethal dosis, a crime that is the reason why shitty death executions get applied, if lethal dosis is not possible anymore!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel/45
https://t.me/DeathExecutionMethod
https://t.me/ShittyDeathExecutions
A crime promoted by Amnesty and John Bessler bullshit propaganda!
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/143
https://t.me/JohnBessler
by ignoring all other things behind that ...
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/59
to
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/61
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel
https://t.me/AmnestyFacts
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
Back to Breivik ...
Da jeg var liten og vokste opp, fikk vi vite at Adolf Hitler var en grusom mann som fortjente å dø https://perma.cc/MJB6-VYC8
When I was little and growing up, we were taught that Adolf Hitler was a cruel man who deserved to die.
this is the best example!!! because again there is a dilemma:
Killing Hitler or not? like allowing Michael Scofield to do prison break or not?
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights
One thing is sure, Michael Scofield with that caused MUCH MORE DEATHS! and we cannot ignore that!
https://t.me/DefenceTelegram/1742
Same for Hitler ... if we killed Hitler years ago, maybe many people would NEVER DIE!
So the question is, better 1 now, or 1000 later?
Obviously Lincoln Burrows was innocent!
https://t.me/TedBundyTelegram/10
but this doesn't need the fact that the story behind Lincoln Burrows caused more deaths! and Michael said that too!
No matter, we don't stand for discrimination based sentences!
https://t.me/ShittyDeathSentences
https://t.me/BlackHumanRights
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/72
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/169
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/146
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/148
or to make victims 😋
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/122
🙅♂️ to innocent people
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/176
Blecker mener ikke at alle drapspersoner fortjener dødsstraff
See next post
Behind the death penalty Part 6
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Blecker does not believe that all murderers deserve the death penalty. But in these cases, he believes that we have a moral obligation to carry out the death penalty https://perma.cc/MJB6-VYC8
EXACTLY! Not all murders deserve a death penalty!!!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
and remember, is not just related to killing someone or not!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/118
you could be Breivik, by killing 0 people, you still deserve death for hate crimes!
Let we remember Norway shitty laws related to rape!!! (not only that ...)
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/49
Learn with Norway
https://t.me/LearnWithNorway
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/45
to
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/47
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/28
Nå blir vel dødsstraff aldri gjeninnført i Norge, (avskaffet i 1948) men maksimumstraffen på 20 år bør heves/endres til ”livslangt fengselsopphold eller institusjon” https://perma.cc/2LYX-9NF6
Now the death penalty will probably never be reintroduced in Norway (abolished in 1948), but the maximum sentence of 20 years should be raised/changed to "life imprisonment or institution".
Will probably never, if NO ONE IS CONTRASTING AMNESTY BULLSHIT. But nope never doesn't mean never, if we promote real facts!
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
No matter, better life, than NOTHING!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/177
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts/21
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/58
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/45
https://t.me/AndersBehringBreivikTelegram/75
Anders Behring Breivik sier han ikke vil ha respekt for en dom på 21 års fengsel, noe han beskriver som en «latterlig straff» https://perma.cc/Y7VZ-ASJK
Anders Behring Breivik says he will not respect a sentence of 21 years in prison, which he describes as a "ridiculous punishment".
For to år siden vedtok Stortinget at maksimalstraffen for terror skulle være 30 år. Justisdepartementet vet ennå ikke når den nye loven kan tre i kraft.
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Blecker does not believe that all murderers deserve the death penalty. But in these cases, he believes that we have a moral obligation to carry out the death penalty https://perma.cc/MJB6-VYC8
EXACTLY! Not all murders deserve a death penalty!!!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/117
and remember, is not just related to killing someone or not!
https://t.me/CrimeExamples/118
you could be Breivik, by killing 0 people, you still deserve death for hate crimes!
Let we remember Norway shitty laws related to rape!!! (not only that ...)
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/49
Learn with Norway
https://t.me/LearnWithNorway
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/45
to
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/47
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/28
Nå blir vel dødsstraff aldri gjeninnført i Norge, (avskaffet i 1948) men maksimumstraffen på 20 år bør heves/endres til ”livslangt fengselsopphold eller institusjon” https://perma.cc/2LYX-9NF6
Now the death penalty will probably never be reintroduced in Norway (abolished in 1948), but the maximum sentence of 20 years should be raised/changed to "life imprisonment or institution".
Will probably never, if NO ONE IS CONTRASTING AMNESTY BULLSHIT. But nope never doesn't mean never, if we promote real facts!
https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
No matter, better life, than NOTHING!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/177
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts/21
https://t.me/DeathSentenceNOW/58
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/45
https://t.me/AndersBehringBreivikTelegram/75
Anders Behring Breivik sier han ikke vil ha respekt for en dom på 21 års fengsel, noe han beskriver som en «latterlig straff» https://perma.cc/Y7VZ-ASJK
Anders Behring Breivik says he will not respect a sentence of 21 years in prison, which he describes as a "ridiculous punishment".
For to år siden vedtok Stortinget at maksimalstraffen for terror skulle være 30 år. Justisdepartementet vet ennå ikke når den nye loven kan tre i kraft.
Behind the death penalty Part 7
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Two years ago (= 2009), the Storting decided that the maximum sentence for terrorism should be 30 years. The Ministry of Justice does not yet know when the new law may enter into force https://perma.cc/TT2X-9X2U
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/4
I proposisjonen Stortinget fikk sto det at dette ville ta tid og at implementeringen av den nye straffeloven var ventet å kunne skje 1. januar 2012. Det er som kjent ikke ennå, sier statssekretær Terje Moland Pedersen (Ap) i Justisdepartementet til Nettavisen.
In the proposal the Storting received, it was stated that this would take time and that the implementation of the new penal code was expected to take place on 1 January 2012. As is known, that is not yet, says State Secretary Terje Moland Pedersen (Ap) in the Ministry of Justice to Nettavisen.
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/12
Det var Adresseavisen som tirsdag skrev at datarot gjør at terrorsiktede Anders Behring Breivik - med 77 liv på samvittigheten - bare kan dømmes etter den gamle terrorparagrafen med maksimal fengselsstraff på 21 år, ikke den nye Stortinget vedtok i 2009. Den gangen vedtok lovgiverne å øke maksimalstraffen til 30 år.
It was Adresseavisen that wrote on Tuesday that a computer mess means that terrorist accused Anders Behring Breivik - with 77 lives on his conscience - can only be sentenced under the old terror clause with a maximum prison sentence of 21 years, not the new one adopted by the Storting in 2009. At that time, the legislators decided to increase the maximum sentence to 30 years.
https://t.me/NorwayErrors
Heving av tidsrammen til 30 år ble gjort fordi maksimalstraffen for terror i Norge og flere andre europeiske land er 30 år. På den måten gir man signaler om at Norge ikke er et «safe haven» for terrorister med lavere straffenivå enn andre land.
Raising the time frame to 30 years was done because the maximum sentence for terrorism in Norway and several other European countries is 30 years.
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Two years ago (= 2009), the Storting decided that the maximum sentence for terrorism should be 30 years. The Ministry of Justice does not yet know when the new law may enter into force https://perma.cc/TT2X-9X2U
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/4
I proposisjonen Stortinget fikk sto det at dette ville ta tid og at implementeringen av den nye straffeloven var ventet å kunne skje 1. januar 2012. Det er som kjent ikke ennå, sier statssekretær Terje Moland Pedersen (Ap) i Justisdepartementet til Nettavisen.
In the proposal the Storting received, it was stated that this would take time and that the implementation of the new penal code was expected to take place on 1 January 2012. As is known, that is not yet, says State Secretary Terje Moland Pedersen (Ap) in the Ministry of Justice to Nettavisen.
https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/12
Det var Adresseavisen som tirsdag skrev at datarot gjør at terrorsiktede Anders Behring Breivik - med 77 liv på samvittigheten - bare kan dømmes etter den gamle terrorparagrafen med maksimal fengselsstraff på 21 år, ikke den nye Stortinget vedtok i 2009. Den gangen vedtok lovgiverne å øke maksimalstraffen til 30 år.
It was Adresseavisen that wrote on Tuesday that a computer mess means that terrorist accused Anders Behring Breivik - with 77 lives on his conscience - can only be sentenced under the old terror clause with a maximum prison sentence of 21 years, not the new one adopted by the Storting in 2009. At that time, the legislators decided to increase the maximum sentence to 30 years.
https://t.me/NorwayErrors
Heving av tidsrammen til 30 år ble gjort fordi maksimalstraffen for terror i Norge og flere andre europeiske land er 30 år. På den måten gir man signaler om at Norge ikke er et «safe haven» for terrorister med lavere straffenivå enn andre land.
Raising the time frame to 30 years was done because the maximum sentence for terrorism in Norway and several other European countries is 30 years.
Behind the death penalty Part 8
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Selv om loven er endret slik at man i dag kan dømmes for terror til forvaring med en tidsramme på 30 år og en minstetid på 20 år, kan ikke dommen til Breivik endres. Dette er fordi lover ikke gis tilbakevirkende kraft i Norge https://perma.cc/U5GA-NG7D
Although the law has been changed so that today one can be sentenced for terrorism to detention with a time frame of 30 years and a minimum term of 20 years, Breivik's sentence cannot be changed. This is because laws are not given retroactive effect in Norway.
💩 with 🇳🇴 quality!!! 🤦♂️ cannot be change UNTIL WE START TO CHANGE LAWS ONCE AT ALL!
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/41
and stop doing errors over errors!
https://t.me/NorwayErrors
https://t.me/LearnWithNorway
https://t.me/HanauBreivik
Forsinket oppgradering av datasystemer i politiet og domstolsapparatet gjør at terrorsiktede Anders Behring Breivik ikke kan dømmes etter den nye terrorparagrafen med maksimalstraff på 30 år, skriver Adresseavisen tirsdag.
Delayed upgrading of computer systems in the police and the court apparatus means that terrorist accused Anders Behring Breivik cannot be sentenced under the new terror clause with a maximum sentence of 30 years, writes Adresseavisen on Tuesday 🤦♂️ obviously, because this is 🇳🇴!!! errors over errors!!!
So now let we summarise all previous posts:
a) we started from the John Bessler bullshit
https://t.me/JohnBessler/142
and we agree it make no sense to apply a death sentence in one case, ignoring that for other ..
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/145
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/147
b) we talked about animal, suicide, abortion and how people forget such cruelty / tortures
https://t.me/JohnBessler/153
https://t.me/JohnBessler/154
https://t.me/JohnBessler/155
c) about Europe mafia!
https://t.me/EuropeFacts/70
d) homicide != homicide
https://t.me/JohnBessler/156
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
e) about other Norway errors ...
https://t.me/NorwayErrors
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
Selv om loven er endret slik at man i dag kan dømmes for terror til forvaring med en tidsramme på 30 år og en minstetid på 20 år, kan ikke dommen til Breivik endres. Dette er fordi lover ikke gis tilbakevirkende kraft i Norge https://perma.cc/U5GA-NG7D
Although the law has been changed so that today one can be sentenced for terrorism to detention with a time frame of 30 years and a minimum term of 20 years, Breivik's sentence cannot be changed. This is because laws are not given retroactive effect in Norway.
💩 with 🇳🇴 quality!!! 🤦♂️ cannot be change UNTIL WE START TO CHANGE LAWS ONCE AT ALL!
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/41
and stop doing errors over errors!
https://t.me/NorwayErrors
https://t.me/LearnWithNorway
https://t.me/HanauBreivik
Forsinket oppgradering av datasystemer i politiet og domstolsapparatet gjør at terrorsiktede Anders Behring Breivik ikke kan dømmes etter den nye terrorparagrafen med maksimalstraff på 30 år, skriver Adresseavisen tirsdag.
Delayed upgrading of computer systems in the police and the court apparatus means that terrorist accused Anders Behring Breivik cannot be sentenced under the new terror clause with a maximum sentence of 30 years, writes Adresseavisen on Tuesday 🤦♂️ obviously, because this is 🇳🇴!!! errors over errors!!!
So now let we summarise all previous posts:
a) we started from the John Bessler bullshit
https://t.me/JohnBessler/142
and we agree it make no sense to apply a death sentence in one case, ignoring that for other ..
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/145
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/147
b) we talked about animal, suicide, abortion and how people forget such cruelty / tortures
https://t.me/JohnBessler/153
https://t.me/JohnBessler/154
https://t.me/JohnBessler/155
c) about Europe mafia!
https://t.me/EuropeFacts/70
d) homicide != homicide
https://t.me/JohnBessler/156
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
e) about other Norway errors ...
https://t.me/NorwayErrors
Part 1 https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/49
A summary of the last 8 posts https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/65
Now in few words:
🙅♂️ animal torture / cruelty 🙅♂️ death penalty to animals done by humans 🙅♂️ train suicide and similar things 🙅♂️ priority of humans over animals 🙅♂️ euthanasia abuse to animals due to ignorance* 🙅♂️ VIP suicide 🙅♂️ indifference for other people rights 🙅♂️@ShittyDeathSentences @ShittyDeathExecutions 🙅♂️ @KeepEyesClosed 🙅♂️ @AmnestyPropaganda https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx 🙅♂️ @IgnorancePeople 🙅♂️ @PrisonBreakFacts 🙅♂️ @ParoleFacts @BreivikParole 🙅♂️ @HumanRightAbuse 🙅♂️ @DiscriminationTelegram 🙅♂️ @JobDiscrimination 🙅♂️ @EuropeAbuse 🙅♂️ missing empathy = @AspergerSyndromeTelegram @EmpathyTelegram 🙅♂️ bullshits in general!!! without science! and multiple perspective
🤜🤜 https://t.me/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx
🤜🤜 (2) https://t.me/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx
🖇🛡 https://t.me/addlist/pL2yDj4ErKNjNjBh
🖇🤡 https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
✅ Not Today Not Tomorrow
https://t.me/NotTodayTelegram
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/123
✅ abortion ✅ @StopDieWelle ✅ @EthicalDilemmaHumanRights ✅ new human rights definition based on amount / deep of crimes ✅ @LearnWithNorway = no doing again the exact same errors like in the past!!!! @HanauBreivik ✅ @NoBreivikMania ✅ @BreivikDeathSentence @DeathSentenceFAQ @AnimalAbuseDeathSentence @DeathSentenceNOW ✅ @LawsTelegram @HumanRightsChecklist @MissionPlaneta @WeAreTheFutureTelegram ✅ more rights for animals ✅ life sentences, if death penalties will never be a reality! (WITHOUT PAROLE) ✅ better future based on science / facts and not bullshit ✅ legal suicide instead! = less trauma for families / victims and all people watching such things! ✅ die with dignity and this means
✅ letal dosis for ☑️ legal assisted suicide! and ☑️ death penalty! 🙅♂️ letal dosis crimes by 🇪🇺!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyInhumane/56
*
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/154
to
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/157
A summary of the last 8 posts https://t.me/BreivikDeathSentence/65
Now in few words:
🙅♂️ animal torture / cruelty 🙅♂️ death penalty to animals done by humans 🙅♂️ train suicide and similar things 🙅♂️ priority of humans over animals 🙅♂️ euthanasia abuse to animals due to ignorance* 🙅♂️ VIP suicide 🙅♂️ indifference for other people rights 🙅♂️@ShittyDeathSentences @ShittyDeathExecutions 🙅♂️ @KeepEyesClosed 🙅♂️ @AmnestyPropaganda https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx 🙅♂️ @IgnorancePeople 🙅♂️ @PrisonBreakFacts 🙅♂️ @ParoleFacts @BreivikParole 🙅♂️ @HumanRightAbuse 🙅♂️ @DiscriminationTelegram 🙅♂️ @JobDiscrimination 🙅♂️ @EuropeAbuse 🙅♂️ missing empathy = @AspergerSyndromeTelegram @EmpathyTelegram 🙅♂️ bullshits in general!!! without science! and multiple perspective
🤜🤜 https://t.me/addlist/Sk-TekVpJhw2MzIx
🤜🤜 (2) https://t.me/addlist/gLPMUCb5s6IwNTMx
🖇🛡 https://t.me/addlist/pL2yDj4ErKNjNjBh
🖇🤡 https://t.me/addlist/mhZg0973N14wMjMx
✅ Not Today Not Tomorrow
https://t.me/NotTodayTelegram
https://t.me/LawsTelegram/123
✅ abortion ✅ @StopDieWelle ✅ @EthicalDilemmaHumanRights ✅ new human rights definition based on amount / deep of crimes ✅ @LearnWithNorway = no doing again the exact same errors like in the past!!!! @HanauBreivik ✅ @NoBreivikMania ✅ @BreivikDeathSentence @DeathSentenceFAQ @AnimalAbuseDeathSentence @DeathSentenceNOW ✅ @LawsTelegram @HumanRightsChecklist @MissionPlaneta @WeAreTheFutureTelegram ✅ more rights for animals ✅ life sentences, if death penalties will never be a reality! (WITHOUT PAROLE) ✅ better future based on science / facts and not bullshit ✅ legal suicide instead! = less trauma for families / victims and all people watching such things! ✅ die with dignity and this means
✅ letal dosis for ☑️ legal assisted suicide! and ☑️ death penalty! 🙅♂️ letal dosis crimes by 🇪🇺!
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyInhumane/56
*
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/154
to
https://t.me/EthicalDilemmaHumanRights/157
Se deveria volver a legalisar la pena de muerte en chile? - One to one with Chile - Death Penalty FAQ Part 1
confias en el poder judicial? Yo no.
= entrusted to the judicial power? Yo no.
Cuatro fueron los sospechosos y un imputado, que finalmente quedó libre por falta de pruebas, se trata del guardia de ese entonces que trabajaba en el colegio Bautista, Domingo Cofré, del cual la fiscalía no pudo probar su autoría.
There were four suspects and one accused, who was finally released due to lack of evidence, was the guard at the time who worked at the Bautista school, Domingo Cofré, whose prosecution could not prove his responsibility https://perma.cc/42YY-29XF
Un desconocido ingresó al departamento donde ella vivía y en dos minutos terminaron con su vida golpeándola brutalmente con elementos contundentes, posteriormente la dejaron boca abajo en una tina con agua caliente y para finalizar tan cruel acto incendiaron el departamento para borrar evidencias.
A stranger entered the apartment where she lived and in two minutes they ended her life by brutally beating her with blunt elements, later they left her face down in a tub with hot water and to finish such a cruel act they set the apartment on fire to erase evidence.
Cuatro fueron los sospechosos y un imputado, que finalmente quedó libre por falta de pruebas, se trata del guardia de ese entonces que trabajaba en el colegio Bautista, Domingo Cofré, del cual la fiscalía no pudo probar su autoría.
There were four suspects and one accused, who was finally released due to lack of evidence, was the guard at the time who worked at the Bautista school, Domingo Cofré, whose prosecution could not prove his responsibility.
Our answer: if there is proof yes death, otherwise life!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/135
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/143
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/146
Showing a rape is not so easy too, but if this can be showed WITH VALID METHODS! not 💩 methods, then yes!
About corruption see next post
confias en el poder judicial? Yo no.
= entrusted to the judicial power? Yo no.
Cuatro fueron los sospechosos y un imputado, que finalmente quedó libre por falta de pruebas, se trata del guardia de ese entonces que trabajaba en el colegio Bautista, Domingo Cofré, del cual la fiscalía no pudo probar su autoría.
There were four suspects and one accused, who was finally released due to lack of evidence, was the guard at the time who worked at the Bautista school, Domingo Cofré, whose prosecution could not prove his responsibility https://perma.cc/42YY-29XF
Un desconocido ingresó al departamento donde ella vivía y en dos minutos terminaron con su vida golpeándola brutalmente con elementos contundentes, posteriormente la dejaron boca abajo en una tina con agua caliente y para finalizar tan cruel acto incendiaron el departamento para borrar evidencias.
A stranger entered the apartment where she lived and in two minutes they ended her life by brutally beating her with blunt elements, later they left her face down in a tub with hot water and to finish such a cruel act they set the apartment on fire to erase evidence.
Cuatro fueron los sospechosos y un imputado, que finalmente quedó libre por falta de pruebas, se trata del guardia de ese entonces que trabajaba en el colegio Bautista, Domingo Cofré, del cual la fiscalía no pudo probar su autoría.
There were four suspects and one accused, who was finally released due to lack of evidence, was the guard at the time who worked at the Bautista school, Domingo Cofré, whose prosecution could not prove his responsibility.
Our answer: if there is proof yes death, otherwise life!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/135
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/143
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/146
Showing a rape is not so easy too, but if this can be showed WITH VALID METHODS! not 💩 methods, then yes!
About corruption see next post
Se deveria volver a legalisar la pena de muerte en chile? - One to one with Chile - Death Penalty FAQ Part 2
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
About corruption
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/172
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/179
especially
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/169
https://t.me/InPrisonNOW/7
No, la pena de muerte no sirve para prevenir. Existe solo para que la masa sienta catarsis por una venganza que no les corresponde a ellos. Lo que deben volver son los trabajos forzados y volver productivo el tiempo de los presos. Fabricas ESTATALES. La pena de muerte transforma a toda la sociedad que la permite en verdugos.
= No, the death penalty does not serve to prevent. It exists only so that the masses feel catharsis for a revenge that is not theirs. What must return is forced labor and make the prisoners' time productive. STATE factories. The death penalty transforms the entire society that allows it into executioners.
Prevent
Is not possible to answer that with science, preventing is not the only goal
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/139
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/93
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts/90
and remember that crimes are not crimes!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/180
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/217
Death penalty is NOT 😋
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/122
La pena de muerte transforma a toda la sociedad que la permite en verdugos —> we are already that!!! WITH ANIMALS!!!
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/132
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/153
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/39
or other things
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel
Tu problema es que crees que los criminales se asustan por las penas, la evidencia es clara, el miedo no sirve para evitar crimenes, por ejemplo, en el caso de los homicidios
The evidence is clear, fear does not help to avoid crimes, for example, in the case of homicides.
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE! See next post
Part 1 https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/219
About corruption
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/172
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/179
especially
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/169
https://t.me/InPrisonNOW/7
No, la pena de muerte no sirve para prevenir. Existe solo para que la masa sienta catarsis por una venganza que no les corresponde a ellos. Lo que deben volver son los trabajos forzados y volver productivo el tiempo de los presos. Fabricas ESTATALES. La pena de muerte transforma a toda la sociedad que la permite en verdugos.
= No, the death penalty does not serve to prevent. It exists only so that the masses feel catharsis for a revenge that is not theirs. What must return is forced labor and make the prisoners' time productive. STATE factories. The death penalty transforms the entire society that allows it into executioners.
Prevent
Is not possible to answer that with science, preventing is not the only goal
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/102
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/139
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
https://t.me/AmnestyShit/93
https://t.me/PrisonBreakFacts/90
and remember that crimes are not crimes!
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/129
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/180
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/217
Death penalty is NOT 😋
https://t.me/DeathSentenceFAQ/122
La pena de muerte transforma a toda la sociedad que la permite en verdugos —> we are already that!!! WITH ANIMALS!!!
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/132
https://t.me/AmnestyIgnorance/153
https://t.me/AnimalAbuseDeathSentence/39
or other things
https://t.me/DeathPenaltyCruel
Tu problema es que crees que los criminales se asustan por las penas, la evidencia es clara, el miedo no sirve para evitar crimenes, por ejemplo, en el caso de los homicidios
The evidence is clear, fear does not help to avoid crimes, for example, in the case of homicides.
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE! See next post