It's one thing to make up a conspiracy theory. We've all been guilty of that.

It's another thing to drag people like @MrsErikaKirk , @BlakeSNeff , @AndrewKolvet into it. For their theory to be right, the people who were closest to Charlie had to be made into evil people. That is the part which makes this unforgivable.

The horrible part of making that thread from earlier this week that it took just 3 minutes to find enough death threats to Erika Kirk to compile a video montage. They were that common and they were everywhere, easily searchable here on 𝕏. I couldn't take any more.

Exodus 22:22-23: You shall not mistreat any widow or fatherless child. If you do mistreat them, and they cry out to me, I will surely hear their cry.

I'm voiceless. Literally. I've spent 44 years getting used to not being heard.

And then, somehow, many people started listening.

That kind of reach isn't something I earned; it was given to me, and not so I could be popular.

It was given to me to say what needed to be said when it mattered.

Your feedback is very important to me. 🎉 It is always rewarding to see my friends enjoying the program.

I am available and actively responding to all new investment requests. Send your request now and I will respond as soon as possible ✍

Your investing journey can be life-changing with the right guidance. Follow my tips and guidelines and watch your portfolio grow with confidence and peace of mind. Trust me, if you haven't invested yet, you're missing out.

Start investing today ✅️

https://t.me/DataRepublicanofficiaI

To those who say we shouldn't believe the "official narrative":

The evidence for who killed Charlie Kirk is overwhelming.

But you're right that something is wrong here. It's just not what Candace is selling you.

Seven "bridge-building" organizations assembled on a conference call within two hours of the shooting. They activated, because UVU was already their campus, and Charlie Kirk's death was the crisis they needed to advance a social credit scoring system, grow their membership, and unlock funding they'd been chasing for years.

That's the coordination you've been looking for, right here in this thread.

🧵🔥 THE MOVE: The Framework Candace Owens Uses to Train Her Audience to Ignore Evidence 🧵

Tyler Robinson left a handwritten confession note under his keyboard for his roommate. He sent a text first: "Drop what you are doing, look under my keyboard."

The response from Candace's audience: "Where's the metadata on those texts?”

The metadata exists. Search Warrant No. 3217131, Page 7: a warrant was obtained for Lance Twiggs' cellphone. The Statewide Information Analysis Center (SIAC) provided Apple ID information for both accounts on the device. FBI investigators reviewed the data. The warrant covers iMessages, FaceTime and call history, photographs, videos, location history, websites visited, email, and browsing history.

But that answer won't matter to anyone who asked. And the reason it won't matter is the whole point of this thread.

Here's how THE MOVE works:
- Candace finds something about the case that hasn't been publicly reported.
- She treats the absence of public reporting as the absence of investigation.
- She fills the gap with a theory.
- When the evidence eventually surfaces, she doesn't engage with it... she finds a new procedural question about the evidence itself.
- And that question does the same job the old one did: allows her audience to keep scrolling.

Below are six videos. One pattern. Once you see THE MOVE, you'll catch it every time she opens her mouth on this case.

As always, patience as I pull together the thread. 👇

Candace: "Does he even exist? I think it's a fair question. Is he just an AI app?"

THE MOVE: Surveillance photos aren't perfectly clear, ergo they're not Tyler Robinson.