@spreekaway Do you mind sharing the message to clarify what I said?Re: your refusal to takedown a false factual statement re "our" immoral/illegal behavior that is against everything I stand for, that discredits the project I work on 16h a day... legal action is not a threat, it's real!

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@spreekaway Wrong. You say "Insane Clown Posse strikes again" then present false factual claims in an image.Nowhere do you say, "obtained from California legal filing" (where people can make up any bs they like using free speech provisions)Obviously, if you wanted to be accurate👇

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@spreekaway You could add, "claims by ex-DFINITY employee fired for terrible performance, who regrets his separation agreement & now wants to screw said for ICP". His slime lawyer likely copy/pasted Roche Freedman bs to pressure us because people don't understand legal hearsay👇

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@spreekaway In fact, there are other lawsuits that make even more extreme claims in their efforts to smear. But note, only inside a) American legal filings, since the cowards involved know their claims are false so won't make them outside, and b) the claims are unsupported by evidence👇

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@spreekaway These stories come from slimy competitors (see https://t.co/meVNKXWlr2), SBF and other bad dudes. They have caused immense pain & harm, including to families, and important crypto research, and will not be forgiven. Asking us to see the joke is an insult. This is not a game

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@Evan_ss6 @SuddenlyHazel He didn't reference that it was a court filing. He presented it as factual (that the "Insane Clown Posse strikes again")

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@spreekaway Dude. You presented damaging false claims as facts saying "Insane Clown Posse strikes again." I/we didn't accept your action and were justifiably angry: we asked you to take down or clarify source. Instead, you doubled down to amplify the harm...👇

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@spreekaway Name, address? I was hoping you'd take down the defamation and you'd do the right thing. Looks like you're incapable. I'm done.

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@spreekaway You seem to think that defamation – which here causes harm to families, serious crypto research, and people who work in the ICP ecosystem – is your right, fun, acceptable, etc. It's not

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

Today, blockchains only process tokens and clips of data.Tomorrow, blockchain will become a decentralized crypto cloud.It's already happening at scale on the Internet Computer, which is powering a blockchain singularity.Join the movementhttps://t.co/ShZENXBNvN

#Bitcoin2023 Miami Day 2#ICP crew is readyLook out for us to experience #ckBTC - a multi-chain bitcoin twin, trustlessly created by chain-key cryptography and Internet Computer smart contracts that directly hold raw bitcoin@TheBitcoinConf https://t.co/roaip4fUtj

@adamscochran Hmm nope: when you make harmful factual claims without reasonable evidence, that is defamation e.g. I could state on Twitter you are a pedophile.. I don't know that's false, but it would be harmful, and since I have no evidence, it would be defamation, obviously👇

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@adamscochran You cannot just state harmful false facts about someone and then claim you didn't know any better. If you are parroting someone else, you need to say "allegedly." Here, he could have referenced the court filing. But just pushing a factual claim w/o clarifications is defamatory👇

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@adamscochran And seriously... would you want it any other way. Are you telling me it should be ok if I could push false factual claims about you that harmed your family, your reputation, your project, your community, etc. I bet if the ball was on the other foot, you'd see things differently

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@adamscochran @spreekaway I am within my rights to demand defamation that harms me, my family, crypto research, my community, etc is taken down. I demanded an apology because @spreekaway should apologize for harming others. That's not coercion. Re your legal arguments: https://t.co/l37aABcAXT

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@Evan_ss6 @SuddenlyHazel Dude, with all due respect, when someone is defaming and harming you, your family, your project, your community, making false claims you are a criminal, then we'll see how you react. Until then, go get a life.

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@outrollthat @SuddenlyHazel @spreekaway Price is what people are willing to pay. If a market starts by establishing a price giving token market cap of $1000 trillion, then obviously it can fall without need for "insiders selling." Crypto Leaks Case #1 kindly gave background, see https://t.co/tnpJ8uKHKC

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@adamscochran Yes, but the text does not say that the words came from a _hearsay_ legal filing. Instead, statement was presented as fact, and that's the problem.Regarding @spreekaway's intent, his wording "Insane Clown Posse strikes again" obviously show this was intended to cause harm.

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@adamscochran @spreekaway Are you in all seriousness saying that you think society should support this kind of thing, like, really, really? I bet if it was you on the end of this your opinion would be very different. My guess is you've never experienced this and you can't imagine.

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@spreekaway I am grateful that you are willing to amend those claims, because they have been seen by tens of thousands of people already, and caused serious harm. But you are acting like YOU are the person that has been harmed, rather than the perpetrator of harm. That's totally fucked👇

https://twitter.com/dominic_w

@spreekaway The reason I asked you to apologize was to give you a way to reduce the harm you'd ALREADY caused. This felt like a kinder and better way than legal action. If people wantonly attack us and cause us harm, we want something. An apology and correction would have been enough👇

https://twitter.com/dominic_w