Why India's Anti-Defection Law Is Fractured
https://www.livelaw.in/lawschool/articles/india-antidefection-law-fractured-538878
https://www.livelaw.in/lawschool/articles/india-antidefection-law-fractured-538878
www.livelaw.in
Why India's Anti-Defection Law Is Fractured
The June 2026 rupture in India's Trinamool Congress have left many questioning the efficacy of India's anti-defection law. Contained in the Tenth Schedule to the Indian Constitution, it was enacted...
Conversion To Islam Doesn't Entitle Person To BC (Muslim) Reservation: Madras High Court Declares GO Unconstitutional
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-go-reservation-converted-muslims-unconstitutional-539000
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-go-reservation-converted-muslims-unconstitutional-539000
www.livelaw.in
Conversion To Islam Doesn't Entitle Person To BC (Muslim) Reservation: Madras High Court Declares GO Unconstitutional
One converting to Islam becomes only a Muslim, not part of any Sect, Court held.
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Conversion To Islam Doesn't Entitle Person To BC (Muslim) Reservation: Madras High Court Declares GO Unconstitutional https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-go-reservation-converted-muslims-unconstitutional-539000
β Islam seeks to establish an egalitarian society. Everyone is equal in the eye of God. There is no social hierarchy. Be that as it may, due to historical reasons, the Islamic society is also stratified into various communities. One can even boldly remark that they are akin to caste in Hinduism. Just as caste is determined by birth, one is a Rowther or Marakkayar or Deccani Muslim by birth alone. It is ridiculous to suggest that one can be converted into a Rowther Muslim,β
β€1π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
β Islam seeks to establish an egalitarian society. Everyone is equal in the eye of God. There is no social hierarchy. Be that as it may, due to historical reasons, the Islamic society is also stratified into various communities. One can even boldly remarkβ¦
By conversion you don't get reservation directly.
Presence Of Multiple Accused Can Make Private Place 'Within Public View' Under SC/ST Act: Kerala High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/caste-based-abuse-multiple-person-private-property-public-view-scst-act-538782
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/caste-based-abuse-multiple-person-private-property-public-view-scst-act-538782
www.livelaw.in
Presence Of Multiple Accused Can Make Private Place 'Within Public View' Under SC/ST Act: Kerala High Court
The Kerala High Court has held that caste-based abuse uttered in the presence of multiple persons
Section 348 BNSS | Power To Recall Witness Should Not Be Used To Confer Second Innings To Negligent Litigant: Madras High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-section-348-bnss-recall-witness-no-second-inning-negligent-litigant-538732
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-section-348-bnss-recall-witness-no-second-inning-negligent-litigant-538732
www.livelaw.in
Section 348 BNSS | Power To Recall Witness Should Not Be Used To Confer Second Innings To Negligent Litigant: Madras High Court
The Madras High Court recently held that the power of a trial court to recall a witness under Section 348 of the BNSS [corresponding to Section 311 of the CrPC] cannot be used to give a second chance
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Section 348 BNSS | Power To Recall Witness Should Not Be Used To Confer Second Innings To Negligent Litigant: Madras High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-section-348-bnss-recall-witness-no-second-inning-negligentβ¦
β A criminal trial is not a game of strategy between the prosecution and the defence. It is a solemn judicial search for truth. But the search for truth must proceed within the boundaries of fairness, legality and procedural discipline. The Court cannot allow the prosecution to repair, at the fag end of trial, what it failed to establish during the normal course of evidence, unless the proposed evidence is shown to be truly indispensable for justice
348 #BNSS@CurrentLegalGK BNSS
348 #BNSS@CurrentLegalGK BNSS
β€1β€βπ₯1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
π€£2β€1
Specific Relief Act | Readiness Must Be Proved From Time For Agreement Execution & Not Just After Filing Suit : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/specific-relief-act-readiness-must-be-proved-from-time-for-agreement-execution-not-just-after-filing-suit-supreme-court-538718
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/specific-relief-act-readiness-must-be-proved-from-time-for-agreement-execution-not-just-after-filing-suit-supreme-court-538718
www.livelaw.in
Specific Relief Act | Readiness Must Be Proved From Time For Agreement Execution & Not Just After Filing Suit : Supreme Court
The Court held that financial documents created long after the institution of the suit cannot establish readiness and willingness to perform the contract.
42514_2024_3_1501_71888_Judgement_19-Jun-2026.pdf
359.5 KB
42514_2024_3_1501_71888_Judgement_19-Jun-2026.pdf
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
42514_2024_3_1501_71888_Judgement_19-Jun-2026.pdf
πΆπ€οΈ
This judgment missed to recognise right side walking as the normal rule instead of left side which also causes problem.
Hierarchy of Rights (necessary when proportionality test is considered in case of conflict it will prevail without any proportionality test)
We have started walking long before wheels were put on our path. The primary right of movement under Article 19(1)(d) is the Fundamental Right to Walk, a right that precedes the right to move on wheels and this precious right must extend to guaranteeing access to safe and well demarcated footpath. The citizenβs fundamental right to walk on a demarcated footpath is primary and shall have priority over movement by motorised vehicles.
Motor Vehicles Act,
1988, is not a legislation for protecting the right to walk on the footpath.
Need of New Law
For enforcement of this Right use 32/ 226, Motor vehicle Act and Sections 38-40 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for the enforcement of public duties can be enforced against the Urban Development Authorities, Municipal Corporations, Municipalities, or the Panchayats.
Fundamental right to walk on demarcated footpaths alongside motorised roads.This judgment missed to recognise right side walking as the normal rule instead of left side which also causes problem.
Hierarchy of Rights (necessary when proportionality test is considered in case of conflict it will prevail without any proportionality test)
We have started walking long before wheels were put on our path. The primary right of movement under Article 19(1)(d) is the Fundamental Right to Walk, a right that precedes the right to move on wheels and this precious right must extend to guaranteeing access to safe and well demarcated footpath. The citizenβs fundamental right to walk on a demarcated footpath is primary and shall have priority over movement by motorised vehicles.
Motor Vehicles Act,
1988, is not a legislation for protecting the right to walk on the footpath.
Need of New Law
For enforcement of this Right use 32/ 226, Motor vehicle Act and Sections 38-40 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for the enforcement of public duties can be enforced against the Urban Development Authorities, Municipal Corporations, Municipalities, or the Panchayats.
Re: Fundamental Right to
Walk and Footpath, 2026
β€3
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
anil-markende-anr-v-state-of-chhattisgarh-682648.pdf
How Voice/Tape Recordings are made admissible?Anil Markende v. State of Chhattisgarh, 2026 (Ch HC)
ο»Ώ1. The voice of the speaker must be duly identified.
2. The accuracy of the tape recorded statement has to be proved.
3. Every possibility of tampering with or erasure of a part of a tape recorded statement must be ruled out.
4. The recorded cassette must be carefully sealed and kept in safe or official custody.
Coupled with Certificate of Section 63.
#BSA@CurrentLegalGK
π5β€3
US Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship, Strikes Down Trump's Executive Order
https://www.livelaw.in/foreign-international/us-supreme-court-upholds-birthright-citizenship-strikes-down-trumps-executive-order-539405
https://www.livelaw.in/foreign-international/us-supreme-court-upholds-birthright-citizenship-strikes-down-trumps-executive-order-539405
www.livelaw.in
US Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship, Strikes Down Trump's Executive Order
The US Supreme Court on Monday held that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship to children born in the United States irrespective of whether their parents are in the country...
Remission Policy Issued Under Article 161 Overrides Statutory Policy Framed Under CrPC: Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/remission-policy-issued-under-article-161-overrides-statutory-policy-framed-under-crpc-supreme-court-539489
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/remission-policy-issued-under-article-161-overrides-statutory-policy-framed-under-crpc-supreme-court-539489
www.livelaw.in
Remission Policy Issued Under Article 161 Overrides Statutory Policy Framed Under CrPC: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court on Tuesday held that a remission policy framed by a State Government in exercise of the Governor's constitutional powers under Article 161 of the Constitution cannot be overridden...
US Supreme Court Upholds State Laws Barring Transgender Women From Female Sports
https://www.livelaw.in/foreign-international/us-supreme-court-upholds-state-laws-barring-transgender-women-from-female-sports-539438
https://www.livelaw.in/foreign-international/us-supreme-court-upholds-state-laws-barring-transgender-women-from-female-sports-539438
www.livelaw.in
US Supreme Court Upholds State Laws Barring Transgender Women From Female Sports
The Court held that it was reasonable to confine women's sports only to biological females.
Representation Of People Act Doesn't Apply To Municipal Elections : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/representation-of-people-act-doesnt-apply-to-municipal-elections-supreme-court-539537
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/representation-of-people-act-doesnt-apply-to-municipal-elections-supreme-court-539537
election" under Section 2(d) of the Representation of the People Act, which restricts its application to elections for Parliament and State Legislatures.
www.livelaw.in
Representation Of People Act Doesn't Apply To Municipal Elections : Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has held that the penal provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (RPA) do not apply to municipal elections, clarifying that candidates accused of filing false...
trump-president-of-the-united-states-v-barbara-683389.pdf
895.2 KB
Read first 6 pages
TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.
v. BARBARA ET AL.
Citizenship issue in USA
#World@CurrentLegalGK
TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.
v. BARBARA ET AL.
Citizenship issue in USA
#World@CurrentLegalGK
How Indiaβs biggest temples safeguard devoteesβ offerings β and where Ayodhya's Ram Temple differs π
#express_explained
#express_explained
Express Explained
How Indiaβs biggest temples safeguard devoteesβ offerings β and where Ayodhyaβs Ram Temple differs
Across India's biggest temples, the broad donation chain is remarkably similar. Where temples differ is not in the journey of the donation but in the institutions governing it.
Why Supreme Court ruled homebuyers can claim compensation despite delayed possession π
#explained_law #express_explained
#explained_law #express_explained
Express Explained
Why Supreme Court ruled homebuyers can claim compensation despite delayed possession
The Court held that buyers can pursue compensation for delayed possession even after accepting their flats and rejected compulsory arbitration.
Citing AI-Generated Fake Precedents Is Advocate Misconduct; Judgments Based On Them Are Void : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/citing-ai-generated-fake-precedents-is-advocate-misconduct-judgments-based-on-them-are-void-supreme-court-539634
#AI@CurrentLegalGK
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/citing-ai-generated-fake-precedents-is-advocate-misconduct-judgments-based-on-them-are-void-supreme-court-539634
#AI@CurrentLegalGK
www.livelaw.in
Citing AI-Generated Fake Precedents Is Advocate Misconduct; Judgments Based On Them Are Void : Supreme Court
It will be a serious lapse on the part of the judges to rely on such non-existent precedents, the Court cautioned.
π2