Can Customer Of Sex Worker Be Prosecuted For Trafficking? Telangana High Court Explains Scope Of Sections 370 & 370A IPC
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/telangana-high-court/telangana-high-court-customer-sex-worker-prosecuted-trafficking-s370-ipc-538307

Registered Sale Deed Presumed Valid; Minor Discrepancy In Attestation Witness Details Won't Invalidate Execution : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/registered-sale-deed-presumed-valid-minor-discrepancy-in-attestation-witness-details-wont-invalidate-execution-supreme-court-538805

Hello 👋

How's preparation goin???

'Law Without Equality Is Merely Organized Will Of The Stronger Party' : CJI Surya Kant At Russia Event
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/cji-surya-kant-russia-forum-speech-equal-law-equal-justice-foundation-of-international-law-origins-in-arthashastra-538974

Expert Explains | Historical arc of Iran-India ties, their significance in a changing West Asia 🔗
#an_expert_explains #explained_history #express_explained #iran

If passport not a proof of citizenship, what is? What India's various laws say 🔗
#express_explained

Can AI Companies Rely On Section 52 Of Copyright Act To Train Large Language Models?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/ai-companies-rely-section52-copyright-act-train-large-language-models-538992

Passport and birth certificate hold high probative value than other documents but still not conclusive.

Given that a passport is issued only to Indian citizens and is accepted abroad, in practice, it is among the strongest pieces of evidence that a person is an Indian citizen.
However, legally, its status as a citizenship document is complicated by the Passports Act itself. Section 20 of the Act empowers the Central government to issue a passport or travel document even to a person who is not an Indian citizen if it considers such issuance necessary in the public interest

Why India's Anti-Defection Law Is Fractured
https://www.livelaw.in/lawschool/articles/india-antidefection-law-fractured-538878

Conversion To Islam Doesn't Entitle Person To BC (Muslim) Reservation: Madras High Court Declares GO Unconstitutional
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-go-reservation-converted-muslims-unconstitutional-539000

“ Islam seeks to establish an egalitarian society. Everyone is equal in the eye of God. There is no social hierarchy. Be that as it may, due to historical reasons, the Islamic society is also stratified into various communities. One can even boldly remark that they are akin to caste in Hinduism. Just as caste is determined by birth, one is a Rowther or Marakkayar or Deccani Muslim by birth alone. It is ridiculous to suggest that one can be converted into a Rowther Muslim,” 

By conversion you don't get reservation directly.

Presence Of Multiple Accused Can Make Private Place 'Within Public View' Under SC/ST Act: Kerala High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/caste-based-abuse-multiple-person-private-property-public-view-scst-act-538782

Section 348 BNSS | Power To Recall Witness Should Not Be Used To Confer Second Innings To Negligent Litigant: Madras High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-section-348-bnss-recall-witness-no-second-inning-negligent-litigant-538732

“ A criminal trial is not a game of strategy between the prosecution and the defence. It is a solemn judicial search for truth. But the search for truth must proceed within the boundaries of fairness, legality and procedural discipline. The Court cannot allow the prosecution to repair, at the fag end of trial, what it failed to establish during the normal course of evidence, unless the proposed evidence is shown to be truly indispensable for justice

348 #BNSS@CurrentLegalGK BNSS

Specific Relief Act | Readiness Must Be Proved From Time For Agreement Execution & Not Just After Filing Suit : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/specific-relief-act-readiness-must-be-proved-from-time-for-agreement-execution-not-just-after-filing-suit-supreme-court-538718

42514_2024_3_1501_71888_Judgement_19-Jun-2026.pdf

🚶🛤️ Fundamental right to walk on demarcated footpaths alongside motorised roads.

This judgment missed to recognise right side walking as the normal rule instead of left side which also causes problem.

Hierarchy of Rights (necessary when proportionality test is considered in case of conflict it will prevail without any proportionality test)

We have started walking long before wheels were put on our path. The primary right of movement under Article 19(1)(d) is the Fundamental Right to Walk, a right that precedes the right to move on wheels and this precious right must extend to guaranteeing access to safe and well demarcated footpath. The citizen’s fundamental right to walk on a demarcated footpath is primary and shall have priority over movement by motorised vehicles.

Motor Vehicles Act,
1988, is not a legislation for protecting the right to walk on the footpath.

Need of New Law

For enforcement of this Right use 32/ 226, Motor vehicle Act and Sections 38-40 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for the enforcement of public duties can be enforced against the Urban Development Authorities, Municipal Corporations, Municipalities, or the Panchayats.

Re: Fundamental Right to
Walk and Footpath, 2026

How Voice/Tape Recordings are made admissible?

Anil Markende v. State of Chhattisgarh, 2026 (Ch HC)

1. The voice of the speaker must be duly identified.
2. The accuracy of the tape recorded statement has to be proved.
3. Every possibility of tampering with or erasure of a part of a tape recorded statement must be ruled out.
4. The recorded cassette must be carefully sealed and kept in safe or official custody.

Coupled with Certificate of Section 63.

#BSA@CurrentLegalGK