26. Therefore, as soon as it comes to the knowledge of intermediary that there is an information, which is being used to commit an unlawful act, it is under construction an obligation to immediately remove the information, data or communication link residing in or connected to resource controlled by the intermediary and expeditiously remove or disable access to that material on that resource without evidence in any manner.

Is this law not against shreya Singhal 2015?

Delhi HC Bar Association v. Kapil Kakar 2026

#IT@CurrentLegalGK

Witness Not Examined U/s. 244 CrPC Can't Be Examined U/s. 246 Invoking Section 311 CrPC: Allahabad High Court
https://www.verdictum.in/allahabad-high-court/dilawar-singh-v-state-of-up-and-3-others-2026ahc125388-complainant-witness-section-246-crpc-1615683

“A witness whose statement was only recorded at the pre-summoning stage under Section 202 Cr.P.C. does not automatically become substantive trial evidence. If the complainant fails to examine them under Section 244, they cannot directly cross-examine them under Section 246”

“Allowing the Complainant to introduce new witnesses at the Section 246 stage when they were never subjected to examination-in-chief under Section 244 would heavily prejudice the statutory rights of the accused and fundamentally disrupt the trial process.”


#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK

AIBE XXI ANSWER KEY

#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK this is a good question.

👶👶 Age Determination POCSO JJ Act | Rule 12 of 2007 or section 94 of 2015 act which one to prefer?


👨‍⚖️👨‍⚖️ Durgesh Vanshkar
v.
State of Madhya Pradesh
[MPHC, 2024]

Main issue: Application of section 94 on prior cases under 2007 rules and application of s. 6 GCA in rules 2007

🤝 Why JJ is Referred in POCSO and how this controversy started.

Jarnail Singh Vs.
State of Haryana (2013)
In our view, there is hardly any difference in so far as the issue of minority is concerned, between a child in conflict with law, and a child who is a victim of crime.

Whether Scholar register entry or birth certificate from school conclusive? answer 👇

P. Yuvaprakash’ case
(supra) has been re-affirmed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in
Manak Chand alias Mani Vs. State of Haryana, 2023 SCC
OnLine SC 1397 in which ratio of Birad Mal Singhvi (supra)
has been relied.

Also Admissibility and probative values are different and see birad mal singhvi case for corroboration required.

@CurrentLegalGK

BREAKING| 'Homemakers Are Nation Builders' : Supreme Court Quantifies Homemaker Contribution As Rs 30K Per Month In Motor Accident Claims
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/homemakers-are-nation-builders-supreme-court-quantifies-homemaker-contribution-as-rs-30k-per-month-537483

#Motor@CurrentLegalGK

Obviously the work is uncountable but for the purpose of compensation court has to quantify something and they did this.

"We only hope and trust that the word Home Maker will now acquire the acronym of nation builder," Justice Karol said.

Judge swipes right on Tinder, loses ₹52 lakh to alleged honeytrap, gets domestic help to file complaint

The Court acknowledged that falling victim to a romance scam could cause personal embarrassment, but that could not justify withholding material facts or evidence from investigators.

https://www.barandbench.com/news/judge-swipes-right-on-tinder-loses-52-lakh-to-alleged-honeytrap-gets-domestic-help-to-file-complaint

'Misleading Ad' Case में सलमान खान को राहत, NCDRC ने फोरेंसिक जांच से जुड़ी कार्यवाही पर लगाई रोक
https://hindi.livelaw.in/category/top-stories/misleading-ad-case-ncdrc-stays-district-commission-proceedings-over-forensic-examination-of-actor-salman-khans-signatures-537564

Keep following this case as the legal status of misleading advt is practically dubious in india.

"Bolo Zuba kesari " 🤣

Dr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta
v.
State of Uttar Pradesh
2026

Still pending.

Issues: 👇

Issues: Dr. Rakesh Kumar Gupta v. State of Uttar Pradesh 2026

Answer: The usual way should be 👇

https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/3786

Section 392 CrPC
#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK
#Landmark@CurrentLegalGK

#Question@CurrentLegalGK

THE REAL JUDICIAL ACTIVISM

Can the courts with the use of interpretation enforce DPSP even though there is a strict bar as they are non-justiciable, to go further can the court bypass a strict express provision by interpreting it under the other broad fundamental rights?

#COI@CurrentLegalGK