Landmark Judgments Under Pocso Act- 2012 and Analysis.pdf
620.2 KB
π
β‘Landmark Judgments Under Pocso Act- 2012 and Analysis
@CurrentLegalGK
As promised here is the material for POCSO Actβ‘Landmark Judgments Under Pocso Act- 2012 and Analysis
@CurrentLegalGK
π₯9π5π1
π±π¦π²
(i) Suits relating to rights to property
(ii) Suits relating to rights of worship
(iii) Suits relating to taking out of religious processions
(iv) Suits relating to right to shares in offerings
(2) Suits for damages for civil wrongs (vi) Suits for specific performance of contracts or for damages for breach
of contracts;
(vii) Suits for specific reliefs;
(viii) Suits for restitution of conjugal rights;
(ix) Suits for dissolution
(x) Suits for rents; of marriages;
(xi) Suits for or on accounts;
(xii) Suits for rights of franchise;
(xiii) Suits for rights to hereditary offices;
(xiv) Suits for rights to Yajmanvritis;
(xv) Suits against wrongful dismissals from service and for salaries, etc.
β‘The following are not suits of a civil nature:
(i) Suits involving principally caste questions;
(ii) Suits involving purely religious rites or ceremonies;
(iii) Suits for upholding mere dignity or honour;
(iv) Suits for recovery of voluntary payments or offerings;
(v) Suits against expulsions from caste, etc.
@CurrentLegalGK
Suits of civil nature: (i) Suits relating to rights to property
(ii) Suits relating to rights of worship
(iii) Suits relating to taking out of religious processions
(iv) Suits relating to right to shares in offerings
(2) Suits for damages for civil wrongs (vi) Suits for specific performance of contracts or for damages for breach
of contracts;
(vii) Suits for specific reliefs;
(viii) Suits for restitution of conjugal rights;
(ix) Suits for dissolution
(x) Suits for rents; of marriages;
(xi) Suits for or on accounts;
(xii) Suits for rights of franchise;
(xiii) Suits for rights to hereditary offices;
(xiv) Suits for rights to Yajmanvritis;
(xv) Suits against wrongful dismissals from service and for salaries, etc.
β‘The following are not suits of a civil nature:
(i) Suits involving principally caste questions;
(ii) Suits involving purely religious rites or ceremonies;
(iii) Suits for upholding mere dignity or honour;
(iv) Suits for recovery of voluntary payments or offerings;
(v) Suits against expulsions from caste, etc.
@CurrentLegalGK
β4π2
π
(i) Order of abatement of suit;
(ii) Dismissal of appeal as time barred;
(iii) Dismissal of suit or appeal for want of evidence or proof;
(iv) Rejection of plaint for non-payment of court fees;
(v) Granting or refusing to grant costs or instalment;
(vi) Modification of scheme under Section 9z of the Code;
(vii) Order holding appeal not maintainable;
(viii) Order holding that the right to sue does not survive;
(ix) Order holding that there is no cause of action;
(x) An award passed by Lok Adalat.
β‘Decisions which are not decrees:
(i) Dismissal of appeal for default;
(ii) Appointment of Commissioner to take accounts;
(iii) Order of remand;
(iv) Order granting or refusing interim relief;
(v) Return of plaint for presentation to proper court;
(vi) Dismissal of suit under Order 13 Rule I;
(vii) Rejection of application for condonation of delay;
(viii) Order holding an application to be maintainable;
(ix) Order refusing to set aside sale;
(x) Order directing assessment of mesne profits.
@CurrentLegalGK
Decisions which are decrees: (i) Order of abatement of suit;
(ii) Dismissal of appeal as time barred;
(iii) Dismissal of suit or appeal for want of evidence or proof;
(iv) Rejection of plaint for non-payment of court fees;
(v) Granting or refusing to grant costs or instalment;
(vi) Modification of scheme under Section 9z of the Code;
(vii) Order holding appeal not maintainable;
(viii) Order holding that the right to sue does not survive;
(ix) Order holding that there is no cause of action;
(x) An award passed by Lok Adalat.
β‘Decisions which are not decrees:
(i) Dismissal of appeal for default;
(ii) Appointment of Commissioner to take accounts;
(iii) Order of remand;
(iv) Order granting or refusing interim relief;
(v) Return of plaint for presentation to proper court;
(vi) Dismissal of suit under Order 13 Rule I;
(vii) Rejection of application for condonation of delay;
(viii) Order holding an application to be maintainable;
(ix) Order refusing to set aside sale;
(x) Order directing assessment of mesne profits.
@CurrentLegalGK
π3π₯1
Mahua Moitraβs imminent expulsion from Lok Sabha raises concerns about misuse of Parliament powers - Frontline
https://frontline.thehindu.com/columns/mahua-moitra-trinamool-mp-lok-sabha-expulsion-ethics-committee-parliament/article67520296.ece
https://frontline.thehindu.com/columns/mahua-moitra-trinamool-mp-lok-sabha-expulsion-ethics-committee-parliament/article67520296.ece
The Hindu
Mahua Moitraβs imminent expulsion from Lok Sabha raises concerns about misuse of Parliament powers
Lok Sabha Ethics Committee has recommended expulsion of Trinamool Congress MP Mahua Moitra for alleged unethical conduct and contempt of the House. The Supreme Court has previously delivered two different verdicts on expulsions, with a majority of four judgesβ¦
π2
ππΈ
π Top results in the quiz 'π Mock Law Quiz
π 43 questions
β± 45 seconds per question
π€ 75 people took the quiz
π₯ @poonam_singh_mahour β 33 (14 min 8 sec)
π₯ @Shubhanshu23 β 14 (11 min 8 sec)
π₯ Tarun Dutt Bhardwaj β 14 (9 min 8 sec)
4. Shakshi β 13 (8 min 50 sec)
5. Mokshda Aggrawal β 12 (10 min 42 sec)
6. @Learning_Bird β 9 (11 min 43 sec)
7. @FatimaBegum786 β 9 (17 min 38 sec)
8. Rajat Tomar β 7 (5 min 2 sec)
9. @kushbrijesh β 6 (7 min 15 sec)
10. @Philejuris β 4 (5 min 43 sec)
11. @Mansi2707 β 3 (1 min 12 sec)
12. @ayuatgc β 3 (1 min 46 sec)
13. Somya Sharma β 3 (4 min 29 sec)
14. Mahak Tiwari β 3 (4 min 7 sec)
15. @aashdrall β 3 (1 min 33 sec)
16. @indianindian1111 β 3 (1 min 46 sec)
17. Naman Maheshwari β 2 (15.4 sec)
18. @akanshasharma86 β 2 (1 min 4 sec)
19. @amas2003 β 2 (33.6 sec)
20. Pallavi β 2 (1 min 33 sec)
@CurrentLegalGK
Top Performers of Our Quizπ Top results in the quiz 'π Mock Law Quiz
π 43 questions
β± 45 seconds per question
π€ 75 people took the quiz
π₯ @poonam_singh_mahour β 33 (14 min 8 sec)
π₯ @Shubhanshu23 β 14 (11 min 8 sec)
π₯ Tarun Dutt Bhardwaj β 14 (9 min 8 sec)
4. Shakshi β 13 (8 min 50 sec)
5. Mokshda Aggrawal β 12 (10 min 42 sec)
6. @Learning_Bird β 9 (11 min 43 sec)
7. @FatimaBegum786 β 9 (17 min 38 sec)
8. Rajat Tomar β 7 (5 min 2 sec)
9. @kushbrijesh β 6 (7 min 15 sec)
10. @Philejuris β 4 (5 min 43 sec)
11. @Mansi2707 β 3 (1 min 12 sec)
12. @ayuatgc β 3 (1 min 46 sec)
13. Somya Sharma β 3 (4 min 29 sec)
14. Mahak Tiwari β 3 (4 min 7 sec)
15. @aashdrall β 3 (1 min 33 sec)
16. @indianindian1111 β 3 (1 min 46 sec)
17. Naman Maheshwari β 2 (15.4 sec)
18. @akanshasharma86 β 2 (1 min 4 sec)
19. @amas2003 β 2 (33.6 sec)
20. Pallavi β 2 (1 min 33 sec)
@CurrentLegalGK
π2π1
β‘
β From Universal's book
π See the format of answering factual questions
@CurrentLegalGK
Application based IPC Questionβ From Universal's book
π See the format of answering factual questions
@CurrentLegalGK
π5β€1
CLAT 2024 Examination Paper Dec.pdf
8.8 MB
π₯CLAT 2024 Examination Paper π€©
π―π 100% coverage of GK by @CurrentLegalGK
βSolve the GK section of CLAT UG to check your preparation on Current Affairs
πDifficulty level - Easy
β‘High Cut Off
π―π 100% coverage of GK by @CurrentLegalGK
βSolve the GK section of CLAT UG to check your preparation on Current Affairs
πDifficulty level - Easy
β‘High Cut Off
ππ CLAT PG ANALYSIS
The CLAT PG exam this year presented a significant departure from the traditional pattern, with an unexpected increase in the number of passages and questions. The exam comprised 24 passages, each accompanied by five questions, resulting in a lengthy and time-consuming test. While the overall difficulty level was moderate, the sheer volume of passages proved challenging for many test-takers, leaving them unable to complete the exam within the allotted time.
The exam's shift of focus from recent case laws was evident,
Interestingly, only one passage delved into cases from 2021, while three passages focused on cases from 2022. This reduced emphasis on recent cases may be due to the fact that landmark cases provide a more stable foundation for legal reasoning and analysis.
Jurisprudence questions proved to be straightforward and easy to answer, demonstrating a clear distinction from the more complex and nuanced questions that have appeared in previous years. Public international law, with its two passages, also maintained a moderate difficulty level. The genocide passage was relatively easy, while the non-intervention passage posed a slightly greater challenge.
Criminal law passages, on the other hand, were generally considered easy, suggesting that this area of law was not a major focus of the exam.
In an interesting departure from the usual pattern, the Specific Relief Act questions were not based on any specific provisions or case laws but rather on the object and reason of the Act. This shift suggests that the exam is moving towards assessing candidates' ability to understand the underlying principles and objectives of a law rather than simply relying on rote memorization of legal provisions and precedents.
Overall, the CLAT PG exam this year presented a unique challenge in terms of its length and the unexpected pattern of questions. While the exam was not overly difficult, the
for many test-takers. Top performers are expected to score between 85 and 90 marks
TIP - Focus on comprehensive preparation and as always focus should be given to static syllabus more and then on recent case laws but don't think that this will repeat next year π
The CLAT PG exam this year presented a significant departure from the traditional pattern, with an unexpected increase in the number of passages and questions. The exam comprised 24 passages, each accompanied by five questions, resulting in a lengthy and time-consuming test. While the overall difficulty level was moderate, the sheer volume of passages proved challenging for many test-takers, leaving them unable to complete the exam within the allotted time.
The exam's shift of focus from recent case laws was evident,
with only five passages covering cases from 2023.
Interestingly, only one passage delved into cases from 2021, while three passages focused on cases from 2022. This reduced emphasis on recent cases may be due to the fact that landmark cases provide a more stable foundation for legal reasoning and analysis.
Jurisprudence questions proved to be straightforward and easy to answer, demonstrating a clear distinction from the more complex and nuanced questions that have appeared in previous years. Public international law, with its two passages, also maintained a moderate difficulty level. The genocide passage was relatively easy, while the non-intervention passage posed a slightly greater challenge.
Criminal law passages, on the other hand, were generally considered easy, suggesting that this area of law was not a major focus of the exam.
In an interesting departure from the usual pattern, the Specific Relief Act questions were not based on any specific provisions or case laws but rather on the object and reason of the Act. This shift suggests that the exam is moving towards assessing candidates' ability to understand the underlying principles and objectives of a law rather than simply relying on rote memorization of legal provisions and precedents.
Overall, the CLAT PG exam this year presented a unique challenge in terms of its length and the unexpected pattern of questions. While the exam was not overly difficult, the
time constraints proved to be a significant factor
for many test-takers. Top performers are expected to score between 85 and 90 marks
TIP - Focus on comprehensive preparation and as always focus should be given to static syllabus more and then on recent case laws but don't think that this will repeat next year π
π4π3β2β€2
Clat PG 2024 @CurrentLegalGK.pdf
22.1 MB
Clat PG 2024 Paper
Abhi sojao kal answer key mil hi jayegi π
Jinhone exam nahi diya ek baar try krna kuch questions waise to hum kuch important passage share krenge subke liye.
@CurrentLegalGK
Abhi sojao kal answer key mil hi jayegi π
Jinhone exam nahi diya ek baar try krna kuch questions waise to hum kuch important passage share krenge subke liye.
@CurrentLegalGK
π5π₯1π€©1π1π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
CLAT PG PYQs @CurrentLegalGK.pdf
Add This 2024 Paper hereβ
π CLAT PG PAST YEAR PAPERS
π1
π₯2
A Woman Facilitating Act Of Rape With A Group Of People May Be Prosecuted For 'Gang Rape' U/S 376D IPC: Allahabad High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/allahabad-high-court-376d-ipc-gang-rape-woman-facilitating-act-rape-group-people-prosecuted-221469
https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/allahabad-high-court-376d-ipc-gang-rape-woman-facilitating-act-rape-group-people-prosecuted-221469
Live Law
A Woman Facilitating Act Of Rape With A Group Of People May Be Prosecuted For 'Gang Rape' U/S 376D IPC: Allahabad High Court
The Allahabad High Court has observed that a woman can not c
π2
Bas
Apart from this GK, subject wise current affairs is enough for most of your upcoming law exams.
@CurrentLegalGK
ic must do recent topicsApart from this GK, subject wise current affairs is enough for most of your upcoming law exams.
@CurrentLegalGK
π3π2π₯1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
GNCTD CASE MCQs Question on cases relied @CurrentLegalGK
Kisi ko lagta hai Answer hi nahi pata π
It might come in DJS attempt to karo.
Questions post kiye h aaplogo ke liye naaki sirf answer batane ke liye so please grab the opportunity π
It might come in DJS attempt to karo.
Questions post kiye h aaplogo ke liye naaki sirf answer batane ke liye so please grab the opportunity π
13._civil_liabilities_for_human_rights_violations_india.pdf
1.2 MB
Human right handbook with lots of case laws on constitution