β±οΈ Concept of Dynamic+ Injunction In Universal City v. Dotmovies. baby
Considering that there was a need to pass effective injunction orders as copyrighted films, TV series, etc. could be uploaded on rogue websites immediately upon release, a Dynamic+ injunction was granted, i.e. an injunction not only in respect of content/work existing at the time of filing of suit, but also future works of the plaintiffs in which their copyright exists and is violated by rogue websites.
β‘ 1st CASE-> Utv Software Communication Ltd. vs 1337X.To And Ors on 10 April, 2019 by Delhi HC
#IPR
@CurrentLegalGK
π
β±οΈTime- 1 min
Accused at the relevant time, was posted at BOP Bamutia, Tripura, which is adjoining to the border of Bangladesh, an area marred by rampant smuggling. The records reveal that border fencing in the area in question had been erected just a few months before the incident had taken place. Prior to that, many villagers used to freely indulge in smuggling activities by crossing over to the Bangladesh side and vice versa.
Deceased used to indulge in smuggling activities and his name was mentioned in the list of smugglers maintained by the BSF. While on patrolling duty in the early hours of 5th June, 2004, the appellant admitted to have fired from his rifle at the deceased, who died as a result of the firearm injuries. He submitted that he noticed 6-7 persons crossing over from Bangladesh by cutting across the International border, who had tried to βgheraoβ him and were armed with weapons like ββBhalaβ, βDahβ and βLathiβ. They managed to surround the accused, who was closer to them. Apprehending an imminent and real threat to his life, the appellant had fired from his rifle at the intruders in self defence and the deceased who was a part of the group, sustained bullet injuries and had fallen on the ground.
β Based on [Ct. Mahadev v. Border Security Force, 2022]
1. Culpable homicide not amounting to Murder under 299 IPC
2. Exception 3 of 300 IPC
3. Exception 1 of 300 IPC
4. Exception 2 of 300 IPC
Factual Matrix based on recent case lawAccused at the relevant time, was posted at BOP Bamutia, Tripura, which is adjoining to the border of Bangladesh, an area marred by rampant smuggling. The records reveal that border fencing in the area in question had been erected just a few months before the incident had taken place. Prior to that, many villagers used to freely indulge in smuggling activities by crossing over to the Bangladesh side and vice versa.
Deceased used to indulge in smuggling activities and his name was mentioned in the list of smugglers maintained by the BSF. While on patrolling duty in the early hours of 5th June, 2004, the appellant admitted to have fired from his rifle at the deceased, who died as a result of the firearm injuries. He submitted that he noticed 6-7 persons crossing over from Bangladesh by cutting across the International border, who had tried to βgheraoβ him and were armed with weapons like ββBhalaβ, βDahβ and βLathiβ. They managed to surround the accused, who was closer to them. Apprehending an imminent and real threat to his life, the appellant had fired from his rifle at the intruders in self defence and the deceased who was a part of the group, sustained bullet injuries and had fallen on the ground.
β Based on [Ct. Mahadev v. Border Security Force, 2022]
1. Culpable homicide not amounting to Murder under 299 IPC
2. Exception 3 of 300 IPC
3. Exception 1 of 300 IPC
4. Exception 2 of 300 IPC
π₯4π2β€1
1_CONCEPT_OF_LOCUS_STANDI_IN_RELATION_TO_CRIMINAL_JURISPRUDENCE.pdf
307.6 KB
CONCEPT OF LOCUS STANDI IN RELATION TO CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE
Judicial Academy
@CurrentLegalGK
Judicial Academy
Can you enumerate the list of offences with exception to the general rule in criminal case locus standi? Comment π
@CurrentLegalGK
π2β€1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
π―Law study Material by Major Universities and Government online material. π―Delhi University law material https://lawfaculty.du.ac.in/Students/LL.B.-Course-Materials π΄Tamil Nadu University tndalu.ac.in/econtent.html https://tndalu.ac.in/econtent.html π£β¦
π‘ REMINDER
YOU CAN SEARCH π YOUR SUBJECTs NOTE HERE AS WELL π
@CurrentLegalGK
YOU CAN SEARCH π YOUR SUBJECTs NOTE HERE AS WELL π
No Current Knowledge Work Without fundamental clarity on Static knowledge
We will be sharing 25 MCQ Quiz Today based on conceptual and recent case laws.@CurrentLegalGK
π€8π1π₯1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
π‘ REMINDER YOU CAN SEARCH π YOUR SUBJECTs NOTE HERE AS WELL π No Current Knowledge Work Without fundamental clarity on Static knowledge We will be sharing 25 MCQ Quiz Today based on conceptual and recent case laws. @CurrentLegalGK
ππ
π @QuizBot quiz:MyLGisq2
1. Just copy the code and paste in any of your chat or group then
2. Attempt the Quiz; and
3. Share your scores in the comments π
@CurrentLegalGK
As Promised Your Quiz is Hereπ @QuizBot quiz:MyLGisq2
1. Just copy the code and paste in any of your chat or group then
2. Attempt the Quiz; and
3. Share your scores in the comments π
@CurrentLegalGK
β€1π1
Sir Benegal Narsing Rau- An Anniversary Tribute
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/benegal-narsing-rau-indian-constitution-70th-memorial-anniversary-tribute-243343
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/benegal-narsing-rau-indian-constitution-70th-memorial-anniversary-tribute-243343
www.livelaw.in
Sir Benegal Narsing Rau- An Anniversary Tribute
We celebrated Constitution Day on November 26. The role and contribution of B.N.Rau in the making of our Constitution is marvellous. The 70th anniversary of his passing is on November 30. It is...
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Sir Benegal Narsing Rau- An Anniversary Tribute https://www.livelaw.in/articles/benegal-narsing-rau-indian-constitution-70th-memorial-anniversary-tribute-243343
The legend BN. RAU π
β€2π₯1
π¨ββοΈ
β‘Notable judgements brief.
β CJI D.Y. CHANDRACHUD https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/668?single
β B.V. NAGARATHNA
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/620?single
@CurrentLegalGK
Justice sanjay kishan kaulβ‘Notable judgements brief.
β CJI D.Y. CHANDRACHUD https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/668?single
β B.V. NAGARATHNA
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/620?single
@CurrentLegalGK
π₯2
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Sir Benegal Narsing Rau- An Anniversary Tribute https://www.livelaw.in/articles/benegal-narsing-rau-indian-constitution-70th-memorial-anniversary-tribute-243343
Do you want us to share the summary of famous legal luminaries and personalities.Which will help you in your exams during prelims, essay mains (quotes) and especially in interviews and even it will help you in moral legal development or act as motivation
π¨ββοΈπ©ββ
If Yes then please do share the names of atleast 3 personalities.
We will start this series by choosing any 10 of them π
β‘ Note: You can also share the ideas as to how we should share the summary and what to include in it.
@CurrentLegalGK
π7π€1
Polity & Yearly Current Affairs 2023
π₯1
β€3
Landmark Judgments Under Pocso Act- 2012 and Analysis.pdf
620.2 KB
π
β‘Landmark Judgments Under Pocso Act- 2012 and Analysis
@CurrentLegalGK
As promised here is the material for POCSO Actβ‘Landmark Judgments Under Pocso Act- 2012 and Analysis
@CurrentLegalGK
π₯9π5π1
π±π¦π²
(i) Suits relating to rights to property
(ii) Suits relating to rights of worship
(iii) Suits relating to taking out of religious processions
(iv) Suits relating to right to shares in offerings
(2) Suits for damages for civil wrongs (vi) Suits for specific performance of contracts or for damages for breach
of contracts;
(vii) Suits for specific reliefs;
(viii) Suits for restitution of conjugal rights;
(ix) Suits for dissolution
(x) Suits for rents; of marriages;
(xi) Suits for or on accounts;
(xii) Suits for rights of franchise;
(xiii) Suits for rights to hereditary offices;
(xiv) Suits for rights to Yajmanvritis;
(xv) Suits against wrongful dismissals from service and for salaries, etc.
β‘The following are not suits of a civil nature:
(i) Suits involving principally caste questions;
(ii) Suits involving purely religious rites or ceremonies;
(iii) Suits for upholding mere dignity or honour;
(iv) Suits for recovery of voluntary payments or offerings;
(v) Suits against expulsions from caste, etc.
@CurrentLegalGK
Suits of civil nature: (i) Suits relating to rights to property
(ii) Suits relating to rights of worship
(iii) Suits relating to taking out of religious processions
(iv) Suits relating to right to shares in offerings
(2) Suits for damages for civil wrongs (vi) Suits for specific performance of contracts or for damages for breach
of contracts;
(vii) Suits for specific reliefs;
(viii) Suits for restitution of conjugal rights;
(ix) Suits for dissolution
(x) Suits for rents; of marriages;
(xi) Suits for or on accounts;
(xii) Suits for rights of franchise;
(xiii) Suits for rights to hereditary offices;
(xiv) Suits for rights to Yajmanvritis;
(xv) Suits against wrongful dismissals from service and for salaries, etc.
β‘The following are not suits of a civil nature:
(i) Suits involving principally caste questions;
(ii) Suits involving purely religious rites or ceremonies;
(iii) Suits for upholding mere dignity or honour;
(iv) Suits for recovery of voluntary payments or offerings;
(v) Suits against expulsions from caste, etc.
@CurrentLegalGK
β4π2
π
(i) Order of abatement of suit;
(ii) Dismissal of appeal as time barred;
(iii) Dismissal of suit or appeal for want of evidence or proof;
(iv) Rejection of plaint for non-payment of court fees;
(v) Granting or refusing to grant costs or instalment;
(vi) Modification of scheme under Section 9z of the Code;
(vii) Order holding appeal not maintainable;
(viii) Order holding that the right to sue does not survive;
(ix) Order holding that there is no cause of action;
(x) An award passed by Lok Adalat.
β‘Decisions which are not decrees:
(i) Dismissal of appeal for default;
(ii) Appointment of Commissioner to take accounts;
(iii) Order of remand;
(iv) Order granting or refusing interim relief;
(v) Return of plaint for presentation to proper court;
(vi) Dismissal of suit under Order 13 Rule I;
(vii) Rejection of application for condonation of delay;
(viii) Order holding an application to be maintainable;
(ix) Order refusing to set aside sale;
(x) Order directing assessment of mesne profits.
@CurrentLegalGK
Decisions which are decrees: (i) Order of abatement of suit;
(ii) Dismissal of appeal as time barred;
(iii) Dismissal of suit or appeal for want of evidence or proof;
(iv) Rejection of plaint for non-payment of court fees;
(v) Granting or refusing to grant costs or instalment;
(vi) Modification of scheme under Section 9z of the Code;
(vii) Order holding appeal not maintainable;
(viii) Order holding that the right to sue does not survive;
(ix) Order holding that there is no cause of action;
(x) An award passed by Lok Adalat.
β‘Decisions which are not decrees:
(i) Dismissal of appeal for default;
(ii) Appointment of Commissioner to take accounts;
(iii) Order of remand;
(iv) Order granting or refusing interim relief;
(v) Return of plaint for presentation to proper court;
(vi) Dismissal of suit under Order 13 Rule I;
(vii) Rejection of application for condonation of delay;
(viii) Order holding an application to be maintainable;
(ix) Order refusing to set aside sale;
(x) Order directing assessment of mesne profits.
@CurrentLegalGK
π3π₯1