๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
831 photos
11 videos
1.64K files
2.94K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš– Filtered Information Brings Clarity.

๐ŸŒTHE BEST FROM ALL LEGAL UPDATES BY EOD.

"Finding Quintessence of all possible POVs of provisions and Precedents
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
Does secularism needs to be manifested in state practices by officials composition expressly?

May be for justice must not only be done but seen to have been done.
Lord Hewart, Rex v. Sussex Justices, [1924] 1 KB 256.


"Reminds me of Ramjanmbhoomi temple case" (5 Judges, 5 Religions)

But Heavily criticised because officials acts in official capacity under oath which includes secularism principles.

Do you thing changing times of extreme communalism must lead to change in approach of law? I don't think so because these type of circumstances were already there before as well, yes misuse happens but larger official duty remians there with checks.

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-delivers-split-verdict-on-maharashtra-govt-review-plea-against-order-constituting-sit-comprising-both-hindu-muslim-officers-309163

3JB Stayed the direction... Matter pending.
โค1
#IOS@CurrentLegalGK

Section 26. of general clauses act.
Provision as to offences punishable under two or more enactments.โ€”Where an act or omission constitutes an offence under two or more enactments, then the offender shall be liable to be prosecuted and punished under either or any of those enactments, but shall not be liable to be punished twice for the same offence.

HOW and WHY then courts 'CONVICT' accused under both IPC and and POCSO/other special statute.

#Question@CurrentLegalGK