๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
831 photos
11 videos
1.64K files
2.94K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš– Filtered Information Brings Clarity.

๐ŸŒTHE BEST FROM ALL LEGAL UPDATES BY EOD.

"Finding Quintessence of all possible POVs of provisions and Precedents
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
#History@CurrentLegalGK

The Adversarial system was not known in India. In the Hindu or the Mohamedan system the judge took an active role in eliciting the truth as in the Continental systems. The theory of the common law " that justice can best be achieved by giving each party the fullest opportunity to present his own case " was brought into vogue in India by the English. The Civil and Criminal Procedure Codes of India and the law of evidence enacted in the latter half of the nineteenth century are in conformity with this common law doctrine.
โค6
๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™€๏ธ Custody period Judgment

โˆ† Case: Hyder Ali v.State of Karnataka, 2024

167 CrPC: Not less than 10 years and 187 BNSS: 10 years or More โ€”โ€”>
Means threshold period of 10 Years.
BOTH ARE SAME NO CHANGE IN NEW LAW.

Reason for the aforesaid issue :
The offence in the case at hand, does not bear a
minimum threshold sentence of ten years, but is extendable or to an extent of ten years, which would mean, discretion available to the concerned Court to impose punishment up to ten years. Therefore, the
minimum threshold is not ten years.

1. 10 or More means Minimum is 10 years.

2. Extend to 10 years means 1 to 10 years.

Both are different

In minimum 10 years it is 90 days and in upto 10 years it is 60 days maximum custody.

Again repeating no change in new law both are same 167 and 187.

Must be interpreted in the light of Article 21.

@CurrentLegalGK
โค3๐Ÿ‘2
๐ŸŒฒ๐Ÿ—“๏ธ๐ŸŒ Winner's of the this year last quarter challenge are as follows.

๐Ÿ‘Really it is a tough task to do


Not in order of ranks.
1. Har Har Mahadev.
2. Renu Chaudhary.
3. Khushbu Gupta
4. Divya Bansal.
5. P82228
6. Jay Kumar Singhal.
7. Sachijaa.
8. Saksham.
9. Prakriti Malik.
10. Neeha.
11. Choti.
12. Swagat.
13. Shubhi.
14. Unknown (dot)
15. Priya.
16. Rupreet kaur.
17. Abhishek Pandey ji.
18. OG.
19. Hritika.
20. Sushmita.
21. Dharm Yadav.
22. Samb sada shiv.
23. Priyanka.
24. Ayush.
25. Aletta.
26. Shraddha.

Some did consistently for 80+ days some did for 50 days and some for 30 days, atleast you tried but remember our motto.
๐Ÿง˜โ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿง˜โ€โ™€๏ธ
เคธ เคคเฅ เคฆเฅ€เคฐเฅเค˜เค•เคพเคฒเคจเฅˆเคฐเคจเฅเคคเคฐเฅเคฏเคธเคคเฅเค•เคพเคฐเคพเคธเฅ‡เคตเคฟเคคเฅ‹ เคฆเฅƒเคขเคญเฅ‚เคฎเคฟเคƒเฅฅ

That practice becomes firmly grounded when pursued for a long time, without interruption, and with sincere devotion.

~Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, Sutra 1.14

Congratulations ๐Ÿ‘ ๐ŸŽ‰
By bye 2025 It was a great year for me as well, looking for a robust 2026 ahead.

New Year New Challenge is awaiting....

Whenever you waste time Self guilt is must... sharing your goals and able to complete them gives immense satisfaction, learning from others goals also helps you a lot.

New Challenge


Dates: 1st Jan to 31st March
Challenge:
โœ“ Wake up 6 AM take bath Post your goals (in detail for more clarity on plans).
โœ“Complete them by 11 PM
โœ“ Post what you did complete and what you didn't.
โœ“โœ“New addition: Share one conceptual Question on law subject along with your completion post.

New Tip: if you want to avoid mobile distraction make a timelapse video of yourself for 3 days (consistent) in a go the effect will be that you will on a constant watch to do something productive and mobile will be kept away.

Any suggestions are welcome- Share them by tomorrow morning.

As always meritorious candidates are rewarded in our groups, we don't let the merit go away without paying it off.

โณ๐Ÿš€ To start the challenge:
@NinetyDaysPledge
โค8๐Ÿ‘2๐ŸŽ‰1
Does secularism needs to be manifested in state practices by officials composition expressly?

May be for justice must not only be done but seen to have been done.
Lord Hewart, Rex v. Sussex Justices, [1924] 1 KB 256.


"Reminds me of Ramjanmbhoomi temple case" (5 Judges, 5 Religions)

But Heavily criticised because officials acts in official capacity under oath which includes secularism principles.

Do you thing changing times of extreme communalism must lead to change in approach of law? I don't think so because these type of circumstances were already there before as well, yes misuse happens but larger official duty remians there with checks.

https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-delivers-split-verdict-on-maharashtra-govt-review-plea-against-order-constituting-sit-comprising-both-hindu-muslim-officers-309163

3JB Stayed the direction... Matter pending.
โค1
#IOS@CurrentLegalGK

Section 26. of general clauses act.
Provision as to offences punishable under two or more enactments.โ€”Where an act or omission constitutes an offence under two or more enactments, then the offender shall be liable to be prosecuted and punished under either or any of those enactments, but shall not be liable to be punished twice for the same offence.

HOW and WHY then courts 'CONVICT' accused under both IPC and and POCSO/other special statute.

#Question@CurrentLegalGK