𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

Applicability of Section
125(4) Cr.P.C. to the case on hand. The question as to whether non- compliance with a decree for restitution of conjugal rights by a wife would be sufficient in itself to deny her maintenance, owing to Section 125(4) Cr.P.C, has been addressed by several High Courts but no consistent view is forthcoming, as their opinions were varied and conflicting.

Rina kumari v Dinesh Kumar Mahato 2025

❤4❤‍🔥3

1.64K viewsedited 10:09

Direct Courts To Dispose Execution Petitions Within 6 Months, Hold Presiding Officer Liable On Failure : Supreme Court Asks High Courts https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/direct-courts-to-dispose-execution-petitions-in-6-months-hold-presiding-officer-liable…

PERIYAMMAL  
    versus 
   V. RAJAMANI

Execution proceedings should not be used to re-litigate issues already decided in the suit. The executing court’s role is limited to ensuring the decree is executed, not to question its validity. The judgment underscores the importance of timely execution of decrees and prevents parties from frustrating decrees through collusive claims raised during execution proceedings. It reaffirms the principle that executing courts cannot go behind the decree or re-adjudicate issues already decided in the suit. The Court issued directions to all High Courts to monitor and expedite the disposal of pending execution petitions, emphasizing the need to avoid delays in the execution of decrees. The Court reiterated the need for expeditious disposal of execution proceedings, directing all High Courts to ensure pending execution petitions are decided within six months.

#CPC@CurrentLegalGK

❤1⚡1

1.36K viewsedited 16:38

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

Acquitted After Noose : Supreme Court Upheld No Death Sentence In 2025, But Acquittals Came After Years On Death Row
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/acquitted-after-noose-supreme-court-upheld-no-death-sentence-in-2025-but-acquittals-came-after-years-on-death-row-514525

www.livelaw.in

Acquitted After Noose : Supreme Court Upheld No Death Sentence In 2025, But Acquittals Came After Years On Death Row

With Surendra Koli—the last remaining in the 2006 Nithari killings—walking free after the Supreme Court acquitted him, once again, debate has resurfaced whether establishing guilt beyond a...

⚡2❤1

1.16K views16:53

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

Suspension Of Kuldeep Singh Sengar's Sentence In Unnao Rape Case Is Legally Flawed & Problematic
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/kuldeep-singh-sengars-sentence-suspension-in-unnao-rape-case-is-legally-flawed-514451

www.livelaw.in

Kuldeep Singh Sengar’s Sentence Suspension In Unnao Rape Case Is Legally Flawed

The High Court's order is not based on any prima facie finding regarding innocence but on a hypertechnical view about the misclassification of the offence.

👌2

1.43K views17:59

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

Fingerprints are not unique.

https://indiandefencereview.com/ai-proves-fingerprints-are-not-unique/

👌2🤯1

1.2K viewsedited 18:24

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

#Question@CurrentLegalGK

Can Criminal courts (including HC) direct investigative agency to arrest the accused?

👌2

1.08K views18:27

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2024/12/20/sc-quashes-hc-order-for-re-investigation-while-acquitting-accused-for-same-offence/

SCC Times

‘Transfer of investigation to CBI in special circumstances’; SC sets aside Madras HC order for re-investigation while acquitting…

SC sets aside Madras HC order transferring investigation for re-investigation while acquitting accused for offence

1.18K views20:20

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

X Corp Can't Challenge Indian Laws Regulating Social Media Invoking 'Citizen Centric' Article 19: Karnataka High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/karnataka-high-court/x-corp-karnataka-high-court-article-19-indian-laws-regulating-social-media-305375

www.livelaw.in

X Corp Can't Challenge Indian Laws Regulating Social Media Invoking 'Citizen Centric' Article 19: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has ruled that X Crop, formerly Twitter, being a foreign entity cannot challenge Indian laws regulating social media here invoking Article 19 of the Constitution of India....

1.35K views21:04

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™

X Corp Can't Challenge Indian Laws Regulating Social Media Invoking 'Citizen Centric' Article 19: Karnataka High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/karnataka-high-court/x-corp-karnataka-high-court-article-19-indian-laws-regulating-social-media-305375

X CORP AND Union of India & Others

Platform X sought declaration section 79(3)(b) of IT act that it does not empower government to pass blocking orders rather 69A does therefore the impugned rule and portal is ultra vires to act and Article 19 (1)(a).

Held: X platform is a mere intermediary in IT act and nothing else and only citizens can use Article 19.

Can Indian Companies claim Article 19?

STAR INDIA Ltd. v. TRAI 2007

Yes with condition that majority of control and management vests with indian citizens and company incorporated in India.

Consequences: Citizens using such platforms are getting deprived of Article 19 although they can individually approach the court but the blocking orders are not public.