𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
831 photos
11 videos
1.65K files
2.94K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

πŸ‘¨β€βš– Filtered Information Brings Clarity.

🌐THE BEST FROM ALL LEGAL UPDATES BY EOD.

"Finding Quintessence of all possible POVs of provisions and Precedents
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
A combined summary of all 100 judgments will be shared.

I am damn sure we have covered atleast 300+ important judgments throughout the year

So atleast for now skim through the posts of our channel throughout the year.

Starts from here, scroll a little bit of important thing rather than shorts/reels/random news.

Just copy the links of posts which you feel are landmark (don't rely on others)
Hardly 30 mins exercise
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4582
😍5❀2
ff266bbeed10c48e3479c941484f3525.pdf
11 MB
ONE NATION ONE LICENSE ONE PAYMENT
Balancing AI Innovation and Copyright

Part 1 DPIIT report on input copyrightability abd mandatory licensing and payments to owners.

Part 2 will be released on output of copyright and AI.

#IPR@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘2πŸ‘Œ2
πŸŽπŸŽ„ Merry Christmas

Hope Santa Brings Wisdom, and Justice for your hardwork my friends.

πŸŽ…πŸŽ… Ho ho ho β˜ƒοΈπŸŒ²πŸŽ
πŸ€—11πŸ‘3❀1
733620242025-01-10-580866.pdf
219.2 KB
Applicability of Section
125(4) Cr.P.C. to the case on hand. The question as to whether non- compliance with a decree for restitution of conjugal rights by a wife would be sufficient in itself to deny her maintenance, owing to Section 125(4) Cr.P.C, has been addressed by several High Courts but no consistent view is forthcoming, as their opinions were varied and conflicting
.

Rina kumari v Dinesh Kumar Mahato 2025
❀4❀‍πŸ”₯3
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Direct Courts To Dispose Execution Petitions Within 6 Months, Hold Presiding Officer Liable On Failure : Supreme Court Asks High Courts https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/direct-courts-to-dispose-execution-petitions-in-6-months-hold-presiding-officer-liable…
PERIYAMMAL
versus
V. RAJAMANI


Execution proceedings should not be used to re-litigate issues already decided in the suit. The executing court’s role is limited to ensuring the decree is executed, not to question its validity. The judgment underscores the importance of timely execution of decrees and prevents parties from frustrating decrees through collusive claims raised during execution proceedings. It reaffirms the principle that executing courts cannot go behind the decree or re-adjudicate issues already decided in the suit. The Court issued directions to all High Courts to monitor and expedite the disposal of pending execution petitions, emphasizing the need to avoid delays in the execution of decrees. The Court reiterated the need for expeditious disposal of execution proceedings, directing all High Courts to ensure pending execution petitions are decided within six months.

#CPC@CurrentLegalGK
❀1⚑1