Is Not The Magistrate A Prisoner Of Section 175 (3) Read With Section 173 (4) Of BNSS?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/magistrate-power-to-order-investigation-section-156-crpc-vs-section-175-bnss-comparative-analysis-275948

#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK complaint and direction to investigation and cognizance

When Bulldozer Becomes The Law
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/rule-of-law-and-bulldozer-justice-critical-analysis-307015

Fifty Years Of The Emergency: The Constitution, The Courts, And The Battle For India's Democracy
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/fifty-years-emergency-constitution-courts-battle-indias-democracy-306680

Tort Of Alienation Of Affection (AoA): A Critique
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/delhi-high-court-judgment-on-alienation-of-affection-analysis-306591

#Discernible_Topics@CurrentLegalGK

Cognizance At Crossroads: An Analytical Examination Of The Proviso To Section 223(1) Of The BNSS
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/hearing-accused-before-cognizance-section-223-bnss-analysis-307140

So much of relevant articles to read.

Read understand and note them.

I will share my broef notes @EOD

Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Rejection Of Plaint To Be Decided Solely On Plaint Averments : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/order-vii-rule-11-cpc-rejection-of-plaint-to-be-decided-solely-on-plaint-averments-supreme-court-307168

Good article.

During National emergency whether article 32 is suspended?

Give reasons.

The president has the power by order to declare that any of the fundamental rights cannot be enforced in courts.

But it is not necessary that all rights will be suspended by the presidential order and article 20 and 21 cannot be suspended hence these rights can be enforced in courts including under article 32 which specifically deals with enforcement of fundamental rights.

Therefore president cannot suspend article 32 in anycase.

What's your view comment

#Question@CurrentLegalGK

Supreme Court expresses ‘grave concern’ over rising ‘digital arrests’ scams, seeks responses from Centre and CBI - The Hindu
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/supreme-court-expresses-grave-concern-over-rising-digital-arrests-scams-seeks-responses-from-centre-and-cbi/article70174306.ece

https://scctimes.com/2970F5Pbd
Personality rights

Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu (the Auto Shankar case),

where the Court recognised an individual’s right to control the commercial use of their identity as part of the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21. It affirmed that privacy includes the “right to be let alone”, limiting how personal attributes can be exploited without consent.

Aishwarya rai bachhan 2025 case

John Doe orders have become a critical judicial tool to protect celebrities against online misuse. These ex parte injunctions are issued against unknown infringers, commonly referred to as John Doe or Ashok Kumar, to prevent ongoing or future violations, particularly where the offender’s identity is not yet known. Courts permit such orders under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 as an exception to the general rule under Order 7 requiring a named defendant....

#IPR@CurrentLegalGK

Supreme Court Awards Compensation To Transwoman Teacher Dismissed Over Gender Identity; Forms Committee On Transgender Rights
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-awards-compensation-to-transwoman-teacher-dismissed-over-gender-identity-forms-committee-on-transgender-rights-307222

JANE KAUSHIK v UNION OF INDIA 
2025

1. Guidelines issued to formulate an equal opportunity policy for the protection of the rights of transgender persons.

2. Compensation on gender discrimination in employement.

Transgender protection act 2019 and 2020 rules

#COI@CurrentLegalGK

Electronic Document Must Be Produced In Entirety To Be Admissible Even If Supported By Certificate U/S 65B Evidence Act: Kerala High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-electronic-document-entirety-section-65b-evidence-act-certificate-307303

What about section 33 of BSA or 39 of Evidence act?

#BSA@CurrentLegalGK
#Question@CurrentLegalGK

When Exceptions Swallow The Rule: Problem With Section 479 BNSS
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/when-exceptions-swallow-rule-problem-section-479-bnss-307288

⛓️‍💥⚡ Very pertinent criticism of sub-section 2 to 439 BNSS | A hidden draconian change


Origin of maximum oeriod for undertrial prisoner in jail.

Section 436-A was a result of the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar,2 where the court strongly criticized the judicial system for the prolonged detention of individuals, without trial, declaring that the right to a speedy trial is an essential component of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

Section 439 reduced maximum period to 1/3rd, for first time offenders, but does not apply when there are multiple charges which is a norm in chargesheets.

⚡Making mere registrations of more than one offence as a reason to deny bail defeats the principle of presumption of innocence.

#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK

UTKAL CONTRACTORS & JOINERY PRIVAIB LTD.
v.
STATE OF ORISSA
1987

How much value to be given to rules of Interpretation by supreme court.

But we think that when we rely upon rules of construction we must always bear in mind Lord Reid's admonition in Maunsell v. Olins (supra) to the following effect:

"Then rules of construction are relied on. They are not rules in the ordinary sense of having some binding force. They are our servants not our masters. They are aids to constructions, presumptions or pointers. Not infrequently one 'rule' points in one direction, another in a different direction. In each case we must look at all relevant circum-stances and decide as a matter of judgment what weight to attach to any particular 'rule'."

+-------+
In essence "Rules of Interpretation are not rules of law".

#IOS@CurrentLegalGK

⚕️🕉️ Story of Lord Dhanvantari - The Celestial Physician of the Universe
https://suryacrafts.com/blog/story-of-lord-dhanvantari-the-celestial-physician-of-universe