🥳🤩 Congratulations Anuj, manshi and all the members who have qualified Chattisgarh Preliminary examination.

With this spirity may you also clear the mains examination soon.

Magistrates Can Direct Witnesses To Give Voice Samples, Not Just Accused; Article 20(3) Not Violated : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/magistrates-can-direct-witnesses-to-give-voice-samples-not-just-accused-article-203-not-violated-supreme-court-306820

MP High Court Rejects PIL Alleging Preferential Treatment To 'VIPs' At Mahakaleshwar Temple
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court-pil-vip-mahakaleshwar-temple-302633

Statutory Interpretation: Distinguishing Mandatory From Directory Provisions
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/supreme-court-judgment-lifestyle-equities-vs-amazon-technologies-analysis-307014

A true inspiration for sincere students - Sir Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam (former president)

A Bench of Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice K. Vinod Chandran relied on the 2019 precedent Ritesh Sinha v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr., which held that even in the absence of an explicit provision in the Cr.P.C., a Judicial Magistrate has the authority to direct a “person” to provide a voice sample for investigation. The Court clarified that the term “person” is not confined to the accused alone but also extends to witnesses.

#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK

Is Not The Magistrate A Prisoner Of Section 175 (3) Read With Section 173 (4) Of BNSS?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/magistrate-power-to-order-investigation-section-156-crpc-vs-section-175-bnss-comparative-analysis-275948

#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK complaint and direction to investigation and cognizance

When Bulldozer Becomes The Law
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/rule-of-law-and-bulldozer-justice-critical-analysis-307015

Fifty Years Of The Emergency: The Constitution, The Courts, And The Battle For India's Democracy
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/fifty-years-emergency-constitution-courts-battle-indias-democracy-306680

Tort Of Alienation Of Affection (AoA): A Critique
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/delhi-high-court-judgment-on-alienation-of-affection-analysis-306591

#Discernible_Topics@CurrentLegalGK

Cognizance At Crossroads: An Analytical Examination Of The Proviso To Section 223(1) Of The BNSS
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/hearing-accused-before-cognizance-section-223-bnss-analysis-307140

So much of relevant articles to read.

Read understand and note them.

I will share my broef notes @EOD

Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Rejection Of Plaint To Be Decided Solely On Plaint Averments : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/order-vii-rule-11-cpc-rejection-of-plaint-to-be-decided-solely-on-plaint-averments-supreme-court-307168

Good article.

During National emergency whether article 32 is suspended?

Give reasons.

The president has the power by order to declare that any of the fundamental rights cannot be enforced in courts.

But it is not necessary that all rights will be suspended by the presidential order and article 20 and 21 cannot be suspended hence these rights can be enforced in courts including under article 32 which specifically deals with enforcement of fundamental rights.

Therefore president cannot suspend article 32 in anycase.

What's your view comment

#Question@CurrentLegalGK

Supreme Court expresses ‘grave concern’ over rising ‘digital arrests’ scams, seeks responses from Centre and CBI - The Hindu
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/supreme-court-expresses-grave-concern-over-rising-digital-arrests-scams-seeks-responses-from-centre-and-cbi/article70174306.ece

https://scctimes.com/2970F5Pbd
Personality rights

Rajagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu (the Auto Shankar case),

where the Court recognised an individual’s right to control the commercial use of their identity as part of the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21. It affirmed that privacy includes the “right to be let alone”, limiting how personal attributes can be exploited without consent.

Aishwarya rai bachhan 2025 case

John Doe orders have become a critical judicial tool to protect celebrities against online misuse. These ex parte injunctions are issued against unknown infringers, commonly referred to as John Doe or Ashok Kumar, to prevent ongoing or future violations, particularly where the offender’s identity is not yet known. Courts permit such orders under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 Civil Procedure Code, 1908 as an exception to the general rule under Order 7 requiring a named defendant....

#IPR@CurrentLegalGK