REJANISH K.V.
v.
K. DEEPA & Ors
2025

District judge direct recruitment case.

Not important for us juniors but for some exams it will be important as well as the reasoning.

Article 233 ko ache se pdhna and related provisions and laws find krke pdhlena jo bhi apply hote h ina ddition to constitution.

#COI@CurrentLegalGK

'No Fundamental Right To Use WhatsApp': Supreme Court Rejects Plea To Restore Blocked Account; Suggests Use Of 'Arattai'
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-rejects-plea-to-restore-blocked-whatsapp-account-suggests-indigenous-app-arattai-306545

Incorrect reasoning.

Dharambir v. State (NCT of Delhi), (2010) 5 SCC 344 observed that “all persons who were below the age of eighteen years on the date of commission of the offence even prior to 1st April, 2001 would be treated as juveniles even if the claim of juvenility is raised after they have attained the age of eighteen years on or before the date of commencement of the JJ Act, 2000 and were undergoing sentences upon being convicted.”

Karnataka Becomes First State to Introduce Menstrual Leave Policy for Women in Govt & Private Sectors
https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/karnataka-becomes-first-state-to-introduce-menstrual-leave-policy-for-women-in-govt-private-sectors-306459

The Time Paradox: When The Tool Becomes The Master
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/the-time-paradox-when-the-tool-becomes-the-master-306491

Excellent observation and even this is true that time though important but it sometimes eats our beautiful calm time, presence of mind in a situation because we often go with mechanical speed to achieve the goal but then after achieving or not achieving we relaise that we lost the journey, we could not digest the change, so be in your present always just keep in your subconscious mind the future.

@CurrentLegalGK

S. 263(1) & S. 269(1) BNSS | Court Cannot Prepare Format Of Charge & Merely Fill Details Of Case In Vacant Space: Kerala High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-order-framing-charges-printed-format-writing-bnss-263-269-306604

important because generally courts make their own formats of routine exercises which is permissible but here it is not.

Can you identify similar such exercise of powers where format cannot be made?

Scientific explanation for the Age for social media.

https://youtube.com/shorts/nAPv_BhnGAM?si=qOg2GJE2Ragc75Rx

Recent legal developments:
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4320
https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/sc-says-no-to-plea-for-barring-kids-below-13-from-using-social-media/article69412224.ece
https://m.economictimes.com/news/india/digital-personal-data-protection-act-social-media-users-under-18-to-require-parental-consent/articleshow/116925617.cms

Liberal interpretation of Hindu Marriage Act divorce provisions will trivialise sanctity of marriage: Delhi High Court
https://www.barandbench.com/news/liberal-interpretation-of-hindu-marriage-act-divorce-provisions-will-trivialise-sanctity-of-marriage-delhi-high-court

A Critique Of Supreme Court's Judgment Allowing Direct Appointment Of Judicial Officers As District Judges
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/a-critique-of-supreme-courts-judgment-allowing-direct-appointment-of-judicial-officers-as-district-judges-306641

Dependent Domicile: How Indian Law Still Chains Married Women To Their Husband's Identity
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/married-woman-and-domicile-of-dependent-persons-gender-equality-analysis-306633

🥳🤩 Congratulations Anuj, manshi and all the members who have qualified Chattisgarh Preliminary examination.

With this spirity may you also clear the mains examination soon.

Magistrates Can Direct Witnesses To Give Voice Samples, Not Just Accused; Article 20(3) Not Violated : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/magistrates-can-direct-witnesses-to-give-voice-samples-not-just-accused-article-203-not-violated-supreme-court-306820

MP High Court Rejects PIL Alleging Preferential Treatment To 'VIPs' At Mahakaleshwar Temple
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court-pil-vip-mahakaleshwar-temple-302633

Statutory Interpretation: Distinguishing Mandatory From Directory Provisions
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/supreme-court-judgment-lifestyle-equities-vs-amazon-technologies-analysis-307014

A true inspiration for sincere students - Sir Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam (former president)

A Bench of Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice K. Vinod Chandran relied on the 2019 precedent Ritesh Sinha v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr., which held that even in the absence of an explicit provision in the Cr.P.C., a Judicial Magistrate has the authority to direct a “person” to provide a voice sample for investigation. The Court clarified that the term “person” is not confined to the accused alone but also extends to witnesses.

#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK