๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

โ˜บ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
68324092025cw134902025112937-622450.pdf
816.9 KB
Delhi High court judgement on CLAT PG requirement for jobs in PSUs.

In view of the reasons given and discussions made above, we are fully convinced that the impugned โ€žrecruitment criteriaโ€Ÿ where selection for appointment to the post in question is to be made on the basis of merit in CLAT (PG) score โ€“ 2022 onwards, is legally not tenable being hit by Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.
๐Ÿ‘Œ4โค3๐Ÿค“2
๐Ÿ”ช๐Ÿ”Ž Purpose of Section 27 IEA/ proviso to section 23 BSA

๐Ÿ”ฎ Myth busted- To lift ban on 25/26 IEA

The essential purpose of Section 27 of the Evidence Act is not to render admissible a โ€œconfessionโ€ in the โ€œdisclosure statementโ€ made by an accused to a Police Officer.

๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš–๏ธ Case- Pulukuri Kottaya v. Emperor AIR 1947

If in a โ€œdisclosure statementโ€ there is a โ€œconfession" such a โ€œconfessionโ€ is inadmissible

๐Ÿ’ฏ Result- If the inculpatory part of the โ€œdisclosure statementโ€ is so excluded, then what remains is a mere statement to P.O.

๐Ÿ‘‰ Consequence of Statement-
Will not hit the Ban Under section 162(1) Cr.P.C because of 162(2).

๐Ÿค” What is โ€œwhether it amounts to a confession or notโ€

If confession is excluded then why this language โ˜๏ธ

โœ… Answer- Pulukuri Kottaya v. Emperor AIR 1947

1. Disclosure statement does not constitute gist of offence only a corroborative piece of evidence other need to be proved.

2. BUT if possessionโ€ or โ€œconcealmentโ€ of the incriminating object itself constitutes the gist of the offence disclosure statementโ€ would be admissible notwithstanding the fact that statement amounts to a โ€œconfessionโ€

๐Ÿ“’ Laws in which when Section 27 Statement amounts to Confession

1. Opium Act, 1978,
2. Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940,
3. Explosives Act, 1884,
4. Explosive Substances Act, 1908,
5. Public Gambling Act, 1867,
6. Gold Control Act, 1968, 7. Narcotic Drugs Act and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

๐ŸŽฌ Illustrationโ€”
Larance says; I have killed Soloman with a Gun and the Gun is placed in the farm house.


1. Confession- Bold Highlighted part
2. Statement of S. 27- Underline.
3. Statement Amounts to confession for S. 25 Arms Act, 1959

๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€โš–๏ธConclusion- Majority of Cases statement does not Amounts to confession but only when concealement and possesion of object itself consitutues offence then amounts to confession.

#BSA@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘5โค2๐Ÿ’ฏ2
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/backward-classes-more-than-50-in-state-madhya-pradesh-govt-defends-27-obc-quota-in-supreme-court-305712
The Madhya Pradesh Government has strongly defended its decision to raise reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) from 14% to 27%, telling the Supreme Court that backward communities collectively make up more than 85% of the State's population and remain severely disadvantaged despite their overwhelming demographic presence.

50% limit is diluted altogether by these Data on marginalised population ratio which every state government can table.

What's your say on this issue, keep the discussion on legal aspects only.

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ’”2โค1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ’ฏ1
โ›“๏ธโ€๐Ÿ’ฅ๐Ÿ—ก๏ธObject of BNS

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Surendra Singh,

"that one of the prime objectives of criminal law is the imposition of adequate, just, proportionate punishment which is commensurate with the gravity and nature of the crime and manner in which the offence is committed. The most relevant determinative factor of sentencing is proportionality between crime and punishment keeping in mind the social interest and consciousness of the society. It is a mockery of the criminal justice system to take a lenient view showing misplaced sympathy to the Accused on any consideration whatsoever including the delay in conclusion of criminal proceedings.

#BNS@CurrentLegalGK
โค5