“In Ugar Ahir and Ors. v. State of Bihar,” 1965,

“The maxim Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus” (false in one thing, false in all things) is neither a sound legal nor a practical rule. The subject is rare to come across as “a witness whose testimony does not contain a grain of falsehood or, at the least,” “exaggerations, embroideries, or embellishments.” As a result, “it is the Court’s responsibility to scrutinize the evidence and, to use a fitting metaphor, separate the grain from the chaff.” It cannot, however, “manifestly disregard the prosecution case or the material components of the evidence and create its tale from the remainder.”

#BSA@CurrentLegalGK

Law of Remand u/s 167 CrPC 187 BNSS

Police and judicial custody.

#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK

𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 ℂ𝕌ℝℝ𝔼ℕ𝕋 𝔸𝔽𝔽𝔸𝕀ℝ𝕊 𝔹𝕪- ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕤𝕥𝕚𝕔𝕖 ™:
Nature of royalty paid by mine leaseholders - Supreme Court Observer
https://www.scobserver.in/cases/is-royalty-paid-by-mine-leaseholders-to-the-union-government-a-form-of-taxmineral-area-development-authority-v-steel-authority-of-india/

Regulating Industrial Alcohol | Judgement Summary - Supreme Court Observer
https://www.scobserver.in/reports/regulating-industrial-alcohol-judgement-summary-state-of-up-v-lalta-prasad-vaish-intoxicating-liquor/

Nature of Private Property - Supreme Court Observer
https://www.scobserver.in/cases/nature-of-private-property-property-owners-association-v-state-of-maharashtra/

Aligarh Muslim University's Minority Status - Supreme Court Observer
https://www.scobserver.in/cases/aligarh-muslim-university-minority-status-case-background-aligarh-muslim-university-through-its-registrar-faizan-mustafa-v-naresh-agarwal/

Official Answer Key.

chattisgarh preliminary 2025
@CurrentLegalGK

The Doctrine of Merger | SCC Times
https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2021/02/06/the-doctrine-of-merger/

#Quote@CurrentLegalGK

Justice Krishna Iyer believed that DPSPs and Fundamental Rights were “symbiotic, not antagonistic”, and “two sides of the same constitutional coin.”

https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2021/07/15/tribunal-reforms-rationalisation-and-conditions-of-service-ordinance-2021/

Madras Bar association v. Union of India 2021

Madras Bar Association v. UoI, 2021

@CurrentLegalGK

⏳🚀 Last one week for 90 Days pledge.

A journey without a robust final touch is a missed journey, so finish it properly.

https://t.me/NinetyDaysPledge

Right of cross examination part of fair trial under article 21

EXISTENCE OF ALTERNATIVE REMEDY AS AN OBSTACLE FOR AVAILING WRIT JURISDICTION
https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/EXISTENCE-OF-ALTERNATIVE-REMEDY-AS-AN-OBSTACLE-FOR-AVAILING-WRIT-JURISDICTION

Ex-CJI UU Lalit Criticises Lack Of Guidelines In BNS On Awarding Community Service As Punishment
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/ex-cji-uu-lalit-criticises-lack-of-guidelines-in-bns-on-awarding-community-service-as-punishment-305013

Not questioning the general discretion in sentencing policy rather the unguided discretion on quantum of punishment which is very apt.

'Abusing Community Leader Not Insult To Religion': Bombay High Court Quashes FIR U/S 295A IPC For Insulting Maratha Leader Manoj Jarange
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/bombay-high-court/bombay-high-court-rules-section-295a-ipc-abuse-not-religious-insult-305095

Ex-CJI UU Lalit Criticises New Penal Law BNS For Not Making Rape Gender Neutral Offence, Says Adult Male Victims Left Remediless
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/ex-cji-uu-lalit-criticises-new-penal-law-bns-for-not-making-rape-gender-neutral-offence-says-adult-male-victims-left-remediless-305145

17 years 11 months and 29 days year old male have a protection against sexual violence but just after one day he loses it.

Defining the limits of law is a tough task.

@CurrentLegalGK

BREAKING| No Need For Pre-Cognizance Summons To Accused In S.138 NI Act Case : Supreme Court Issues Directions For Speedy Trial Of Cheque Bounce Cases
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/no-pre-cognizance-summons-to-accused-in-s138-ni-act-supreme-court-directions-speedy-trial-cheque-bounce-305139

SANJABIJ TARI v. KISHORE S. BORCAR & 2025

#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK
#NIA@CurrentLegalGK

Landmark judgment on NI Act for various guidelines the below paragraph is on

Nature of NIA proceedings

Admittedly, the offence under Section 138 of the NI Act is quasi-criminal in character and is compoundable [See: Damodar S. Prabhu (supra)]. Recently,
in Gian Chand Garg v. Harpal Singh & Anr. a co-ordinate Bench of this Court has set aside concurrent convictions rendered by the Courts below on the ground that the proceeding under Section 138 of the NI Act is essentially a civil proceeding and it is open to the parties to enter into a voluntary compromise. Consequently, this Court is of the view that not only a voluntary compromise can bring the proceedings under Section 138 NI Act to an end, but

the accused under the said offence are entitled to benefit under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 [See: Chellammal & Another vs. State Represented by the Inspector of Police, 2025

SANJABIJ TARI v. KISHORE S. BORCAR & 2025

#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK
#NIA@CurrentLegalGK