1.Session 1 - Legislative Landscape.pdf
1.2 MB
Terrorism offence in BNS and UAPA and organised crimes and sedition changes in BNS.
- Joymalya Bagchi, Judge, Calcutta High Court
#BNS@CurrentLegalGK
- Joymalya Bagchi, Judge, Calcutta High Court
#BNS@CurrentLegalGK
π2β€βπ₯1
https://www.youtube.com/live/DDKQ89pTnx8?feature=shared
Terrorism offence in BNS and UAPA and organised crimes and sedition changes and waging war in BNS, BSA changes etc..
Important issue on interplay between UAPA and BNS section 113 explanation and section 239 BNSS r/w NIA act.
#BNS@CurrentLegalGK
Terrorism offence in BNS and UAPA and organised crimes and sedition changes and waging war in BNS, BSA changes etc..
Important issue on interplay between UAPA and BNS section 113 explanation and section 239 BNSS r/w NIA act.
#BNS@CurrentLegalGK
π1π―1
Explained: The Right to Education Act and minority educational institutions π
#express_premium #supreme_court
#express_premium #supreme_court
Express Explained
Explained: The Right to Education Act and minority educational institutions
SC has questioned a 2014 judgment that exempted minority schools from the ambit of Right to Education Act. The key issue is to strike a balance between minority rights and the universal right to education
Nepal Gen Z Protest: Why is Kathmandu burning? π
#explained_global #express_explained #k_p_sharma_oli #nepal
#explained_global #express_explained #k_p_sharma_oli #nepal
Express Explained
Nepal Gen Z Protest: Why is Kathmandu burning?
Nepal curfew news, Nepal Kathmandu Gen Z protest update: Who are the protesters on the streets of Kathmandu, who all have been attacked, and who is in charge in Nepal now? We answer the key questions surrounding the turmoil in Nepal.
SC on amended Waqf Act: What has been stayed, what remains π
#explained_law #express_explained #waqf_properties
#explained_law #express_explained #waqf_properties
Express Explained
SC on amended Waqf Act: What has been stayed, what remains
Supreme Court Waqf Amendment: While refusing to put a blanket stay on the entire amended Waqf law, the SC temporarily put on hold certain provisions. We explain what the court said.
Emmy Awards 2025: From 1949 to 2025, the journey of 76 years π
#express_explained #the_emmy_awards
#express_explained #the_emmy_awards
Express Explained
Emmy Awards 2025: From 1949 to 2025, the journey of 76 years
77th Primetime Emmys Awards, Emmy Awards winners: Here's a breakdown of televisionβs top prize β its origin, who runs it, how the winners are chosen, and a look at major historic wins.
Some good legal as well as current issues articles.
kindly read them if you haven't yet.
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
S.179(1) BNSS | Police Cannot Compel Presence Of 'Any Person' Acquainted With Case As Matter Of Right: Andhra Pradesh High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/andhra-pradesh-high-court/andhra-pradesh-high-court-ruling-section-179-bnss-power-police-officerβ¦
VD MOORTHY V STATE OF AP 2025 (APHC)
1. CAN POLICE ISSUE NOTICE TO PERSON RESIDING OUT THE JURISDICTIONAL LIMITS OF POLICE STATION?
βA Police Officer has no power to issue notice under Section 179(1) to any person who is not residing within the limits of his own station or any adjoining station. However, the same does not preclude him from making an investigation to examine such a person by approaching him at his place.
2. CAN POLICE ISSUE NOTICE TO PERSONS MENTIONED IN 179(1) PROVISO
β Yes police can issue notice to them as well i.e. male below and above 15 and 60 and women and mentally disabled person. But these are persons are not legally bound to attend the station however police may approach them in their place.
OBJECT OF 179 BNSS PROVISO
The object of this proviso appears to be, such persons, being vulnerable, cannot be troubled by the Police Officer in the name of investigation.β
#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK
1. CAN POLICE ISSUE NOTICE TO PERSON RESIDING OUT THE JURISDICTIONAL LIMITS OF POLICE STATION?
βA Police Officer has no power to issue notice under Section 179(1) to any person who is not residing within the limits of his own station or any adjoining station. However, the same does not preclude him from making an investigation to examine such a person by approaching him at his place.
2. CAN POLICE ISSUE NOTICE TO PERSONS MENTIONED IN 179(1) PROVISO
β Yes police can issue notice to them as well i.e. male below and above 15 and 60 and women and mentally disabled person. But these are persons are not legally bound to attend the station however police may approach them in their place.
OBJECT OF 179 BNSS PROVISO
The object of this proviso appears to be, such persons, being vulnerable, cannot be troubled by the Police Officer in the name of investigation.β
#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK
β€4π³1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Explained: The Right to Education Act and minority educational institutions π #express_premium #supreme_court
two-judge Bench of Justices Dipankar Datta and Manmohan, while deciding on whether the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET) was mandatory for minority schools, held that the ruling in Pramati Educational and Cultural Trust v Union of India (2014) requires reconsideration by a larger Bench of the SC.
The court observed that by taking minority schools out of the ambit of the RTE Act, the Pramati judgment may have jeopardised the fundamental right to quality education for children studying in them.
The court observed that by taking minority schools out of the ambit of the RTE Act, the Pramati judgment may have jeopardised the fundamental right to quality education for children studying in them.
β€2
#Quote@CurrentLegalGK
On a lighter note, the SG opined that Newton's Law also failed before the virality on social media.
"This is serious also, we used to know Newton's law- every action has an equal reaction, now every action has a disproportionate social media reaction."
On a lighter note, the SG opined that Newton's Law also failed before the virality on social media.
"This is serious also, we used to know Newton's law- every action has an equal reaction, now every action has a disproportionate social media reaction."
π2
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
https://www.bhaskarenglish.in/local/mp/news/indore-group-to-burn-surpanakha-effigy-with-sonam-raghuwanshis-face-posters-to-feature-women-accused-in-recent-crimes-against-men-135950795.html
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
Indore group to burn 'Surpanakha' effigy with Sonam Raghuwanshi's face:Posters to feature women accused in recent crimes against men; families of victims invited
Indore group to burn 'Surpanakha' effigy with Sonam Raghuwanshi's face:Posters to feature women accused in recent crimes against men; families of victims invited
Can she file a criminal or civil case for defamationββ€1
All HC | Law Officer employed with a bank counted as full-time employee and thus subject of prohibition under R. 49 of BCI Rules | SCC Times
https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2019/04/19/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules/
https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2019/04/19/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employee-and-thus-subject-of-prohibition-under-r-49-of-bci-rules/
SCC Times
All HC | Law Officer employed with a bank counted as full-time employee and thus subject of prohibition under R. 49 of BCI Rules
Allahabad High Court: The Bench of Pankaj Mithal and Saumitra Dayal Singh, JJ. dismissed a petition filed against the order which rejected
π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
All HC | Law Officer employed with a bank counted as full-time employee and thus subject of prohibition under R. 49 of BCI Rules | SCC Times https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2019/04/19/all-hc-law-officer-employed-with-a-bank-counted-as-full-time-employeeβ¦
So IBPS and other jobs will suspend your bar licence.How many of you are in a dilemma to either pursue a permanent job or get into practice and with struggle get the seat of dream job?
@CurrentLegalGK
β€3
SEBI Gives Clean Chit To Gautam Adani & Adani Group Companies In Hindenburg Case
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/sebi-gives-clean-chit-to-gautam-adani-and-companies-in-hindenburg-case-304380
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/sebi-gives-clean-chit-to-gautam-adani-and-companies-in-hindenburg-case-304380
www.livelaw.in
SEBI Gives Clean Chit To Gautam Adani & Adani Group Companies In Hindenburg Case
In a significant development, the Securities and Exchange Board (SE
Supreme Court Judgment That There's No Right To Convert Must Be Corrected : Justice RF Nariman
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-judgment-that-theres-no-right-to-religious-convert-must-be-corrected-justice-rf-nariman-304361
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-judgment-that-theres-no-right-to-religious-convert-must-be-corrected-justice-rf-nariman-304361
www.livelaw.in
Supreme Court Judgment That There's No Right To Convert Must Be Corrected : Justice RF Nariman
Right to propagate religion certainly includes the right to persuade another to join one's religion, Justice Nariman said.
0d6ef5296f368e964a20c62ddad0d1a74d29b6d81452012111c700c5ee9d51f91758226369.pdf
333.3 KB
5οΈβ£π¨ββοΈ REV. STAINISLAUS
v
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1977
Right to Freedom of religion -Article 25-Right to propogate doesn't mean Right to religion.
Similarly, section 3 of the Orissa Act prohibits forcible conversion by the use of force or by inducement or by any fraudulent means, and section 4 penalises such forcible conversion. The Acts therefore clearly provide for the maintenance of public order for, if forcible conversion had not been prohibited, that would have created public disorder in the States.
Under Entry 1 list 2 (state list) states are competent to enact anti conversion laws and it would not fall in Entry 97 of Union list which delas with residuary powers to enact laws.
Fundamental Right to Propogation of tenets of religion is allowed but not forceful conversion which fallls within exception of public order.
β__β
You have right to profess any religion so right to be converted.
#COI@CurrentLegalGK
v
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH
1977
Right to Freedom of religion -Article 25-Right to propogate doesn't mean Right to religion.
Similarly, section 3 of the Orissa Act prohibits forcible conversion by the use of force or by inducement or by any fraudulent means, and section 4 penalises such forcible conversion. The Acts therefore clearly provide for the maintenance of public order for, if forcible conversion had not been prohibited, that would have created public disorder in the States.
Under Entry 1 list 2 (state list) states are competent to enact anti conversion laws and it would not fall in Entry 97 of Union list which delas with residuary powers to enact laws.
Fundamental Right to Propogation of tenets of religion is allowed but not forceful conversion which fallls within exception of public order.
β__β
You have right to profess any religion so right to be converted.
#COI@CurrentLegalGK
β€4
fd34c756-7387-4994-8dae-1905e753ba32.pdf
324.3 KB
ENVIRONMENTAL CRIMINAL LAW JURISPRUDENCE &
ENFORCEMENT OF WILDLIFE PROTECTION LAW
#Environment@CurrentLegalGK
ENFORCEMENT OF WILDLIFE PROTECTION LAW
#Environment@CurrentLegalGK
β€1π―1
chap13.pdf
117.2 KB
β€βπ₯1β€1π1