𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

☺️ 360° Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
🟰 Mohammed Abdul Wahid v. Nilofer 2021

The Apex Court, through Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, held that β€œwitness and parties to a suit, for the purposes of adducing evidence, either documentary or oral are on the same footing.”

Accordingly, (i) there is no distinction carved out by the provisions of the CPC between a β€˜party to a suit as a witness’ and β€˜a witness simpliciter’; and (ii) documents may be produced to confront both a β€˜party to a suit’ and β€˜witness in a civil trial’ at the stage of cross-examination.

https://disputeresolution.cyrilamarchandblogs.com/2024/01/party-and-witness-on-an-equal-footing-for-the-purpose-of-adducing-evidence-in-civil-suit-supreme-court-clarifies/#_ftn1

#BSA@CurrentLegalGK
1405920211946876order12-sep-2023-492294.pdf
122.7 KB
The enactment of a new law will not obviate the need to adjudicate upon the constitutional validity of Section 124A for the simple reason that any new legislation of a penal character cannot have retrospective effect.

See the stark conflict
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/6827

The only difference is that of procedural and substantive law.

@CurrentLegalGK
❀1πŸ’―1
#BSA@CurrentLegalGK
#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK

A, an accomplice, gives an account of a robbery in which he took part. He also narrates certain incidents unconnected with the robbery that happened on his way to and from the scene of crime. Which of the following statements is correct regarding the admissibility of such evidence?

(a) Independent evidence of these incidents is irrelevant, as they are not directly connected with the robbery

(b) Independent evidence of these incidents may be admitted to corroborate A's testimony regarding the robbery

(c) Independent evidence of these incidents is admissible only if A is not an accomplice

(d) Independent evidence of these incidents are conclusive proof of the robbery


CITE RELEVANT PROVISIONS
❀5
πŸŒ•πŸŒ– Lunar Eclipse | Peak of Blood Moon.

Of course camera could not justify it due to cloudy weather, the colour was really Red.

Today, Learnt the lunar rising point cycles.

πŸ‘€Myth busted: Unlike Solar eclipse, you can watch Lunar eclipse with Naked Eyes.

Astrophysics is always Amazing 🀩


@CurrentLegalGK
❀‍πŸ”₯5⚑3πŸ”₯2❀1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Constitutional Morality And 130th Amendment https://www.livelaw.in/articles/constitutional-morality-and-constitution-130th-amendment-bill-2025-and-302452
The Representation of the People Act already disqualifies legislators upon conviction for crimes carrying a sentence of two years or more. That provision is justified because conviction follows judicial determination of guilt. The 130th Amendment goes further, introducing what may be called a β€œdisqualification by suspicion.” Philosophically, it privileges the appearance of morality over the substance of due process.

Can there be a different class of legislation for Minister and non minister MPs and MLAs? even MPs have a voting power but ministers are also part of executive and even on 38Hrs of cutody bureaucrats are suspended.


130th Constitutional amendment bill.

The main problem is with presumption of innocence is gone forever, we must understand that even ministers are MPs and MLAs and are representative of people merely on suspicion no suspension direct removal that too when 30 days custody is possible when we have a delayed criminal judtice system, the remedy can be a special court MP MLA courts which can speedily try and suspension would be the Right criteria.

#COI@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘2❀1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
AI Cannot Replace Human Conscience In Justice Delivery: Justice Vikram Nath https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/justice-vikram-nath-advises-against-lawyers-misusing-artificial-intelligence-303329
Role of Media in protecting public trust in judiciary.

β€œIf the past century belonged to the struggle for free speech, perhaps the coming one will belong to the struggle for true speech β€” information that is accurate, ethical, and respectful of dignity.
If the past century grappled with access to justice, the coming one may grapple with fairness in technologically driven justice. And
if the past century debated the power of the press, the coming one will debate the power of algorithms. The struggle is never-ending
”

Sometimes influencers and social media accounts themselves engage in selective picking of arguments/discussions being made in the Court. They extract this byte, usually termed as clickbait, to draw greater number of views to generate revenue at the cost of reputation of our Courts.

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ’―3❀1