𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

☺️ 360° Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Animal Rights in India: Landmark Cases and laws https://blog.finology.in/Legal-news/animal-rights-india
In many states across India, it is mandatory to get a pet license. However, no legislation on pet tax exists. For example the Punjab government announced a pet tax; of Rs. 250 for dogs & pig and Rs. 500 for cows.

Some Data on National Wildlife Day:
107 : National Parks.
573 : Wildlife sanctuaries
18 : Biospehere reserves.
7 : Natural World heritage sites.

22nd Feb and 4th Sept both are days of National Wildlife celebration.

Steve Irwin and colleen paige are founders of these 2 days.

Keep a watch on recent vantara zoo case which deals with wildlife protection act, 1972 and recognition of zoo rules 2009

No zoo can run without recognition by central zoo authority (38H of 1972 Act)

@CurrentLegalGK
❀7πŸ’―1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
'Witness Protection Scheme Not Substitute For Bail Cancellation' : Supreme Court Deprecates Allahabad High Court's 'Cyclostyled' Orders https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/witness-protection-scheme-not-substitute-for-bail-cancellation-supreme-court-deprecates…
Accused is threatening witness.

What remedy does witness have?

1. Witness protection scheme
2. Cancellation of accused bail.

Complainant: sought cancellation

Allahabad HC said : Use witness protection scheme

SC said: πŸ™‚ Cancellation of Bail is then otiose and bail conditions are of no use of its violation is brushed aside simply because alternative rmedy is present.


Witness protection Scheme v. Cancellation of Bail (both are different yet work simultaneously)

Thus, the purpose of the Scheme is to ensure that witnesses, who are the eyes and ears of justice, are not reduced to silence or falsehood by threats that invade their psyche. It does not displace or dilute the established jurisprudence of bail; rather, it works alongside it, providing a protective canopy so that the existing provisions can
operate in an environment where witnesses are free to testify. This duality is essential, as the law on bail restrains the accused through conditions, and prevents any further infractions of intimidation by cancellation of bail while the Witness Protection Scheme eradicate the invisible yet potent influence of fear, intimidation or threat, that are the consequences of the threats made by the accused persons to maintain the sanctity of trial.

Read on witness protection Scheme: https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/6200

PHIRERAM v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH 2025



#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘3❀1
#Question@CurrentLegalGK

If an Offence of Rape is committed by a man on her wife and husband pleads exception of marriage but the marriage is technically void due to one ceremony was not conducted even though both husband and wife were living together from 5 years as husband and wife, whether offence of rape is committed?
2025_livelaw_sc_169_vihaan_kumar_v_state_of_haryana_7_feb_2025_611210.pdf
451.8 KB
Grounds of arrest in writing to accused as well as relative to make Article 22 meaningful

Hence, the requirement of communicating the grounds
of arrest in writing is not only to the arrested person, but also to the friends, relatives or such other person as may be disclosed or nominated by the arrested person, so as to make the mandate of Article 22(1) of the Constitution meaningful and effective failing which, such arrest may be rendered illegal

2. Arrest illegal if Groumds not provided.

VIHAAN KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA 2025
πŸ‘4❀2
2025_livelaw_sc_628_kasireddy_upender_reddy_v_state_of_andhra_pradesh.pdf
593.8 KB
KASIREDDY UPENDER REDDY v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

If a person is arrested on a warrant, the grounds for reasons for the arrest is the warrant itself; if the warrant is read over to him, that is sufficient compliance with the requirement that he should be informed of the grounds for his arrest.

Reasons for arrest v Grounds for arrest (Prabir Purkayastha v. State, 2024)

#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK SECTION 47
πŸ‘4❀2
MIHIR RAJESH SHAH v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA SLP(Crl) No. 17132/2024

Pending....

"The question that we are called upon to answer is as to whether in each and every case, even arising out of IPC, would it be necessary to furnish grounds of arrest to accused either before arrest or forthwith after arrest? Another question we are required to consider is, in exceptional cases, on account of exigencies, if it is not possible to furnish grounds of arrest either before or immediately after arrest, whether even in such cases the arrest is vitiated on account of non-compliance with Section 50 CrPC

#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK