𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

☺️ 360° Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
subject_wise_case_guide_law_students_secretary_general_sc_subhash_chandra https://www.manupatracademy.com/home/subject-wise-case-guide-law-students-secretary-general-sc-subhash-chandra
Point to be noted here is the court delivered judgment is High Court.

The High Court of Delhi held that asset declarations of Supreme Court judges should be disclosed if there is public interest in disclosure; where the interest is shown, the authority should consult the judge concerned and balance the interest in disclosure against privacy concerns.

Title: Secretary General, Supreme Court of India vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal 2010


Relevancy: Recent declaration of assets by judges of Supreme Court.


@CurrentLegalGK
❀2πŸ‘1
9b0fda072a7783b0a4e16ee29eee31979cd734ec1e98f4400fad596eb05d67e61756752023.pdf
2.2 MB
CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION
OFFICER, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
v.
SUBHASH CHANDRA AGARWAL
2019 (5 Judges bench)

Upheld the 2010 Delhi High Court judgment (see para 116 at conclusions) ( of course with additional conclusions)

Judicial accountability, judges asset declaration, right to information and CJI office.

Now a mandatory disclosure of assets by SC/HC judges after 2025 resolution.

Case also dealt with procedure and elements considered before appointing judves by collegium system.


#COI@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ”₯2❀1πŸ‘1πŸ’―1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Legal research isn’t just about finding, it’s about understanding https://www.barandbench.com/view-point/legal-research-isnt-just-about-finding-its-about-understanding
Yes it is always about good authority on a relevant finding of law in a judgment.

Currently the competitive exams tests the basics which is again difficult due to the volume but when a real societal problem arises then even toppers would barely pass in finding a law on real world societal problem which is not taught in any law school except for some moot court exercises which ks usually on substantial questions of law which never arises in practical situations.

Therefore keep your legal lens open find problems with good observation skills and then try to find a law or remedy on it.


So have you seen medical shops giving medicines without prescription, is this a problem?

@CurrentLegalGK
❀4πŸ’―3πŸ‘1
Former Prime Minister H.D. Deve Gowda writes to Hon'ble PM Narendra Modi on Recent foreign visits and developments in relations and world order.

@CurrentLegalGK
🌚3πŸ‘2❀1😍1
PARAMVIR SINGH SAINI  vs. BALJIT SINGH 2020 (landmark case which issued guidelines to install CCTV with oversight committees)

Full summary with chronological cases:
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4257

Recent backdrop:
The Supreme Court on September 4 registered a suo motu case on the lack of functional CCTV cameras in police stations across the country.

A bench  took the suo motu action based on a report published by Dainik Bhaskar. As per the report, around 11 people have died in police custody in the last seven to eight months this year.
⚑4πŸ‘2πŸ’―1