#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK

Landmark case on constructive Res judicata

Supreme Court Judges Launch NALSA Scheme For Victims Of Human -Wildlife Conflict
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/kelsa-nalsa-conference-on-human-wildlife-conflict-co-existence-302454

“The topic of the conference centers around conflict and co-existence. These are not opposites, they are two possibilities that arises from the choices we make.”

Compendium of notifications guidelines circulars of central state etc... Use for research paper.

https://scourtapp.nic.in/ebook/index.html

🙂 Why section 307 of IPC is not unconstitutional if 303 is

303: Whoever, being under sentence of imprisonment for life, commits murder, shall be punished with death.

307 Para 2: When any person offending under this section is under sentence of imprisonment for life, he may, if hurt is caused, be punished with death.

Mithu Singh v. State of Punjab, 1983

Distinction between two Sections 302 and 303 of IPC is that Section 302 of IPC provides for sentence of death as alternative sentence - Only sentence which Section 303 of IPC prescribes is sentence of death - Court has no option under Section 303of IPC to impose any other sentence - Since Section 303 of IPC does not provide for alternative sentence, Section 354(3) of Cr PC has no application to cases arising under that Section - Section 235(2) of CrPC which confers right upon accused to be heard on question of sentence becomes meaningless ritual in cases arising under Section 303 of IPC - In matter of Dilip Kumar Sharma vs State of M.P., Supreme Court hold that Section is Draconian in severity, relentless and inexorable in operation - Court strike down Section 303 of IPC as unconstitutional and declare it void - All cases of murder will fall under Section 302 of IPC and there shall be no mandatory sentence of death for offence of murder - Petitions may be placed before Division Bench for disposal on merits in light of above judgments

What provisions of BNS deals with the aforesaid provisions of IPC?

#BNS@CurrentLegalGK

Constitutional Morality And 130th Amendment
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/constitutional-morality-and-constitution-130th-amendment-bill-2025-and-302452

A Need For Quota For Women Judges In Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/a-need-for-quota-for-women-judges-in-supreme-court-302417

Relate it with 106th Constitutional Amendment for better analogy.

@CurrentLegalGK

Beyond Formality: Why Written Grounds Of Arrest Must Reach Both Accused And Their Families
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/article-22-of-constitution-and-written-grounds-of-arrest-analysis-302404

🏢🏚️ For those giving exams which have insolvency and bankruptcy code of india 2016 in their syllabus.

https://vinodkothari.com/2025/08/ibc-amendment-bill-2025/


Still a bill.

#IBC@CurrentLegalGK

🛣️👷‍♂️🚧 Roadside Revisions be like

Afcons Infrastructure v. Cherian Varkey, 2010

Read: https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4998

#Jocks@CurrentLegalGK

⚽ Which offence if any has been committed in this scenerio?

#Jocks@CurrentLegalGK

BREAKING| Supreme Court Doubts Correctness Of Judgment Exempting Minority Schools From RTE Act; Refers To CJI
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-doubts-correctness-of-judgment-excluding-minority-schools-from-rte-act-refers-to-cji-302557

subject_wise_case_guide_law_students_secretary_general_sc_subhash_chandra
https://www.manupatracademy.com/home/subject-wise-case-guide-law-students-secretary-general-sc-subhash-chandra

Point to be noted here is the court delivered judgment is High Court.

The High Court of Delhi held that asset declarations of Supreme Court judges should be disclosed if there is public interest in disclosure; where the interest is shown, the authority should consult the judge concerned and balance the interest in disclosure against privacy concerns.

Title: Secretary General, Supreme Court of India vs. Subhash Chandra Agarwal 2010

Relevancy: Recent declaration of assets by judges of Supreme Court.


@CurrentLegalGK

CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION
OFFICER, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
v.
SUBHASH CHANDRA AGARWAL
2019 (5 Judges bench)

Upheld the 2010 Delhi High Court judgment (see para 116 at conclusions) ( of course with additional conclusions)

Judicial accountability, judges asset declaration, right to information and CJI office.

Now a mandatory disclosure of assets by SC/HC judges after 2025 resolution.

Case also dealt with procedure and elements considered before appointing judves by collegium system.


#COI@CurrentLegalGK

Police Can Further Investigate Even After Chargesheet Submission; Magistrate's Permission Not Required: Gujarat High Court
https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/high-courts/gujarat-high-court/manoj-kumar-v-state-2025-gujhc-42612-post-office-ahmedabad-illegal-currency-exchange-demonetization-1589964

'Every Acquittal Of Actual Culprit A Blot On System' : Supreme Court Warns Against Misapplying 'Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt'
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/every-acquittal-of-actual-culprit-a-blot-on-system-supreme-court-warns-against-misapplying-proof-beyond-reasonable-doubt-302654

Anna Chandy: the one who stood tall in court - The Hindu
https://www.thehindu.com/children/anna-chandy-the-one-who-stood-tall-in-court/article69987712.ece