Liquor Shop Allotment In Densely Populated Market Prima Facie Violates Articles 21 & 47 Of Constitution: Rajasthan High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-order-allotment-of-liquor-shops-and-rajasthan-government-temperance-policy-302480
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-order-allotment-of-liquor-shops-and-rajasthan-government-temperance-policy-302480
www.livelaw.in
Liquor Shop Allotment In Densely Populated Market Prima Facie Violates Articles 21 & 47 Of Constitution: Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court has said that allotment of liquor shops in densely populated market was "prima facie" against Articles 21 and 47 of the Constitution, and directed the State to furnish an...
β€1π1
UKJS Prelims 2025.pdf
11.5 MB
UKJS Prelims 2025
Uttarakhand Preliminary 2025
@CurrentLegalGK
Question 27 was a reminder in between of thr exam to pay focus this is the golden opportunity.
Uttarakhand Preliminary 2025
@CurrentLegalGK
π₯2β€1β‘1π1
7οΈβ£:
π¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈ
v.
π¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈ
By majority: Sikri, C.J. and Shelat, Hegde, Grover, Khanna, Jaganmohan
Reddy and Mukherjea, JJ.
Dissenting: (Ray, Palekar, Mathew, Beg, Dwivedi and Chandrachud, JJ. ) :
What was exactly held:
"The power to amend does not include the power to alter the basic structure or framework of the Constitution so as to change its identity"
@CurrentLegalGK
6οΈβ£ Basic structure Coram strength
π¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈ
v.
π¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈ
By majority: Sikri, C.J. and Shelat, Hegde, Grover, Khanna, Jaganmohan
Reddy and Mukherjea, JJ.
Dissenting: (Ray, Palekar, Mathew, Beg, Dwivedi and Chandrachud, JJ. ) :
What was exactly held:
"The power to amend does not include the power to alter the basic structure or framework of the Constitution so as to change its identity"
@CurrentLegalGK
β€4π―1
#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK
Article 21 KS puttaswamy
#Quote@CurrentLegalGK
Privacy attaches to the person since it is an essential part of the dignity of human existence and happiness derives from the right to decide for oneself and dignity, which are both essential attributes of Privacy.
Article 21 KS puttaswamy
#Quote@CurrentLegalGK
β€1π1
Supreme Court Judges Launch NALSA Scheme For Victims Of Human -Wildlife Conflict
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/kelsa-nalsa-conference-on-human-wildlife-conflict-co-existence-302454
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/kelsa-nalsa-conference-on-human-wildlife-conflict-co-existence-302454
www.livelaw.in
Supreme Court Judges Launch NALSA Scheme For Victims Of Human -Wildlife Conflict
The two-day Regional Conference on Human -Wildlife Conflict & Co-Existence organized by the Kerala State Legal Services Authority (KeLSA) under the aegis of the National Legal Services Authority...
β€1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Supreme Court Judges Launch NALSA Scheme For Victims Of Human -Wildlife Conflict https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/kelsa-nalsa-conference-on-human-wildlife-conflict-co-existence-302454
βThe topic of the conference centers around conflict and co-existence. These are not opposites, they are two possibilities that arises from the choices we make.β
Compendium of notifications guidelines circulars of central state etc... Use for research paper.
https://scourtapp.nic.in/ebook/index.html
Compendium of notifications guidelines circulars of central state etc... Use for research paper.
https://scourtapp.nic.in/ebook/index.html
scourtapp.nic.in
COMPENDIUM ON HUMAN-WILDLIFE CONFLICT 2025
β€1
βοΈπ
It will help you remember the Punishments under IPCβ
π We will share the list of all Punishment mentioned under Section 53 and beyond that some important tricks as well.
π₯Some other laws including-
β POCSO Section 6
βArms Act
βUAPA
βNDPS
βSC ST Act
βCoast Gaurd, BSF, ITBP force Act
βGeneva convention Act
Section #376DB #376AB #120B #364A #121 #195A of IPC
@CurrentLegalGK
Offences Punishable With Death Penalty Under IPC It will help you remember the Punishments under IPCβ
π We will share the list of all Punishment mentioned under Section 53 and beyond that some important tricks as well.
π₯Some other laws including-
β POCSO Section 6
βArms Act
βUAPA
βNDPS
βSC ST Act
βCoast Gaurd, BSF, ITBP force Act
βGeneva convention Act
Section #376DB #376AB #120B #364A #121 #195A of IPC
@CurrentLegalGK
β2β€2β€βπ₯2β‘1
π
303: Whoever, being under sentence of imprisonment for life, commits murder, shall be punished with death.
307 Para 2: When any person offending under this section is under sentence of imprisonment for life, he may, if hurt is caused, be punished with death.
Distinction between two Sections 302 and 303 of IPC is that Section 302 of IPC provides for sentence of death as alternative sentence - Only sentence which Section 303 of IPC prescribes is sentence of death - Court has no option under Section 303of IPC to impose any other sentence - Since Section 303 of IPC does not provide for alternative sentence, Section 354(3) of Cr PC has no application to cases arising under that Section - Section 235(2) of CrPC which confers right upon accused to be heard on question of sentence becomes meaningless ritual in cases arising under Section 303 of IPC - In matter of Dilip Kumar Sharma vs State of M.P., Supreme Court hold that Section is Draconian in severity, relentless and inexorable in operation - Court strike down Section 303 of IPC as unconstitutional and declare it void - All cases of murder will fall under Section 302 of IPC and there shall be no mandatory sentence of death for offence of murder - Petitions may be placed before Division Bench for disposal on merits in light of above judgments
#BNS@CurrentLegalGK
Why section 307 of IPC is not unconstitutional if 303 is303: Whoever, being under sentence of imprisonment for life, commits murder, shall be punished with death.
307 Para 2: When any person offending under this section is under sentence of imprisonment for life, he may, if hurt is caused, be punished with death.
Mithu Singh v. State of Punjab, 1983
Distinction between two Sections 302 and 303 of IPC is that Section 302 of IPC provides for sentence of death as alternative sentence - Only sentence which Section 303 of IPC prescribes is sentence of death - Court has no option under Section 303of IPC to impose any other sentence - Since Section 303 of IPC does not provide for alternative sentence, Section 354(3) of Cr PC has no application to cases arising under that Section - Section 235(2) of CrPC which confers right upon accused to be heard on question of sentence becomes meaningless ritual in cases arising under Section 303 of IPC - In matter of Dilip Kumar Sharma vs State of M.P., Supreme Court hold that Section is Draconian in severity, relentless and inexorable in operation - Court strike down Section 303 of IPC as unconstitutional and declare it void - All cases of murder will fall under Section 302 of IPC and there shall be no mandatory sentence of death for offence of murder - Petitions may be placed before Division Bench for disposal on merits in light of above judgments
What provisions of BNS deals with the aforesaid provisions of IPC?
#BNS@CurrentLegalGK
β€4π3β1π³1π―1
Constitutional Morality And 130th Amendment
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/constitutional-morality-and-constitution-130th-amendment-bill-2025-and-302452
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/constitutional-morality-and-constitution-130th-amendment-bill-2025-and-302452
www.livelaw.in
Constitutional Morality And 130th Amendment
The relationship between law and morality has long occupied philosophers and jurists. Lon Fuller distinguished between the βmorality of lawβ and the βmorality of duty,β while H.L.A. Hart cautioned...
β€2π1