All the best Uttarakhand Preliminary exam candidates.
I hope everyone of you give the best according to your potential and just one tip read twice even if you know the answer, to avoid silly mistakes.
@CurrentLegalGK
I hope everyone of you give the best according to your potential and just one tip read twice even if you know the answer, to avoid silly mistakes.
@CurrentLegalGK
β€4π2
2024092873.pdf
866.2 KB
β€2β€βπ₯1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
64_Patan_Jamal_Vali_v_State_of_AP.pdf
βΏβοΈπ§Ύ
Rape against disabled women.
Intersectionality test.
Para 55 for SC ST Act.
Para 54 for testimony of disabled witness.
This kind of a judicial attitude stems from and perpetuates the underlying bias and stereotypes against persons with disabilities. We are of the view that the testimony of a prosecutrix with a disability, or of a disabled witness for that matter, cannot be considered weak or inferior, only because such an individual interacts with the world in a different manner, vis-a-vis their able-bodied counterparts. As long as the testimony of such a witness otherwise meets the criteria for inspiring judicial confidence, it is entitled to full legal weight. It goes without saying that the court appreciating such testimony needs to be attentive to the fact that the witnessβ disability can have the consequence of the testimony being rendered in a different form, relative to that of an able-bodied witness. In the case at hand, for instance, PW2βs blindness meant that she had no visual contact with the world. Her primary mode of identifying those around her, therefore, is by the sound of their voice. And so PW2βs testimony is entitled to equal weight as that of a prosecutrix who would have been able to visually identify the appellant.
Article 15(1) Navtej singh johar and intersectionality test (only on the ground)
#SCST@CurrentLegalGK
#BSA@CurrentLegalGK
#COI@CurrentLegalGK
Patan Jamal Vali v. State of Andhra Pradesh 2022Rape against disabled women.
Intersectionality test.
Para 55 for SC ST Act.
Para 54 for testimony of disabled witness.
This kind of a judicial attitude stems from and perpetuates the underlying bias and stereotypes against persons with disabilities. We are of the view that the testimony of a prosecutrix with a disability, or of a disabled witness for that matter, cannot be considered weak or inferior, only because such an individual interacts with the world in a different manner, vis-a-vis their able-bodied counterparts. As long as the testimony of such a witness otherwise meets the criteria for inspiring judicial confidence, it is entitled to full legal weight. It goes without saying that the court appreciating such testimony needs to be attentive to the fact that the witnessβ disability can have the consequence of the testimony being rendered in a different form, relative to that of an able-bodied witness. In the case at hand, for instance, PW2βs blindness meant that she had no visual contact with the world. Her primary mode of identifying those around her, therefore, is by the sound of their voice. And so PW2βs testimony is entitled to equal weight as that of a prosecutrix who would have been able to visually identify the appellant.
Deaf's identification by hearing same as ocular evidence.
Article 15(1) Navtej singh johar and intersectionality test (only on the ground)
#SCST@CurrentLegalGK
#BSA@CurrentLegalGK
#COI@CurrentLegalGK
β€4β3π1π³1
Supreme Court Half Yearly Digest 2025: Evidence Act & BSA
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-judgments-and-orders-evidence-act-and-bsa-digest-2025-302481
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-judgments-and-orders-evidence-act-and-bsa-digest-2025-302481
www.livelaw.in
Supreme Court Half Yearly Digest 2025: Evidence Act & BSA
SUPREME COURT HALF YEARLY DIGEST 2025BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023, (BSA) / INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872, (IEA)Section 6. Motive, preparation and previous or subsequent conductSection 8 IEA -...
β€3
Liquor Shop Allotment In Densely Populated Market Prima Facie Violates Articles 21 & 47 Of Constitution: Rajasthan High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-order-allotment-of-liquor-shops-and-rajasthan-government-temperance-policy-302480
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-order-allotment-of-liquor-shops-and-rajasthan-government-temperance-policy-302480
www.livelaw.in
Liquor Shop Allotment In Densely Populated Market Prima Facie Violates Articles 21 & 47 Of Constitution: Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court has said that allotment of liquor shops in densely populated market was "prima facie" against Articles 21 and 47 of the Constitution, and directed the State to furnish an...
β€1π1
UKJS Prelims 2025.pdf
11.5 MB
UKJS Prelims 2025
Uttarakhand Preliminary 2025
@CurrentLegalGK
Question 27 was a reminder in between of thr exam to pay focus this is the golden opportunity.
Uttarakhand Preliminary 2025
@CurrentLegalGK
π₯2β€1β‘1π1
7οΈβ£:
π¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈ
v.
π¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈ
By majority: Sikri, C.J. and Shelat, Hegde, Grover, Khanna, Jaganmohan
Reddy and Mukherjea, JJ.
Dissenting: (Ray, Palekar, Mathew, Beg, Dwivedi and Chandrachud, JJ. ) :
What was exactly held:
"The power to amend does not include the power to alter the basic structure or framework of the Constitution so as to change its identity"
@CurrentLegalGK
6οΈβ£ Basic structure Coram strength
π¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈ
v.
π¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈ
By majority: Sikri, C.J. and Shelat, Hegde, Grover, Khanna, Jaganmohan
Reddy and Mukherjea, JJ.
Dissenting: (Ray, Palekar, Mathew, Beg, Dwivedi and Chandrachud, JJ. ) :
What was exactly held:
"The power to amend does not include the power to alter the basic structure or framework of the Constitution so as to change its identity"
@CurrentLegalGK
β€4π―1
#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK
Article 21 KS puttaswamy
#Quote@CurrentLegalGK
Privacy attaches to the person since it is an essential part of the dignity of human existence and happiness derives from the right to decide for oneself and dignity, which are both essential attributes of Privacy.
Article 21 KS puttaswamy
#Quote@CurrentLegalGK
β€1π1
Supreme Court Judges Launch NALSA Scheme For Victims Of Human -Wildlife Conflict
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/kelsa-nalsa-conference-on-human-wildlife-conflict-co-existence-302454
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/kelsa-nalsa-conference-on-human-wildlife-conflict-co-existence-302454
www.livelaw.in
Supreme Court Judges Launch NALSA Scheme For Victims Of Human -Wildlife Conflict
The two-day Regional Conference on Human -Wildlife Conflict & Co-Existence organized by the Kerala State Legal Services Authority (KeLSA) under the aegis of the National Legal Services Authority...
β€1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Supreme Court Judges Launch NALSA Scheme For Victims Of Human -Wildlife Conflict https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/kelsa-nalsa-conference-on-human-wildlife-conflict-co-existence-302454
βThe topic of the conference centers around conflict and co-existence. These are not opposites, they are two possibilities that arises from the choices we make.β
Compendium of notifications guidelines circulars of central state etc... Use for research paper.
https://scourtapp.nic.in/ebook/index.html
Compendium of notifications guidelines circulars of central state etc... Use for research paper.
https://scourtapp.nic.in/ebook/index.html
scourtapp.nic.in
COMPENDIUM ON HUMAN-WILDLIFE CONFLICT 2025
β€1