𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

☺️ 360° Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
#Maxim@CurrentLegalGK

1. Assentio Mentium: Assent of Minds

2. Consensus ad idem: Meeting of Minds)
(section 13 contract act)

3. Bona Vacantia: {Res Nullius}
Goods without an owner
(Escheat)

4. In limine: At the outset
(Motion not heard on merits but dismissed in limine).

#CPC@CurrentLegalGK
#TPA@CurrentLegalGK
#ICA@CurrentLegalGK
❀‍πŸ”₯3πŸ‘3❀2🀝1
All the best Uttarakhand Preliminary exam candidates.

I hope everyone of you give the best according to your potential and just one tip read twice even if you know the answer, to avoid silly mistakes
.

@CurrentLegalGK
❀4πŸ‘2
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
64_Patan_Jamal_Vali_v_State_of_AP.pdf
β™Ώβ™€οΈπŸ§Ύ Patan Jamal Vali v. State of Andhra Pradesh 2022

Rape against disabled women.
Intersectionality test.

Para 55 for SC ST Act.

Para 54 for testimony of disabled witness.

This kind of a judicial attitude stems from and perpetuates the underlying bias and stereotypes against persons with disabilities. We are of the view that the testimony of a prosecutrix with a disability, or of a disabled witness for that matter, cannot be considered weak or inferior, only because such an individual interacts with the world in a different manner, vis-a-vis their able-bodied counterparts. As long as the testimony of such a witness otherwise meets the criteria for inspiring judicial confidence, it is entitled to full legal weight. It goes without saying that the court appreciating such testimony needs to be attentive to the fact that the witness’ disability can have the consequence of the testimony being rendered in a different form, relative to that of an able-bodied witness. In the case at hand, for instance, PW2’s blindness meant that she had no visual contact with the world. Her primary mode of identifying those around her, therefore, is by the sound of their voice. And so PW2’s testimony is entitled to equal weight as that of a prosecutrix who would have been able to visually identify the appellant.

Deaf's identification by hearing same as ocular evidence.


Article 15(1) Navtej singh johar and intersectionality test (only on the ground)

#SCST@CurrentLegalGK
#BSA@CurrentLegalGK
#COI@CurrentLegalGK
❀4✍3πŸ‘1🐳1
7️⃣: 6️⃣ Basic structure Coram strength

πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈπŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈπŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈπŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈπŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈπŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈπŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈ
v.
πŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈπŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈπŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈπŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈπŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈπŸ‘¨β€βš–οΈ


By majority: Sikri, C.J. and Shelat, Hegde, Grover, Khanna, Jaganmohan
Reddy and Mukherjea, JJ.

Dissenting: (Ray, Palekar, Mathew, Beg, Dwivedi and Chandrachud, JJ. ) :

What was exactly held:
"The power to amend does not include the power to alter the basic structure or framework of the Constitution so as to change its identity"

@CurrentLegalGK
❀4πŸ’―1
#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK

Privacy attaches to the person since it is an essential part of the dignity of human existence and happiness derives from the right to decide for oneself and dignity, which are both essential attributes of Privacy.


Article 21 KS puttaswamy
#Quote@CurrentLegalGK
❀1πŸ‘1