CoolingโOff And Committees: New Path For Section 85 BNS Reform
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/coolingoff-committees-new-path-section85-bns-reform-300442
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/coolingoff-committees-new-path-section85-bns-reform-300442
www.livelaw.in
CoolingโOff And Committees: New Path For Section 85 BNS Reform
Section 85 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding to the earlier section 498A of IPC) deals with instances of cruelty committed against married women in their matrimonial house by the...
โค3
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
CoolingโOff And Committees: New Path For Section 85 BNS Reform https://www.livelaw.in/articles/coolingoff-committees-new-path-section85-bns-reform-300442
cruelty 498A
better to read brief as this article doesn't discuss the main precedential value of this judgment.
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/6405
better to read brief as this article doesn't discuss the main precedential value of this judgment.
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/6405
โค3
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
https://www.verdictum.in/job-updates/district-legal-services-authority-keonjhar-1587730
apply now, only students are eligible and not advocates.
โค4
Fraud as a Ground for Arbitrability: Demystifying the Evolved Jurisprudence
https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/Fraud-as-a-Ground-for-Arbitrability-Demystifying-the-Evolved-Jurisprudence
https://articles.manupatra.com/article-details/Fraud-as-a-Ground-for-Arbitrability-Demystifying-the-Evolved-Jurisprudence
Manupatra
Articles โ Manupatra
Expand your legal research by reading legal articles & updates by law students, legal professionals, law firms, case studies & briefs, academic journals etc.
โค2
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/if-its-reported-to-us-we-will-proceed-to-take-action-against-any-such-resistance-which-may-be-offeredwe-are-issuing-this-directing-keeping-in-mind-the-larger-public-interest-300515
IN RE 'CITY HOUNDED BY STRAYS, KIDS PAY PRICE'
SMW(C) No. 5/2025
SMW(C) No. 5/2025
Is this Suo Motu Petition limited to NCT delhi? but we see this problem prevailing in most of the parts of country?
๐1
S.223 BNSS Which Gives Right Of Hearing To Accused Before Cognizance Can Apply To Complaint Filed Before July 01, 2024: P&H High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court/223-bnss-accused-right-to-hearing-cognizance-retrospective-complaint-filed-before-bnss-enforcement-300494
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court/223-bnss-accused-right-to-hearing-cognizance-retrospective-complaint-filed-before-bnss-enforcement-300494
www.livelaw.in
S.223 BNSS Which Gives Right Of Hearing To Accused Before Cognizance Can Apply To Complaint Filed Before July 01, 2024: P&H Highโฆ
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that Section 223 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhit
๐1
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
S.223 BNSS Which Gives Right Of Hearing To Accused Before Cognizance Can Apply To Complaint Filed Before July 01, 2024: P&H High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court/223-bnss-accused-right-to-hearing-cognizance-retrospectiveโฆ
" Issuing process of a criminal offence has serious repercussions for the accused, and that is the reason the Legislature deemed it appropriate to provide prior hearing to the person sought to be summoned. The right of hearing is one of the most cherished rights in the criminal jurisprudence, and is embedded in the Principles of Natural Justice permeating to the Constitutional scheme of things, especially Articles 14 and 21 guaranteeing the right to fair trial. Therefore, there is no reason why the benefit of hearing should not be afforded to the accused after coming into force of the BNSS, even if complaint against him has been technically filed before coming into force of the BNSS on 01.07.2024."
Retrospective application of 223 BNSS
Our Question and draft answer:
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/5028
#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK
Retrospective application of 223 BNSS
Sikander Singh v. ED, 2025 (P&H)
Our Question and draft answer:
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/5028
#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK
๐5โค1
เคชเฅเคฒเคฟเคธ เคถเคฌเฅเคฆเคพเคตเคฒเฅ.pdf
2.8 MB
โคโ๐ฅ1๐1
Inception of Epistolary Jurisdiction | RostrumLegal
https://www.rostrumlegal.com/inception-of-epistolary-jurisdiction/
https://www.rostrumlegal.com/inception-of-epistolary-jurisdiction/
RostrumLegal
Inception of Epistolary Jurisdiction - RostrumLegal
Public Interest Litigation- The Beginning
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
Inception of Epistolary Jurisdiction | RostrumLegal https://www.rostrumlegal.com/inception-of-epistolary-jurisdiction/
Which was the first case where epistolary jurisdiction of Supreme Court was invoked.
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
Kindly read judgement before you answer.
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
3 Member committee formed by speaker of lok sabha under section 3 of judges inquiry act 1968.
Following are the 3 members:
i) Supreme Court Judge Justice Aravind Kumar,
ii) Chief Justice of Madras High Court Justice Maninder Mohan Shrivastava and
iii) Senior Advocate of Karnataka High Court B V Acharaya. (of course distinguished jurist in speaker's opinion)
.
https://youtu.be/feugRUKlAok?feature=shared
Following are the 3 members:
i) Supreme Court Judge Justice Aravind Kumar,
ii) Chief Justice of Madras High Court Justice Maninder Mohan Shrivastava and
iii) Senior Advocate of Karnataka High Court B V Acharaya. (of course distinguished jurist in speaker's opinion)
.
https://youtu.be/feugRUKlAok?feature=shared
YouTube
LS Speaker Om Birla discusses impeachment of Allahabad High Court Judge Justice Yashwant Varma.
#monsoonsession2025 #loksabha #rajyasabha #parliamentsession
เคฒเฅเคเคธเคญเคพ เคธเฅเคชเฅเคเคฐ @ombirlakota เคจเฅ เคเคฒเคพเคนเคพเคฌเคพเคฆ HC เคเฅ เคเค เคฏเคถเคตเคเคค เคตเคฐเฅเคฎเคพ เคเฅ เคฎเคนเคพเคญเคฟเคฏเฅเค เคชเคฐ เคเคฐเฅเคเคพ เคเฅ เคเคฐ เคเคฐเฅเคชเฅเค เคเฅ เคเคพเคเค เคนเฅเคคเฅ เคคเฅเคจ เคธเคฆเคธเฅเคฏเฅเคฏ เคชเฅเคจเคฒ เคเฅ เคเฅเคทเคฃเคพ เคเฅเฅค SC judge Aravind Kumar, Madras HC Chief Justice Manindraโฆ
เคฒเฅเคเคธเคญเคพ เคธเฅเคชเฅเคเคฐ @ombirlakota เคจเฅ เคเคฒเคพเคนเคพเคฌเคพเคฆ HC เคเฅ เคเค เคฏเคถเคตเคเคค เคตเคฐเฅเคฎเคพ เคเฅ เคฎเคนเคพเคญเคฟเคฏเฅเค เคชเคฐ เคเคฐเฅเคเคพ เคเฅ เคเคฐ เคเคฐเฅเคชเฅเค เคเฅ เคเคพเคเค เคนเฅเคคเฅ เคคเฅเคจ เคธเคฆเคธเฅเคฏเฅเคฏ เคชเฅเคจเคฒ เคเฅ เคเฅเคทเคฃเคพ เคเฅเฅค SC judge Aravind Kumar, Madras HC Chief Justice Manindraโฆ
โค3๐1
5a54cb47231b948d69322f599c13e64209950d3e99475d525f392b2b72a42f961755004799.pdf
939.3 KB
FERTILIZER CORPORATION KAMGAR UNION (REGD.),
B SINDRI AND OTHERS
v.
UNION OF INDIA 1980
B SINDRI AND OTHERS
v.
UNION OF INDIA 1980
S.58 BNSS | Bail Must Be Granted To Accused If Not Produced Before Magistrate Within 24 Hrs Of Arrest: Orissa High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/orissa-high-court/orissa-high-court-ruling-production-of-accused-within-24-hours-illegal-arrest-and-section-58-bnss-300588
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/orissa-high-court/orissa-high-court-ruling-production-of-accused-within-24-hours-illegal-arrest-and-section-58-bnss-300588
www.livelaw.in
S.58 BNSS | Bail Must Be Granted To Accused If Not Produced Before Magistrate Within 24 Hrs Of Arrest: Orissa High Court
The Orissa High Court has reiterated that failure on the part of police/investigation agency to produce an accused before Magistrate within 24 hours of arrest shall vitiate the arrest itself, as it...
๐ฏ2
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
S.58 BNSS | Bail Must Be Granted To Accused If Not Produced Before Magistrate Within 24 Hrs Of Arrest: Orissa High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/orissa-high-court/orissa-high-court-ruling-production-of-accused-within-24-hours-illegal-arrest-and-sectionโฆ
Reliance was placed upon a recent Supreme Court ruling in Directorate of Enforcement v. Subhash Sharma, 2025 LiveLaw (SC) 137 which held that once a Court finds the fundamental rights of the accused under Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution having been violated while arresting the accused or after arresting him, it is the duty of the Court dealing with the bail application to release the accused on bail
Candidate's Involvement In Gambling-Related Activities Is Moral Turpitude, Cannot Direct Consideration For Public Service: Bombay High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/bombay-high-court/candidates-involvement-in-gambling-related-activities-is-moral-turpitude-cannot-direct-consideration-for-public-service-bombay-high-court-300556
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/bombay-high-court/candidates-involvement-in-gambling-related-activities-is-moral-turpitude-cannot-direct-consideration-for-public-service-bombay-high-court-300556
www.livelaw.in
Candidate's Involvement In Gambling-Related Activities Is Moral Turpitude, Cannot Direct Consideration For Public Service: Bombayโฆ
A candidate's involvement in an activity associated with gambling certainly amounts to moral turpitude and writ courts cannot order an employer to consider such a person for public service,...
๐ฏ
The compounding of an offence is no different from conviction on trial and the only difference is that the accused is given the benefit of compounding on admission of guilt. The severity of punishment is not the sole criteria to determine the effect of a crime on the society. The involvement of the petitioner in the activity associated with gambling certainly pertains to moral turpitude and the writ Court shall have no jurisdiction to direct the employer to take the person like the petitioner in employment who was involved in such an activity,"
@CurrentLegalGK
No difference between compounding and punishment of offence in effect.
The compounding of an offence is no different from conviction on trial and the only difference is that the accused is given the benefit of compounding on admission of guilt. The severity of punishment is not the sole criteria to determine the effect of a crime on the society. The involvement of the petitioner in the activity associated with gambling certainly pertains to moral turpitude and the writ Court shall have no jurisdiction to direct the employer to take the person like the petitioner in employment who was involved in such an activity,"
@CurrentLegalGK
โค1