History And Origin of Friendship Day Celebration- FNP
https://www.fnp.com/article/friendship-day

The celebration of every type of day in India and world has various particular significance one of which is to promote harmony and fraternity which is one element of trinity in preambular objectives.

Friendship day is a celebration which is directly related to fraternity it is a bond which is not by blood or kinship or inherited but made as if acquired traits.

A good friendship can be defined in the words of Walter Winchell
"A real friend is one who walks in when the rest of the world walks out."

1st Sunday of August.
#Day@CurrentLegalGK

DEFINITION OF MERITS

You might have read "merits of the case" too many times while reading various bare acts, but what does it broadly mean?


https://supremetoday.ai/issue/DEFINITION-OF-MERITS

Answer if you know it 👇

Implied Exclusion of Jurisdiction in Arbitration | SCC Times
https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2020/11/21/implied-exclusion-of-jurisdiction-in-arbitration/

UNION OF INDIA
v.
RAJENDRA N SHAH
2021

Constitutional validity of coperative society i.e. 97th constitutional amendment.

@CurrentLegalGK

Services Rendered By Advocates Come Under Contract Of Personal Service: Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/services-rendered-by-advocates-come-under-contract-of-personal-service-supreme-court-257909

What Are The Tests To Find Out Whether Contract Labourers Are Direct Employees? SC Explains [Read Order]
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/what-are-tests-to-find-out-whether-contract-labourers-are-direct-employees-sc-explains-read-order-145580

Question: If the original employer is able to establish that when the servant was lent, the effective control over him was also transferred to the hirer, the original owner can avoid his liability?

Answer: "The general proposition of law that an employer, i.e., the person who has the right to hire and fire the employee is generally responsible vicariously for the tort committed during the course of employment, is a rebuttable presumption. If the original employer is able to establish that when the servant was lent, the effective control over him was also transferred to the hirer, the original owner can avoid his liability. In such a case hirer will be held vicariously liable for the tort committed by the concerned employee."


See also: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/152536735/

#Torts@CurrentLegalGK

Contract of service or contract for service: The Supreme Court Test | India Corporate Law
https://corporate.cyrilamarchandblogs.com/2020/05/contract-of-service-or-contract-for-service-the-supreme-court-test/

Judicial Supervision Vs. Constitutional Autonomy of High Courts
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/supreme-court-shikhar-chemicals-judicial-supervision-autonomy-of-high-courts-299986

Yes the same has been aptly posted here:

https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/2277

Also very important part only the law laid down by the SC is binding as per 141 then how do Adminstrative directions can bind HC when there is no such power.

Eg. SC directing CJ to withdraw case and send to another bench, CJ is the master of roaster of HC and not SC judges.

HOW HC & SC ARE INTEGRATED BY CONSTITUTION?

Allowing Public To Use Washroom Is Covered Under Marketing Discipline Guidelines Governing Fuel Stations: Oil Companies Tell Kerala High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-seeks-clarity-from-oil-companies-on-public-access-to-petrol-pump-washrooms-299966

Mere Non-Lowering Of Indian Flag After Sunset Not An Offence, But Violation Of Flag Code: Kerala High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-national-flag-sunrise-sunset-flag-code-not-offence-299941

Flag Code, 2002 contains executive instructions of the Central Government and, therefore, it is not a law within the meaning of Article 13(3)(a) of the Constitution of India. It is a model code of conduct to be followed compulsorily by all the citizens of India. Penal consequences cannot be invoked unless there is a statutory provision for the same..

The Fundamental right to fly the National Flag is not absolute but a qualified one, being subject to
reasonable restrictions under Clause (2) of Article 19 of the Constitution of India.

1. The Emblems and Names (Prevention of Improper Use) Act, 1950 and the Act of 1971 regulate the use of the National Flag [Union of India v. Naveen Jindal & Another (2004).

2. Section 2 of the Act of 1971 deals with the insults to the Indian National Flag and Constitution of India.

Vinu C. Kunjappan v. State of Kerala 2025 (Ker HC)

@CurrentLegalGK

XXX v. State of Kerala 2025

Fundamental duty to respect freedom fighters.

#COI@CurrentLegalGK

India mail delivery ends after 50 years — and so does a workplace culture
https://www.peoplematters.in/article/organisational-culture/india-mail-delivery-ends-after-50-years-and-so-does-a-workplace-culture-42339

Have you ever used this traditional postal service?

@CurrentLegalGK

💯 SUSHILABEN INDRAVADAN GANDHI
v.
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
2020

Contract of service v. Contract for service.

Tests application laid down to establish employer employee relationship.

#ICA@CurrentLegalGK

BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS
v.
MAHENDRA PRASAD JAKHMOLA & ORS.

2019

Worker contracter and principle employer relationship.

2 core tests
1. Who gives wage?
2. Who controls manner of work.
—-------------------—

Lawyer client relationship?

BAR OF INDIAN LAWYERS
vs.
D.K.GANDHI PS NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASES
2024.

#ICA@CurrentLegalGK

🌅 #Quote@CurrentLegalGK

स तु दीर्घकालनैरन्तर्यसत्कारासेवितो दृढभूमिः॥

That practice becomes firmly grounded when pursued for a long time, without interruption, and with sincere devotion.

~Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, Sutra 1.14

Incestuous Sexual Violence Committed By Parent Requires Severest Punishment : Supreme Court Upholds Father's POCSO Conviction
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/incestuous-sexual-violence-committed-by-parent-requires-severest-punishment-supreme-court-upholds-fathers-pocso-conviction-300179

Constitutional vision to protect dignity of women

“

Yatra nāryastu pūjyante ramante tatra devatāḥ, yatraitaastu na pūjyante sarvāstatra aphalāḥ kriyāḥ.”

i.e., "Where women are honoured, divinity flourishes; and where they are dishonoured, all acts become fruitless.", 

“This verse reflects not merely a cultural principle but a constitutional vision. The dignity of women is non-negotiable, and our legal system must not permit repeated intrusion into that dignity under the guise of misplaced sympathy or alleged procedural fairness.”, the court said.

👨‍👧 Principle of Sentencing in incestuous offences
"When a child is forced to suffer at the hands of her own father, the law must speak in a voice that is resolute and uncompromising. There can be no mitigation in sentencing for crimes that subvert the very notion of family as a space of security," 

💰 Directed State of HP to award compensation under victim comopensation scheme. (cited nipun saxena case)
“This Court reiterates that justice must not be limited to conviction, it must, where the law so permits, include restitution. In awarding this compensation, we reaffirm the constitutional commitment to protect the rights and dignity of child survivors, and to ensure that the justice delivered is substantive, compassionate, and complete.”


BHANEI PRASAD @ RAJU
VS.
STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH
2025

@CurrentLegalGK