๐จโโ๏ธ๐ฉโโ๏ธ
All the best to all my viewers, subscribers and especially the active members.
You will clear the exam, tomorrow is your day, you are matured enough to handle the pressure you are not going to appear for any school examination but appearing for a prestigious position so have pride and confidence.
As always Fod ke ana hai or is baar to aag bhi laga dena ๐
#Wish@CurrentLegalGK
RJS ASPIRANTSAll the best to all my viewers, subscribers and especially the active members.
You will clear the exam, tomorrow is your day, you are matured enough to handle the pressure you are not going to appear for any school examination but appearing for a prestigious position so have pride and confidence.
As always Fod ke ana hai or is baar to aag bhi laga dena ๐
Sahi me mat laga dena ๐
#Wish@CurrentLegalGK
โค22๐ฅ3๐3๐คฉ2๐2๐1
RJS Prelims 2025 .pdf
26 MB
RJS Prelims 2025
@CurrentLegalGK
well RJS has a unique pattern of not repeating last year pattern ๐
@CurrentLegalGK
โค2๐2๐1๐1
Have you guys calculated your rough marks according to google answers or any other reliable answer key?
should we start a poll?
@CurrentLegalGK
should we start a poll?
waise kuch log to 200 marks ka cut off bhi bata rhe hai ๐คซ
@CurrentLegalGK
โค3๐ฑ3๐ฏ2๐1๐1
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK
Sita and Gita purchased same necklaces from a jeweler shop. Sita committed theft of Gita's Necklace from her almirah and kept it in her almirah. Unaware of the missing of her necklace, one day, Gita opened the almirah of Sita with the intention of committing theft of her necklace and take away her own necklace assuming the same to be of Sita.
Which of the following statement is correct?
(1) Gita went there with intention to commit theft of Sita's necklace and took the same assuming it to be of Sita, hence, she has committed the offence of theft.
(2). She has committed no offence.
(3) Gita dishonestly removes the movable property, from the possession of Sita without her consent, hence, Gita has committed the offence of theft.
(4) However, Gita has committed the offence of theft but neither she nor Sita will be prosecuted for the offence of theft because their acts shall be treated as equalizer of each other's act.
Question 42 series B Answer is 2
Sita and Gita purchased same necklaces from a jeweler shop. Sita committed theft of Gita's Necklace from her almirah and kept it in her almirah. Unaware of the missing of her necklace, one day, Gita opened the almirah of Sita with the intention of committing theft of her necklace and take away her own necklace assuming the same to be of Sita.
Which of the following statement is correct?
(1) Gita went there with intention to commit theft of Sita's necklace and took the same assuming it to be of Sita, hence, she has committed the offence of theft.
(2). She has committed no offence.
(3) Gita dishonestly removes the movable property, from the possession of Sita without her consent, hence, Gita has committed the offence of theft.
(4) However, Gita has committed the offence of theft but neither she nor Sita will be prosecuted for the offence of theft because their acts shall be treated as equalizer of each other's act.
Question 42 series B Answer is 2
Not objectionable: Explanation
Actus reus: https://t.me/LegalQuizzes/555696
See definitions of dishonestly wrong ful gain and wrongful loss.
โค4๐1
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข pinned ยซFor more better results you can share the poll ๐ค @CurrentLegalGKยป
CJC2997175369482911.pdf
176.2 KB
๐
Change your vote if there is any changes by retracting vote and voting again on correct marks range.
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/6441
The answer to above question is no offence as per answer key, I know that this will be a little bit difficult so though of sharing for discussion. {answer option B is correct}
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/6443
"Coaching institutes ki quality inhi question ke answers pe pata chal jaati hai"
Answer key RJS prelims 2025Change your vote if there is any changes by retracting vote and voting again on correct marks range.
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/6441
The answer to above question is no offence as per answer key, I know that this will be a little bit difficult so though of sharing for discussion. {answer option B is correct}
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/6443
"Coaching institutes ki quality inhi question ke answers pe pata chal jaati hai"
โค1
#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK
Which of the following is best suited to fill in the blank? Consent is said to be free when it is not caused by
(1) Coercion or Undue Influence
(2) Fraud or Misrepresentation
(3) Misappropriation or Cheating
(4) All the above are correct
This looks contentious ๐ค
Primarily answer lies in whether grounds in section 14 are exhaustive and even if exhaustive option 3 (cheating) is covered in 1 and 2 therefore 4 is correct.
Again then also they excluded option 1 and 2 and answer mentioned is 3.
Which of the following is best suited to fill in the blank? Consent is said to be free when it is not caused by
(1) Coercion or Undue Influence
(2) Fraud or Misrepresentation
(3) Misappropriation or Cheating
(4) All the above are correct
Section 14 ICA?
This looks contentious ๐ค
Primarily answer lies in whether grounds in section 14 are exhaustive and even if exhaustive option 3 (cheating) is covered in 1 and 2 therefore 4 is correct.
Again then also they excluded option 1 and 2 and answer mentioned is 3.
โค1๐1๐1๐1
Superlative Injunction:Most Secretive Form Of Legal Protection
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/superlative-injunction-secretive-form-legal-protection-298982
UTV Software Communication Ltd.
v.
1337X 2019
Delhi High Court held that โThough the
was issued by the Singapore High Court under the provisions of Section 193 DDA of the Singapore Copyright Act, and no similar procedure exists in India, yet in order to meet the ends of justice and to address the menace of piracy, this Court in exercise of its inherent power under Section 151 CPC permits the plaintiffs to implead the mirror/redirect/alphanumeric websites under Order I Rule 10 CPC as these websites merely provide access to the same websites which are the subject of the main injunction.โ
Star India Pvt Ltd
v.
IPTV Smarter Pro
2025
โ
In the new age of technology, today it has become increasingly easy and convenient for infringers to create alpha-numeric/ mirror/ redirect variants of infringing websites, and by the time impleadment and extension of relief(s) can take place, certain time-sensitive infringing activities like live streaming of sporting events have already commenced illegally and by the time the effected party like the plaintiff approaches this Court, it is too late. Even otherwise, the post blocking scenario is also a race against time since new alpha-numeric/ mirror/ redirect variants of infringing websites spawn in the spur of the moment in these rapid times. Under such circumstances, this Court has repeatedly held that real-time relief is warranted in order to not let the rights of plaintiff(s) like the plaintiff herein be rendered otiose in the virtual world
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/superlative-injunction-secretive-form-legal-protection-298982
UTV Software Communication Ltd.
v.
1337X 2019
Delhi High Court held that โThough the
dynamic injunction
was issued by the Singapore High Court under the provisions of Section 193 DDA of the Singapore Copyright Act, and no similar procedure exists in India, yet in order to meet the ends of justice and to address the menace of piracy, this Court in exercise of its inherent power under Section 151 CPC permits the plaintiffs to implead the mirror/redirect/alphanumeric websites under Order I Rule 10 CPC as these websites merely provide access to the same websites which are the subject of the main injunction.โ
Star India Pvt Ltd
v.
IPTV Smarter Pro
2025
โ
a superlative injunction"
In the new age of technology, today it has become increasingly easy and convenient for infringers to create alpha-numeric/ mirror/ redirect variants of infringing websites, and by the time impleadment and extension of relief(s) can take place, certain time-sensitive infringing activities like live streaming of sporting events have already commenced illegally and by the time the effected party like the plaintiff approaches this Court, it is too late. Even otherwise, the post blocking scenario is also a race against time since new alpha-numeric/ mirror/ redirect variants of infringing websites spawn in the spur of the moment in these rapid times. Under such circumstances, this Court has repeatedly held that real-time relief is warranted in order to not let the rights of plaintiff(s) like the plaintiff herein be rendered otiose in the virtual world
This is, thus, a superlative
injunction, which, for ease of reference can easily be referred to as an extended version of the available dynamic+ injunction, as the said superlative injunction also opens up an additional route for the plaintiff(s) to avail the grant of real-time relief(s) against the infringing activities of โrogueโ defendant(s) irrespective of the mode(s) thereof.
www.livelaw.in
Superlative Injunction:Most Secretive Form Of Legal Protection
Injunctions are a familiar tool in the legal world. They're court orders used to prevent someone from doing something or, in some cases, to compel them to act. But what happens when even the...
โค5
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK
A' borrowed Rs. 50000 from 'B'. Despite repeated reminders, he was not repaying the same. 'A' instigate 'C', his servant, to murder 'B', when he comes to demand his money. Next day, 'B' came to make a demand of money. Hot talks were exchanged between 'A' and 'B'. However, 'A' didn't do anything, but under such instigation, 'C' gave an axe blow on the head of 'B', resultantly, 'B' died at the spot. What offences, 'A' and 'C' has committed?
(1) C is guilty of murder of B and A is guilty of abating such murder.
(2) A & C both are guilty of murder of B.
(3) C is guilty of murder of B and A has not committed any offence.
(4) A is guilty of abating murder of B and C has not committed any offence.
A' borrowed Rs. 50000 from 'B'. Despite repeated reminders, he was not repaying the same. 'A' instigate 'C', his servant, to murder 'B', when he comes to demand his money. Next day, 'B' came to make a demand of money. Hot talks were exchanged between 'A' and 'B'. However, 'A' didn't do anything, but under such instigation, 'C' gave an axe blow on the head of 'B', resultantly, 'B' died at the spot. What offences, 'A' and 'C' has committed?
(1) C is guilty of murder of B and A is guilty of abating such murder.
(2) A & C both are guilty of murder of B.
(3) C is guilty of murder of B and A has not committed any offence.
(4) A is guilty of abating murder of B and C has not committed any offence.
The cut off might go around 77-79
However, if you have -2 then also prepare for mains, we don't know what will be the actual result.
Vacancy number, candidates, level of difficulty are the parameters.
@CurrentLegalGK
However, if you have -2 then also prepare for mains, we don't know what will be the actual result.
Vacancy number, candidates, level of difficulty are the parameters.
@CurrentLegalGK
โค2
To all those getting below this threshold point, could you please comment why low marks?
1. What was surprising in this paper?
2. Where did you miss?
3. What practice or mocks themselves missed?
Options in RJS were always tricky, hindi too has dominance in the exam.
These are known facts.
@CurrentLegalGK
1. What was surprising in this paper?
2. Where did you miss?
3. What practice or mocks themselves missed?
Options in RJS were always tricky, hindi too has dominance in the exam.
These are known facts.
@CurrentLegalGK
โค4
Erasing Digital Past: Courts Are Listening
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/erasing-digital-past-courts-are-listening-299058
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/erasing-digital-past-courts-are-listening-299058
www.livelaw.in
Erasing Digital Past: Courts Are Listening
In an era where personal information is archived, indexed, and retrievable with the tap of a finger, the concept of being allowed to move on from one's past is increasingly being tested in legal...
๐1๐1
เคธเคนเคฎเคคเคฟ เคเฅ เคเคฎเฅเคฐ 18 เคตเคฐเฅเคท เคนเฅ เคฐเคนเคจเฅ เคเคพเคนเคฟเค; เคเคฟเคถเฅเคฐ เคธเคเคฌเคเคงเฅเค เคเฅ เคฎเคพเคฎเคฒเฅเค เคฎเฅเค เคจเฅเคฏเคพเคฏเคฟเค เคตเคฟเคตเฅเค เคเคพ เคชเฅเคฐเคฏเฅเค เคเคฟเคฏเคพ เคเคพ เคธเคเคคเคพ เคนเฅ: เคเฅเคเคฆเฅเคฐ เคจเฅ เคธเฅเคชเฅเคฐเฅเคฎ เคเฅเคฐเฅเค เคเฅ เคฌเคคเคพเคฏเคพ
https://hindi.livelaw.in/category/news-updates/age-of-consent-judicial-discretion-adolescent-relationship-cases-centre-supreme-court-298895
#Hindi@CurrentLegalGK
https://hindi.livelaw.in/category/news-updates/age-of-consent-judicial-discretion-adolescent-relationship-cases-centre-supreme-court-298895
#Hindi@CurrentLegalGK
hindi.livelaw.in
เคธเคนเคฎเคคเคฟ เคเฅ เคเคฎเฅเคฐ 18 เคตเคฐเฅเคท เคนเฅ เคฐเคนเคจเฅ เคเคพเคนเคฟเค; เคเคฟเคถเฅเคฐ เคธเคเคฌเคเคงเฅเค เคเฅ เคฎเคพเคฎเคฒเฅเค เคฎเฅเค เคจเฅเคฏเคพเคฏเคฟเค เคตเคฟเคตเฅเค เคเคพ เคชเฅเคฐเคฏเฅเค เคเคฟเคฏเคพ เคเคพ เคธเคเคคเคพ เคนเฅ: เคเฅเคเคฆเฅเคฐ เคจเฅ เคธเฅเคชเฅเคฐเฅเคฎ เคเฅเคฐเฅเคโฆ
เคธเฅเคชเฅเคฐเฅเคฎ เคเฅเคฐเฅเค เคฎเฅเค เคฏเฅเคจ เค
เคชเคฐเคพเคงเฅเค เคเฅ เคฎเคพเคฎเคฒเฅ เคฎเฅเค เคญเคพเคฐเคคเฅเคฏ เคเคชเคฐเคพเคงเคฟเค เคจเฅเคฏเคพเคฏ เคชเฅเคฐเคฃเคพเคฒเฅ เคเฅ เคชเฅเคฐเคคเคฟเคเฅเคฐเคฟเคฏเคพ เคฎเฅเค เคธเฅเคงเคพเคฐ เคเฅ เคธเคเคฌเคเคง เคฎเฅเค เคเค เคเคจเคนเคฟเคค เคฏเคพเคเคฟเคเคพ เคฆเคพเคฏเคฐ เคเฅ เคเค เคนเฅ, เคเคฟเคธเคฎเฅเค เคฆเฅ เคเค เคฒเคฟเคเคฟเคค เคฆเคฒเฅเคฒ เคฎเฅเค เคฏเฅเคจเคฟเคฏเคจ เคเคซ เคเคเคกเคฟเคฏเคพ เคจเฅ เคญเคพเคฐเคคเฅเคฏ...
๐2โค1โคโ๐ฅ1
Should A Woman Be Granted Bail Solely Based On Her Gender?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/should-a-woman-be-granted-bail-solely-based-on-her-gender-299084
#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK Appeal section 480 and section 437 crpc bail in non bailable offences proviso.
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/should-a-woman-be-granted-bail-solely-based-on-her-gender-299084
#BNSS@CurrentLegalGK Appeal section 480 and section 437 crpc bail in non bailable offences proviso.
www.livelaw.in
Should A Woman Be Granted Bail Solely Based On Her Gender?
The basis of Criminal jurisprudence assumes that every accused is innocent until proven guilty. It is indisputable fact that criminal trail goes for long and to balance the personal liberty of...
Changing Judicial Climate Around Section 498A IPC And Sections 3 & 4 Of Dowry Prohibition Act
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/changing-judicial-climate-around-section-498a-ipc-sections-3-4-dowry-prohibition-act-299085
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/changing-judicial-climate-around-section-498a-ipc-sections-3-4-dowry-prohibition-act-299085
www.livelaw.in
Changing Judicial Climate Around Section 498A IPC And Sections 3 & 4 Of Dowry Prohibition Act
Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code[1] and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (DPA), were enacted were introduced to combat systemic exploitation and violence against women in...
๐3โค1