๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
852 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.1K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

โ˜บ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
๐Ÿ‘จโ€โš–๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ฉโ€โš–๏ธRJS ASPIRANTS

All the best to all my viewers, subscribers and especially the active members.

You will clear the exam, tomorrow is your day, you are matured enough to handle the pressure you are not going to appear for any school examination but appearing for a prestigious position so have pride and confidence.

As always Fod ke ana hai or is baar to aag bhi laga dena ๐Ÿ˜Ž

Sahi me mat laga dena ๐Ÿ˜



#Wish@CurrentLegalGK
โค22๐Ÿ”ฅ3๐Ÿ™3๐Ÿคฉ2๐Ÿ’”2๐Ÿ’‹1
Have you guys calculated your rough marks according to google answers or any other reliable answer key?

should we start a poll?

waise kuch log to 200 marks ka cut off bhi bata rhe hai ๐Ÿคซ


@CurrentLegalGK
โค3๐Ÿ˜ฑ3๐Ÿ’ฏ2๐Ÿ˜1๐Ÿ˜1
#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK

Sita and Gita purchased same necklaces from a jeweler shop. Sita committed theft of Gita's Necklace from her almirah and kept it in her almirah. Unaware of the missing of her necklace, one day, Gita opened the almirah of Sita with the intention of committing theft of her necklace and take away her own necklace assuming the same to be of Sita.

Which of the following statement is correct?

(1) Gita went there with intention to commit theft of Sita's necklace and took the same assuming it to be of Sita, hence, she has committed the offence of theft.

(2). She has committed no offence.

(3) Gita dishonestly removes the movable property, from the possession of Sita without her consent, hence, Gita has committed the offence of theft.

(4) However, Gita has committed the offence of theft but neither she nor Sita will be prosecuted for the offence of theft because their acts shall be treated as equalizer of each other's act.


Question 42 series B Answer is 2

Not objectionable: Explanation
Actus reus: https://t.me/LegalQuizzes/555696

See definitions of dishonestly wrong ful gain and wrongful loss.
โค4๐Ÿ‘1
CJC2997175369482911.pdf
176.2 KB
๐Ÿ”” Answer key RJS prelims 2025

Change your vote if there is any changes by retracting vote and voting again on correct marks range.
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/6441


The answer to above question is no offence as per answer key, I know that this will be a little bit difficult so though of sharing for discussion. {answer option B is correct}
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/6443

"Coaching institutes ki quality inhi question ke answers pe pata chal jaati hai"
โค1
#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK

Which of the following is best suited to fill in the blank? Consent is said to be free when it is not caused by

(1) Coercion or Undue Influence

(2) Fraud or Misrepresentation

(3) Misappropriation or Cheating

(4) All the above are correct


Section 14 ICA?


This looks contentious ๐Ÿค”

Primarily answer lies in whether grounds in section 14 are exhaustive and even if exhaustive option 3 (cheating) is covered in 1 and 2 therefore 4 is correct.

Again then also they excluded option 1 and 2 and answer mentioned is 3.
โค1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ‘Œ1
Superlative Injunction:Most Secretive Form Of Legal Protection
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/superlative-injunction-secretive-form-legal-protection-298982

UTV Software Communication Ltd.
v.
1337X
2019

Delhi High Court held that โ€œThough the
dynamic injunction

was issued by the Singapore High Court under the provisions of Section 193 DDA of the Singapore Copyright Act, and no similar procedure exists in India, yet in order to meet the ends of justice and to address the menace of piracy, this Court in exercise of its inherent power under Section 151 CPC permits the plaintiffs to implead the mirror/redirect/alphanumeric websites under Order I Rule 10 CPC as these websites merely provide access to the same websites which are the subject of the main injunction.โ€



Star India Pvt Ltd
v.
IPTV Smarter Pro  
2025

โ€œ
a superlative injunction"

In the new age of technology, today it has become increasingly easy and convenient for infringers to create alpha-numeric/ mirror/ redirect variants of infringing websites, and by the time impleadment and extension of relief(s) can take place, certain time-sensitive infringing activities like live streaming of sporting events have already commenced illegally and by the time the effected party like the plaintiff approaches this Court, it is too late. Even otherwise, the post blocking scenario is also a race against time since new alpha-numeric/ mirror/ redirect variants of infringing websites spawn in the spur of the moment in these rapid times. Under such circumstances, this Court has repeatedly held that real-time relief is warranted in order to not let the rights of plaintiff(s) like the plaintiff herein be rendered otiose in the virtual world 

This is, thus, a superlative
injunction, which, for ease of reference can easily be referred to as an extended version of the available dynamic+ injunction, as the said superlative injunction also opens up an additional route for the plaintiff(s) to avail the grant of real-time relief(s) against the infringing activities of โ€˜rogueโ€™ defendant(s) irrespective of the mode(s) thereof.
โค5
#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK

A' borrowed Rs. 50000 from 'B'. Despite repeated reminders, he was not repaying the same. 'A' instigate 'C', his servant, to murder 'B', when he comes to demand his money. Next day, 'B' came to make a demand of money. Hot talks were exchanged between 'A' and 'B'. However, 'A' didn't do anything, but under such instigation, 'C' gave an axe blow on the head of 'B', resultantly, 'B' died at the spot. What offences, 'A' and 'C' has committed?

(1) C is guilty of murder of B and A is guilty of abating such murder.

(2) A & C both are guilty of murder of B.

(3) C is guilty of murder of B and A has not committed any offence.

(4) A is guilty of abating murder of B and C has not committed any offence.
To all those getting below this threshold point, could you please comment why low marks?

1. What was surprising in this paper?
2. Where did you miss?
3. What practice or mocks themselves missed?

Options in RJS were always tricky, hindi too has dominance in the exam.

These are known facts.
@CurrentLegalGK
โค4
เคธเคนเคฎเคคเคฟ เค•เฅ€ เค‰เคฎเฅเคฐ 18 เคตเคฐเฅเคท เคนเฅ€ เคฐเคนเคจเฅ€ เคšเคพเคนเคฟเค; เค•เคฟเคถเฅ‹เคฐ เคธเค‚เคฌเค‚เคงเฅ‹เค‚ เค•เฅ‡ เคฎเคพเคฎเคฒเฅ‹เค‚ เคฎเฅ‡เค‚ เคจเฅเคฏเคพเคฏเคฟเค• เคตเคฟเคตเฅ‡เค• เค•เคพ เคชเฅเคฐเคฏเฅ‹เค— เค•เคฟเคฏเคพ เคœเคพ เคธเค•เคคเคพ เคนเฅˆ: เค•เฅ‡เค‚เคฆเฅเคฐ เคจเฅ‡ เคธเฅเคชเฅเคฐเฅ€เคฎ เค•เฅ‹เคฐเฅเคŸ เค•เฅ‹ เคฌเคคเคพเคฏเคพ
https://hindi.livelaw.in/category/news-updates/age-of-consent-judicial-discretion-adolescent-relationship-cases-centre-supreme-court-298895

#Hindi@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘2โค1โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1