𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

☺️ 360° Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
🎯DJS Cut-Off βœ…
-------------------
πŸ‘‰2017 - 133.25
πŸ‘‰2018 - 139
πŸ‘‰2019 - 120 (116.5)
πŸ‘‰2022 - 128.75
+ 2023 - 160.25
(Unofficial)
πŸ”₯4πŸ‘2
πŸ”₯ Basis on which SC Judges are recommended for appointment by Collegium.

In News πŸ—žοΈ
1. Chief Justice of Delhi HC Satish Chandra Sharma

2. Chief Justice of Rajasthan HC Augustine George Masih

3. Chief Justice of Gauhati HC Sandeep Mehta

If these proposals are cleared, the Supreme Court will have the full strength of 34 judges.

You can Quote this in collegium system or diversity in Judiciary essay

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘3πŸ’―2
IMPORTANT JUDGEMENTS OVER WOMEN PROTECTIONS



β€œHonesty, pride and self-esteem are crucial to the personal freedom of a woman. Social progress depends on the progress of everyone. Following words of the father of our nation must be noted at all times: To call woman the weaker sex is a libel; it is man's injustice to woman. If by strength is meant moral power, then woman is immeasurably man's superior. Has she not greater intuition, is she not more self-sacrificing, has she not greater powers of endurance, has she not greater courage? Without her, man could not be. If non-violence is the law of our being, the future is with woman. Who can make a more effective appeal to the heart than woman?

Mukesh & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors., (2017) 6 SCC 1.

The Supreme Court has recently pronounced numerous judgments on women’s rights. Therefore, on the occasion of International Women’s Day, it would be apposite to briefly discuss the important pronouncements.

X v. Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Another, (Civil Appeal No. 5802 of 2022).

The Supreme Court held that all women are entitled to safe and legal abortion. The Court held that by eliminating the word β€œmarried woman or her husband” from the scheme of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971, the legislature intended to clarify the scope of Section 3 of the MTP Act and bring pregnancies which occur outside the institution of marriage within the protective umbrella of the law. The Court further held that by framing Rule 3B of the MTP Rules, the legislature intended to solve the mischief, so to speak, of women being unable to access abortions when their lives underwent significant changes impacting their physical and mental health, and their decision to have a child was impacted after the length of the pregnancy exceeded twenty weeks. The Court also dwelled upon the right to dignity and held that if women with unwanted pregnancies are forced to carry their pregnancies to term, the state would be stripping them of the right to determine the immediate and long-term path their lives would take. Depriving women of autonomy not only over their bodies but also over their lives would be an affront to their dignity. The right to dignity would be under attack if women were forced to continue with unwanted pregnancies.

Kamla Neti (Dead) through LRs v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer & Ors., (Civil Appeal No. 6901 of 2022).

The Supreme Court observed that when the daughter belonging to the nonΒ­tribal is entitled to the equal share in the property of the father, there is no reason to deny such right to the daughter of the Tribal community. Female tribal is entitled to parity with male tribal in intestate succession. To deny the equal right to the daughter belonging to the tribal even after a period of 70 years of the Constitution of India under which right to equality is guaranteed, it is high time for the Central Government to look into the matter and if required, to amend the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act by which the Hindu Succession Act is not made applicable to the members of the Scheduled Tribe.

Mrs. Akella Lalitha v. Sri Konda Hanumantha Rao & Anr., (Civil Appeal Nos. 6325-6326 of 2015).
πŸ‘4❀2
πŸ‘©β€βš–οΈ First Woman CJI by 2027
Justice Bangalore Venkataramiah Nagarathna (her family is deeply rooted in legal profession)

Notable judgements and desents with famous legal Quotes.

#legal_personality

Case laws-
βœ“kaushal kishor v state of UP
βœ“vivek narayan Sharma v UOI
βœ“sukhpal Singh khaira v state of punjab
βœ“Pattali makkal katchi v mayileruperumal
βœ“Bilkis yakub rasool v UOI
βœ“neeraj dutta v state ( nct Delhi )

B.v. nagarathna
#CJIs_OF_INDIA
@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘8✍2πŸ”₯1
πŸ›οΈRecent Acts and bills

1. Women reservation
2. Government of NCT delhi
3. Forest bill
4. Advocates bill
5. Chief election commission bill
6. Criminal law bills BNS BSA BNSS

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘5😍5❀1
🀝 Hello Doston

We have sent almost all the relevant CURRENT AFFAIRS Material whether legal or GK one including Important Supreme court judgements and 6 monthly digest.

Delhi High Court ki Digest send krdun???

Anything else you want? Any feedback?
You can tell us hereπŸ‘‡

#Enjoy_Learning

@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ‘4