ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Column 12 Of Charge-Sheet, Delhi Police Showing A Person As βSuspectβ Is Arbitrary, Illegal, Unconstitutional https://www.livelaw.in/articles/delhi-police-arbitrary-suspect-labelling-chargesheet-illegal-section-173-crpc-241586
Hello Doston π
We will be providing summary of 5 Pending Articles soon...
Till that time read our case summaries and complete 2023 Current Affairs
Stay tuned π
We will be providing summary of 5 Pending Articles soon...
Till that time read our case summaries and complete 2023 Current Affairs
Stay tuned π
π5π1
Overall the Paper of JLO was Easy but you can also share your opinion.
Almost 90% Case laws came in the paper were covered by us either here or in other group.
π
Almost 90% Case laws came in the paper were covered by us either here or in other group.
π
π4π―1
π₯
===>Landmark case on reservation
#Article_16_of_constitution
#50%_limit
@CurrentLegalGK
Indra Sawhney v. UOI 1993===>Landmark case on reservation
#Article_16_of_constitution
#50%_limit
@CurrentLegalGK
π1
Why GNCTD (Amendment) Act 2023 May Not Pass Constitutional Test Despite Changes From Services Ordinance?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/why-gnctd-amendment-act-2023-may-not-pass-constitutional-test-despite-changes-from-services-ordinance-235443
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/why-gnctd-amendment-act-2023-may-not-pass-constitutional-test-despite-changes-from-services-ordinance-235443
www.livelaw.in
Why GNCTD (Amendment) Act 2023 May Not Pass Constitutional Test Despite Changes From Services Ordinance?
On August 12, the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Amendment) Act 2023, which seeks to diminish the powers of the elected government of Delhi over services, received the assent of...
π1π₯1
π―DJS Cut-Off β
-------------------
π2017 - 133.25
π2018 - 139
π2019 - 120 (116.5)
π2022 - 128.75
+ 2023 - 160.25
(Unofficial)
-------------------
π2017 - 133.25
π2018 - 139
π2019 - 120 (116.5)
π2022 - 128.75
+ 2023 - 160.25
(Unofficial)
π₯4π2
Constitution Amendments by @CurrentLegalGK (1).pdf
6.6 MB
Constitution Amendments till 106th compiled by @CurrentLegalGK
π5π3β‘1β€1
π₯
In News ποΈ
1. Chief Justice of Delhi HC Satish Chandra Sharma
2. Chief Justice of Rajasthan HC Augustine George Masih
3. Chief Justice of Gauhati HC Sandeep Mehta
If these proposals are cleared, the Supreme Court will have the full strength of 34 judges.
You can Quote this in collegium system or diversity in Judiciary essay
@CurrentLegalGK
Basis on which SC Judges are recommended for appointment by Collegium.In News ποΈ
1. Chief Justice of Delhi HC Satish Chandra Sharma
2. Chief Justice of Rajasthan HC Augustine George Masih
3. Chief Justice of Gauhati HC Sandeep Mehta
If these proposals are cleared, the Supreme Court will have the full strength of 34 judges.
You can Quote this in collegium system or diversity in Judiciary essay
@CurrentLegalGK
π3π―2
IMPORTANT JUDGEMENTS OVER WOMEN PROTECTIONSβHonesty, pride and self-esteem are crucial to the personal freedom of a woman. Social progress depends on the progress of everyone. Following words of the father of our nation must be noted at all times: To call woman the weaker sex is a libel; it is man's injustice to woman. If by strength is meant moral power, then woman is immeasurably man's superior. Has she not greater intuition, is she not more self-sacrificing, has she not greater powers of endurance, has she not greater courage? Without her, man could not be. If non-violence is the law of our being, the future is with woman. Who can make a more effective appeal to the heart than woman?
Mukesh & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors., (2017) 6 SCC 1.
The Supreme Court has recently pronounced numerous judgments on womenβs rights. Therefore, on the occasion of International Womenβs Day, it would be apposite to briefly discuss the important pronouncements.
X v. Principal Secretary, Health and Family Welfare Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Another, (Civil Appeal No. 5802 of 2022).
The Supreme Court held that all women are entitled to safe and legal abortion. The Court held that by eliminating the word βmarried woman or her husbandβ from the scheme of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971, the legislature intended to clarify the scope of Section 3 of the MTP Act and bring pregnancies which occur outside the institution of marriage within the protective umbrella of the law. The Court further held that by framing Rule 3B of the MTP Rules, the legislature intended to solve the mischief, so to speak, of women being unable to access abortions when their lives underwent significant changes impacting their physical and mental health, and their decision to have a child was impacted after the length of the pregnancy exceeded twenty weeks. The Court also dwelled upon the right to dignity and held that if women with unwanted pregnancies are forced to carry their pregnancies to term, the state would be stripping them of the right to determine the immediate and long-term path their lives would take. Depriving women of autonomy not only over their bodies but also over their lives would be an affront to their dignity. The right to dignity would be under attack if women were forced to continue with unwanted pregnancies.
Kamla Neti (Dead) through LRs v. The Special Land Acquisition Officer & Ors., (Civil Appeal No. 6901 of 2022).
The Supreme Court observed that when the daughter belonging to the nonΒtribal is entitled to the equal share in the property of the father, there is no reason to deny such right to the daughter of the Tribal community. Female tribal is entitled to parity with male tribal in intestate succession. To deny the equal right to the daughter belonging to the tribal even after a period of 70 years of the Constitution of India under which right to equality is guaranteed, it is high time for the Central Government to look into the matter and if required, to amend the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act by which the Hindu Succession Act is not made applicable to the members of the Scheduled Tribe.
Mrs. Akella Lalitha v. Sri Konda Hanumantha Rao & Anr., (Civil Appeal Nos. 6325-6326 of 2015).
π4β€2
The Goods and Services Tax has been introduced by __ Constitutional Amendment Act.
Anonymous Quiz
4%
99th
79%
101st
15%
100th
1%
98th
the 91st Amendment of the Constitution pertains to:
Anonymous Quiz
35%
Panchayati Raj
50%
Number of Ministers in the Council of Ministers
10%
Election Petitions
5%
Coalition Governments
π₯
Power of judicial review of SC and HC under article 32 and 226
#323A #323B #Tribunals
@CurrentLegalGK
L chandra Kumar vs UOI 1997Power of judicial review of SC and HC under article 32 and 226
#323A #323B #Tribunals
@CurrentLegalGK
π2β€βπ₯1π1