"I hope this becomes a strong model for all bar associations across the country, after all, a strong bar is a foundation of an independent judiciary" 


Context: SCBA has implemented an insurance scheme for advocates.

@CurrentLegalGK

Occupational stress and work-family conflict among police constables

@CurrentLegalGK

The Veeraswami case: When can a sitting judge face an FIR? 🔗
#express_premium #jagdeep_dhankhar #supreme_court

SC held that while a judge can be considered a public servant for a corruption case to be registered against him, the sanction must come from the CJI.
Ordinarily, sanction is granted by the authority that has the power to appoint the public servant. But the SC emphasised that “there is no master and servant relationship or employer and employee relationship between a Judge and the President of India in whom the executive power of the Union is vested under the provisions of Article 53 of the Constitution.”
The inclusion of the CJI, therefore, ring-fenced the prosecution of judges against executive interference

@CurrentLegalGK

So the joke of either relief or 3 years practice on review in SC is surfacing everywhere 😁

But can an advocate directly practice in supreme court?

Mention the relevant law 👇

@CurrentLegalGK

Ask your questions use ₹10 and invest them to clear doubts.

Use RTI for bar council and bar association both, if you are not getting authentic reliable information ASAP.

@CurrentLegalGK

Copyright And Classical Music - Analysis Of Delhi HC Decision
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/delhi-high-court-judgment-ustad-faiyaz-wasifuddin-dagar-vs-ar-rahman-critical-analysis-291955

Should Grounds Of Arrest Be Mandatorily Supplied 'Prior' To Arrest In Every Case?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/supreme-court-judgments-accused-right-to-know-grounds-of-arrest-critical-analysis-291340

👨‍⚖️ Analysis of 3 Year Practice Rule

The main premise of this mandatory practice judgment in essence is not the experience, practical knowledge, career pushing etc.. but to let you the judge know the hardship faced by advocates, to develop core empathy.

Otherwise these 2 judges wouldn't have said this.

Justice Gavai sharing his experience stated: "We had a lawyer in Nagpur who said he could write a book on subject: '100 ways of seeking adjournment'."

Justice Masih "A very good candidate, father a very leading advocate at the District Court. But for two years, the son did not go for a day to the Court...He had two years as an advocate but then, where do we get that experience? This is what we are looking for," 

If they have said it they should have properly addressed it .


Well corruption and nepotism are at its peak in district judiciary giving a very narrow space for 1st Gen lawyers, though anyhow advocates who will not clear the exam will have to practice but the question is as regards practice certificate and its endorsement, one will get it easily by connections or money but one will have to work harder the whole purpose is defeated then where is empathy among these corrupt ones?

If HCs will make rules they will again make it unequal rules which will further complicate the situation and inequality will prevail, the whole judgment was an opportunity to make major reforms in appointment system in the bedrock of judicial pyramid (basic structure of CoI) but the core is not addressed.

Yes law students will come out of comfort zone and even if they don't become judges they will get a good headstart as advocates, the quality and competitions of advocates is going to rise.

Look for opportunities guys research, be prepared.

Legal Soft skills will help...

After judgment Will the Quality of exam and legal knowledge of candidates be the same?

Will the candidates can be easily be moulded in training?

@CurrentLegalGK

Supreme Court Refrains From Sentencing POCSO Convict After Noting That Victim Is Now Married To Him & Didn't See It As Crime
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-refrains-from-sentencing-pocso-convict-after-noting-that-victim-is-now-married-to-him-didnt-see-it-as-crime-293149

That is the reason we are giving for exercising power under Article 142 not to impose sentence.”

Still the Socio-Legal Gap is not fulfilled.

@CurrentLegalGK

[Arbitration] S.10 Of General Clauses Act Applies Only If S.34 Application Was Filed Within Time, Court Was Closed On Last Day Of Limitation: Delhi HC
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/delhi-high-court/section-10-of-general-clauses-act-applies-only-if-section-34-petition-is-filed-within-90-days-and-court-is-closed-on-last-day-not-during-extendable-period-delhi-hc-293110

No Legal Or Contractual Obligation On Restaurant To Provide Gravy With Porotta & Beef Fry: CDRC Ernakulam
https://www.livelaw.in/news-updates/no-legal-contractual-obligation-restaurant-gravy-porotta-consumer-commission-ernakulam-293141

Gravy 🥦 🍲🥘 😭

@CurrentLegalGK

Reform Of Illusion: An Analysis On Utility Of Offence Of 'Terrorism' In BNS
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/reform-illusion-analysis-utility-offence-terrorism-bns-293099

Important

In light of the above discussion, the court concluded that “the benefit of Section 10 of the General Clauses Act is available only where the petition is filed within the normal period of limitation, and the Court was closed on the date when the normal period of limitation came to an end. It does not apply where the closure of the Court was on the date when the extendable period came to an end.”

VASISHTA MANTENA NH04 JV
v.
BLACKLEAD INFRATECH PVT. LTD.
2025

IMPORTANT

#Arbitration@CurrentLegalGK

Offence Of Outraging Modesty Of A Woman In Public Is A Serious Offence, Regardless Of Punishment Term U/S 354 IPC: P&H High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court/punjab-haryana-high-court-offence-of-outraging-modesty-of-woman-committed-in-public-place-cant-be-compromised-293166

Where the offence is more or less in the nature of a private offence such like in the matrimonial cases, commercial disputes, money matters and some other offences of lighter nature, which does not affect public interest at large, then certainly given the facts and circumstances of each and every case, FIR can be quashed on the basis of compromise," the Court said.

Maternity Leave Part Of Reproductive Rights: Supreme Court Sets Aside Denial Of Maternity Leave For Third Child
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-rules-maternity-leave-part-of-woman-reproductive-rights-293184