Minimum Practice Condition For Judicial Service : What High Courts & States Told Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/minimum-practice-condition-for-judicial-service-what-high-courts-states-told-supreme-court-292826

🤝 News is simple.

Got some rumours that MP is removing the criteria, so I tried confirming it from a reliable source and got the news that yes they are removing 70% or 3 years practice criteria.

But again it is subject to the SC judgment if judgment comes in our favour then this news a good news for many.

Ab Firse comment kardo 😝

@CurrentLegalGK

Remember this message?

Juvenile Justice Board Has No Power To Review Its Orders : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/juvenile-justice-board-has-no-power-to-review-its-orders-supreme-court-292819

Rajni v. State of UP

"It is not open to the JJB to say in subsequent proceeding that date of birth of respondent No. 2 is not 08.09.2003 and thereafter proceed to have the opinion of the medical board. If this is permitted, it will amount to reviewing its earlier order. The JJ Act, 2015 confers no such power of review upon the JJB.

It is trite law that power of review is either statutorily conferred or by necessary implication. No such power of JJB is traceable under the JJ Act, 2015.”

@CurrentLegalGK

Some practical Questions will may be asked in prelims and mains.

I means in interview they will definitely ask you why you chose to practice in this field or that.

But the questions too atleast 20% would be moulded as per the practical experience.

Even if you have big sources to get those certificates or endorsement you will have to practice to gain the in hand knowledge.

Go start don't wait a lot, plan within a week consult and start.

Practice too will have competition so grab the good opportunities earlier.

@CurrentLegalGK

'From Labourer To Chief Justice, Treated People As Dr Ambedkar Envisioned': Justice Suresh Kumar Kait Bids Farewell To MP High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madhya-pradesh-high-court/chief-justice-suresh-kumar-kait-madhya-pradesh-high-court-farewell-292853

💼👨‍⚖️ Join and discuss your strategies with peers, make friends and work together in this challenging situation.

https://t.me/LawOfficerExam

Nana Keshav Lagad
v.
State of Maharashtra 
2013

The Supreme Court laid down a proposition that the credibility of a stock witness's evidence about recovery of offensive weapons should not be shaken only because he deposed in some other case. It was further stated that each particular case should be evaluated in terms of the reliability of evidence and it does not mean that if the same witness testified on many occasions, then his deposition stands to be rejected automatically.

#BSA@CurrentLegalGK

Section 377 of IPC cannot be applied to criminalise marital sex: Delhi High Court
https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2025/05/21/section-377-ipc-cannot-be-applied-to-criminalise-marital-sex-dhc/

In 377 (which was read down in navtej singh johar) only non consensual is punishable and explanation II of 376 states implied consent of wife.
-----
But we should not see the marital rape exception at first glance but see the intent of offence, both rape explanation II and 377 are different, an implied consent of sexual intercourse under Rape cannot be for unnatural sexual intercourse.

What do you think?

@CurrentLegalGK

CJI BR Gavai Urges Bar Associations To Follow SCBA Model Of Raising Group Insurance For Lawyers From CSR Funds
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/cji-br-gavai-urges-bar-associations-to-follow-scba-model-of-raising-group-insurance-for-lawyers-from-csr-funds-292958

"I hope this becomes a strong model for all bar associations across the country, after all, a strong bar is a foundation of an independent judiciary" 


Context: SCBA has implemented an insurance scheme for advocates.

@CurrentLegalGK

Occupational stress and work-family conflict among police constables

@CurrentLegalGK

The Veeraswami case: When can a sitting judge face an FIR? 🔗
#express_premium #jagdeep_dhankhar #supreme_court

SC held that while a judge can be considered a public servant for a corruption case to be registered against him, the sanction must come from the CJI.
Ordinarily, sanction is granted by the authority that has the power to appoint the public servant. But the SC emphasised that “there is no master and servant relationship or employer and employee relationship between a Judge and the President of India in whom the executive power of the Union is vested under the provisions of Article 53 of the Constitution.”
The inclusion of the CJI, therefore, ring-fenced the prosecution of judges against executive interference

@CurrentLegalGK

So the joke of either relief or 3 years practice on review in SC is surfacing everywhere 😁

But can an advocate directly practice in supreme court?

Mention the relevant law 👇

@CurrentLegalGK

Ask your questions use ₹10 and invest them to clear doubts.

Use RTI for bar council and bar association both, if you are not getting authentic reliable information ASAP.

@CurrentLegalGK

Copyright And Classical Music - Analysis Of Delhi HC Decision
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/delhi-high-court-judgment-ustad-faiyaz-wasifuddin-dagar-vs-ar-rahman-critical-analysis-291955

Should Grounds Of Arrest Be Mandatorily Supplied 'Prior' To Arrest In Every Case?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/supreme-court-judgments-accused-right-to-know-grounds-of-arrest-critical-analysis-291340