#Tip@CurrentLegalGK #Essay@CurrentLegalGK
Quote few lines of poems, stories in your essays that will your essay more coherent and literature based, instead of factual only.
don't write a section or law separately use it with your arguments your essay must not look like an answer it must look like an article.
Quote few lines of poems, stories in your essays that will your essay more coherent and literature based, instead of factual only.
don't write a section or law separately use it with your arguments your essay must not look like an answer it must look like an article.
โคโ๐ฅ6๐3๐1
๐ ๐๐ NCERT BNS BNSS AND BSA MINI BOOKS
Karlo jisko share krna hai: To all the channels ๐
Bohot baar dekha hai SIRF idhar ka udhar karke channels chala rahe hain log.
Padhai Karlo bachhon.
P.S. 11th and 12th standard students are studying these things, competition is rising ๐
@CurrentLegalGK
Karlo jisko share krna hai: To all the channels ๐
Bohot baar dekha hai SIRF idhar ka udhar karke channels chala rahe hain log.
Padhai Karlo bachhon.
P.S. 11th and 12th standard students are studying these things, competition is rising ๐
@CurrentLegalGK
๐ฏ9๐5๐3๐คฉ1๐1
Wife Watching Porn, Engaging In Self Pleasure Not By Itself Cruelty On Husband, Woman Retains Her Individuality Even After Marriage: Madras High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-wife-watching-porn-self-pleasure-not-cruelty-286935
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-wife-watching-porn-self-pleasure-not-cruelty-286935
www.livelaw.in
Wife Watching Porn, Engaging In Self Pleasure Not By Itself Cruelty On Husband, Woman Retains Her Individuality Even After Marriage:โฆ
Wife Watching Porn Privately Not Cruelty By Itself, Right To Spousal Privacy Includes Various Aspects Of Woman's Sexual Autonomy: Madras HC
โค6๐1
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
Wife Watching Porn, Engaging In Self Pleasure Not By Itself Cruelty On Husband, Woman Retains Her Individuality Even After Marriage: Madras High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-wife-watching-porn-self-pleasure-notโฆ
Morality v. Legality.
In normal life a human must be morally right, law enters only when there is a dispute.
So you won't be called a good human when you say you have complied all the laws but not morality.
@CurrentLegalGK
In normal life a human must be morally right, law enters only when there is a dispute.
The limits of Law.
So you won't be called a good human when you say you have complied all the laws but not morality.
@CurrentLegalGK
๐8๐1
IPR Law And Atrocities Act: Intersectionality Of Identity Politics And Knowledge Economy
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/ipr-law-atrocities-act-intersectionality-identity-politics-knowledge-economy-286557
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/ipr-law-atrocities-act-intersectionality-identity-politics-knowledge-economy-286557
www.livelaw.in
IPR Law And Atrocities Act: Intersectionality Of Identity Politics And Knowledge Economy
On 24 January 2025, a seminal judgement on the scope of intellectual property law and its correlation with human rights and criminal law came from the Supreme Court. In the case titled The...
๐2
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
IPR Law And Atrocities Act: Intersectionality Of Identity Politics And Knowledge Economy https://www.livelaw.in/articles/ipr-law-atrocities-act-intersectionality-identity-politics-knowledge-economy-286557
๐ฎ
Creativity and philosophy starts when your stomach is filled and brain has freedom to think.
For disadvantage groups like SC/ST/OBCs or Racism on the basis of colour creed ethinicty etc.. there was an intangible barrier of discrimination to create something therefore these people must be uplifted and their IP work must be protected (see Art 14)
In the year 2025 SC upheld the decision of BOM HCthat word property under section 15 includes both tangible as well as intangible.
Case Title:
Principal Secretary Government of Maharashtra
v.
Kshipra Kamlesh Uke, 2025
๐ค Section 15A(11)(d) of SC ST prevention of atrocities, Act 1989
It shall be the duty of the concerned State to specify an appropriate scheme to ensure implementation of the following rights and entitlements of victims and witnesses in accessing justice so as-
(d) to provide relief in respect of death or injury or damage to property;
@CurrentLegalGK
IPR and Discrimination.Creativity and philosophy starts when your stomach is filled and brain has freedom to think.
For disadvantage groups like SC/ST/OBCs or Racism on the basis of colour creed ethinicty etc.. there was an intangible barrier of discrimination to create something therefore these people must be uplifted and their IP work must be protected (see Art 14)
In the year 2025 SC upheld the decision of BOM HCthat word property under section 15 includes both tangible as well as intangible.
Case Title:
Principal Secretary Government of Maharashtra
v.
Kshipra Kamlesh Uke, 2025
๐ค Section 15A(11)(d) of SC ST prevention of atrocities, Act 1989
It shall be the duty of the concerned State to specify an appropriate scheme to ensure implementation of the following rights and entitlements of victims and witnesses in accessing justice so as-
(d) to provide relief in respect of death or injury or damage to property;
@CurrentLegalGK
๐3๐1
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/nhrc-fall-from-status-fading-credibility-286550
NHRC, 25 SHRC, New Chairman, Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI)
Paris Principles- It is an internationally set out agreed principles adopted in 1993 by the UN that all NHRI's must meet, to be considered credible. These principles are- mandate and competence, autonomy from government, independence guaranteed by a statute or constitution, pluralism, adequate resources, and adequate powers of investigation.
Compliance of Paris principles is necessary for 'A' Grade Status otherwise NHRC will get 'B' Grade Status.
Instances Where We Can Say NHRC is a toothless tiger.
Some facts:
โ Human Rights Day is on 10th December (UDHR adoption, in 1948)
โ NHRC was established on
12th October , 1993
โ GANHRI has 120 Members.
โ 13 Members in NHRC as per S. 3 of PHRA, 1993 currently 11 members are present with chairman [Justice V. Ramasubramanian]
@CurrentLegalGK
Paris Principles- It is an internationally set out agreed principles adopted in 1993 by the UN that all NHRI's must meet, to be considered credible. These principles are- mandate and competence, autonomy from government, independence guaranteed by a statute or constitution, pluralism, adequate resources, and adequate powers of investigation.
Compliance of Paris principles is necessary for 'A' Grade Status otherwise NHRC will get 'B' Grade Status.
Instances Where We Can Say NHRC is a toothless tiger.
Some facts:
โ Human Rights Day is on 10th December (UDHR adoption, in 1948)
โ NHRC was established on
12th October , 1993
โ GANHRI has 120 Members.
โ 13 Members in NHRC as per S. 3 of PHRA, 1993 currently 11 members are present with chairman [Justice V. Ramasubramanian]
@CurrentLegalGK
๐4๐1
Evolving Standards Of Child Witness Testimony: A Comparative Analysis Of English And Indian Jurisprudence
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/evolving-standards-child-witness-testimony-comparative-analysis-english-indian-jurisprudence-286521
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/evolving-standards-child-witness-testimony-comparative-analysis-english-indian-jurisprudence-286521
www.livelaw.in
Evolving Standards Of Child Witness Testimony: A Comparative Analysis Of English And Indian Jurisprudence
Child witness testimony has been a fiercely debated legal issue for a long time. The latest Supreme Court ruling in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh v. Balveer Singh (2025 LiveLaw (SC) 243)...
๐1
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
Evolving Standards Of Child Witness Testimony: A Comparative Analysis Of English And Indian Jurisprudence https://www.livelaw.in/articles/evolving-standards-child-witness-testimony-comparative-analysis-english-indian-jurisprudence-286521
Earlier under 7 years of age a person is not considered competent to give testimony but Uk has evolved almost to the extent of Indian legal system on child witness.
Indian Cases
1. Rameshwar v. State of Rajasthan (1952): The landmark judgment held that child testimony, much scrutinized, does not require compulsory corroboration in the absence of grounds for suspecting tutoring or fabrication.
2. Dattu Ramrao Sakhare v. State of Maharashtra (1997): The Supreme Court once again reiterated that when a child witness appears to be truthful and consistent, the said testimony could alone furnish the basis for conviction.
The core of Child witness testimony is that the judge must see it is not tutored or there is not undue influence or any other external influence or pressure.
If the testimony is found reliable there is no need of corroboration and it can become the sole basis of conviction.
In India section 118 and 119 (competency) of BSA and POCSO (provisions relating to safe environment, reduce trauma etc) delas with child witness testimony.
In a nutshell child is a as competent as and adult sound person and the testimony cannot be rejected on the grounds of AGE.
@CurrentLegalGK
Indian Cases
1. Rameshwar v. State of Rajasthan (1952): The landmark judgment held that child testimony, much scrutinized, does not require compulsory corroboration in the absence of grounds for suspecting tutoring or fabrication.
2. Dattu Ramrao Sakhare v. State of Maharashtra (1997): The Supreme Court once again reiterated that when a child witness appears to be truthful and consistent, the said testimony could alone furnish the basis for conviction.
The core of Child witness testimony is that the judge must see it is not tutored or there is not undue influence or any other external influence or pressure.
If the testimony is found reliable there is no need of corroboration and it can become the sole basis of conviction.
In India section 118 and 119 (competency) of BSA and POCSO (provisions relating to safe environment, reduce trauma etc) delas with child witness testimony.
In a nutshell child is a as competent as and adult sound person and the testimony cannot be rejected on the grounds of AGE.
@CurrentLegalGK
โค14๐5๐ฅ1๐1
๐ง ๐ฅ #Tip
Brainstorming is an essentialskill.
No it is HABIT of active recalling & being attentive and observing the question and extracting the relevant material information.
But why to do it?
Law students need a big memory, Nah! They need good recalling power your memory is good it is just that you are not ACTIVE ๐ฅ (it will help in mains a lottttt)
How to master it?
Simple, Don't you solve MCQs Daily?
I believe most of you do, so while solving them firstly use timer of less period โณ secondly after solving them here comes your result of test, you haven't achieved something from test, now you have analyse it then you will get something (point out mistakes)
How to Analyse?
Again Simple, Read Every option of Every question whether write or wrong, then if a legal word comes just think of its section so for instance, there is an MCQ on Consideration think of section 2(d) its definition, section 25 and obviously a landmark case law (ratio)+ (decision)
This is how you should recall, it is not about the correct answer it is about why you have arrived to that conclusion this will build your concepts stronger and then no one will be able to shake your concept by complex doubts.
Note: This is a gradual habit and habits take time to speed up....
#Tip@CurrentLegalGK
Brainstorming is an essential
No it is HABIT of active recalling & being attentive and observing the question and extracting the relevant material information.
But why to do it?
Law students need a big memory, Nah! They need good recalling power your memory is good it is just that you are not ACTIVE ๐ฅ (it will help in mains a lottttt)
How to master it?
Simple, Don't you solve MCQs Daily?
I believe most of you do, so while solving them firstly use timer of less period โณ secondly after solving them here comes your result of test, you haven't achieved something from test, now you have analyse it then you will get something (point out mistakes)
How to Analyse?
Again Simple, Read Every option of Every question whether write or wrong, then if a legal word comes just think of its section so for instance, there is an MCQ on Consideration think of section 2(d) its definition, section 25 and obviously a landmark case law (ratio)+ (decision)
This is how you should recall, it is not about the correct answer it is about why you have arrived to that conclusion this will build your concepts stronger and then no one will be able to shake your concept by complex doubts.
Note: This is a gradual habit and habits take time to speed up....
#Tip@CurrentLegalGK
๐11โคโ๐ฅ3โก3โค2๐2
Grabbing Breasts, Breaking Minor Victim's Pyjama String Not Attempt To Rape But Prima Facie 'Aggravated Sexual Assault': Allahabad HC
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/allahabad-high-court/allahabad-high-court-grabbing-breasts-victim-pyjama-string-attempt-rape-prima-facie-aggravated-sexual-assault-286880
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/allahabad-high-court/allahabad-high-court-grabbing-breasts-victim-pyjama-string-attempt-rape-prima-facie-aggravated-sexual-assault-286880
www.livelaw.in
Grabbing Breasts, Breaking Minor Victim's Pyjama String Not Attempt To Rape But Prima Facie 'Aggravated Sexual Assault': Allahabadโฆ
Observing that grabbing the breasts of the victim, breaking the string of her pyjama and trying to drag her beneath the culvert before fleeing the spot won't come under the offence of rape or an...
๐ฑ4โค1
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
Grabbing Breasts, Breaking Minor Victim's Pyjama String Not Attempt To Rape But Prima Facie 'Aggravated Sexual Assault': Allahabad HC https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/allahabad-high-court/allahabad-high-court-grabbing-breasts-victim-pyjama-string-attemptโฆ
You will find n number of cases on this point.
A thin line of difference between sexual assault and attempt to commit penetrative sexual assault.
if we consider POCSO act.
Attempt of Section 3 and offence under Section 7
@CurrentLegalGK
A thin line of difference between sexual assault and attempt to commit penetrative sexual assault.
if we consider POCSO act.
Attempt of Section 3 and offence under Section 7
It is difficult in some cases.
@CurrentLegalGK
๐4
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
You will find n number of cases on this point. A thin line of difference between sexual assault and attempt to commit penetrative sexual assault. if we consider POCSO act. Attempt of Section 3 and offence under Section 7 It is difficult in some cases. โฆ
Read facts and develop understanding.
I am sharing herewith the copy of judgment.
I am sharing herewith the copy of judgment.
akash_and_2_others_vs_state_of_up_and_2_others_allahabad_high_court.pdf
80.8 KB
akash-and-2-others-vs-state-of-up-and-2-others-allahabad-high-court-
12 Pages Only (with provisions verbatim included)
Hardly 10-15 mins reading
summoning order of trial court modified to lesser gravity of offences
12 Pages Only (with provisions verbatim included)
Hardly 10-15 mins reading
summoning order of trial court modified to lesser gravity of offences
Supreme court rules 2013 .pdf
4.9 MB
Supreme court rules 2013
Subject to latest amendments
kindly see them from website.
1. Eligibility of AOR examination.
2. Article 145 of constitution of India.
Order 4 Rule 5
Subject to latest amendments
kindly see them from website.
1. Eligibility of AOR examination.
2. Article 145 of constitution of India.
Order 4 Rule 5
๐1
#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK
Consider the following regarding Part 22 Click on above right corner Bulb ๐ก for explanation.
Consider the following regarding Part 22 Click on above right corner Bulb ๐ก for explanation.
Anonymous Quiz
6%
A. Constitution of India is the short title
29%
B. Article 393 mentions short title as: The Constitution of India
19%
C. Repealed Independence act, Government of india act, Abolition of Privy Council Jurisdiction Act.
6%
D. None of them are correct
41%
Both (B) and (C) are correct
๐ฏ2๐1