โNot The Right Peopleโ: Why Jury Trials were Abolished in India
https://www.sociolegalreview.com/post/not-the-right-people-why-jury-trials-were-abolished-in-india
https://www.sociolegalreview.com/post/not-the-right-people-why-jury-trials-were-abolished-in-india
SLR
โNot The Right Peopleโ: Why Jury Trials were Abolished in India
- James Jaffe * Several years ago, I wrote a short piece for EPW on the fate of jury trials in India after the famous Nanavati trial.[1] For the last half century, that case has been acknowledged as the last jury trial in India and has made its way into popularโฆ
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
โNot The Right Peopleโ: Why Jury Trials were Abolished in India https://www.sociolegalreview.com/post/not-the-right-people-why-jury-trials-were-abolished-in-india
So in India we have totally abolished Jury System but don't you think U.S.A. the first modern democratic country which still have this system in existence is Ironical.
Why does US have this system and India Doesn't, Comment.
See the 1898 CrPC sections for Jury trial.
https://www.bareactslive.com/ACA/ACT2062.HTM#269
Prevailing system of Jury trial (parsi trial) in India
https://lawschoolpolicyreview.com/2018/11/27/rights-of-women-a-critical-study-of-the-jury-system-in-parsi-matrimonial-law/
๐จโโ๏ธ https://www.livelaw.in/articles/last-jury-standing-indias-unique-parsi-matrimonial-court-system-292011
#Discernible_topics@CurrentLegalGK
Why does US have this system and India Doesn't, Comment.
See the 1898 CrPC sections for Jury trial.
https://www.bareactslive.com/ACA/ACT2062.HTM#269
Prevailing system of Jury trial (parsi trial) in India
https://lawschoolpolicyreview.com/2018/11/27/rights-of-women-a-critical-study-of-the-jury-system-in-parsi-matrimonial-law/
๐จโโ๏ธ https://www.livelaw.in/articles/last-jury-standing-indias-unique-parsi-matrimonial-court-system-292011
#Discernible_topics@CurrentLegalGK
โคโ๐ฅ3๐2
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
Mention the Names of the Drafting committee of New criminal Laws.
Our Current System Macaulay, James Stephen, Henry Maine, Earle Richards, BN Rau, Ambedkar ๐
Mention the Names of the Drafting committee of New criminal Laws.
Our Current System Macaulay, James Stephen, Henry Maine, Earle Richards, BN Rau, Ambedkar ๐
๐
#Quotes_@CurrentLegalGK
All the rights secured to the citizens under the Constitution are worth nothing, and a mere bubble, except guaranteed to them by an independent and virtuous Judiciary.
Andrew Jackson
(7th U.S.A. President)
All the rights secured to the citizens under the Constitution are worth nothing, and a mere bubble, except guaranteed to them by an independent and virtuous Judiciary.
Andrew Jackson
(7th U.S.A. President)
๐10๐คฉ1
#LegalMaxim@CurrentLeglGK
Animus deserendi i.e intention to bring cohabitation permanently to an end.
Family law: Divorce, restitution.
Animus deserendi i.e intention to bring cohabitation permanently to an end.
Family law: Divorce, restitution.
โคโ๐ฅ4๐2
Supreme Court Hears Concerns Over Allowing Law Graduates To Enter Judicial Service Without Practice As Advocate
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-to-examine-concerns-over-allowing-law-graduates-to-enter-judicial-service-without-practice-as-advocate-282233
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-to-examine-concerns-over-allowing-law-graduates-to-enter-judicial-service-without-practice-as-advocate-282233
www.livelaw.in
Supreme Court Hears Concerns Over Allowing Law Graduates To Enter Judicial Service Without Practice As Advocate
Several High Courts have demanded that the experience at the bar must be made a condition to appear for the judicial service exam.
๐5
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
Supreme Court Hears Concerns Over Allowing Law Graduates To Enter Judicial Service Without Practice As Advocate https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-to-examine-concerns-over-allowing-law-graduates-to-enter-judicial-service-without-practice-as-advocateโฆ
However, Justice Gavai stated that earlier the service conditions were not "attractive" but now it is. He said: "Now, the service conditions are so attractive that a lawyer with three years of practice would be more than willing to [enter in judicial service]."
๐ค
They are planning to make practice mandatory just they have taken some time to see the methods though which they can operationalise it.
Whether by getting certificate from the judge or orders or judgment.
@CurrentLegalGK
๐ค
They are planning to make practice mandatory just they have taken some time to see the methods though which they can operationalise it.
Whether by getting certificate from the judge or orders or judgment.
@CurrentLegalGK
๐ฑ8๐4๐พ2โก1
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
However, Justice Gavai stated that earlier the service conditions were not "attractive" but now it is. He said: "Now, the service conditions are so attractive that a lawyer with three years of practice would be more than willing to [enter in judicial service]."โฆ
Now that the things are not looking in our favour (final outcome may come differently but still the winds are flowing in this direction)
I would like to share one News.
If you guys want to hear that news just comment.
If I will receive 50 YES Comments that would be great otherwise the News will not be shared.
@CurrentLegalGK
I would like to share one News.
If you guys want to hear that news just comment.
If I will receive 50 YES Comments that would be great otherwise the News will not be shared.
@CurrentLegalGK
๐คฏ6๐2๐ฏ2๐1
๐ค
Got some rumours that MP is removing the criteria, so I tried confirming it from a reliable source and got the news that yes they are removing 70% or 3 years practice criteria.
But again it is subject to the SC judgment if judgment comes in our favour then this news a good news for many.
@CurrentLegalGK
News is simple.Got some rumours that MP is removing the criteria, so I tried confirming it from a reliable source and got the news that yes they are removing 70% or 3 years practice criteria.
But again it is subject to the SC judgment if judgment comes in our favour then this news a good news for many.
Ab Firse comment kardo ๐
@CurrentLegalGK
๐ฅฐ10โคโ๐ฅ5๐คฉ4โค3๐3๐1๐1๐1
#Tip@CurrentLegalGK #Essay@CurrentLegalGK
Quote few lines of poems, stories in your essays that will your essay more coherent and literature based, instead of factual only.
don't write a section or law separately use it with your arguments your essay must not look like an answer it must look like an article.
Quote few lines of poems, stories in your essays that will your essay more coherent and literature based, instead of factual only.
don't write a section or law separately use it with your arguments your essay must not look like an answer it must look like an article.
โคโ๐ฅ6๐3๐1
๐ ๐๐ NCERT BNS BNSS AND BSA MINI BOOKS
Karlo jisko share krna hai: To all the channels ๐
Bohot baar dekha hai SIRF idhar ka udhar karke channels chala rahe hain log.
Padhai Karlo bachhon.
P.S. 11th and 12th standard students are studying these things, competition is rising ๐
@CurrentLegalGK
Karlo jisko share krna hai: To all the channels ๐
Bohot baar dekha hai SIRF idhar ka udhar karke channels chala rahe hain log.
Padhai Karlo bachhon.
P.S. 11th and 12th standard students are studying these things, competition is rising ๐
@CurrentLegalGK
๐ฏ9๐5๐3๐คฉ1๐1
Wife Watching Porn, Engaging In Self Pleasure Not By Itself Cruelty On Husband, Woman Retains Her Individuality Even After Marriage: Madras High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-wife-watching-porn-self-pleasure-not-cruelty-286935
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-wife-watching-porn-self-pleasure-not-cruelty-286935
www.livelaw.in
Wife Watching Porn, Engaging In Self Pleasure Not By Itself Cruelty On Husband, Woman Retains Her Individuality Even After Marriage:โฆ
Wife Watching Porn Privately Not Cruelty By Itself, Right To Spousal Privacy Includes Various Aspects Of Woman's Sexual Autonomy: Madras HC
โค6๐1
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
Wife Watching Porn, Engaging In Self Pleasure Not By Itself Cruelty On Husband, Woman Retains Her Individuality Even After Marriage: Madras High Court https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/madras-high-court/madras-high-court-wife-watching-porn-self-pleasure-notโฆ
Morality v. Legality.
In normal life a human must be morally right, law enters only when there is a dispute.
So you won't be called a good human when you say you have complied all the laws but not morality.
@CurrentLegalGK
In normal life a human must be morally right, law enters only when there is a dispute.
The limits of Law.
So you won't be called a good human when you say you have complied all the laws but not morality.
@CurrentLegalGK
๐8๐1
IPR Law And Atrocities Act: Intersectionality Of Identity Politics And Knowledge Economy
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/ipr-law-atrocities-act-intersectionality-identity-politics-knowledge-economy-286557
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/ipr-law-atrocities-act-intersectionality-identity-politics-knowledge-economy-286557
www.livelaw.in
IPR Law And Atrocities Act: Intersectionality Of Identity Politics And Knowledge Economy
On 24 January 2025, a seminal judgement on the scope of intellectual property law and its correlation with human rights and criminal law came from the Supreme Court. In the case titled The...
๐2
๐๐ผ๐พ๐ธ๐ โ๐โโ๐ผโ๐ ๐ธ๐ฝ๐ฝ๐ธ๐โ๐ ๐น๐ช- โ๐๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ฆ๐ค๐ฅ๐๐๐ โข
IPR Law And Atrocities Act: Intersectionality Of Identity Politics And Knowledge Economy https://www.livelaw.in/articles/ipr-law-atrocities-act-intersectionality-identity-politics-knowledge-economy-286557
๐ฎ
Creativity and philosophy starts when your stomach is filled and brain has freedom to think.
For disadvantage groups like SC/ST/OBCs or Racism on the basis of colour creed ethinicty etc.. there was an intangible barrier of discrimination to create something therefore these people must be uplifted and their IP work must be protected (see Art 14)
In the year 2025 SC upheld the decision of BOM HCthat word property under section 15 includes both tangible as well as intangible.
Case Title:
Principal Secretary Government of Maharashtra
v.
Kshipra Kamlesh Uke, 2025
๐ค Section 15A(11)(d) of SC ST prevention of atrocities, Act 1989
It shall be the duty of the concerned State to specify an appropriate scheme to ensure implementation of the following rights and entitlements of victims and witnesses in accessing justice so as-
(d) to provide relief in respect of death or injury or damage to property;
@CurrentLegalGK
IPR and Discrimination.Creativity and philosophy starts when your stomach is filled and brain has freedom to think.
For disadvantage groups like SC/ST/OBCs or Racism on the basis of colour creed ethinicty etc.. there was an intangible barrier of discrimination to create something therefore these people must be uplifted and their IP work must be protected (see Art 14)
In the year 2025 SC upheld the decision of BOM HCthat word property under section 15 includes both tangible as well as intangible.
Case Title:
Principal Secretary Government of Maharashtra
v.
Kshipra Kamlesh Uke, 2025
๐ค Section 15A(11)(d) of SC ST prevention of atrocities, Act 1989
It shall be the duty of the concerned State to specify an appropriate scheme to ensure implementation of the following rights and entitlements of victims and witnesses in accessing justice so as-
(d) to provide relief in respect of death or injury or damage to property;
@CurrentLegalGK
๐3๐1