Some key Section number changes table.
New substantive changes table.
BNS punishment increase, fine increase and mandatory punishment table
Study 1 new criminal law at a time and read these simultaneously 3 -4 times.
@CurrentLegalGK
New substantive changes table.
BNS punishment increase, fine increase and mandatory punishment table
Study 1 new criminal law at a time and read these simultaneously 3 -4 times.
@CurrentLegalGK
π7β€βπ₯1π1
When Can Criminal Trial Be Transferred From One State Under S.406 CrPC? Supreme Court Explains
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/when-can-criminal-trial-be-transferred-from-one-state-under-s406-crpc-supreme-court-explains-285873
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/when-can-criminal-trial-be-transferred-from-one-state-under-s406-crpc-supreme-court-explains-285873
www.livelaw.in
When Can Criminal Trial Be Transferred From One State Under S.406 CrPC? Supreme Court Explains
The Court added that mere inconvenience of the accused is not a ground to transfer.
π3
Accused Can Refuse To Give Blood Sample After Court Orders DNA Profiling In Rape Case: Rajasthan High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-ruling-rape-accused-dna-test-self-incrimination-article-20-constitution-272022
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-ruling-rape-accused-dna-test-self-incrimination-article-20-constitution-272022
www.livelaw.in
Accused Can Refuse To Give Blood Sample After Court Orders DNA Profiling In Rape Case: Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court has ruled that a judicial order permitting DNA profiling of an accused in a rape case does not by itself violate the constitutional protection against self-incrimination under...
π2
Hemudan Nanbha Gadhvi Vs. State of Gujarat - (Supreme Court) (28 Sep 2018)
When there is omission to put material evidence to Accused by Trial Court, prosecution cannot be said to be guilty of not adducing or suppressing such evidence
The mere fact that, PW-2 may have turned hostile is not relevant and does not efface the evidence with regard to the sexual assault upon victim and the identification of the Appellant as the perpetrator. A criminal trial is but a quest for truth. The nature of inquiry and evidence required will depend on the facts of each case. The presumption of innocence will have to be balanced with the rights of the victim, and above all the societal interest for preservation of the Rule of law. Neither the Accused nor the victim can be permitted to subvert a criminal trial by stating falsehood and resort to contrivances, so as to make it the theatre of the absurd. Dispensation of justice in a criminal trial is a serious matter and cannot be allowed to become a mockery by simply allowing prime prosecution witnesses to turn hostile as a ground for acquittal, as observed in Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat and Mahila Vinod Kumari v. State of Madhya Pradesh. The serologist report was an expert opinion under Section 45 of the Evidence Act, 1872 and was therefore admissible in evidence without being marked an exhibit formally or having to be proved by oral evidence.
https://updates.manupatra.com/roundup/contentsummary.aspx?iid=17036
When there is omission to put material evidence to Accused by Trial Court, prosecution cannot be said to be guilty of not adducing or suppressing such evidence
The mere fact that, PW-2 may have turned hostile is not relevant and does not efface the evidence with regard to the sexual assault upon victim and the identification of the Appellant as the perpetrator. A criminal trial is but a quest for truth. The nature of inquiry and evidence required will depend on the facts of each case. The presumption of innocence will have to be balanced with the rights of the victim, and above all the societal interest for preservation of the Rule of law. Neither the Accused nor the victim can be permitted to subvert a criminal trial by stating falsehood and resort to contrivances, so as to make it the theatre of the absurd. Dispensation of justice in a criminal trial is a serious matter and cannot be allowed to become a mockery by simply allowing prime prosecution witnesses to turn hostile as a ground for acquittal, as observed in Zahira Habibullah Sheikh v. State of Gujarat and Mahila Vinod Kumari v. State of Madhya Pradesh. The serologist report was an expert opinion under Section 45 of the Evidence Act, 1872 and was therefore admissible in evidence without being marked an exhibit formally or having to be proved by oral evidence.
https://updates.manupatra.com/roundup/contentsummary.aspx?iid=17036
Manupatra
-Manupatra
β€βπ₯2π2β€1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Hemudan Nanbha Gadhvi Vs. State of Gujarat - (Supreme Court) (28 Sep 2018) When there is omission to put material evidence to Accused by Trial Court, prosecution cannot be said to be guilty of not adducing or suppressing such evidence The mere fact that,β¦
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
If there is a case in which victim of rape turns hostile then the prosecution has any other means to convict the accused?
If there is a case in which victim of rape turns hostile then the prosecution has any other means to convict the accused?
π4
Forwarded from ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’ (Abhi Tiwari)
Right to Marry is a fundamental right under Indian Constitution β
Anonymous Quiz
58%
Yes under article 21
38%
No
3%
Both
2%
None
Forwarded from ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’ (Abhi Tiwari)
Transwomen- transmen, transwomen-cismen, transmen-ciswomen have right to marry under special marriage act and personal laws?
Anonymous Quiz
38%
Yes
62%
No
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
Acceptance of benefit by owner amounts to confirmation by election __
1. When owner is aware of his duty to elect.
2. When owner is aware of his duty to elect and the circusmtance which will influence the iudgemnt of reasonable man in election.
3. When owner waives inquiry into the circumstances.
4. Either 2 or 3
Hint:S. 35 TPA
Acceptance of benefit by owner amounts to confirmation by election __
1. When owner is aware of his duty to elect.
2. When owner is aware of his duty to elect and the circusmtance which will influence the iudgemnt of reasonable man in election.
3. When owner waives inquiry into the circumstances.
4. Either 2 or 3
Hint:
β€1
A_CASE_FOR_DIFFERENT_STANDARDS_IN_AGE_DETERMINATION_PROCEEDINGS.pdf
368 KB
A CASE FOR DIFFERENT STANDARDS IN AGE DETERMINATION PROCEEDINGS
POCSO SECTION 35 IEA SECTION 29 BSA SECTION 94 JJ ACT
POCSO SECTION 35 IEA SECTION 29 BSA SECTION 94 JJ ACT
International Women's Day 2025: Indians among worldβs most progressive on gender equality, global survey finds
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/womens-day-indians-world-progressive-gender-equality-ipsos-survey-9875052/
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/womens-day-indians-world-progressive-gender-equality-ipsos-survey-9875052/
The Indian Express
International Womenβs Day 2025: Indians among worldβs most progressive on gender equality, global survey finds
International Women's Day 2025: The Ipsos IWD 2025 Global Survey found that 78 per cent of Indian citizens believe in the importance of achieving gender equality, with both genders supporting the cause.
β€5
Culpable Homicide and Murder by Justice KN Basha.pdf
325.7 KB
Culpable Homicide and Murder by Justice KN Basha.pdf
π3π3
Pakistani religious scholar shot dead: Recalling his involvement in Kulbhushan Jadhav case π
#balochistan #everyday_explainers #everyday_global #express_explained #kulbhushan_jadhav
#balochistan #everyday_explainers #everyday_global #express_explained #kulbhushan_jadhav
The Indian Express
Pakistani religious scholar shot dead: Recalling his involvement in Kulbhushan Jadhav case
Mufti Shah Mir was reportedly involved in the kidnapping of former Indian Navy officer Kulbhushan Jadhav, who has been lodged in a Pakistan jail since 2016 over allegations of spying and terrorism.
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
https://www.livemint.com/news/india/govt-to-bring-law-to-determine-working-hours-for-truck-drivers-11674056983876.html
ππ NOTE: This above promise of bringing a new law is of 2023.
You just read this excerpt and understand that we have a law no less than any European or american country it is just that it has no means of enforcement just a plain piece of paper, in USA they have detection mechanism device in the truck itself.
The Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 and the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, lays down the maximum number of hours that a truck driver can work without taking a break. According to the rules, a truck driver can work for a maximum of 8 hours in a day, after which they must take a break of at least 8 hours before they can start driving again. Additionally, they are not allowed to drive for more than 60 hours in a week
@CurrentLegalGK
You just read this excerpt and understand that we have a law no less than any European or american country it is just that it has no means of enforcement just a plain piece of paper, in USA they have detection mechanism device in the truck itself.
The Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961 and the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, lays down the maximum number of hours that a truck driver can work without taking a break. According to the rules, a truck driver can work for a maximum of 8 hours in a day, after which they must take a break of at least 8 hours before they can start driving again. Additionally, they are not allowed to drive for more than 60 hours in a week
@CurrentLegalGK
π5β€βπ₯2
bangalore_principles_1689941119.pdf
24.9 KB
β€βπ₯2π2