Omission To Name Some Accused In FIR Is A Relevant Fact Under Section 11 Evidence Act : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/omission-to-name-some-accused-in-fir-is-a-relevant-fact-under-section-11-evidence-act-supreme-court-283077

The Court observed that the complainant's omission to name two perpetrators in FIR, otherwise not relevant, becomes relevant fact under Section 11 of the Evidence Act.
“If he claims to be an eye-witness to the incident and is said to have witnessed three persons known to him assaulting his son i.e. the deceased then what was the good reason not to name the other two accused (juvenile Accused) in the FIR. This omission assumes significance and is a relevant fact under Section 11 of the Evidence Act.”, the court observed.

☀️ Evidentiary Value of FIR section 11 Evidence Act, 1872/ Section 9 of Bhartiya Shkashya Adhiniyam, 2023

@CurrentLegalGK

Notification Issued Under The Old Criminal Law Amendment Act Still Valid: SC [Read Order]
https://www.livelaw.in/notification-issued-old-criminal-law-amendment-act-still-valid-sc-read-order/

👨‍🏫👩‍🏫 Important for UGC NET, teaching Interviews.

Also read UGC 2025 Rules major changes and their positive and negative impacts.

You as a teacher must know the facts with analysis and not mere factual information otherwise imparting it to the students would be difficult.

@CurrentLegalGK

What to know about Bhopal’s new order criminalising begging 🔗
#explained_law #express_explained

Who has the power to grant furloughs? Why Delhi HC is hearing a case about this 🔗
#explained_law #express_explained

Two very Important Articles.

Instead of saving them on phone save in your brain.

Legality of waiver/release forms in adventure sports - iPleaders
https://blog.ipleaders.in/legality-of-waiverrelease-forms-in-adventure-sports/

Section 28 of Indian Contract Act, 1872

@CurrentLegalGK

#Question@CurrentLegalGK

Explain what is distress/distraint, whether in India a landlord or a lessor has the Right to recover rent by way of distress.

DHJS Pre 2025 Answer Key

Question paper: https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4891

Trump, Rubio attack South Africa’s land acquisition law: How do India & US compare? 🔗
#explained_law #express_explained #land_acquisition

#Question@CurrentLegalGK

When can a private person arrest an offender/accused?

A. Can he arrest when the person is a proclaimed offender or has a bounty under wanted list of criminals?

B. Whether Any restrictions exists in comparison to a police officer?

✓BNSS - (6 Marks)

#Question@CurrentLegalGK

👍 Constituion

The Procedure of Amendment followed in 42nd Amendment was with or without ratification of 50% state assemblies?

#Question@CurrentLegalGK

In brief Explain the lehislative history of Wildlife Protection Act, 1972 (last amended in 2022) The Seventh Schedule subjects as well as states resolutions.

🪪 UCC | Uniform Civil Code, 2024 (2025 Rules)

"live-in relationship"

means a relationship between a man and a woman (hereinafter referred to as "partners"), who cohabit in a shared household through a relationship in the nature of marriage, provided that such relationship is not prohibited under Part - 3 of this Code.

Effect of Registration: Maintenance from desertion, Child legitimacy, Non reject of tenancy just because of live in relationship status.

👉 Issues in My opinion:
1. Supriyo v. UoI, 2023 disallowed marriage of Homosexual couples but allowed civil union with lots of protection but this legislation is not providing them protection, this law is not protecting the civil union between LGBTQIA+ (these provisions related to live in does not deal with marriage but civil unions)

2. UCC Rules, 2025 - Chapter 5 Rule: 15 (3) (j) (vi) If within those 74 Prohibited relationship (schedule 1 part 1 and 2) then certificate of religious leader required for exceptions in customs etc.
What About Atheists?

Do you find any Intelligible Differentia in not giving LGBTQIA+ community civil union's any protection, just leaving the 3rd gender even though they require it the most and they have the most number of live relationship percentage wise to their population?

@CurrentLegalGK

Governor Can't 'Pocket-Veto' Bills, Anti-Federal To Return Bills Without Giving Reasons: Tamil Nadu Govt To Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/governor-cant-pocket-veto-bills-anti-federal-to-return-bills-without-giving-reasons-tamil-nadu-govt-to-supreme-court-283195

☀️💯 EIGHT QUESTIONS FRAMED BY THE COURT :

1. When the legislative assembly has passed a Bill and presented it to the Governor for assent, but the Governor withholds his assent thereto, and as a result therefore, the legislative assembly passes the Bill again, and presents it to Governor, will it be open for him to reserve the Bill for the consideration of President, more particularly when he did not reserve it for the President when it was present at first instance.

2. Whether the discretion of Governor in reserving a Bill for the President is exercisable upon any Bill or is it limited to certain specified categories, particularly where the subject-matter appears to be beyond the competence of the State legislature or repugnant to a Central law. 

3. What considerations weighed with the Governor when he decided to reserve the Bill for consideration by the President?

4. What is the concept of pocket veto?

5. What is the effect of the expression 'shall declare' used in the substantive part of Article 200? Can a time period be read in Article 200 in which it is expected for the Governor to pass a declaration? 

6. How is Article 200 construed in two scenarios-
6.1 Bill is presented for assent and upon consideration, the Governor returns the Bill together with message requesting to reconsider certain aspects of Bill in terms of first proviso to Article 200 and
6.2 a Bill is presented but upon consideration, the Governor declares he withholds assent and therefore, the legislature passes the Bill and presents it again to the Governor for assent-whether the Governor bound to give assent in both scenarios?

7. When the President directs Governor to return the Bill and the Bill is passed and presented again to the President, in what matter President to act?

8. Is it mandatorily required to assent to the Bill when it is placed before him for reconsideration or is there a constitutional scheme in Article 201 and if yes, how is the silence to be construed? 

First major Important Case of 2025 is coming to resolve big issues relating to governor powers on bills

@CurrentLegalGK