#Question@CurrentLegalGK
The police file a chargesheet against A for attempting to murder B, and the court frames the charges accordingly. However, when the trial begins, the accused states that the alleged attempt to murder was an act of private defense against sexual assault and produces evidence in support thereof.
Decide the further course of action under BNSS
The police file a chargesheet against A for attempting to murder B, and the court frames the charges accordingly. However, when the trial begins, the accused states that the alleged attempt to murder was an act of private defense against sexual assault and produces evidence in support thereof.
Decide the further course of action under BNSS
π2π―1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
https://www.firstpost.com/explainers/one-nation-one-time-13857075.html
Pdhlena 2025 rules and the act name and the GK behind it.
pehele kahan unified nahi tha ye zaroor dekhna
pehele kahan unified nahi tha ye zaroor dekhna
π4π€3π1
Mitigating circumstances: Why RG Kar rape case convict was not given death penalty π
#express_explained #express_premium #west_bengal_rape
#express_explained #express_premium #west_bengal_rape
The Indian Express
Mitigating circumstances: Why RG Kar rape case convict was not given death penalty
The understanding of mitigating and aggravating circumstances has evolved over the years, and new factors have been added to the list through several decisions.
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Mitigating circumstances: Why RG Kar rape case convict was not given death penalty π #express_explained #express_premium #west_bengal_rape
Too much important to article and too much important to read the detailed brief of Bachhan singh judgment.
In suo motu proceedings instituted in 2022 (IN RE: Framing Guidelines Regarding Potential Mitigating Circumstances To Be Considered While Imposing Death Sentences), the SC asked whether sentences delivered on the same day as the conviction satisfy the requirement of a meaningful and effective hearing.
@CurrentLegalGK
In suo motu proceedings instituted in 2022 (IN RE: Framing Guidelines Regarding Potential Mitigating Circumstances To Be Considered While Imposing Death Sentences), the SC asked whether sentences delivered on the same day as the conviction satisfy the requirement of a meaningful and effective hearing.
@CurrentLegalGK
π5
An Unavoidable Conundrum in Section 360 Of BNSS [Withdrawal From Prosecution]
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/withdrawal-from-prosecution-section-360-bnss-vs-section-321-crpc-282388
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/withdrawal-from-prosecution-section-360-bnss-vs-section-321-crpc-282388
www.livelaw.in
An Unavoidable Conundrum in Section 360 Of BNSS [Withdrawal From Prosecution]
AN AVOIDABLE CONUNDRUM CREATED BY THE DEVIATION MADE IN CLAUSE (II) OF THE PROVISO TO SECTION 360 BNSS FROM CLAUSE (II) OF THE PROVISO TO SECTION 321 Cr.P.C. Section 360 of the...
π2
'Live-In Relationships Must Be Registered With Govt Authority Till Law Is Formulated To Govern Them': Rajasthan High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-registration-of-live-in-relationships-government-competent-authority-282380
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-registration-of-live-in-relationships-government-competent-authority-282380
www.livelaw.in
'Live-In Relationships Must Be Registered With Govt Authority Till Law Is Formulated To Govern Them': Rajasthan High Court
Emphasizing that the need of the hour was for the Centre and State government to enact a legislation governing live-in relationships, the Jaipur bench of the Rajasthan High Court on Wednesday...
20460002183202429125-583953-583994.pdf
466.6 KB
β¨
"Whether a married person living with an unmarried
person, without dissolution of his/her marriage or/and
whether two married persons with two different marriages living in live-in-relationship, without dissolution of their marriages, are entitled to get protection order from the Court ?"
Let the matter be placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice on the administrative side for constitution of Special/Larger Bench to answer the aforesaid question, referred by this Court.
@CurrentLegalGK
The Res Integra"Whether a married person living with an unmarried
person, without dissolution of his/her marriage or/and
whether two married persons with two different marriages living in live-in-relationship, without dissolution of their marriages, are entitled to get protection order from the Court ?"
Let the matter be placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice on the administrative side for constitution of Special/Larger Bench to answer the aforesaid question, referred by this Court.
Live in relationship formalisation is now increasingwill it get the status of marriage? if yes then why to recognice it
@CurrentLegalGK
π2π€―1π€©1
Observations made by the Supreme Court in a judgment
https://www.barandbench.com/columns/observations-made-by-the-supreme-court-in-a-judgment-binding-or-not
https://www.barandbench.com/columns/observations-made-by-the-supreme-court-in-a-judgment-binding-or-not
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
Observations made by the Supreme Court in a judgment
The Supreme Court, being the custodian and guardian of fundamental rights, is also vested with certain powers that conspicuously flow from the Constitution. One
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Observations made by the Supreme Court in a judgment https://www.barandbench.com/columns/observations-made-by-the-supreme-court-in-a-judgment-binding-or-not
read with
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4706
Also Which law says that even the picture dicta of supreme court is binding on all courts exercising itself.
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4706
Also Which law says that even the picture dicta of supreme court is binding on all courts exercising itself.
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
Telegram
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
β¨ Staire decisis
Every Decision of Supreme Court not a binding precedent under 141
βas an institution, our Supreme Court performs the twin functions of decision-making and precedent-making. A substantial portion of our jurisdiction under Article 136β¦
Every Decision of Supreme Court not a binding precedent under 141
βas an institution, our Supreme Court performs the twin functions of decision-making and precedent-making. A substantial portion of our jurisdiction under Article 136β¦
π₯2
[Section 223 BNSS] Notice Should Not Be Issued To Prospective Accused Before Taking Cognizance Of Offence: Kerala High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-section-223-cognizance-offence-magistrate-hearing-accused-282428
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-section-223-cognizance-offence-magistrate-hearing-accused-282428
π1
Capital Punishment An Exception; Even In Cases Of Multiple Murders, Avoid Death Sentence If There's Possibility Of Reform : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/capital-punishment-an-exception-even-in-cases-of-multiple-murders-avoid-death-sentence-if-theres-possibility-of-reform-supreme-court-282400
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/capital-punishment-an-exception-even-in-cases-of-multiple-murders-avoid-death-sentence-if-theres-possibility-of-reform-supreme-court-282400
www.livelaw.in
Capital Punishment An Exception; Even In Cases Of Multiple Murders, Avoid Death Sentence If There's Possibility Of Reform : Supremeβ¦
Recently, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a man for murdering his wife and four minor daughters but commuted his death sentence to life imprisonment without remission, citing a lack of...
π3π’2π―2
Sixty Days or Ninety Days -- The Confusion Continues
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/right-to-default-bail-under-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-282457
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/right-to-default-bail-under-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-282457
www.livelaw.in
Sixty Days or Ninety Days -- The Confusion Continues
Article 21 of the Constitution of India declares that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. The right to default bail is part...
π1π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Sixty Days or Ninety Days -- The Confusion Continues https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/right-to-default-bail-under-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-282457
This is just an article for critical analysis of this judgement.
you can see the post for judgment to get clarity
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4640
you can see the post for judgment to get clarity
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4640
Telegram
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
β¨ Section 187(2) & (3)
Issue: Upto 10 Years it is 40 Days or 60 Days period in which 15 days Police custody can be given in whole or in parts.
Judgment: 15-day police custody must be sought within the first forty days in cases of offences which are punishableβ¦
Issue: Upto 10 Years it is 40 Days or 60 Days period in which 15 days Police custody can be given in whole or in parts.
Judgment: 15-day police custody must be sought within the first forty days in cases of offences which are punishableβ¦
'Not Everything Said In A Judgment Constitutes A Precedent' : Supreme Court Explains Distinction Between Obiter Dicta & Ratio Decidendi
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-obiter-dicta-ratio-decidendi-distinction-career-institute-educational-society-vs-om-shree-thakurji-educational-society-227739
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-obiter-dicta-ratio-decidendi-distinction-career-institute-educational-society-vs-om-shree-thakurji-educational-society-227739
www.livelaw.in
'Not Everything Said In A Judgment Constitutes A Precedent' : Supreme Court Explains Distinction Between Obiter Dicta & Ratio Decidendi
In an order passed recently, the Supreme Court briefly explained th
π―1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
'Not Everything Said In A Judgment Constitutes A Precedent' : Supreme Court Explains Distinction Between Obiter Dicta & Ratio Decidendi https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-obiter-dicta-ratio-decidendi-distinction-career-institute-educationalβ¦
Ratio decidendi v obiter dicta Explained
1. βThe inversion testβ (Effect of removing that law point) to identify what is ratio decidendi in a judgment. To test whether a particular proposition of law is to be treated as the ratio decidendi of the case, the proposition is to be inversed, i.e. to remove from the text of the judgment as if it did not exist. If the conclusion of the case would still have been the same even without examining the proposition, then it cannot be regarded as the ratio decidendi of the case.
2. Fact and conclusions not precedent-
It is not the findings of material facts, direct and inferential, but the statements of the principles of law applicable to the legal problems disclosed by the facts, which is the vital element in the decision and operates as a precedent. Even the conclusion does not operate as a precedent, albeit operates as res judicata. Thus, it is not everything said by a Judge when giving judgment that constitutes a precedent. The only thing in a Judge's decision binding as a legal precedent is the principle upon which the case is decided and, for this reason, it is important to analyse a decision and isolate from it the obiter dicta
@CurrentLegalGK
1. βThe inversion testβ (Effect of removing that law point) to identify what is ratio decidendi in a judgment. To test whether a particular proposition of law is to be treated as the ratio decidendi of the case, the proposition is to be inversed, i.e. to remove from the text of the judgment as if it did not exist. If the conclusion of the case would still have been the same even without examining the proposition, then it cannot be regarded as the ratio decidendi of the case.
2. Fact and conclusions not precedent-
It is not the findings of material facts, direct and inferential, but the statements of the principles of law applicable to the legal problems disclosed by the facts, which is the vital element in the decision and operates as a precedent. Even the conclusion does not operate as a precedent, albeit operates as res judicata. Thus, it is not everything said by a Judge when giving judgment that constitutes a precedent. The only thing in a Judge's decision binding as a legal precedent is the principle upon which the case is decided and, for this reason, it is important to analyse a decision and isolate from it the obiter dicta
@CurrentLegalGK
π6β€βπ₯1
#Essay@CurrentLegalGK
π«1. Social-
"Productivity vs. Employee Welfare: The Dilemma of Long Working Hours"
OR
Age restriction on social Media, A Good or Bad Move for Growth?
π¨ββοΈ 2. Legal-
Live-In Relationships: Navigating Tradition and Individual Rights in India"
π«1. Social-
"Productivity vs. Employee Welfare: The Dilemma of Long Working Hours"
OR
Age restriction on social Media, A Good or Bad Move for Growth?
π¨ββοΈ 2. Legal-
Live-In Relationships: Navigating Tradition and Individual Rights in India"
β2β€2π2π2
How Uttarakhand UCC regulates live-in relationships π
#explained_law #express_explained #live_in_relationship #uniform_civil_code #uttarakhand
#explained_law #express_explained #live_in_relationship #uniform_civil_code #uttarakhand
The Indian Express
How Uttarakhand UCC regulates live-in relationships
Uttarakhand UCC: What is a live-in relationship? Who can enter into one? How does one register a live-in relationship? What documents are required at the time of registration? What happens if one does not register?
π―1
Why Himachal Pradesh could soon allow controlled cannabis cultivation π
#cannabis #express_explained #narcotic_drugs_and_psychotropic_substances_(ndps)_act
#cannabis #express_explained #narcotic_drugs_and_psychotropic_substances_(ndps)_act
Express Explained
Why Himachal Pradesh could soon allow controlled cannabis cultivation
If the pilot project is successful, Himachal Pradesh will become the fourth state to allow controlled cannabis cultivation in India.
π2π±1π1