Supreme Court To Examine Concerns Over Allowing Law Graduates To Enter Judicial Service Without Practice As Advocate
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-to-examine-concerns-over-allowing-law-graduates-to-enter-judicial-service-without-practice-as-advocate-282233
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-to-examine-concerns-over-allowing-law-graduates-to-enter-judicial-service-without-practice-as-advocate-282233
www.livelaw.in
Supreme Court Hears Concerns Over Allowing Law Graduates To Enter Judicial Service Without Practice As Advocate
Several High Courts have demanded that the experience at the bar must be made a condition to appear for the judicial service exam.
π’8π―3
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Supreme Court To Examine Concerns Over Allowing Law Graduates To Enter Judicial Service Without Practice As Advocate https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-to-examine-concerns-over-allowing-law-graduates-to-enter-judicial-service-without-practiceβ¦
π Ab 70% or practice ke beech me difference dikhayi dega?
Why Practice is fruitful?
Good practical experience and to learn about the tactics played by advocates.
Why 3 years after graduation is not fruitful?
Many good talented students will not wait for 5+3 years for a career.
Judiciary is a service but it is a job as well and for a person who is going to serve must have good career aspects, he really prepares for it and gives his/her best.
What's the Solution?
Instead of spraying fertilisers of leaves, treat the rotten roots.
Make India's legal education substantially a practical based as we have in other countries.
BCI/UGC aren't wroking properly that's the truth, we need a proper body for legal education and for scrutiny of students of law.
3 Years practice might be a good move but there is other side also which can make it worst by reducing good active talent and by reducing the competition in legal competitive exam, proper knowledge of law is important practical experience can be gained theough extensive trainings as well.
Change the education system, change the examination pattern a litlle bit rather than throwing blame for every wrong by giving few rare examples onto all the aspiring candidates, they too have a right, they are our future judicial officers of the fundamental courts.
Don't repeat the cycle of practice v. non practice era again just because today we have more aspirants than the earlier era and we have to filter them out.
@CurrentLegalGK
Why Practice is fruitful?
Good practical experience and to learn about the tactics played by advocates.
Why 3 years after graduation is not fruitful?
Many good talented students will not wait for 5+3 years for a career.
Judiciary is a service but it is a job as well and for a person who is going to serve must have good career aspects, he really prepares for it and gives his/her best.
What's the Solution?
Instead of spraying fertilisers of leaves, treat the rotten roots.
Make India's legal education substantially a practical based as we have in other countries.
BCI/UGC aren't wroking properly that's the truth, we need a proper body for legal education and for scrutiny of students of law.
3 Years practice might be a good move but there is other side also which can make it worst by reducing good active talent and by reducing the competition in legal competitive exam, proper knowledge of law is important practical experience can be gained theough extensive trainings as well.
Change the education system, change the examination pattern a litlle bit rather than throwing blame for every wrong by giving few rare examples onto all the aspiring candidates, they too have a right, they are our future judicial officers of the fundamental courts.
Don't repeat the cycle of practice v. non practice era again just because today we have more aspirants than the earlier era and we have to filter them out.
1st Gen v. already established practice me inequality rahegi, itna practical experience to courts ko bhi hona chahiye jub vo rules frame krenge
@CurrentLegalGK
π―10π6π’6π2β€βπ₯1
Presumption That Husband Is Father Of Child Born During Marriage Not Displaced Even If Wife Had Relations With Another Man : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/presumption-that-husband-is-father-of-child-born-during-marriage-not-displaced-even-if-wife-had-relations-with-another-man-supreme-court-282258
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/presumption-that-husband-is-father-of-child-born-during-marriage-not-displaced-even-if-wife-had-relations-with-another-man-supreme-court-282258
www.livelaw.in
Presumption That Husband Is Father Of Child Born During Marriage Not Displaced Even If Wife Had Relations With Another Man : Supremeβ¦
The Supreme Court today (January 28) reaffirmed that a child's legitimacy determines paternity, emphasizing that a child born during a valid marriage is presumed to be the legitimate offspring of...
π5
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Presumption That Husband Is Father Of Child Born During Marriage Not Displaced Even If Wife Had Relations With Another Man : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/presumption-that-husband-is-father-of-child-born-during-marriage-not-displaced-evenβ¦
Even if it is assumed that the Respondent's mother had relations with the Appellant during her marriage and especially when the Respondent was begotten, such a fact per se, would not be sufficient to displace the presumption of legitimacy. The only thing that such an allegation sheds light on is the fact that there seems to have been simultaneous access with the Respondent's mother, by the Appellant and Mr. RK. What, however, needs to be clarified is that an 'additional' access or 'multiple' access does not automatically negate the access between the spouses and prove non-access thereof. Consequently, there is a statutory mandate that the Respondent must be presumed to be the son of RK
π1
Accusing Judge As Corrupt In Open Court, Does It Not Lower Image Of Judiciary?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/accusing-judge-corrupt-open-court-lower-image-judiciary-282074
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/accusing-judge-corrupt-open-court-lower-image-judiciary-282074
www.livelaw.in
Accusing Judge As Corrupt In Open Court, Does It Not Lower Image Of Judiciary?
Recently, I went through a judgment delivered by the Bombay High Court in the matter of S.B. Patil Versus Manubhai Hargovandas Patel, Criminal Reference No.5 of 2024 decided on September 3, 2024...
Population-Based Delimitation: Resulting In Unequal Representation
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/territorial-representation-system-and-indian-democracy-281980
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/territorial-representation-system-and-indian-democracy-281980
www.livelaw.in
Population-Based Delimitation: Resulting In Unequal Representation
Democracy is the rule of people, by the people,[1] In a democratic system, people rule themselves either by themselves or by their elected representatives. There are two types of representative...
π1π―1
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
The police file a chargesheet against A for attempting to murder B, and the court frames the charges accordingly. However, when the trial begins, the accused states that the alleged attempt to murder was an act of private defense against sexual assault and produces evidence in support thereof.
Decide the further course of action under BNSS
The police file a chargesheet against A for attempting to murder B, and the court frames the charges accordingly. However, when the trial begins, the accused states that the alleged attempt to murder was an act of private defense against sexual assault and produces evidence in support thereof.
Decide the further course of action under BNSS
π2π―1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
https://www.firstpost.com/explainers/one-nation-one-time-13857075.html
Pdhlena 2025 rules and the act name and the GK behind it.
pehele kahan unified nahi tha ye zaroor dekhna
pehele kahan unified nahi tha ye zaroor dekhna
π4π€3π1
Mitigating circumstances: Why RG Kar rape case convict was not given death penalty π
#express_explained #express_premium #west_bengal_rape
#express_explained #express_premium #west_bengal_rape
The Indian Express
Mitigating circumstances: Why RG Kar rape case convict was not given death penalty
The understanding of mitigating and aggravating circumstances has evolved over the years, and new factors have been added to the list through several decisions.
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Mitigating circumstances: Why RG Kar rape case convict was not given death penalty π #express_explained #express_premium #west_bengal_rape
Too much important to article and too much important to read the detailed brief of Bachhan singh judgment.
In suo motu proceedings instituted in 2022 (IN RE: Framing Guidelines Regarding Potential Mitigating Circumstances To Be Considered While Imposing Death Sentences), the SC asked whether sentences delivered on the same day as the conviction satisfy the requirement of a meaningful and effective hearing.
@CurrentLegalGK
In suo motu proceedings instituted in 2022 (IN RE: Framing Guidelines Regarding Potential Mitigating Circumstances To Be Considered While Imposing Death Sentences), the SC asked whether sentences delivered on the same day as the conviction satisfy the requirement of a meaningful and effective hearing.
@CurrentLegalGK
π5
An Unavoidable Conundrum in Section 360 Of BNSS [Withdrawal From Prosecution]
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/withdrawal-from-prosecution-section-360-bnss-vs-section-321-crpc-282388
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/withdrawal-from-prosecution-section-360-bnss-vs-section-321-crpc-282388
www.livelaw.in
An Unavoidable Conundrum in Section 360 Of BNSS [Withdrawal From Prosecution]
AN AVOIDABLE CONUNDRUM CREATED BY THE DEVIATION MADE IN CLAUSE (II) OF THE PROVISO TO SECTION 360 BNSS FROM CLAUSE (II) OF THE PROVISO TO SECTION 321 Cr.P.C. Section 360 of the...
π2
'Live-In Relationships Must Be Registered With Govt Authority Till Law Is Formulated To Govern Them': Rajasthan High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-registration-of-live-in-relationships-government-competent-authority-282380
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/rajasthan-high-court/rajasthan-high-court-registration-of-live-in-relationships-government-competent-authority-282380
www.livelaw.in
'Live-In Relationships Must Be Registered With Govt Authority Till Law Is Formulated To Govern Them': Rajasthan High Court
Emphasizing that the need of the hour was for the Centre and State government to enact a legislation governing live-in relationships, the Jaipur bench of the Rajasthan High Court on Wednesday...
20460002183202429125-583953-583994.pdf
466.6 KB
β¨
"Whether a married person living with an unmarried
person, without dissolution of his/her marriage or/and
whether two married persons with two different marriages living in live-in-relationship, without dissolution of their marriages, are entitled to get protection order from the Court ?"
Let the matter be placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice on the administrative side for constitution of Special/Larger Bench to answer the aforesaid question, referred by this Court.
@CurrentLegalGK
The Res Integra"Whether a married person living with an unmarried
person, without dissolution of his/her marriage or/and
whether two married persons with two different marriages living in live-in-relationship, without dissolution of their marriages, are entitled to get protection order from the Court ?"
Let the matter be placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice on the administrative side for constitution of Special/Larger Bench to answer the aforesaid question, referred by this Court.
Live in relationship formalisation is now increasingwill it get the status of marriage? if yes then why to recognice it
@CurrentLegalGK
π2π€―1π€©1
Observations made by the Supreme Court in a judgment
https://www.barandbench.com/columns/observations-made-by-the-supreme-court-in-a-judgment-binding-or-not
https://www.barandbench.com/columns/observations-made-by-the-supreme-court-in-a-judgment-binding-or-not
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
Observations made by the Supreme Court in a judgment
The Supreme Court, being the custodian and guardian of fundamental rights, is also vested with certain powers that conspicuously flow from the Constitution. One
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Observations made by the Supreme Court in a judgment https://www.barandbench.com/columns/observations-made-by-the-supreme-court-in-a-judgment-binding-or-not
read with
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4706
Also Which law says that even the picture dicta of supreme court is binding on all courts exercising itself.
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4706
Also Which law says that even the picture dicta of supreme court is binding on all courts exercising itself.
#Question@CurrentLegalGK
Telegram
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
β¨ Staire decisis
Every Decision of Supreme Court not a binding precedent under 141
βas an institution, our Supreme Court performs the twin functions of decision-making and precedent-making. A substantial portion of our jurisdiction under Article 136β¦
Every Decision of Supreme Court not a binding precedent under 141
βas an institution, our Supreme Court performs the twin functions of decision-making and precedent-making. A substantial portion of our jurisdiction under Article 136β¦
π₯2
[Section 223 BNSS] Notice Should Not Be Issued To Prospective Accused Before Taking Cognizance Of Offence: Kerala High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-section-223-cognizance-offence-magistrate-hearing-accused-282428
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/kerala-high-court/kerala-high-court-section-223-cognizance-offence-magistrate-hearing-accused-282428
π1
Capital Punishment An Exception; Even In Cases Of Multiple Murders, Avoid Death Sentence If There's Possibility Of Reform : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/capital-punishment-an-exception-even-in-cases-of-multiple-murders-avoid-death-sentence-if-theres-possibility-of-reform-supreme-court-282400
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/capital-punishment-an-exception-even-in-cases-of-multiple-murders-avoid-death-sentence-if-theres-possibility-of-reform-supreme-court-282400
www.livelaw.in
Capital Punishment An Exception; Even In Cases Of Multiple Murders, Avoid Death Sentence If There's Possibility Of Reform : Supremeβ¦
Recently, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a man for murdering his wife and four minor daughters but commuted his death sentence to life imprisonment without remission, citing a lack of...
π3π’2π―2
Sixty Days or Ninety Days -- The Confusion Continues
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/right-to-default-bail-under-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-282457
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/right-to-default-bail-under-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-282457
www.livelaw.in
Sixty Days or Ninety Days -- The Confusion Continues
Article 21 of the Constitution of India declares that no person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. The right to default bail is part...
π1π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Sixty Days or Ninety Days -- The Confusion Continues https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/right-to-default-bail-under-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-282457
This is just an article for critical analysis of this judgement.
you can see the post for judgment to get clarity
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4640
you can see the post for judgment to get clarity
https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4640
Telegram
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
β¨ Section 187(2) & (3)
Issue: Upto 10 Years it is 40 Days or 60 Days period in which 15 days Police custody can be given in whole or in parts.
Judgment: 15-day police custody must be sought within the first forty days in cases of offences which are punishableβ¦
Issue: Upto 10 Years it is 40 Days or 60 Days period in which 15 days Police custody can be given in whole or in parts.
Judgment: 15-day police custody must be sought within the first forty days in cases of offences which are punishableβ¦