𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
πŸ“² Contact β†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

☺️ 360° Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
🧠 Daily Quiz β†’ @LegalQuizzes

β³πŸš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
#Quotes_@CurrentLegalGK

Remembering that I'll be dead soon is the most important tool I've ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life.

- Steve Jobs
πŸ‘Œ10πŸ’―4πŸ‘3πŸ”₯3😁2❀‍πŸ”₯1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Supreme Court To Examine Concerns Over Allowing Law Graduates To Enter Judicial Service Without Practice As Advocate https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-to-examine-concerns-over-allowing-law-graduates-to-enter-judicial-service-without-practice…
πŸ™‚ Ab 70% or practice ke beech me difference dikhayi dega?

Why Practice is fruitful?
Good practical experience and to learn about the tactics played by advocates.

Why 3 years after graduation is not fruitful?
Many good talented students will not wait for 5+3 years for a career.
Judiciary is a service but it is a job as well and for a person who is going to serve must have good career aspects, he really prepares for it and gives his/her best.

What's the Solution?
Instead of spraying fertilisers of leaves, treat the rotten roots.
Make India's legal education substantially a practical based as we have in other countries.

BCI/UGC aren't wroking properly that's the truth, we need a proper body for legal education and for scrutiny of students of law.

3 Years practice might be a good move but there is other side also which can make it worst by reducing good active talent and by reducing the competition in legal competitive exam, proper knowledge of law is important practical experience can be gained theough extensive trainings as well.

Change the education system, change the examination pattern a litlle bit rather than throwing blame for every wrong by giving few rare examples onto all the aspiring candidates, they too have a right, they are our future judicial officers of the fundamental courts.

Don't repeat the cycle of practice v. non practice era again just because today we have more aspirants than the earlier era and we have to filter them out.

1st Gen v. already established practice me inequality rahegi, itna practical experience to courts ko bhi hona chahiye jub vo rules frame krenge


@CurrentLegalGK
πŸ’―10πŸ‘6😒6πŸ‘Œ2❀‍πŸ”₯1
𝕃𝔼𝔾𝔸𝕃 β„‚π•Œβ„β„π”Όβ„•π•‹ π”Έπ”½π”½π”Έπ•€β„π•Š 𝔹π•ͺ- ℕ𝕒π•₯𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕝 𝕁𝕦𝕀π•₯π•šπ•”π•– β„’
Presumption That Husband Is Father Of Child Born During Marriage Not Displaced Even If Wife Had Relations With Another Man : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/presumption-that-husband-is-father-of-child-born-during-marriage-not-displaced-even…
Even if it is assumed that the Respondent's mother had relations with the Appellant during her marriage and especially when the Respondent was begotten, such a fact per se, would not be sufficient to displace the presumption of legitimacy. The only thing that such an allegation sheds light on is the fact that there seems to have been simultaneous access with the Respondent's mother, by the Appellant and Mr. RK. What, however, needs to be clarified is that an 'additional' access or 'multiple' access does not automatically negate the access between the spouses and prove non-access thereof. Consequently, there is a statutory mandate that the Respondent must be presumed to be the son of RK
πŸ‘1
#Question@CurrentLegalGK

The police file a chargesheet against A for attempting to murder B, and the court frames the charges accordingly. However, when the trial begins, the accused states that the alleged attempt to murder was an act of private defense against sexual assault and produces evidence in support thereof.

Decide the further course of action under BNSS
πŸ‘Œ2πŸ’―1
20460002183202429125-583953-583994.pdf
466.6 KB
✨ The Res Integra

"Whether a married person living with an unmarried
person, without dissolution of his/her marriage or/and
whether two married persons with two different marriages living in live-in-relationship, without dissolution of their marriages, are entitled to get protection order from the Court ?"

Let the matter be placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice on the administrative side for constitution of Special/Larger Bench to answer the aforesaid question, referred by this Court.

Live in relationship formalisation is now increasingwill it get the status of marriage? if yes then why to recognice it


@CurrentLegalGK
😍2🀯1🀩1