๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

โ˜บ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
4-Corpus Delicti-by Smt Shaik Faizunnisa.pdf
50.4 KB
Corpus Delicti


RISHI PAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND 2013

In the absence of corpus delicti what the court looks for is clinching evidence that proves that the victim has been done to death. If the prosecution is successful in providing cogent and satisfactory proof of the victim having met a homicidal death, absence of corpus delicti will not by itself be fatal to a charge of murder. Failure of the prosecution to assemble such evidence will, however, result in failure of the most essential requirement in a case involving a charge of murder.

@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ‘Œ1๐Ÿ˜1
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
Supreme Court To Examine Concerns Over Allowing Law Graduates To Enter Judicial Service Without Practice As Advocate https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/supreme-court-to-examine-concerns-over-allowing-law-graduates-to-enter-judicial-service-without-practiceโ€ฆ
๐Ÿ™‚ Ab 70% or practice ke beech me difference dikhayi dega?

Why Practice is fruitful?
Good practical experience and to learn about the tactics played by advocates.

Why 3 years after graduation is not fruitful?
Many good talented students will not wait for 5+3 years for a career.
Judiciary is a service but it is a job as well and for a person who is going to serve must have good career aspects, he really prepares for it and gives his/her best.

What's the Solution?
Instead of spraying fertilisers of leaves, treat the rotten roots.
Make India's legal education substantially a practical based as we have in other countries.

BCI/UGC aren't wroking properly that's the truth, we need a proper body for legal education and for scrutiny of students of law.

3 Years practice might be a good move but there is other side also which can make it worst by reducing good active talent and by reducing the competition in legal competitive exam, proper knowledge of law is important practical experience can be gained theough extensive trainings as well.

Change the education system, change the examination pattern a litlle bit rather than throwing blame for every wrong by giving few rare examples onto all the aspiring candidates, they too have a right, they are our future judicial officers of the fundamental courts.

Don't repeat the cycle of practice v. non practice era again just because today we have more aspirants than the earlier era and we have to filter them out.

1st Gen v. already established practice me inequality rahegi, itna practical experience to courts ko bhi hona chahiye jub vo rules frame krenge


@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ’ฏ10๐Ÿ‘6๐Ÿ˜ข6๐Ÿ‘Œ2โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
Presumption That Husband Is Father Of Child Born During Marriage Not Displaced Even If Wife Had Relations With Another Man : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/presumption-that-husband-is-father-of-child-born-during-marriage-not-displaced-evenโ€ฆ
Even if it is assumed that the Respondent's mother had relations with the Appellant during her marriage and especially when the Respondent was begotten, such a fact per se, would not be sufficient to displace the presumption of legitimacy. The only thing that such an allegation sheds light on is the fact that there seems to have been simultaneous access with the Respondent's mother, by the Appellant and Mr. RK. What, however, needs to be clarified is that an 'additional' access or 'multiple' access does not automatically negate the access between the spouses and prove non-access thereof. Consequently, there is a statutory mandate that the Respondent must be presumed to be the son of RK
๐Ÿ‘1
#Question@CurrentLegalGK

The police file a chargesheet against A for attempting to murder B, and the court frames the charges accordingly. However, when the trial begins, the accused states that the alleged attempt to murder was an act of private defense against sexual assault and produces evidence in support thereof.

Decide the further course of action under BNSS
๐Ÿ‘Œ2๐Ÿ’ฏ1