๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
18.9K subscribers
851 photos
11 videos
1.72K files
3.09K links
๐Ÿ“ฒ Contact โ†’ @CurrentLegalGKBOT

โ˜บ๏ธ 360ยฐ Cases on topics.

Keywords: Civil Judge, MPCJ, UP PSCJ, Haryana ADA, DJS, CBI APP, RJS, JLO, CLAT PG, Supreme Court law clerk, AIBE, IBPS, UGC NET.
_____________
๐Ÿง  Daily Quiz โ†’ @LegalQuizzes

โณ๐Ÿš€ Enjoy Learning!
Download Telegram
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
Conditions To Invoke S. 53A Transfer Of Property Act : Supreme Court Explains https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/conditions-to-invoke-s-53a-transfer-of-property-act-supreme-court-explains-279281
Section 53A of TPA acts as a shield for the prospective transferee who is holding possession of the immovable property under a contract of sale, that is not formally executed (not registered). The provision puts an obligation on the transferor to not enforce the contract against the transferee when the transferee has acted in accordance with the written agreement.
โ€œSection 53-A of the Transfer of Property Act was inserted partly to set at rest the conflict of views in this country, but principally for the protection of ignorant transferees who take possession or spend money in improvements relying on documents which are ineffective as transfers or on contracts which cannot be proved for want of registration. The effect of this section, is to relax the strict provisions of the Transfer of Property Act and the Registration Act in favour of transferees in order to allow the defence of part performance to be established.โ€, the court observed.

GIRIYAPPA v. KAMALAMMA, 2024

#Object_of_law@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘5
๐•ƒ๐”ผ๐”พ๐”ธ๐•ƒ โ„‚๐•Œโ„โ„๐”ผโ„•๐•‹ ๐”ธ๐”ฝ๐”ฝ๐”ธ๐•€โ„๐•Š ๐”น๐•ช- โ„•๐•’๐•ฅ๐•ฆ๐•ฃ๐•’๐• ๐•๐•ฆ๐•ค๐•ฅ๐•š๐•”๐•– โ„ข
S. 100 CPC | High Courts Cannot Pass Interim Order In Second Appeal Without Framing Substantial Question Of Law : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-section-100-cpc-second-appeal-interim-order-substantial-question-of-law-281308
whether the High Court could pass any ad interim order for a limited period, before framing the substantial question(s) of law, while dealing with a second appeal filed under Order XLI r/w Section 100 CPC.

Answering negatively, the Court observed:

This Court has categorically held that the High Court acquires jurisdiction to deal with the second appeal on merits only when it frames a substantial question of law as required to be framed under Section 100 CPC; and it cannot grant an interim order, without framing substantial question of law.โ€

High Court cannot use 151 to issue interim orders before framing substantial question of law.


@CurrentLegalGK
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ2
๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿš” Power to Transfer investigation to another agency

==> Vishal Tiwari v. UoI, 2024 relied on
K.V. Rajendran v. Superintendent of Police CBCID South Zone, Chennai, 2013

Article 32 and 142 Gives the supreme court power to Transfer an investigation


@CurrentLegalGK
๐Ÿ‘7๐Ÿ˜1