Current Scenario On Death Penalty In Light Of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/death-penalty-under-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-280919

Capital Punishment #Essay@CurrentLegalGK Legal provisions as per new Criminal law.
BNSS

📄✍🏻 𝐂𝐨𝐝𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐥 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐞, 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐅𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐑𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐬.


@CurrentLegalGK

Fake Cops, Real Crimes: The Rise Of Impersonation In Law Enforcement
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/fake-police-stations-digital-arrest-and-financial-scam-280993

🌟✍🏻𝘿𝙤𝙘𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝘾𝙖𝙨𝙪𝙨 𝙊𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙪𝙨

Casus omissus finds its origin in the Latin Maxim “casus omissus pro omisso habendus est” that means that a case omitted is to be held as intentionally omitted. Casus omissus, literally means "𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐝".

"✔️When a statute or contract does not cover a situation, the doctrine of casus omissus states that the courts should interpret the law based on the facts of the case. 

✔️The doctrine of casus omissus is a canon of construction, which means that courts create principles for interpreting statutes. 
( Interpretation of Statutes )

✔️The doctrine of casus omissus ensures that the legislature is responsible for creating laws.

✔️The doctrine of casus omissus reflects the tension between the courts and the legislature."

@CurrentLegalGK

✨✨ #Tip@CurrentLegalGK

One of the benefit of reading facts (detailed or brief) is that the case may be used in several other topics as the facts of a case are very wide they deal with various combination of laws.

Can you give any examples? if yes then you are somewhere ready.

#Question@CurrentLegalGK

Explain the concept of judicial review of executive action with the help of precedents.

@CurrentLegalGK

Order II Rule 2 CPC Doesn't Mean Different Causes Of Action From Same Transaction Must Be Included In Single Suit : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/order-ii-rule-2-cpc-doesnt-mean-different-causes-of-action-from-same-transaction-must-be-included-in-single-suit-supreme-court-281155

[Self-Incrimination] Company Cannot Seek Protection Under Article 20(3) Of Constitution Without Satisfying Its Ingredients: P&H High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court/punjab-haryana-high-court-company-cannot-seek-protection-art-203-without-satisfying-ingredients-when-document-necessary-to-adjudicate-matter-is-summoned-281191

Justice N.S Shekhawat explained that, “considering the Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India, the protection against self incrimination would come to the rescue of a person only when these three ingredients are satisfied,
(a) accusation of an offence against such person
(b) compulsion to provide evidence and
(c) giving out self incriminating material, relating to accusations levelled against him, either in the form of oral testimony or in the form of a statement recorded or in the form of document produced.”

@CurrentLegalGK

Handcuffing: Necessity Or Violation Of Rights?
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/arrested-person-handcuffing-violation-of-fundamental-rights-supreme-court-judgments-280994

⛓️🔗🙌#Quotes_@CurrentLegalGK

“Handcuffing is prima facie inhuman and, therefore, unreasonable; it should be the last resort, not the first reflex." -

~ Justice Krishna Iyer

S. 54 TPA | Possession Of Property Under Agreement To Sell Doesn't Grant Ownership; Registration Required: Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-property-ownership-registration-agreement-to-sell-281269

Drafting Pleading and Conveyancing.

See the drafts of Civil criminal pleadings such as Plaint, complaint, bail etc. as well as Agreement to sell and Sale deed.

To get a fair idea of how practically the law is applied because 1st step for a practical lawyer is to learn to draft as per the law and a law student to imagine how practical world works and to understand the concept in interesting way then it is a good method.


Reading Writs under constituion then go through these drafts after reading the concept and find out what what law points are applied and what aren't.

@CurrentLegalGK

The two-Judge Bench comprising Justice B.R. Gavai and Justice K.V. Viswanathan observed, “It can thus be seen that in the said case, it was held that the test of manifest arbitrariness as laid down by this Court in various judgments would also apply to invalidate legislation as well as subordinate legislation under Article 14. It was held that manifest arbitrariness must be something done by the legislature capriciously, irrationally and/or without adequate determining principle. It further goes on to hold that when something is done which is excessive and disproportionate, such a legislation would be manifestly arbitrary.

@CurrentLegalGK

Can’t Declare HC Judgment As Illegal Under Article 32 Of Constitution; If Petitioners Haven't Been Heard, They Can Either File Recall Application Before HC Or SLP: SC
https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/vimal-babu-dhumadiya-ors-v-the-state-of-maharashtra-ors-2025-insc-77-article-32-constitution-article-136-recall-application-1565090

In our considered opinion, under Article 32 of the Constitution, the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay cannot be declared as illegal”, the Bench held. It was further explained by the Bench that if the petitioners have not been heard and are affected by the said judgment, the remedy available to them is to either file a petition/application for recall of the said judgment or a petition under Article 136 of the Constitution before the Apex Court.

Conditions To Invoke S. 53A Transfer Of Property Act : Supreme Court Explains
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/conditions-to-invoke-s-53a-transfer-of-property-act-supreme-court-explains-279281