Petitioner is a food lisencee holder with Railways.

✨ Facts:
1. Complaints about the petitioner’s catering service were posted on social media platform X (formerly Twitter).
2. The complaints alleged substandard food quality, overcharging, and vendor misconduct.
3. The South Central Railway acted on these complaints, treating them with seriousness and issuing warnings to the petitioner.
4. The petitioner contended that social media complaints should not be considered equivalent to formal complaints as per the contract.

✨ Issue:
Whether complaints made on social media (X) can be treated as valid and serious complaints under the contractual obligations governing the license agreement.

✨ Held- The complaints on social media cannot be seen as lacking in gravity as opposed to formal written complaints. Complaints/customer feedback on social media is an accepted mode of registering complaints against a service provider and the petitioner cannot adopt an ostrich policy in today's time on the pretext that social media complaints do not deserve to be treated with seriousness."

@CurrentLegalGK

Principles To Evaluate Circumstantial Evidence In Criminal Cases : Supreme Court Explains
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/principles-to-evaluate-circumstantial-evidence-in-criminal-cases-supreme-court-explains-280771

Whether two finger test is banned? if yes Then whether Potency Test is also banned?

Comment by citing cases

If there is violation of the 2 aforesaid tests by doctors what is the punishment?

#Question@CurrentLegalGK

https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/mumbai/iqbal-chagla-dead-senior-advocate-9775310/

A Man with Great Legal background who took courageous Legal steps for Reformation of Judicial system i.e.Judicial Reforms.🙌

🌟🏛" In 2016, the English edition of “𝘾𝙤𝙪𝙧𝙩𝙨 𝙤𝙛 𝙄𝙣𝙙𝙞𝙖 – 𝙋𝙖𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙋𝙧𝙚𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩” was released, chronicling the 𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐡 𝐡𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐨𝐟 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚’𝐬 𝐣𝐮𝐝𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐫𝐲.

✨ See Video - https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/3614

👨‍⚖️ BR Ambedkar selective speech on topics, Supreme court website and byjus for other speeches.

Also Search here itself for more.

✨✨ For post independence History Read NCERT 11th and 12th

#History@CurrentLegalGK

Supreme Court Says Its Judgments Must Clarify Their Binding Nature So That HCs & Trial Courts Don't Get Confused
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-says-its-judgments-must-clarify-their-binding-nature-to-avoid-confusing-hcs-trial-courts-280807

✨ Staire decisis

Every Decision of Supreme Court not a binding precedent under 141



“as an institution, our Supreme Court performs the twin functions of decision-making and precedent-making. A substantial portion of our jurisdiction under Article 136 is reflective of regular appellate disposition of decision making. Every judgment or order made by this Court in disposing of these appeals is not intended to be a binding precedent under Article 141. Though the arrival of a dispute for this Court's consideration, either for decision-making or precedent-making is at the same tarmac, every judgment or order which departs from this Court lands at the doorstep of the High Courts and the subordinate courts as a binding precedent. We are aware of the difficulties that High Courts and the subordinate courts face in determining whether the judgment is in the process of decision-making or precedent-making, particularly when we have also declared that even an obiter of this Court must be treated as a binding precedent for the High Courts and the courts below. In the process of decision making, this Court takes care to indicate the instances where the decision of the Supreme Court is not to be treated as precedent. It is therefore necessary to be cautious in our dispensation and state whether a particular decision is to resolve the dispute between the parties and provide finality or whether the judgment is intended to and in fact declares the law under Article 141.”, 


NBCC (INDIA) LTD. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL 2025

@CurrentLegalGK

Supreme Court Annual Digest 2024 Constitution of India

@CurrentLegalGK

https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4686

🌤️🌊The Mahakumbh is an awe-inspiring display of faith, hope, and unity—a reminder of our shared humanity and the power of spirituality to connect us all.

🌌🕉️ Embark on a celestial journey through the world's largest religious gathering for saints, sadhus, and seekers from across the globe to experience the majestic shahi snan (holy dip) in the Triveni sangam of the Ganga, Yamuna and Saraswati rivers at Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh.

📜 ✨Dive into the spiritual grandeur of महाकुंभ 2025 with this comprehensive travel guide- 'MAHAKUMBH E-GUIDE'. From traditions, to roadmaps, to travel-tips, discover everything you need to make your journey sacred, harmless and enlightening.

Further, assistance can be gathered from the government website of kumbh before heading to the mahakumbh mela.
🫴 https://kumbh.gov.in/


🙏 Jai Ganga Maiya! Jai Kumbh!

#Mahakumbh
@CurrentLegalGK

Current Scenario On Death Penalty In Light Of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/death-penalty-under-bharatiya-nagarik-suraksha-sanhita-280919

Capital Punishment #Essay@CurrentLegalGK Legal provisions as per new Criminal law.
BNSS

📄✍🏻 𝐂𝐨𝐝𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐂𝐢𝐯𝐢𝐥 𝐏𝐫𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐝𝐮𝐫𝐞, 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐩𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐍𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐚𝐥 𝐉𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐅𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐚𝐥 𝐑𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬 𝐢𝐧 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐱𝐭 𝐨𝐟 𝐒𝐩𝐞𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐒𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐭𝐞𝐬.


@CurrentLegalGK

Fake Cops, Real Crimes: The Rise Of Impersonation In Law Enforcement
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/fake-police-stations-digital-arrest-and-financial-scam-280993

🌟✍🏻𝘿𝙤𝙘𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙛 𝘾𝙖𝙨𝙪𝙨 𝙊𝙢𝙞𝙨𝙨𝙪𝙨

Casus omissus finds its origin in the Latin Maxim “casus omissus pro omisso habendus est” that means that a case omitted is to be held as intentionally omitted. Casus omissus, literally means "𝐜𝐚𝐬𝐞 𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐝".

"✔️When a statute or contract does not cover a situation, the doctrine of casus omissus states that the courts should interpret the law based on the facts of the case. 

✔️The doctrine of casus omissus is a canon of construction, which means that courts create principles for interpreting statutes. 
( Interpretation of Statutes )

✔️The doctrine of casus omissus ensures that the legislature is responsible for creating laws.

✔️The doctrine of casus omissus reflects the tension between the courts and the legislature."

@CurrentLegalGK

✨✨ #Tip@CurrentLegalGK

One of the benefit of reading facts (detailed or brief) is that the case may be used in several other topics as the facts of a case are very wide they deal with various combination of laws.

Can you give any examples? if yes then you are somewhere ready.

#Question@CurrentLegalGK

Explain the concept of judicial review of executive action with the help of precedents.

@CurrentLegalGK

Order II Rule 2 CPC Doesn't Mean Different Causes Of Action From Same Transaction Must Be Included In Single Suit : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/order-ii-rule-2-cpc-doesnt-mean-different-causes-of-action-from-same-transaction-must-be-included-in-single-suit-supreme-court-281155

[Self-Incrimination] Company Cannot Seek Protection Under Article 20(3) Of Constitution Without Satisfying Its Ingredients: P&H High Court
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/punjab-and-haryana-high-court/punjab-haryana-high-court-company-cannot-seek-protection-art-203-without-satisfying-ingredients-when-document-necessary-to-adjudicate-matter-is-summoned-281191

Justice N.S Shekhawat explained that, “considering the Article 20(3) of the Constitution of India, the protection against self incrimination would come to the rescue of a person only when these three ingredients are satisfied,
(a) accusation of an offence against such person
(b) compulsion to provide evidence and
(c) giving out self incriminating material, relating to accusations levelled against him, either in the form of oral testimony or in the form of a statement recorded or in the form of document produced.”

@CurrentLegalGK