π
While reading POCSO I come accross section 2(2) and in particular IPC and CrPC but we all know new laws came.
Then what to do?
Should we refer new laws or not?
Any help from laws other than common sense.
Yes !
Section 8 of General Clauses Act 1897. Construction of references to repealed enactments
Where this Act, or any Central Act or Regulation made after the commencement of this Act, repeals and re-enacts, with or without modification, any provision of a former enactment, then references in any other enactment or in any instrument to the provision so repealed shall, unless a different intention appears, be construed as references to the provision so re-enacted.
@CurrentLegalGK
New criminal laws referencesWhile reading POCSO I come accross section 2(2) and in particular IPC and CrPC but we all know new laws came.
Then what to do?
Should we refer new laws or not?
Any help from laws other than common sense.
Yes !
Section 8 of General Clauses Act 1897. Construction of references to repealed enactments
Where this Act, or any Central Act or Regulation made after the commencement of this Act, repeals and re-enacts, with or without modification, any provision of a former enactment, then references in any other enactment or in any instrument to the provision so repealed shall, unless a different intention appears, be construed as references to the provision so re-enacted.
See the image for Notification and not only for short title but especially for change in section numbers.
@CurrentLegalGK
π3π2π1
ππ
30 Days Challenge is Complete π―β
Winners areβ
Sushmita, Anmol, Bhavna, Jay kumar Singhal, chakshu, mansi, nikhil, shekh jeba, Param, Aman
and there are many who could not complete 21 days but were very close.
Congrats to everyone of those who have atleast tried.
Lesson: If you can control your extreme bodily wants then these exams are not that difficult for you to overcome.
Next Challenge starts from Today and will end after:
β60 Days.
β6 AM Daily.
Congratulations 30 Days Challenge is Complete π―β
Winners areβ
and there are many who could not complete 21 days but were very close.
Congrats to everyone of those who have atleast tried.
Lesson: If you can control your extreme bodily wants then these exams are not that difficult for you to overcome.
Next Challenge starts from Today and will end after:
β60 Days.
β6 AM Daily.
π―13π5π2β€βπ₯1β‘1π€©1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
A very good morning everyone πππππ€ Have a nice day to all of you ππ€π Timing :- 7:45 AM !
π
BEST Image from last 2 days.
π3π2π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/maneka-sanjay-gandhi-v-union-of-india-wpc-5882024-with-rambhual-nishad-ca-106442024-1563675
ποΈπ¨ββοΈ
Cooperative between organs | Separation of powers.
During the course of the hearing, Justice Kant remarked, "With every law, there should be a legislative review. Reviews should not only be confined to judicial reviews, there should be legislative reviews of laws from time to time. You may have it every 20 years, 25 years or 50 years."
Justice Kant, suggesting that there be an expert body to undertake periodic legislative review, said, "One should have an expert body to find out whether a law has worked well, what was the object for which it was enacted and has it really succeeded in achieving that object. If not, what are the deficiencies, bottlenecks and grey areas which need to be taken care of."
@CurrentLegalGK
Judicial Review combined with legislative review will have better effect.Cooperative between organs | Separation of powers.
During the course of the hearing, Justice Kant remarked, "With every law, there should be a legislative review. Reviews should not only be confined to judicial reviews, there should be legislative reviews of laws from time to time. You may have it every 20 years, 25 years or 50 years."
Justice Kant, suggesting that there be an expert body to undertake periodic legislative review, said, "One should have an expert body to find out whether a law has worked well, what was the object for which it was enacted and has it really succeeded in achieving that object. If not, what are the deficiencies, bottlenecks and grey areas which need to be taken care of."
My Question:
Then What is the work of Law commissionβ
@CurrentLegalGK
π―3β€βπ₯1
Improper Rejection Of Juvenility Claim Even In SC's Curative Jurisdiction Not Final; Fresh Plea Can Be Raised : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/improper-rejection-of-juvenility-claim-even-in-scs-curative-jurisdiction-not-final-fresh-plea-can-be-raised-supreme-court-280421
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/improper-rejection-of-juvenility-claim-even-in-scs-curative-jurisdiction-not-final-fresh-plea-can-be-raised-supreme-court-280421
www.livelaw.in
Improper Rejection Of Juvenility Claim Even In SC's Curative Jurisdiction Not Final; Fresh Plea Can Be Raised : Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has held that a plea of juvenility, which was not properly considered by Courts as per due procedure, cannot be treated as final. Therefore, a fresh plea of juvenility can be...
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
Improper Rejection Of Juvenility Claim Even In SC's Curative Jurisdiction Not Final; Fresh Plea Can Be Raised : Supreme Court https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/improper-rejection-of-juvenility-claim-even-in-scs-curative-jurisdiction-not-final-fresh-plea-canβ¦
ππ«
Note: Read whole.
@CurrentLegalGK
What's above and after curative Petition? It is plea of juvenilityNote: Read whole.
@CurrentLegalGK
π2π1
CompNRIPIOOCI_25042017.pdf
83.5 KB
β€βπ₯1π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
CompNRIPIOOCI_25042017.pdf
Sharing the comparison between the Indian Diaspora kinds on the occasion of biennial Celebration of the Pravasi Bharatiya Diwas that is on 9th Jan (When Gandhi came to India in 1915 from South Africa π)
π3π1π―1
π¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈπ¨ββοΈ
As Nick Robinson noted in Interpreting the Constitution: Supreme Court Constitution Benches since Independence (2011), the Supreme Court of India has historically been "chief justice dominant." The article suggests that CJIs may have strategically chosen bench compositions to align decisions with their preferences. This is evident from the fact that between 1947 and 2009, the CJI dissented only 10 times on constitutional benches.
@CurrentLegalGK
CJI Influence on constitution benches
As Nick Robinson noted in Interpreting the Constitution: Supreme Court Constitution Benches since Independence (2011), the Supreme Court of India has historically been "chief justice dominant." The article suggests that CJIs may have strategically chosen bench compositions to align decisions with their preferences. This is evident from the fact that between 1947 and 2009, the CJI dissented only 10 times on constitutional benches.
@CurrentLegalGK
π2π2β€1
India Legal January 13th 2025 (1).pdf
16.1 MB
π€©6β€βπ₯2π1π1
CJI & Supreme Court Judges Not Amenable To Lokpal's Jurisdiction: Lokpal
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/cji-supreme-court-judges-not-amenable-to-lokpals-jurisdiction-lokpal-280500
https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/cji-supreme-court-judges-not-amenable-to-lokpals-jurisdiction-lokpal-280500
www.livelaw.in
CJI & Supreme Court Judges Not Amenable To Lokpal's Jurisdiction: Lokpal
A Chief Justice of India or a Judge of the Supreme Court is not amenable to the jurisdiction of the Lokpal, held the Lokpal while refusing to entertain a complaint.The Lokpal held that a Judge of...
π1π―1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
CJI & Supreme Court Judges Not Amenable To Lokpal's Jurisdiction: Lokpal https://www.livelaw.in/top-stories/cji-supreme-court-judges-not-amenable-to-lokpals-jurisdiction-lokpal-280500
The Lokpal held that a Judge of the Supreme Court does not come within the ambit of its jurisdiction in terms of Section 14 of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013.
As per Section 14, Lokpal has jurisdiction over a person who is or has been the Prime Minister, Union Minister, Member of Parliament, Group 'A', 'B', 'C' or 'D' officials serving the Union etc.
@CurrentLegalGK
As per Section 14, Lokpal has jurisdiction over a person who is or has been the Prime Minister, Union Minister, Member of Parliament, Group 'A', 'B', 'C' or 'D' officials serving the Union etc.
@CurrentLegalGK
π2
π9β€1β€βπ₯1
TheImpactsofArtificialIntelligenceonResearchintheLegalProfession.pdf
365.7 KB
π
πππ ππ’π₯πππ©π¨ π€π πΌπ§π©πππππππ‘ ππ£π©ππ‘π‘ππππ£ππ π€π£ πππ¨πππ§ππ ππ£ π©ππ πππππ‘ ππ§π€πππ¨π¨ππ€π£
@CurrentLegalGK
πππ ππ’π₯πππ©π¨ π€π πΌπ§π©πππππππ‘ ππ£π©ππ‘π‘ππππ£ππ π€π£ πππ¨πππ§ππ ππ£ π©ππ πππππ‘ ππ§π€πππ¨π¨ππ€π£
@CurrentLegalGK
π6β€βπ₯1π1
Abolition Of The Post Of βAssistant Sessions Judgeβ By The βBNSSβ, Whether Justifiable.
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/abolition-of-assistant-session-judge-post-under-bnss-critical-analysis-280499
https://www.livelaw.in/articles/abolition-of-assistant-session-judge-post-under-bnss-critical-analysis-280499
www.livelaw.in
Abolition Of The Post Of βAssistant Sessions Judgeβ By The βBNSSβ, Whether Justifiable.
The Court of Session is one of the Courts by which ordinarily graver offences both under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (βIPCβ for short), and other laws, are triable. Under Section 9 (3) of the Code...
π1π1