The Then Western Dress Styling Colour + Labour Class colour.

🧠 REASON UNKNOWN

Koi Batayega CPC ki Book me Nerolac ka Advertisement kyon hua hai?

@CurrentLegalGK

Know The Law | Supreme Court Explains Doctrine of Relation Back In Hindu Succession & Adoption Laws
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/know-the-law-supreme-court-explains-doctrine-of-relation-back-in-hindu-succession-adoption-laws-280025

🔙 Doctrine of Relation Back

Applicable to various branches of civil law, the 'Doctrine of Relation Back' refers to a principle that creates a legal fiction where certain acts or rights are allowed to take effect retroactively from an earlier date than the actual date of occurrence. Because the rights came to be enforceable from an earlier date, thus the doctrine saves the person from the prejudice suffered between the period of enforcement and the actual occurrence of the rights or interest.

@CurrentLegalGK

#MCQ@CurrentLegalGK

✍🏻 Give your answer with proper reason.

✨ Amendments in constitution by way of Simple majority.

@CurrentLegalGK

#Ideas@CurrentLegalGK

If you were an author of a law book:

1. What would the topic be?
2. How would you make the book unique?

Congratulations 🎉

To those who have surpassed this much length of time with consistency,
Last 2 Days Challenge is:-

🌄Share a Time stamp Image of Sunrise
(The just extreme starting of sunrise)

Happy Robust Day Cycle

@CurrentLegalGK

✨ DJS MAINS RESULT 2023

Congratulations to 3 of my friends, who have Qualified.

Anyone from Channel?
@CurrentLegalGK

Right To Appeal Against Conviction Is Also A Fundamental Right; Can't Be Dismissed On Delay Without Examining Reasons For Delay : Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/right-to-appeal-against-conviction-is-also-a-fundamental-right-cant-be-dismissed-on-delay-without-examining-reasons-for-delay-supreme-court-280218

"Right of Appeal from a judgment of conviction affecting the liberty of a person keeping in view the expansive definition of Article 21 is also a Fundamental Right," the Court observed.

Mahesh Singh Banzara v. State Of Madhya Pradesh, 2025

Methodology: Obviously there are precedents if you know them stick to that judgment and don't remember this one but if you are reading for the first time then remember this one.

@CurrentLegalGK

🧠 #Question@CurrentLegalGK

Brainstorming Time

Mention 10 Provisions of Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 which should be read in consonance with Code of Civil Procedure Sections/Orders.

@CurrentLegalGK

Finalise Draft Rules Under Freedom Of Religion Act 1978 Within Six Months: Gauhati High Court To Arunachal Pradesh Govt
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/gauhati-high-court/gauhati-high-court-hearing-pil-arunachal-pradesh-freedom-of-religion-act-rules-arunachal-pradesh-government-271245

Grievous Hurt Offence (S.326 IPC) Can Be Compromised In Exceptional Circumstances: Supreme Court
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/grievous-hurt-offence-s326-ipc-can-be-compromised-in-exceptional-circumstances-supreme-court-280252

🤝🤔 Compoundablity of Non Compoundable offences.

✓ https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/4108
✓ https://t.me/CurrentLegalGK/3464


Non compoundable cases me HC Quashed krta h proceeding 482 m compound nhi kr skta

📌🔔 Announcement | Notice

Hello Doston,

From past 3 Years, If you really like the posts and material we share without any fee then you must know this information.

✓ firstly, we got one copyright on 1 message we are working for resolution but you are a part of our family that's the reason we are telling you.

✓ Secondly, if you guys really want good content in future a robust revolution in Answer writing enhancers, Case laws compilations explanations, recent cases lucid explanation and daily MCQ practice then you must follow our YT channel, if you don't want to miss the opportunity to gain knowledge.

I know many of you want a good unique content for your exam which can make yourself stand different from others in this competition.

As a backup channel join it I am not promising that I will start Rightaway in YouTube bcz I want perfection in content but we are Planning something good, just reserve it and join it for free robust content better than many paid institution.


📸🎞️
https://youtube.com/@naturaljustice?feature=shared

☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️

Delay in justice is injustice
Justice delayed is justice denied, Solutions.

#essay@CurrentLegalGK

✨ Section 187(2) & (3)

Issue: Upto 10 Years it is 40 Days or 60 Days period in which 15 days Police custody can be given in whole or in parts.

Judgment: 15-day police custody must be sought within the first forty days in cases of offences which are punishable upto ten years of imprisonment.

Is this not a departure from Bare Language?

✨ Reasoning by High Court judgment which supreme court refused to interfere Next post

But first Let us see the Offences which are charged in the present case.

✓ 108 Abetment of suicide:
Imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable
to fine

✓ 308(5) Extortion:
Either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and
shall also be liable to fine.

Others are not of our use.

"The Phrase Which may extend to ten years is being interpreted in the lines of 187 (2) & (3)"

👉 2 Important Phrases
S.187- 10 Years or More &
S. 108 Punishment- 
Extend to 10 years

Note: HC judgment considered 167 and 187 as same.

👮‍♀️ Custody period Judgment

∆ Case: Hyder Ali v.State of Karnataka, 2024

167 CrPC: Not less than 10 years and 187 BNSS: 10 years or More ——>
Means threshold period of 10 Years.
BOTH ARE SAME NO CHANGE IN NEW LAW.

Reason for the aforesaid issue :
The offence in the case at hand, does not bear a
minimum threshold sentence of ten years, but is extendable or to an extent of ten years, which would mean, discretion available to the concerned Court to impose punishment up to ten years. Therefore, the
minimum threshold is not ten years.

1. 10 or More means Minimum is 10 years.

2. Extend to 10 years means 1 to 10 years.

Both are different

In minimum 10 years it is 90 days and in upto 10 years it is 60 days maximum custody.

Again repeating no change in new law both are same 167 and 187.

Must be interpreted in the light of Article 21.

@CurrentLegalGK

If you have understood you will be able to answer the following:
Share examples of offences where as per this phraseology 90 days custody can be given.