2024: A Year of Bold Dissents in the Face of Landmark Verdicts
https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2025/01/02/2024-dissents-landmark-verdicts-yearly-review-sc-legal-news/
https://www.scconline.com/blog/post/2025/01/02/2024-dissents-landmark-verdicts-yearly-review-sc-legal-news/
SCC Times
2024: A Year of Bold Dissents in the Face of Landmark Verdicts
2024 was a year of pathbreaking Supreme Court verdicts on several issues however, there were notable Dissenting Opinions in 2024 which shed light on several key legal concepts.
π1
π€«
1. 279th law commission report
2. Kedarnath v state of bihar
3. Pallavi v state of kerala
4. Balwant singh v state of punjab
5. S.G. vombatkere v UOI 2022
Section 150 BNS
Section 124A IPC
@CurrentLegalGK
Sedition Law Complete GK1. 279th law commission report
2. Kedarnath v state of bihar
3. Pallavi v state of kerala
4. Balwant singh v state of punjab
5. S.G. vombatkere v UOI 2022
Section 150 BNS
Section 124A IPC
@CurrentLegalGK
π5β€βπ₯2π1
Conjugal rights of prisoners.pdf
436.1 KB
π4π1
Is it a crime to offer a bribe even if it is refused? The question before Supreme Court π
#bribe #explained_law #express_explained #prevention_of_corruption_act
#bribe #explained_law #express_explained #prevention_of_corruption_act
Express Explained
Is it a crime to offer a bribe even if it is refused? The question before Supreme Court
Though a 2018 amendment to the PCA clearly made it a crime to even offer a bribe, separate High Courts have offered different perspectives.
β3π2π1π1π1
Gulam_Abbas_Ors_vs_State_Of_U_P_Ors_on_3_November_1981.PDF
359 KB
Difference between executive and judicial magistrate
Gulam Abbas & Ors vs State Of U.P., 1981
Recent: Complaint is filed before judicial magistrate and not executive.
Para 24
@CurrentLegalGK
Gulam Abbas & Ors vs State Of U.P., 1981
Recent: Complaint is filed before judicial magistrate and not executive.
Para 24
@CurrentLegalGK
π5π4π1
BCI moves Supreme Court for increase in enrolment fee, highlights financial crunch
https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/bci-moves-supreme-court-increase-enrolment-fee
https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/bci-moves-supreme-court-increase-enrolment-fee
Bar and Bench - Indian Legal news
BCI moves Supreme Court for increase in enrolment fee, highlights financial crunch
The Bar Council of India (BCI) has filed an application before the Supreme Court seeking a direction to the Central government to amend the Advocates Act, 1961
π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
BCI moves Supreme Court for increase in enrolment fee, highlights financial crunch https://www.barandbench.com/news/litigation/bci-moves-supreme-court-increase-enrolment-fee
Chalo ab 5-10K to ho hi jayegi π
π―2
π
βIt is true that normally, quashing of criminal proceedings would be sought and would be done in exercise of the inherent power of the High Court under Section 482, Cr. P.C. But certainly, that does not mean that it could not be done only in an invocation of the extraordinary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.β, the court said.
Case: Kim Wansoo v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2025
FIR QUASHING IN 528 BNSS & 226 BOTH REMEDIES ALLOWED βIt is true that normally, quashing of criminal proceedings would be sought and would be done in exercise of the inherent power of the High Court under Section 482, Cr. P.C. But certainly, that does not mean that it could not be done only in an invocation of the extraordinary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.β, the court said.
Case: Kim Wansoo v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2025
π2π1
πΊοΈπβοΈ State bifurcation and continuance of laws β¨ Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ranchi and Ors. v. Swarn Rekha Cokes and Coals (P) Ltd., 2004
(Bihar & Jharkhand)
Recent Case on Andhra Pradesh and Telengana.
Any Constitutional Article that you can cite? π
@CurrentLegalGK
π2
The nature of dissent in the Indian judiciary - The Hindu
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/the-nature-of-dissent-in-the-indian-judiciary/article69047904.ece
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/the-nature-of-dissent-in-the-indian-judiciary/article69047904.ece
The Hindu
The nature of dissent in the Indian judiciary
Dissent in Indian and U.S. judiciaries varies from political to social to intellectual disagreements, shaping legal landscapes uniquely.
π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
The nature of dissent in the Indian judiciary - The Hindu https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/the-nature-of-dissent-in-the-indian-judiciary/article69047904.ece
The Type of Dissent Shows the Strength of Judiciary.
In US it is mostly Political however in India it is multifaceted.
Justices S.C. Agarwal and A.S. Anand dissented in PV Narsimha Rao 1998 and their view was given prominence by majority in Sita soren 2023
In US it is mostly Political however in India it is multifaceted.
Justices S.C. Agarwal and A.S. Anand dissented in PV Narsimha Rao 1998 and their view was given prominence by majority in Sita soren 2023
π8π1
TRIAL_BY_MEDIA_CONCEPT_AND_PHENOMENON.pdf
483.2 KB
πTrial By Media : Concept & Phenomenon
(Published in International Journal of Advanced Research i.e. IJAR )
βπ» Content for Essay on "Media-Trial."
(Published in International Journal of Advanced Research i.e. IJAR )
βπ» Content for Essay on "Media-Trial."
π7π1
Supreme Court Explains Difference Between Lease & Allotment
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-judgment-explains-difference-between-lease-and-allotment-279935
https://www.livelaw.in/supreme-court/supreme-court-judgment-explains-difference-between-lease-and-allotment-279935
www.livelaw.in
Supreme Court Explains Difference Between Lease & Allotment
The Supreme Court yesterday (on January 02), while deciding a batch of civil appeals, reiterated that terms lease and allotment are different. Lease is a temporary grant whereas allotment though is...
β¨β¨
βIt is a well-established principle that the High Court, while exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot reappreciate the evidence and arrive at a finding of facts unless the authorities below had either exceeded its jurisdiction or acted perversely.β
https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/ajay-singh-v-khacheru-2025-insc-9-hc-cannot-reappreciate-evidence-or-make-factual-findings-unless-authorities-below-exceeded-jurisdiction-1563285
226 and reappreciation of evidence
βIt is a well-established principle that the High Court, while exercising its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, cannot reappreciate the evidence and arrive at a finding of facts unless the authorities below had either exceeded its jurisdiction or acted perversely.β
https://www.verdictum.in/court-updates/supreme-court/ajay-singh-v-khacheru-2025-insc-9-hc-cannot-reappreciate-evidence-or-make-factual-findings-unless-authorities-below-exceeded-jurisdiction-1563285
www.verdictum.in
Article 226 Constitution| HCs Cannot Reappreciate Evidence Or Make Factual Findings Unless Authorities Below Exceeded Their Jurisdictionβ¦
The Supreme Court held that High Courts, under Article 226 of the Constitution, cannot reappreciate the evidence or make factual findings unless the authorities below have exceeded their...
π2
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
TRIAL_BY_MEDIA_CONCEPT_AND_PHENOMENON.pdf
πPrinciple of Prior Restraintπ
Related Topic - "Media-Trial"
Also Read -
* Media Guidelines Case ( Sahara vs SEBI - EXCEPTION to the rule against prior restraint.)
* Gag Orders - Concept & Applicability in Media Trial.
Prior restraints-The battle between throttling speech and protecting societal interests
https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-591-prior-restraints-the-battle-between-throttling-speech-and-protecting-societal-interests.html
#Discernible_Topics@CurrentLegalGK
doctrine of prior Restraint
Related Topic - "Media-Trial"
Also Read -
* Media Guidelines Case ( Sahara vs SEBI - EXCEPTION to the rule against prior restraint.)
* Gag Orders - Concept & Applicability in Media Trial.
Prior restraints-The battle between throttling speech and protecting societal interests
https://www.legalserviceindia.com/legal/article-591-prior-restraints-the-battle-between-throttling-speech-and-protecting-societal-interests.html
#Discernible_Topics@CurrentLegalGK
doctrine of prior Restraint
Legalserviceindia
Prior restraints-The battle between throttling speech and protecting societal interests | Legal Service India - Law Articles -β¦
The battle between throttling speech and protecting societal interests.
The Constitution provides freedom of speech and expression vide Article 19(1) to
all its citizens but in the same breat...
The Constitution provides freedom of speech and expression vide Article 19(1) to
all its citizens but in the same breat...
π3π2β€1π1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
πWELCOME 2025 | HAPPY NEW YEAR | CONGO EARTH FOR ONE MORE SUCCESFUL REVOLUTION β¨ The faster you move in space the slower the time for you. β Do more smartly, be water, be faster and save time to enjoy this Year Amazingly. π
The 4th Dimensional Goal forβ¦
Kya Badla Doston 2025 me?
Shyd automatic kuch nahi badlega jub tak khud nahi badloge....
Lage Raho Apni dream ke peeche kuch na kuch to acha hoga hi, bus lage raho.
Good Night π΄
Shyd automatic kuch nahi badlega jub tak khud nahi badloge....
Lage Raho Apni dream ke peeche kuch na kuch to acha hoga hi, bus lage raho.
Good Night π΄
π―20β€βπ₯5π₯4β€1
ππΌπΎπΈπ βπββπΌβπ πΈπ½π½πΈπβπ πΉπͺ- βππ₯π¦π£ππ ππ¦π€π₯πππ β’
https://www.livelaw.in/high-court/gujarat-high-court/gujarat-high-court-leave-encashment-salary-property-constitution-statutory-provision-violation-279897
β¨ E.L. Encashment is a Constitutional Right
AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION v/s SADGUNBHAI SEMULBHAI SOLANKI , 2024
Common Employee Awareness
@CurrentLegalGK
AHMEDABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION v/s SADGUNBHAI SEMULBHAI SOLANKI , 2024
Common Employee Awareness
@CurrentLegalGK
π1π1